European butterfly populations vary in sensitivity to weather across their geographical ranges
Aim: The aim was to assess the sensitivity of butterfly population dynamics to variation in weather conditions across their geographical ranges, relative to sensitivity to density dependence, and determine whether sensitivity is greater towards latitudinal range margins. Location: Europe. Time perio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Global ecology and biogeography 2017-12, Vol.26 (11/12), p.1374-1385 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1385 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11/12 |
container_start_page | 1374 |
container_title | Global ecology and biogeography |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Mills, Simon C. Oliver, Tom H. Bradbury, Richard B. Gregory, Richard D. Brereton, Tom Kühn, Elisabeth Kuussaari, Mikko Musche, Martin Roy, David B. Schmucki, Reto Stefanescu, Constantí van Swaay, Chris Evans, Karl L. |
description | Aim: The aim was to assess the sensitivity of butterfly population dynamics to variation in weather conditions across their geographical ranges, relative to sensitivity to density dependence, and determine whether sensitivity is greater towards latitudinal range margins. Location: Europe. Time period: 1980–2014. Major taxa studied: Butterflies. Methods: We use long-term (35 years) butterfly monitoring data from > 900 sites, ranging from Finland to Spain, grouping sites into 2° latitudinal bands. For 12 univoltine butterfly species with sufficient data from at least four bands, we construct population growth rate models that include density dependence, temperature and precipitation during distinct life-cycle periods, defined to accommodate regional variation in phenology. We use partial R2 values as indicators of butterfly population dynamics' sensitivity to weather and density dependence, and assess how these vary with latitudinal position within a species' distribution. Results: Population growth rates appear uniformly sensitive to density dependence across species' geographical distributions, and sensitivity to density dependence is typically greater than sensitivity to weather. Sensitivity to weather is greatest towards range edges, with symmetry in northern and southern parts of the range. This pattern is not driven by variation in the magnitude of weather variability across the range, topographic heterogeneity, latitudinal range extent or phylogeny. Significant weather variables in population growth rate models appear evenly distributed across the life cycle and across temperature and precipitation, with substantial intraspecific variation across the geographical ranges in the associations between population dynamics and specific weather variables. Main conclusions: Range-edge populations appear more sensitive to changes in weather than those nearer the centre of species' distributions, but density dependence does not exhibit this pattern. Precipitation is as important as temperature in driving butterfly population dynamics. Intraspecific variation in the form and strength of sensitivity to weather suggests that there may be important geographical variation in populations' responses to climate change. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/geb.12659 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1964396234</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26630162</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26630162</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3549-7a8ba75979c29b28c7f638296f90c6cd2680e188e4dc4663ca960b6ad7ff6f703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhSMEEqUw8AOQLDExpLWdxLFHqEpBqsQCEhOW49qpqxAH22mVf49poRu33A3fu3v3kuQawQmKNa1VNUGYFOwkGaGckJTijJ4eZ_x-nlx4v4EQFnlBRsnHvHe2U6IFVR-CcroZQGe7vhHB2NaDrXADMC3wqvUmmK0JAwgW7JQIa-WAkM56D-JsHKiVrZ3o1kaKBjjR1spfJmdaNF5d_fZx8vY4f509pcuXxfPsfpnKrMhZWgpaibJgJZOYVZjKUpOMYkY0g5LIFSYUKkSpylcyPpJJwQisiFiVWhNdwmyc3B72ds5-9coHvrG9a-NJjhjJM0Zwlkfq7kDtXTuleefMZ_yQI8h_4uMxPr6PL7LTA7szjRr-B_li_vCnuDkoNj5Yd1Tg6BeieP8bG1J8ZA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1964396234</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>European butterfly populations vary in sensitivity to weather across their geographical ranges</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Mills, Simon C. ; Oliver, Tom H. ; Bradbury, Richard B. ; Gregory, Richard D. ; Brereton, Tom ; Kühn, Elisabeth ; Kuussaari, Mikko ; Musche, Martin ; Roy, David B. ; Schmucki, Reto ; Stefanescu, Constantí ; van Swaay, Chris ; Evans, Karl L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mills, Simon C. ; Oliver, Tom H. ; Bradbury, Richard B. ; Gregory, Richard D. ; Brereton, Tom ; Kühn, Elisabeth ; Kuussaari, Mikko ; Musche, Martin ; Roy, David B. ; Schmucki, Reto ; Stefanescu, Constantí ; van Swaay, Chris ; Evans, Karl L.