EDGE EFFECT ON NESTING SUCCESS OF GROUND NESTING BIRDS NEAR REGENERATING CLEARCUTS IN A FOREST-DOMINATED LANDSCAPE
Forest fragmentation has been implicated as a cause of population declines of several Neotropical migrant bird species. Fragmentation increases the amount of habitat edge, and reduced nesting success rates near forest edges are well documented in agricultural landscapes (“edge effects”). However, ed...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Auk 2002-10, Vol.119 (4), p.955-970 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 970 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 955 |
container_title | The Auk |
container_volume | 119 |
creator | Manolis, James C Andersen, David E Cuthbert, Francesca J |
description | Forest fragmentation has been implicated as a cause of population declines of several Neotropical migrant bird species. Fragmentation increases the amount of habitat edge, and reduced nesting success rates near forest edges are well documented in agricultural landscapes (“edge effects”). However, edge effects in predominantly forested landscapes, particularly those related to timber harvest, are poorly understood. This study examines nesting success of ground nesting birds in relation to clearcut edges in a forest-dominated landscape in north-central Minnesota. A total of 383 nests of seven species of ground nesting birds were found and monitored during 1992–1998. Ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapilus; n = 318) and Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus; n = 44) nests composed the majority of the sample. Predation accounted for 94% of all nest failures. Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater) parasitism was low (1.8% for all ground nests). Using proportional hazards regression, distance to nearest clearcut edge was the best predictor of nest failure. For all ground nests, nesting success was 0.18 at 0–100 m, 0.39 at 101–500 m, and 0.52 at 501–954 m from nearest clearcut edge. Source–sink modeling indicated that distances ≤100 m from clearcut edges were sink habitats for Ovenbirds (i.e. recruitment was lower than survival). These results provide strong evidence of a negative edge effect on ground nests, extending 100 m or more from clearcut edges in a forest-dominated area of north-central Minnesota. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1642/0004-8038(2002)119[0955:EEONSO]2.0.CO;2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_196455352</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4090226</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4090226</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b359t-a5b67b06431d3f66da44b37eaa76d65694a3a8032d5387e5fc8b65c46809b83e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkE9v1DAQxS0EEkvbb8DBQkKCQ7b-vzGcguOkkbYOSrInhCwnm0i7Kps23h749jikWu6cRjPvzRv7B8AtRmssGLlFCLEoRjT-RBAinzGWP5Dk_IvWpanLn2SN1qr8Sl6BFZY0jhjh7DVYXbbegnfeH0PLUSxXYNJprqHOMq0aWBpodN0UJof1Tild17DMYF6VO5NelG9FldahSypY6VwbXSV_52obRmrX1LAwMIFZWYWFKC3vC5M0OoXbxKS1Sr7ra_BmcA--v3mpV2CX6UbdRdsyL1SyjVrK5TlyvBWbFglG8Z4OQuwdYy3d9M5txF5wIZmjLvyI7DmNNz0furgVvGMiRrKNaU-vwIcl93Ean557f7bH8Xk6hZMWS8E4p5wEU76Yumn0fuoH-zgdfrnpt8XIzrztTM7O5OzM2wbeduZtF942GKwKJSR9fDnnfOcehsmduoP_F8c45iSmwfd-8R39eZwuOkMSESKCrBe5PYzjqf_v5_wBiqGWeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196455352</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>EDGE EFFECT ON NESTING SUCCESS OF GROUND NESTING BIRDS NEAR REGENERATING CLEARCUTS IN A FOREST-DOMINATED LANDSCAPE</title><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Manolis, James C ; Andersen, David E ; Cuthbert, Francesca J</creator><contributor>duPlessis, M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Manolis, James C ; Andersen, David E ; Cuthbert, Francesca J ; duPlessis, M</creatorcontrib><description>Forest fragmentation has been implicated as a cause of population declines of several Neotropical migrant bird species. Fragmentation increases the amount of habitat edge, and reduced nesting success rates near forest edges are well documented in agricultural landscapes (“edge effects”). However, edge effects in predominantly forested landscapes, particularly those related to timber harvest, are poorly understood. This study examines nesting success of ground nesting birds in relation to clearcut edges in a forest-dominated landscape in north-central Minnesota. A total of 383 nests of seven species of ground nesting birds were found and monitored during 1992–1998. Ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapilus; n = 318) and Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus; n = 44) nests composed the majority of the sample. Predation accounted for 94% of all nest failures. Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater) parasitism was low (1.8% for all ground nests). Using proportional hazards regression, distance to nearest clearcut edge was the best predictor of nest failure. For all ground nests, nesting success was 0.18 at 0–100 m, 0.39 at 101–500 m, and 0.52 at 501–954 m from nearest clearcut edge. Source–sink modeling indicated that distances ≤100 m from clearcut edges were sink habitats for Ovenbirds (i.e. recruitment was lower than survival). These results provide strong evidence of a negative edge effect on ground nests, extending 100 m or more from clearcut edges in a forest-dominated area of north-central Minnesota.