CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF TREE SWALLOW (TACHYCINETA BICOLOR) DISPERSAL IN SASKATCHEWAN

Poor breeding success often increases dispersal, but there is conflicting evidence about the putative adaptive benefits of dispersal behavior. Thus, observational and experimental data were analyzed to test whether breeding success (number of young fledging) influenced breeding and natal dispersal b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Auk 2003-07, Vol.120 (3), p.619-631
Hauptverfasser: Shutler, Dave, Clark, Robert G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 631
container_issue 3
container_start_page 619
container_title The Auk
container_volume 120
creator Shutler, Dave
Clark, Robert G
description Poor breeding success often increases dispersal, but there is conflicting evidence about the putative adaptive benefits of dispersal behavior. Thus, observational and experimental data were analyzed to test whether breeding success (number of young fledging) influenced breeding and natal dispersal by Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor), using information from 1,302 nests over 12 years. Success was experimentally altered at 291 randomly selected nest boxes by adding or removing three eggs (representing ±50% of modal clutch size). Finally, we tested whether dispersal distance, controlling for antecedent breeding success, had consequences for subsequent breeding success. Contrary to predictions, (1) adult and natal dispersal distances were not significantly influenced by breeding success, and (2) manipulating success had no effect on either breeding or natal dispersal. Moreover, after controlling for antecedent breeding success, dispersal distance had no influence on subsequent breeding success. In most years of our study, >85% of nest initiations produced at least one fledgling, and individual boxes did not consistently have low or high fledgling production. Hence, swallows may have little to gain by dispersing out of our nest-box grid, and box-specific success did not provide a reliable cue about where to disperse within the grid. Thus, remaining in the grid for subsequent breeding attempts, regardless of fledgling production, could be interpreted as adaptive. Nonetheless, most adults remained close to the nest they had used in previous years, which suggests that some unmeasured influence, such as social interactions among neighbors, led to nonrandom dispersal.
doi_str_mv 10.1642/0004-8038(2003)120[0619:CACOTS]2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_196448648</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4090094</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4090094</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b367t-c588ace61be37632a15a663a75e6217e4cfcdedf95e12c06e6feb0031d9e0a753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdkF1v0zAUhiMEEmXwHywE0naR7vgjTgxXxvO2iCiGOlWFELLc1JFabc1Iugv-PY4yAddcWbYfv-_xkySXGJaYM3IJACwtgBbnBIBeYALfgWPxQUllGvuDLGGpzEfyLFlgQYuUkYw9TxZ_Xr1MXo3jIW4zKMQi2Si5ttoiWV8hZWqrv651reKBuUbNSmtkN7KqzAadN1LdflNlrRuJPpXKVGZ1ga5K-0WvrKxQWSMr7WfZqFu9kfXr5EXn78bw5mk9S9bXOt6llbkplazSLeX5KW2zovBt4HgbaM4p8TjznFOfZ4ETnAfWdu0u7DqRBUxa4IF3YRu_jXciQKToWfJ2zn0Y-p-PYTy5Q_84HGOlw4IzVnBWROhmhtqhH8chdO5h2N_74ZfD4CapbtLjJj1ukuqiVDdJdbNUFwGnjCMx6f1TnR9bf9cN_tjux79xWZ4JAiJy72buMJ764d86QiF3DASAYBHTM7bd9_0x_PdYvwEaNpH3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196448648</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF TREE SWALLOW (TACHYCINETA BICOLOR) DISPERSAL IN SASKATCHEWAN</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Shutler, Dave ; Clark, Robert G</creator><contributor>Grubb, T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Shutler, Dave ; Clark, Robert G ; Grubb, T</creatorcontrib><description>Poor breeding success often increases dispersal, but there is conflicting evidence about the putative adaptive benefits of dispersal behavior. Thus, observational and experimental data were analyzed to test whether breeding success (number of young fledging) influenced breeding and natal dispersal by Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor), using information from 1,302 nests over 12 years. Success was experimentally altered at 291 randomly selected nest boxes by adding or removing three eggs (representing ±50% of modal clutch size). Finally, we tested whether dispersal distance, controlling for antecedent breeding success, had consequences for subsequent breeding success. Contrary to predictions, (1) adult and natal dispersal distances were not significantly influenced by breeding success, and (2) manipulating success had no effect on either breeding or natal dispersal. Moreover, after controlling for antecedent breeding success, dispersal distance had no influence on subsequent breeding success. In most years of our study, &gt;85% of nest initiations produced at least one fledgling, and individual boxes did not consistently have low or high fledgling production. Hence, swallows may have little to gain by dispersing out of our nest-box grid, and box-specific success did not provide a reliable cue about where to disperse within the grid. Thus, remaining in the grid for subsequent breeding attempts, regardless of fledgling production, could