</creatorcontrib><description>Aim: The aim was to assess the sensitivity of butterfly population dynamics to variation in weather conditions across their geographical ranges, relative to sensitivity to density dependence, and determine whether sensitivity is greater towards latitudinal range margins. Location: Europe. Time period: 1980–2014. Major taxa studied: Butterflies. Methods: We use long-term (35 years) butterfly monitoring data from > 900 sites, ranging from Finland to Spain, grouping sites into 2° latitudinal bands. For 12 univoltine butterfly species with sufficient data from at least four bands, we construct population growth rate models that include density dependence, temperature and precipitation during distinct life-cycle periods, defined to accommodate regional variation in phenology. We use partial R2 values as indicators of butterfly population dynamics' sensitivity to weather and density dependence, and assess how these vary with latitudinal position within a species' distribution. Results: Population growth rates appear uniformly sensitive to density dependence across species' geographical distributions, and sensitivity to density dependence is typically greater than sensitivity to weather. Sensitivity to weather is greatest towards range edges, with symmetry in northern and southern parts of the range. This pattern is not driven by variation in the magnitude of weather variability across the range, topographic heterogeneity, latitudinal range extent or phylogeny. Significant weather variables in population growth rate models appear evenly distributed across the life cycle and across temperature and precipitation, with substantial intraspecific variation across the geographical ranges in the associations between population dynamics and specific weather variables. Main conclusions: Range-edge populations appear more sensitive to changes in weather than those nearer the centre of species' distributions, but density dependence does not exhibit this pattern. Precipitation is as important as temperature in driving butterfly population dynamics. Intraspecific variation in the form and strength of sensitivity to weather suggests that there may be important geographical variation in populations' responses to climate change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1466-822X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1466-8238</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/geb.12659</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: John Wiley & Sons Ltd</publisher><subject>adaptation ; biogeography ; Butterflies & moths ; climate ; Climate change ; Climate models ; Density ; Density dependence ; Dynamics ; Growth rate ; Herbivores ; Life cycle engineering ; Life cycles ; long‐term monitoring ; Phenology ; Phylogeny ; Population dynamics ; Population growth ; Precipitation ; Rainfall ; range edge ; Sensitivity ; Sensitivity analysis ; Species ; Taxa ; Temperature effects ; Variation ; Weather</subject><ispartof>Global ecology and biogeography, 2017-12, Vol.26 (11/12), p.1374-1385</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2017 The Authors. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3549-7a8ba75979c29b28c7f638296f90c6cd2680e188e4dc4663ca960b6ad7ff6f703</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3549-7a8ba75979c29b28c7f638296f90c6cd2680e188e4dc4663ca960b6ad7ff6f703</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1880-8425</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26630162$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26630162$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mills, Simon C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliver, Tom H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradbury, Richard B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregory, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brereton, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kühn, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuussaari, Mikko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musche, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, David B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmucki, Reto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefanescu, Constantí</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Swaay, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Karl L.</creatorcontrib><title>European butterfly populations vary in sensitivity to weather across their geographical ranges</title><title>Global ecology and biogeography</title><description>Aim: The aim was to assess the sensitivity of butterfly population dynamics to variation in weather conditions across their geographical ranges, relative to sensitivity to density dependence, and determine whether sensitivity is greater towards latitudinal range margins. Location: Europe. Time period: 1980–2014. Major taxa studied: Butterflies. Methods: We use long-term (35 years) butterfly monitoring data from > 900 sites, ranging from Finland to Spain, grouping sites into 2° latitudinal bands. For 12 univoltine butterfly species with sufficient data from at least four bands, we construct population growth rate models that include density dependence, temperature and