Institutional Regime, Off-Farm Employment, and the Interaction Effect: What are the Determinants of Households’ Forestland Transfer in China?

The development of the land rental market has been widely attributed to the associated institutional regime and the functioning of the off-farm labor market. However, little is known of the interaction effect of these two factors. To fill this gap, we employ a nationwide representative household dat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sustainability 2017-10, Vol.9 (10), p.1885
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Han, Kuuluvainen, Jari, Ning, Youliang, Liao, Wenmei, Liu, Can
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1885
container_title Sustainability
container_volume 9
creator Zhang, Han
Kuuluvainen, Jari
Ning, Youliang
Liao, Wenmei
Liu, Can
description The development of the land rental market has been widely attributed to the associated institutional regime and the functioning of the off-farm labor market. However, little is known of the interaction effect of these two factors. To fill this gap, we employ a nationwide representative household dataset to investigate the effects of China’s collective forest tenure reform (CFTR) and off-farm employment on forestland transfer in China. Special interest is focused on their potential interaction effect. The Smith-Blundell instrumental variable tobit model is adopted to account for the endogeneity of off-farm employment. The estimation results show that both the tenure reform and off-farm employment significantly influence forestland transactions. However, compared to the positive effect of the reform on both renting in and renting out forestland, the effect of off-farm employment is mixed, that is, its effect is negative when forestland is rented in but positive on rent-out decisions. An important finding is that the CFTR imposes a negative enhancement effect on forestland rent-in through its interaction term with off-farm employment. In contrast, the enhancement effect on rent-out is not statistically significant, which may be due to the neutralization by the endowment effect of the CFTR.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/su9101885
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1965627173</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1965627173</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-df4161d01a5c54967c457de9de4d3fb5ff99220c1ae87d693362c9499553b6113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1KAzEURgdRsGgXvkHAldDR3Mkk07gRqa0tFApScTmk-bFTZpKaZBbd-QaufT2fxKkV8W7uXZzv43KS5ALwNSEc34SWA4bhkB4lvQwXkAKm-PjffZr0Q9jgbggBDqyXfMxsiFVsY-WsqNGTfq0aPUALY9KJ8A0aN9va7Rpt4wAJq1BcazSzUXsh9xE0NkbLeIte1iIi4fUP8KA7oKmssDEgZ9DUtUGvXa3C1_snmjivQ6z3bUsvbDDao8qi0boL3J0nJ0bUQfd_91nyPBkvR9N0vnicje7nqcx4FlNlcmCgMAgqac5ZIXNaKM2VzhUxK2oM51mGJQg9LBTjhLBM8pxzSsmKAZCz5PLQu_Xure3-KTeu9Z2CUAJnlGUFFKSjrg6U9C4Er0259VUj_K4EXO6Vl3_KyTfQy3TO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1965627173</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Institutional Regime, Off-Farm Employment, and the Interaction Effect: What are the Determinants of Households’ Forestland Transfer in China?</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Zhang, Han ; Kuuluvainen, Jari ; Ning, Youliang ; Liao, Wenmei ; Liu, Can</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Han ; Kuuluvainen, Jari ; Ning, Youliang ; Liao, Wenmei ; Liu, Can</creatorcontrib><description>The development of the land rental market has been widely attributed to the associated institutional regime and the functioning of the off-farm labor market. However, little is known of the interaction effect of these two factors. To fill this gap, we employ a nationwide representative household dataset to investigate the effects of China’s collective forest tenure reform (CFTR) and off-farm employment on forestland transfer in China. Special interest is focused on their potential interaction effect. The Smith-Blundell instrumental variable tobit model is adopted to account for the endogeneity of off-farm employment. The estimation results show that both the tenure reform and off-farm employment significantly influence forestland transactions. However, compared to the positive effect of the reform on both renting in and renting out forestland, the effect of off-farm employment is mixed, that is, its effect is negative when forestland is rented in but positive on rent-out decisions. An important finding is that the CFTR imposes a negative enhancement effect on forestland rent-in through its interaction term with off-farm employment. In contrast, the enhancement effect on rent-out is not statistically significant, which may be due to the neutralization by the endowment effect of the CFTR.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su9101885</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Economic models ; Employment ; Households ; Markets ; Neutralization ; Statistical analysis ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2017-10, Vol.9 (10), p.1885</ispartof><rights>Copyright MDPI AG 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-df4161d01a5c54967c457de9de4d3fb5ff99220c1ae87d693362c9499553b6113</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-df4161d01a5c54967c457de9de4d3fb5ff99220c1ae87d693362c9499553b6113</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8890-0390</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuuluvainen, Jari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ning, Youliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Wenmei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Can</creatorcontrib><title>Institutional Regime, Off-Farm Employment, and the Interaction Effect: What are the Determinants of Households’ Forestland Transfer in China?