be interpreted as adaptive. Nonetheless, most adults remained close to the nest they had used in previous years, which suggests that some unmeasured influence, such as social interactions among neighbors, led to nonrandom dispersal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-8038</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-4254</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2732-4613</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1642/0004-8038(2003)120[0619:CACOTS]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AUKJAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence, KS: The American Ornithologists' Union</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Autoecology ; Aves ; Aviculture ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bird nesting ; Birds ; Breeding ; Breeding of animals ; Breeding success ; Dispersal ; Eggs ; Experiments ; Female animals ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Male animals ; Plant breeding ; Reproductive success ; Swallows ; Vertebrata ; Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><ispartof>The Auk, 2003-07, Vol.120 (3), p.619-631</ispartof><rights>The American Ornithologists' Union</rights><rights>Copyright 2003 The American Ornithologists' Union</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Ornithologists' Union Jul 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b367t-c588ace61be37632a15a663a75e6217e4cfcdedf95e12c06e6feb0031d9e0a753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b367t-c588ace61be37632a15a663a75e6217e4cfcdedf95e12c06e6feb0031d9e0a753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1642/0004-8038(2003)120[0619:CACOTS]2.0.CO;2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4090094$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,26959,27905,27906,52344,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15759209$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Grubb, T</contributor><creatorcontrib>Shutler, Dave</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Robert G</creatorcontrib><title>CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF TREE SWALLOW (TACHYCINETA BICOLOR) DISPERSAL IN SASKATCHEWAN</title><title>The Auk</title><description>Poor breeding success often increases dispersal, but there is conflicting evidence about the putative adaptive benefits of dispersal behavior. Thus, observational and experimental data were analyzed to test whether breeding success (number of young fledging) influenced breeding and natal dispersal by Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor), using information from 1,302 nests over 12 years. Success was experimentally altered at 291 randomly selected nest boxes by adding or removing three eggs (representing ±50% of modal clutch size). Finally, we tested whether dispersal distance, controlling for antecedent breeding success, had consequences for subsequent breeding success. Contrary to predictions, (1) adult and natal dispersal distances were not significantly influenced by breeding success, and (2) manipulating success had no effect on either breeding or natal dispersal. Moreover, after controlling for antecedent breeding success, dispersal distance had no influence on subsequent breeding success. In most years of our study, &gt;85% of nest initiations produced at least one fledgling, and individual boxes did not consistently have low or high fledgling production. Hence, swallows may have little to gain by dispersing out of our nest-box grid, and box-specific success did not provide a reliable cue about where to disperse within the grid. Thus, remaining in the grid for subsequent breeding attempts, regardless of fledgling production, could be interpreted as adaptive. Nonetheless, most adults remained close to the nest they had used in previous years, which suggests that some unmeasured influence, such as social interactions among neighbors, led to nonrandom dispersal.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Aves</subject><subject>Aviculture</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bird nesting</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Breeding</subject><subject>Breeding of animals</subject><subject>Breeding success</subject><subject>Dispersal</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Female animals</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Male animals</subject><subject>Plant breeding</subject><subject>Reproductive success</subject><subject>Swallows</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><subject>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</subject><issn>0004-8038</issn><issn>1938-4254</issn><issn>2732-4613</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqdkF1v0zAUhiMEEmXwHywE0naR7vgjTgxXxvO2iCiGOlWFELLc1JFabc1Iugv-PY4yAddcWbYfv-_xkySXGJaYM3IJACwtgBbnBIBeYALfgWPxQUllGvuDLGGpzEfyLFlgQYuUkYw9TxZ_Xr1MXo3jIW4zKMQi2Si5ttoiWV8hZWqrv651reKBuUbNSmtkN7KqzAadN1LdflNlrRuJPpXKVGZ1ga5K-0WvrKxQWSMr7WfZqFu9kfXr5EXn78bw5mk9S9bXOt6llbkplazSLeX5KW2zovBt4HgbaM4p8TjznFOfZ4ETnAfWdu0u7DqRBUxa4IF3YRu_jXciQKToWfJ2zn0Y-p-PYTy5Q_84HGOlw4IzVnBWROhmhtqhH8chdO5h2N_74ZfD4CapbtLjJj1ukuqiVDdJdbNUFwGnjCMx6f1TnR9bf9cN_tjux79xWZ4JAiJy72buMJ764d86QiF3DASAYBHTM7bd9_0x_PdYvwEaNpH3</recordid><startdate>20030701</startdate><enddate>20030701</enddate><creator>Shutler, Dave</creator><creator>Clark, Robert