precipitation during distinct life-cycle periods, defined to accommodate regional variation in phenology. We use partial R2 values as indicators of butterfly population dynamics' sensitivity to weather and density dependence, and assess how these vary with latitudinal position within a species' distribution. Results: Population growth rates appear uniformly sensitive to density dependence across species' geographical distributions, and sensitivity to density dependence is typically greater than sensitivity to weather. Sensitivity to weather is greatest towards range edges, with symmetry in northern and southern parts of the range. This pattern is not driven by variation in the magnitude of weather variability across the range, topographic heterogeneity, latitudinal range extent or phylogeny. Significant weather variables in population growth rate models appear evenly distributed across the life cycle and across temperature and precipitation, with substantial intraspecific variation across the geographical ranges in the associations between population dynamics and specific weather variables. Main conclusions: Range-edge populations appear more sensitive to changes in weather than those nearer the centre of species' distributions, but density dependence does not exhibit this pattern. Precipitation is as important as temperature in driving butterfly population dynamics. Intraspecific variation in the form and strength of sensitivity to weather suggests that there may be important geographical variation in populations' responses to climate change.</description><subject>adaptation</subject><subject>biogeography</subject><subject>Butterflies & moths</subject><subject>climate</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>Density dependence</subject><subject>Dynamics</subject><subject>Growth rate</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Life cycle engineering</subject><subject>Life cycles</subject><subject>long‐term monitoring</subject><subject>Phenology</subject><subject>Phylogeny</subject><subject>Population dynamics</subject><subject>Population growth</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>range edge</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Temperature effects</subject><subject>Variation</subject><subject>Weather</subject><issn>1466-822X</issn><issn>1466-8238</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAQhSMEEqUw8AOQLDExpLWdxLFHqEpBqsQCEhOW49qpqxAH22mVf49poRu33A3fu3v3kuQawQmKNa1VNUGYFOwkGaGckJTijJ4eZ_x-nlx4v4EQFnlBRsnHvHe2U6IFVR-CcroZQGe7vhHB2NaDrXADMC3wqvUmmK0JAwgW7JQIa-WAkM56D-JsHKiVrZ3o1kaKBjjR1spfJmdaNF5d_fZx8vY4f509pcuXxfPsfpnKrMhZWgpaibJgJZOYVZjKUpOMYkY0g5LIFSYUKkSpylcyPpJJwQisiFiVWhNdwmyc3B72ds5-9coHvrG9a-NJjhjJM0Zwlkfq7kDtXTuleefMZ_yQI8h_4uMxPr6PL7LTA7szjRr-B_li_vCnuDkoNj5Yd1Tg6BeieP8bG1J8ZA</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Mills, Simon C.</creator><creator>Oliver, Tom H.</creator><creator>Bradbury, Richard B.</creator><creator>Gregory, Richard D.</creator><creator>Brereton, Tom</creator><creator>Kühn, Elisabeth</creator><creator>Kuussaari, Mikko</creator><creator>Musche, Martin</creator><creator>Roy, David B.</creator><creator>Schmucki, Reto</creator><creator>Stefanescu, Constantí</creator><creator>van Swaay, Chris</creator><creator>Evans, Karl L.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1880-8425</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>European butterfly populations vary in sensitivity to weather across their geographical ranges</title><author>Mills, Simon C. ; Oliver, Tom H. ; Bradbury, Richard B. ; Gregory, Richard D. ; Brereton, Tom ; Kühn, Elisabeth ; Kuussaari, Mikko ; Musche, Martin ; Roy, David B. ; Schmucki, Reto ; Stefanescu, Constantí ; van Swaay, Chris ; Evans, Karl L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3549-7a8ba75979c29b28c7f638296f90c6cd2680e188e4dc4663ca960b6ad7ff6f703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>adaptation</topic><topic>biogeography</topic><topic>Butterflies & moths</topic><topic>climate</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>Density dependence</topic><topic>Dynamics</topic><topic>Growth rate</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Life cycle engineering</topic><topic>Life cycles</topic><topic>long‐term monitoring</topic><topic>Phenology</topic><topic>Phylogeny</topic><topic>Population dynamics</topic><topic>Population growth</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>range edge</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Temperature effects</topic><topic>Variation</topic><topic>Weather</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mills, Simon C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliver, Tom H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bradbury, Richard B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gregory, Richard D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brereton, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kühn, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuussaari, Mikko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musche, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roy, David B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmucki, Reto</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stefanescu, Constantí</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Swaay, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Karl L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Global ecology and biogeography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mills, Simon C.