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-8038</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-4254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2732-4613</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1642/0004-8038(2002)119[0955:EEONSO]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AUKJAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence, KS: The American Ornithologists' Union</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Animal nesting ; Animal populations ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bird migration ; Bird nesting ; Clearcutting ; Conservation biology ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Edge effect ; Edge effects ; Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration ; Forest ecology ; Forest habitats ; Forest regeneration ; Forestry ; Forests ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General forest ecology ; Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology ; Landscapes ; Migratory birds ; Nesting ; Nests ; Parasitism ; Population decline ; Predation ; Predators</subject><ispartof>The Auk, 2002-10, Vol.119 (4), p.955-970</ispartof><rights>The American Ornithologists' Union</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 The American Ornithologists' Union</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Ornithologists' Union Oct 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b359t-a5b67b06431d3f66da44b37eaa76d65694a3a8032d5387e5fc8b65c46809b83e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b359t-a5b67b06431d3f66da44b37eaa76d65694a3a8032d5387e5fc8b65c46809b83e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1642/0004-8038(2002)119[0955:EEONSO]2.0.CO;2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4090226$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,26978,27924,27925,52363,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14515283$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>duPlessis, M</contributor><creatorcontrib>Manolis, James C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, David E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuthbert, Francesca J</creatorcontrib><title>EDGE EFFECT ON NESTING SUCCESS OF GROUND NESTING BIRDS NEAR REGENERATING CLEARCUTS IN A FOREST-DOMINATED LANDSCAPE</title><title>The Auk</title><description>Forest fragmentation has been implicated as a cause of population declines of several Neotropical migrant bird species. Fragmentation increases the amount of habitat edge, and reduced nesting success rates near forest edges are well documented in agricultural landscapes (“edge effects”). However, edge effects in predominantly forested landscapes, particularly those related to timber harvest, are poorly understood. This study examines nesting success of ground nesting birds in relation to clearcut edges in a forest-dominated landscape in north-central Minnesota. A total of 383 nests of seven species of ground nesting birds were found and monitored during 1992–1998. Ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapilus; n = 318) and Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus; n = 44) nests composed the majority of the sample. Predation accounted for 94% of all nest failures. Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater) parasitism was low (1.8% for all ground nests). Using proportional hazards regression, distance to nearest clearcut edge was the best predictor of nest failure. For all ground nests, nesting success was 0.18 at 0–100 m, 0.39 at 101–500 m, and 0.52 at 501–954 m from nearest clearcut edge. Source–sink modeling indicated that distances ≤100 m from clearcut edges were sink habitats for Ovenbirds (i.e. recruitment was lower than survival). These results provide strong evidence of a negative edge effect on ground nests, extending 100 m or more from clearcut edges in a forest-dominated area of north-central Minnesota.</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Animal nesting</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bird migration</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Clearcutting</subject><subject>Conservation biology</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Edge effect</subject><subject>Edge effects</subject><subject>Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration</subject><subject>Forest ecology</subject><subject>Forest habitats</subject><subject>Forest regeneration</subject><subject>Forestry</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General forest ecology</subject><subject>Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology</subject><subject>Landscapes</subject><subject>Migratory birds</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Nests</subject><subject>Parasitism</subject><subject>Population decline</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Predators</subject><issn>0004-8038</issn><issn>1938-4254</issn><issn>2732-4613</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqdkE9v1DAQxS0EEkvbb8DBQkKCQ7b-vzGcguOkkbYOSrInhCwnm0i7Kps23h749jikWu6cRjPvzRv7B8AtRmssGLlFCLEoRjT-RBAinzGWP5Dk_IvWpanLn2SN1qr8Sl6BFZY0jhjh7DVYXbbegnfeH0PLUSxXYNJprqHOMq0aWBpodN0UJof1Tild17DMYF6VO5NelG9FldahSypY6VwbXSV_52obRmrX1LAwMIFZWYWFKC3vC5M0OoXbxKS1Sr7ra_BmcA--v3mpV2CX6UbdRdsyL1SyjVrK5TlyvBWbFglG8Z4OQuwdYy3d9M5txF5wIZmjLvyI7DmNNz0furgVvGMiRrKNaU-vwIcl93Ean557f7bH8Xk6hZMWS8E4p5wEU76Yumn0fuoH-zgdfrnpt8XIzrztTM7O5OzM2wbeduZtF942GKwKJSR9fDnnfOcehsmduoP_F8c45iSmwfd-8R39eZwuOkMSESKCrBe5PYzjqf_v5_wBiqGWeg</recordid><startdate>20021001</startdate><enddate>20021001</enddate><creator>Manolis, James C</creator><creator>Andersen, David E</creator><creator>Cuthbert, Francesca J</creator><general>The American Ornithologists' Union</general><general>Ornithological Societies North America</general><general>American Ornithological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20021001</creationdate><title>EDGE