G</creator><general>The American Ornithologists' Union</general><general>Ornithological Societies North America</general><general>American Ornithological Society</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030701</creationdate><title>CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF TREE SWALLOW (TACHYCINETA BICOLOR) DISPERSAL IN SASKATCHEWAN</title><author>Shutler, Dave ; Clark, Robert G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b367t-c588ace61be37632a15a663a75e6217e4cfcdedf95e12c06e6feb0031d9e0a753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Aves</topic><topic>Aviculture</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bird nesting</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Breeding</topic><topic>Breeding of animals</topic><topic>Breeding success</topic><topic>Dispersal</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Female animals</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Male animals</topic><topic>Plant breeding</topic><topic>Reproductive success</topic><topic>Swallows</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><topic>Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shutler, Dave</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clark, Robert G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>The Auk</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shutler, Dave</au><au>Clark, Robert G</au><au>Grubb, T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF TREE SWALLOW (TACHYCINETA BICOLOR) DISPERSAL IN SASKATCHEWAN</atitle><jtitle>The Auk</jtitle><date>2003-07-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>619</spage><epage>631</epage><pages>619-631</pages><issn>0004-8038</issn><eissn>1938-4254</eissn><eissn>2732-4613</eissn><coden>AUKJAF</coden><abstract>Poor breeding success often increases dispersal, but there is conflicting evidence about the putative adaptive benefits of dispersal behavior. Thus, observational and experimental data were analyzed to test whether breeding success (number of young fledging) influenced breeding and natal dispersal by Tree Swallows (Tachycineta bicolor), using information from 1,302 nests over 12 years. Success was experimentally altered at 291 randomly selected nest boxes by adding or removing three eggs (representing ±50% of modal clutch size). Finally, we tested whether dispersal distance, controlling for antecedent breeding success, had consequences for subsequent breeding success. Contrary to predictions, (1) adult and natal dispersal distances were not significantly influenced by breeding success, and (2) manipulating success had no effect on either breeding or natal dispersal. Moreover, after controlling for antecedent breeding success, dispersal distance had no influence on subsequent breeding success. In most years of our study, &gt;85% of nest initiations produced at least one fledgling, and individual boxes did not consistently have low or high fledgling production. Hence, swallows may have little to gain by dispersing out of our nest-box grid, and box-specific success did not provide a reliable cue about where to disperse within the grid. Thus, remaining in the grid for subsequent breeding attempts, regardless of fledgling production, could be interpreted as adaptive. Nonetheless, most adults remained close to the nest they had used in previous years, which suggests that some unmeasured influence, such as social interactions among neighbors, led to nonrandom dispersal.</abstract><cop>Lawrence, KS</cop><pub>The American Ornithologists' Union</pub><doi>10.1642/0004-8038(2003)120[0619:CACOTS]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-8038
ispartof The Auk, 2003-07, Vol.120 (3), p.619-631
issn 0004-8038
1938-4254
2732-4613
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_196448648
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; BioOne Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Autoecology
Aves
Aviculture
Biological and medical sciences
Bird nesting
Birds
Breeding
Breeding of animals
Breeding success
Dispersal
Eggs
Experiments
Female animals
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Male animals
Plant breeding
Reproductive success
Swallows
Vertebrata
Vertebrates: general zoology, morphology, phylogeny, systematics, cytogenetics, geographical distribution
title CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF TREE SWALLOW (TACHYCINETA BICOLOR) DISPERSAL IN SASKATCHEWAN
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T16%3A50%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CAUSES%20AND%20CONSEQUENCES%20OF%20TREE%20SWALLOW%20(TACHYCINETA%20BICOLOR)%20DISPERSAL%20IN%20SASKATCHEWAN&rft.jtitle=The%20Auk&rft.au=Shutler,%20Dave&rft.date=2003-07-01&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=619&rft.epage=631&rft.pages=619-631&rft.issn=0004-8038&rft.eissn=1938-4254&rft.coden=AUKJAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1642/0004-8038(2003)120%5B0619:CACOTS%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E4090094%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196448648&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4090094&rfr_iscdi=true