</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>The development of the land rental market has been widely attributed to the associated institutional regime and the functioning of the off-farm labor market. However, little is known of the interaction effect of these two factors. To fill this gap, we employ a nationwide representative household dataset to investigate the effects of China’s collective forest tenure reform (CFTR) and off-farm employment on forestland transfer in China. Special interest is focused on their potential interaction effect. The Smith-Blundell instrumental variable tobit model is adopted to account for the endogeneity of off-farm employment. The estimation results show that both the tenure reform and off-farm employment significantly influence forestland transactions. However, compared to the positive effect of the reform on both renting in and renting out forestland, the effect of off-farm employment is mixed, that is, its effect is negative when forestland is rented in but positive on rent-out decisions. An important finding is that the CFTR imposes a negative enhancement effect on forestland rent-in through its interaction term with off-farm employment. In contrast, the enhancement effect on rent-out is not statistically significant, which may be due to the neutralization by the endowment effect of the CFTR.</description><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Households</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Neutralization</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM1KAzEURgdRsGgXvkHAldDR3Mkk07gRqa0tFApScTmk-bFTZpKaZBbd-QaufT2fxKkV8W7uXZzv43KS5ALwNSEc34SWA4bhkB4lvQwXkAKm-PjffZr0Q9jgbggBDqyXfMxsiFVsY-WsqNGTfq0aPUALY9KJ8A0aN9va7Rpt4wAJq1BcazSzUXsh9xE0NkbLeIte1iIi4fUP8KA7oKmssDEgZ9DUtUGvXa3C1_snmjivQ6z3bUsvbDDao8qi0boL3J0nJ0bUQfd_91nyPBkvR9N0vnicje7nqcx4FlNlcmCgMAgqac5ZIXNaKM2VzhUxK2oM51mGJQg9LBTjhLBM8pxzSsmKAZCz5PLQu_Xure3-KTeu9Z2CUAJnlGUFFKSjrg6U9C4Er0259VUj_K4EXO6Vl3_KyTfQy3TO</recordid><startdate>20171019</startdate><enddate>20171019</enddate><creator>Zhang, Han</creator><creator>Kuuluvainen, Jari</creator><creator>Ning, Youliang</creator><creator>Liao, Wenmei</creator><creator>Liu, Can</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8890-0390</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171019</creationdate><title>Institutional Regime, Off-Farm Employment, and the Interaction Effect: What are the Determinants of Households’ Forestland Transfer in China?</title><author>Zhang, Han ; Kuuluvainen, Jari ; Ning, Youliang ; Liao, Wenmei ; Liu, Can</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-df4161d01a5c54967c457de9de4d3fb5ff99220c1ae87d693362c9499553b6113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Households</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Neutralization</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuuluvainen, Jari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ning, Youliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liao, Wenmei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Can</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Han</au><au>Kuuluvainen, Jari</au><au>Ning, Youliang</au><au>Liao, Wenmei</au><au>Liu, Can</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Institutional Regime, Off-Farm Employment, and the Interaction Effect: What are the Determinants of Households’ Forestland Transfer in China?</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2017-10-19</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1885</spage><pages>1885-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>The development of the land rental market has been widely attributed to the associated institutional regime and the functioning of the off-farm labor market. However, little is known of the interaction effect of these two factors. To fill this gap, we employ a nationwide representative household dataset to investigate the effects of China’s collective forest tenure reform (CFTR) and off-farm employment on forestland transfer in China. Special interest is focused on their potential interaction effect. The Smith-Blundell instrumental variable tobit model is adopted to account for the endogeneity of off-farm employment. The estimation results show that both the tenure reform and off-farm employment significantly influence forestland transactions. However, compared to the positive effect of the reform on both renting in and renting out forestland, the effect of off-farm employment is mixed, that is, its effect is negative when forestland is rented in but positive on rent-out decisions. An important finding is that the CFTR imposes a negative enhancement effect on forestland rent-in through its interaction term with off-farm employment. In contrast, the enhancement effect on rent-out is not statistically significant, which may be due to the neutralization by the endowment effect of the CFTR.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su9101885</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8890-0390</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2071-1050
ispartof Sustainability, 2017-10, Vol.9 (10), p.1885
issn 2071-1050
2071-1050
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1965627173
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Economic models
Employment
Households
Markets
Neutralization
Statistical analysis
Sustainability
title Institutional Regime, Off-Farm Employment, and the Interaction Effect: What are the Determinants of Households’ Forestland Transfer in China?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T15%3A28%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Institutional%20Regime,%20Off-Farm%20Employment,%20and%20the%20Interaction%20Effect:%20What%20are%20the%20Determinants%20of%20Households%E2%80%99%20Forestland%20Transfer%20in%20China?&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Zhang,%20Han&rft.date=2017-10-19&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1885&rft.pages=1885-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su9101885&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1965627173%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1965627173&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true