EFFECT ON NESTING SUCCESS OF GROUND NESTING BIRDS NEAR REGENERATING CLEARCUTS IN A FOREST-DOMINATED LANDSCAPE</title><author>Manolis, James C ; Andersen, David E ; Cuthbert, Francesca J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b359t-a5b67b06431d3f66da44b37eaa76d65694a3a8032d5387e5fc8b65c46809b83e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Animal nesting</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bird migration</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Clearcutting</topic><topic>Conservation biology</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Edge effect</topic><topic>Edge effects</topic><topic>Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration</topic><topic>Forest ecology</topic><topic>Forest habitats</topic><topic>Forest regeneration</topic><topic>Forestry</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General forest ecology</topic><topic>Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology</topic><topic>Landscapes</topic><topic>Migratory birds</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Nests</topic><topic>Parasitism</topic><topic>Population decline</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Predators</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Manolis, James C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andersen, David E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cuthbert, Francesca J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Auk</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Manolis, James C</au><au>Andersen, David E</au><au>Cuthbert, Francesca J</au><au>duPlessis, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EDGE EFFECT ON NESTING SUCCESS OF GROUND NESTING BIRDS NEAR REGENERATING CLEARCUTS IN A FOREST-DOMINATED LANDSCAPE</atitle><jtitle>The Auk</jtitle><date>2002-10-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>119</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>955</spage><epage>970</epage><pages>955-970</pages><issn>0004-8038</issn><eissn>1938-4254</eissn><eissn>2732-4613</eissn><coden>AUKJAF</coden><abstract>Forest fragmentation has been implicated as a cause of population declines of several Neotropical migrant bird species. Fragmentation increases the amount of habitat edge, and reduced nesting success rates near forest edges are well documented in agricultural landscapes (“edge effects”). However, edge effects in predominantly forested landscapes, particularly those related to timber harvest, are poorly understood. This study examines nesting success of ground nesting birds in relation to clearcut edges in a forest-dominated landscape in north-central Minnesota. A total of 383 nests of seven species of ground nesting birds were found and monitored during 1992–1998. Ovenbird (Seiurus aurocapilus; n = 318) and Hermit Thrush (Catharus guttatus; n = 44) nests composed the majority of the sample. Predation accounted for 94% of all nest failures. Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater) parasitism was low (1.8% for all ground nests). Using proportional hazards regression, distance to nearest clearcut edge was the best predictor of nest failure. For all ground nests, nesting success was 0.18 at 0–100 m, 0.39 at 101–500 m, and 0.52 at 501–954 m from nearest clearcut edge. Source–sink modeling indicated that distances ≤100 m from clearcut edges were sink habitats for Ovenbirds (i.e. recruitment was lower than survival). These results provide strong evidence of a negative edge effect on ground nests, extending 100 m or more from clearcut edges in a forest-dominated area of north-central Minnesota.</abstract><cop>Lawrence, KS</cop><pub>The American Ornithologists' Union</pub><doi>10.1642/0004-8038(2002)119[0955:EEONSO]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0004-8038 |
ispartof | The Auk, 2002-10, Vol.119 (4), p.955-970 |
issn | 0004-8038 1938-4254 2732-4613 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_196455352 |
source | BioOne Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Agricultural land Animal nesting Animal populations Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Biological and medical sciences Bird migration Bird nesting Clearcutting Conservation biology Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Edge effect Edge effects Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration Forest ecology Forest habitats Forest regeneration Forestry Forests Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General forest ecology Generalities. Production, biomass. Quality of wood and forest products. General forest ecology Landscapes Migratory birds Nesting Nests Parasitism Population decline Predation Predators |
title | EDGE EFFECT ON NESTING SUCCESS OF GROUND NESTING BIRDS NEAR REGENERATING CLEARCUTS IN A FOREST-DOMINATED LANDSCAPE |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T05%3A31%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EDGE%20EFFECT%20ON%20NESTING%20SUCCESS%20OF%20GROUND%20NESTING%20BIRDS%20NEAR%20REGENERATING%20CLEARCUTS%20IN%20A%20FOREST-DOMINATED%20LANDSCAPE&rft.jtitle=The%20Auk&rft.au=Manolis,%20James%20C&rft.date=2002-10-01&rft.volume=119&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=955&rft.epage=970&rft.pages=955-970&rft.issn=0004-8038&rft.eissn=1938-4254&rft.coden=AUKJAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1642/0004-8038(2002)119%5B0955:EEONSO%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4090226%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196455352&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4090226&rfr_iscdi=true |