Quantitative Accuracy and Lesion Detectability of Low-Dose ^sup 18^F-FDG PET for Lung Cancer Screening

Lung cancer remains responsible for more deaths worldwide than any other cancer, but recently there has been a significant shift in the clinical paradigm regarding the initial management of subjects at high risk for this disease. Low-dose CT has demonstrated significant improvements over planar x-ra...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978) 2017-03, Vol.58 (3), p.399
Hauptverfasser: Schaefferkoetter, Joshua D, Yan, Jianhua, Sjöholm, Therese, Townsend, David W, Conti, Maurizio, Tam, John Kit Chung, Soo, Ross A, Tham, Ivan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 399
container_title The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)
container_volume 58
creator Schaefferkoetter, Joshua D
Yan, Jianhua
Sjöholm, Therese
Townsend, David W
Conti, Maurizio
Tam, John Kit Chung
Soo, Ross A
Tham, Ivan
description Lung cancer remains responsible for more deaths worldwide than any other cancer, but recently there has been a significant shift in the clinical paradigm regarding the initial management of subjects at high risk for this disease. Low-dose CT has demonstrated significant improvements over planar x-ray screening for patient prognoses and is now performed in the United States. Specificity of this modality, however, is poor, and the additional information from PET has the potential to improve its accuracy. Routine screening requires consideration of the effective dose delivered to the patient, and this work investigates image quality of PET for low-dose conditions, in the context of lung lesion detectability. Reduced radiotracer doses were simulated by randomly discarding counts from clinical lung cancer scans acquired in list-mode. Bias and reproducibility of lesion activity values were relatively stable even at low total counts of around 5 million trues. Additionally, numeric observer models were developed and trained with the results of 2 physicians and 3 postdoctoral researchers with PET experience in a detection task; detection sensitivity of the observers was well correlated with lesion signal-to-noise ratio. The models were used prospectively to survey detectability of lung cancer lesions, and the findings suggested a lower limit around 10 million true counts for maximizing performance. Under the acquisition parameters used in this study, this translates to an effective patient dose of less than 0.4 mSv, potentially allowing a complete low-dose PET/CT lung screening scan to be obtained under 1 mSv.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1964526199</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1964526199</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_19645261993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyssOATEUgOFGSIzLO5zEukmL1sxSjGExC8KaVJ2RirT0Qrw9Cw9g9S--v0UyLiaCCilnbZIxLjkVgoku6YVwZYzJPM8z0myTstFEFc0TYa518kq_Qdkz1BiMs1BiRB3VydxMfINroHYvWrqAcAjpDjw_VLQqV7BZ7qFxHupkL7BQVqOHnfaI1tjLgHQadQs4_LVPRtVyv1jTu3ePhCEery55-6UjL-RUjCUvisl_1wf1t0Z8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1964526199</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quantitative Accuracy and Lesion Detectability of Low-Dose ^sup 18^F-FDG PET for Lung Cancer Screening</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Schaefferkoetter, Joshua D ; Yan, Jianhua ; Sjöholm, Therese ; Townsend, David W ; Conti, Maurizio ; Tam, John Kit Chung ; Soo, Ross A ; Tham, Ivan</creator><creatorcontrib>Schaefferkoetter, Joshua D ; Yan, Jianhua ; Sjöholm, Therese ; Townsend, David W ; Conti, Maurizio ; Tam, John Kit Chung ; Soo, Ross A ; Tham, Ivan</creatorcontrib><description>Lung cancer remains responsible for more deaths worldwide than any other cancer, but recently there has been a significant shift in the clinical paradigm regarding the initial management of subjects at high risk for this disease. Low-dose CT has demonstrated significant improvements over planar x-ray screening for patient prognoses and is now performed in the United States. Specificity of this modality, however, is poor, and the additional information from PET has the potential to improve its accuracy. Routine screening requires consideration of the effective dose delivered to the patient, and this work investigates image quality of PET for low-dose conditions, in the context of lung lesion detectability. Reduced radiotracer doses were simulated by randomly discarding counts from clinical lung cancer scans acquired in list-mode. Bias and reproducibility of lesion activity values were relatively stable even at low total counts of around 5 million trues. Additionally, numeric observer models were developed and trained with the results of 2 physicians and 3 postdoctoral researchers with PET experience in a detection task; detection sensitivity of the observers was well correlated with lesion signal-to-noise ratio. The models were used prospectively to survey detectability of lung cancer lesions, and the findings suggested a lower limit around 10 million true counts for maximizing performance. Under the acquisition parameters used in this study, this translates to an effective patient dose of less than 0.4 mSv, potentially allowing a complete low-dose PET/CT lung screening scan to be obtained under 1 mSv.