</au><au>Oliver, Tom H.</au><au>Bradbury, Richard B.</au><au>Gregory, Richard D.</au><au>Brereton, Tom</au><au>Kühn, Elisabeth</au><au>Kuussaari, Mikko</au><au>Musche, Martin</au><au>Roy, David B.</au><au>Schmucki, Reto</au><au>Stefanescu, Constantí</au><au>van Swaay, Chris</au><au>Evans, Karl L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>European butterfly populations vary in sensitivity to weather across their geographical ranges</atitle><jtitle>Global ecology and biogeography</jtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>11/12</issue><spage>1374</spage><epage>1385</epage><pages>1374-1385</pages><issn>1466-822X</issn><eissn>1466-8238</eissn><abstract>Aim: The aim was to assess the sensitivity of butterfly population dynamics to variation in weather conditions across their geographical ranges, relative to sensitivity to density dependence, and determine whether sensitivity is greater towards latitudinal range margins. Location: Europe. Time period: 1980–2014. Major taxa studied: Butterflies. Methods: We use long-term (35 years) butterfly monitoring data from > 900 sites, ranging from Finland to Spain, grouping sites into 2° latitudinal bands. For 12 univoltine butterfly species with sufficient data from at least four bands, we construct population growth rate models that include density dependence, temperature and precipitation during distinct life-cycle periods, defined to accommodate regional variation in phenology. We use partial R2 values as indicators of butterfly population dynamics' sensitivity to weather and density dependence, and assess how these vary with latitudinal position within a species' distribution. Results: Population growth rates appear uniformly sensitive to density dependence across species' geographical distributions, and sensitivity to density dependence is typically greater than sensitivity to weather. Sensitivity to weather is greatest towards range edges, with symmetry in northern and southern parts of the range. This pattern is not driven by variation in the magnitude of weather variability across the range, topographic heterogeneity, latitudinal range extent or phylogeny. Significant weather variables in population growth rate models appear evenly distributed across the life cycle and across temperature and precipitation, with substantial intraspecific variation across the geographical ranges in the associations between population dynamics and specific weather variables. Main conclusions: Range-edge populations appear more sensitive to changes in weather than those nearer the centre of species' distributions, but density dependence does not exhibit this pattern. Precipitation is as important as temperature in driving butterfly population dynamics. Intraspecific variation in the form and strength of sensitivity to weather suggests that there may be important geographical variation in populations' responses to climate change.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/geb.12659</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1880-8425</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1466-822X |
ispartof | Global ecology and biogeography, 2017-12, Vol.26 (11/12), p.1374-1385 |
issn | 1466-822X 1466-8238 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1964396234 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals |
subjects | adaptation biogeography Butterflies & moths climate Climate change Climate models Density Density dependence Dynamics Growth rate Herbivores Life cycle engineering Life cycles long‐term monitoring Phenology Phylogeny Population dynamics Population growth Precipitation Rainfall range edge Sensitivity Sensitivity analysis Species Taxa Temperature effects Variation Weather |
title | European butterfly populations vary in sensitivity to weather across their geographical ranges |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T20%3A52%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=European%20butterfly%20populations%20vary%20in%20sensitivity%20to%20weather%20across%20their%20geographical%20ranges&rft.jtitle=Global%20ecology%20and%20biogeography&rft.au=Mills,%20Simon%20C.&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=11/12&rft.spage=1374&rft.epage=1385&rft.pages=1374-1385&rft.issn=1466-822X&rft.eissn=1466-8238&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/geb.12659&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26630162%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1964396234&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26630162&rfr_iscdi=true |