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0161-5505</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-5667</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Society of Nuclear Medicine</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Cancer ; Cancer screening ; Computed tomography ; Computer simulation ; Disease control ; Health risks ; Image quality ; Lesions ; Lung cancer ; Mathematical models ; Medical imaging ; Medical personnel ; Medical screening ; Nuclear medicine ; Physicians ; Positron emission ; Positron emission tomography ; Prognosis ; Reproducibility ; Risk management ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 2017-03, Vol.58 (3), p.399</ispartof><rights>Copyright Society of Nuclear Medicine Mar 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schaefferkoetter, Joshua D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Jianhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sjöholm, Therese</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Townsend, David W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conti, Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tam, John Kit Chung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soo, Ross A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tham, Ivan</creatorcontrib><title>Quantitative Accuracy and Lesion Detectability of Low-Dose ^sup 18^F-FDG PET for Lung Cancer Screening</title><title>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</title><description>Lung cancer remains responsible for more deaths worldwide than any other cancer, but recently there has been a significant shift in the clinical paradigm regarding the initial management of subjects at high risk for this disease. Low-dose CT has demonstrated significant improvements over planar x-ray screening for patient prognoses and is now performed in the United States. Specificity of this modality, however, is poor, and the additional information from PET has the potential to improve its accuracy. Routine screening requires consideration of the effective dose delivered to the patient, and this work investigates image quality of PET for low-dose conditions, in the context of lung lesion detectability. Reduced radiotracer doses were simulated by randomly discarding counts from clinical lung cancer scans acquired in list-mode. Bias and reproducibility of lesion activity values were relatively stable even at low total counts of around 5 million trues. Additionally, numeric observer models were developed and trained with the results of 2 physicians and 3 postdoctoral researchers with PET experience in a detection task; detection sensitivity of the observers was well correlated with lesion signal-to-noise ratio. The models were used prospectively to survey detectability of lung cancer lesions, and the findings suggested a lower limit around 10 million true counts for maximizing performance. Under the acquisition parameters used in this study, this translates to an effective patient dose of less than 0.4 mSv, potentially allowing a complete low-dose PET/CT lung screening scan to be obtained under 1 mSv.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer screening</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Disease control</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>Lesions</subject><subject>Lung cancer</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Nuclear medicine</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Positron emission</subject><subject>Positron emission tomography</subject><subject>Prognosis</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>0161-5505</issn><issn>1535-5667</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNyssOATEUgOFGSIzLO5zEukmL1sxSjGExC8KaVJ2RirT0Qrw9Cw9g9S--v0UyLiaCCilnbZIxLjkVgoku6YVwZYzJPM8z0myTstFEFc0TYa518kq_Qdkz1BiMs1BiRB3VydxMfINroHYvWrqAcAjpDjw_VLQqV7BZ7qFxHupkL7BQVqOHnfaI1tjLgHQadQs4_LVPRtVyv1jTu3ePhCEery55-6UjL-RUjCUvisl_1wf1t0Z8</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Schaefferkoetter, Joshua D</creator><creator>Yan, Jianhua</creator><creator>Sjöholm, Therese</creator><creator>Townsend, David W</creator><creator>Conti, Maurizio</creator><creator>Tam, John Kit Chung</creator><creator>Soo, Ross A</creator><creator>Tham, Ivan</creator><general>Society of Nuclear Medicine</general><scope>4T-</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7Z</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Quantitative Accuracy and Lesion Detectability of Low-Dose ^sup 18^F-FDG PET for Lung Cancer Screening</title><author>Schaefferkoetter, Joshua D ; Yan, Jianhua ; Sjöholm, Therese ; Townsend, David W ; Conti, Maurizio ; Tam, John Kit Chung ; Soo, Ross A ; Tham, Ivan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_19645261993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer screening</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Disease control</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>Lesions</topic><topic>Lung cancer</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Nuclear medicine</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Positron emission</topic><topic>Positron emission tomography</topic><topic>Prognosis</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schaefferkoetter, Joshua D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yan, Jianhua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sjöholm, Therese</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Townsend, David W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conti, Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tam, John Kit Chung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soo, Ross A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tham, Ivan</creatorcontrib><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biochemistry Abstracts 1</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schaefferkoetter, Joshua D</au><au>Yan, Jianhua</au><au>Sjöholm, Therese</au><au>Townsend, David W</au><au>Conti, Maurizio</au><au>Tam, John Kit Chung</au><au>Soo, Ross A</au><au>Tham, Ivan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Quantitative Accuracy and Lesion Detectability of Low-Dose ^sup 18^F-FDG PET for Lung Cancer Screening</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978)</jtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>399</spage><pages>399-</pages><issn>0161-5505</issn><eissn>1535-5667</eissn><abstract>Lung cancer remains responsible for more deaths worldwide than any other cancer, but recently there has been a significant shift in the clinical paradigm regarding the initial management of subjects at high risk for this disease. Low-dose CT has demonstrated significant improvements over planar x-ray screening for patient prognoses and is now performed in the United States. Specificity of this modality, however, is poor, and the additional information from PET has the potential to improve its accuracy. Routine screening requires consideration of the effective dose delivered to the patient, and this work investigates image quality of PET for low-dose conditions, in the context of lung lesion detectability. Reduced radiotracer doses were simulated by randomly discarding counts from clinical lung cancer scans acquired in list-mode. Bias and reproducibility of lesion activity values were relatively stable even at low total counts of around 5 million trues. Additionally, numeric observer models were developed and trained with the results of 2 physicians and 3 postdoctoral researchers with PET experience in a detection task; detection sensitivity of the observers was well correlated with lesion signal-to-noise ratio. The models were used prospectively to survey detectability of lung cancer lesions, and the findings suggested a lower limit around 10 million true counts for maximizing performance. Under the acquisition parameters used in this study, this translates to an effective patient dose of less than 0.4 mSv, potentially allowing a complete low-dose PET/CT lung screening scan to be obtained under 1 mSv.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Society of Nuclear Medicine</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0161-5505
ispartof The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), 2017-03, Vol.58 (3), p.399
issn 0161-5505
1535-5667
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1964526199
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Accuracy
Cancer
Cancer screening
Computed tomography
Computer simulation
Disease control
Health risks
Image quality
Lesions
Lung cancer
Mathematical models
Medical imaging
Medical personnel
Medical screening
Nuclear medicine
Physicians
Positron emission
Positron emission tomography
Prognosis
Reproducibility
Risk management
Tomography
title Quantitative Accuracy and Lesion Detectability of Low-Dose ^sup 18^F-FDG PET for Lung Cancer Screening
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T04%3A07%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quantitative%20Accuracy%20and%20Lesion%20Detectability%20of%20Low-Dose%20%5Esup%2018%5EF-FDG%20PET%20for%20Lung%20Cancer%20Screening&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20nuclear%20medicine%20(1978)&rft.au=Schaefferkoetter,%20Joshua%20D&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=399&rft.pages=399-&rft.issn=0161-5505&rft.eissn=1535-5667&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1964526199%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1964526199&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true