Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review
Agile software development represents a major departure from traditional, plan-based approaches to software engineering. A systematic review of empirical studies of agile software development up to and including 2005 was conducted. The search strategy identified 1996 studies, of which 36 were identi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Information and software technology 2008-08, Vol.50 (9), p.833-859 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 859 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 9 |
| container_start_page | 833 |
| container_title | Information and software technology |
| container_volume | 50 |
| creator | Dybå, Tore Dingsøyr, Torgeir |
| description | Agile software development represents a major departure from traditional, plan-based approaches to software engineering. A systematic review of empirical studies of agile software development up to and including 2005 was conducted. The search strategy identified 1996 studies, of which 36 were identified as empirical studies. The studies were grouped into four themes: introduction and adoption, human and social factors, perceptions on agile methods, and comparative studies. The review investigates what is currently known about the benefits and limitations of, and the strength of evidence for, agile methods. Implications for research and practice are presented. The main implication for research is a need for more and better empirical studies of agile software development within a common research agenda. For the industrial readership, the review provides a map of findings, according to topic, that can be compared for relevance to their own settings and situations. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_196417885</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0950584908000256</els_id><sourcerecordid>1497444961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-234db26f1502bc1722d91e0c56ed7b4b6496798bc74ee792657e545c96aeb9e63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwByws9gljJ7ZjFkhVKQ-pEhtYW4kzQY7yKLbbir8nVVizms29Z3QPIbcMUgZM3repG5owNikHKFJgKYA8IwtWqCyRwMU5WYAWkIgi15fkKoQWgCnIYEGeNv3OeWfLjoa4rx0GOja0_HId0okYj6VHWuMBu3HX4xAf6IqGnxCxL6Oz1OPB4fGaXDRlF_Dm7y7J5_PmY_2abN9f3tarbWKzLIsJz_K64rJhAnhlmeK81gzBCom1qvJK5loqXVRW5YhKcykUilxYLUusNMpsSe5m7s6P33sM0bTj3g_TS8O0zJkqCjGF8jlk_RiCx8bsvOtL_2MYmJMu05pZlznpMsDMpGuqPc41nAZMo7wJ1uFgsXYebTT16P4H_AI5-nUE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196417885</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Dybå, Tore ; Dingsøyr, Torgeir</creator><creatorcontrib>Dybå, Tore ; Dingsøyr, Torgeir</creatorcontrib><description>Agile software development represents a major departure from traditional, plan-based approaches to software engineering. A systematic review of empirical studies of agile software development up to and including 2005 was conducted. The search strategy identified 1996 studies, of which 36 were identified as empirical studies. The studies were grouped into four themes: introduction and adoption, human and social factors, perceptions on agile methods, and comparative studies. The review investigates what is currently known about the benefits and limitations of, and the strength of evidence for, agile methods. Implications for research and practice are presented. The main implication for research is a need for more and better empirical studies of agile software development within a common research agenda. For the industrial readership, the review provides a map of findings, according to topic, that can be compared for relevance to their own settings and situations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-5849</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6025</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agile software development ; Empirical software engineering ; Evidence-based software engineering ; Extreme programming ; Research synthesis ; Scrum ; Software ; Software engineering ; Studies ; Systematic review ; Systems development</subject><ispartof>Information and software technology, 2008-08, Vol.50 (9), p.833-859</ispartof><rights>2008 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Aug 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-234db26f1502bc1722d91e0c56ed7b4b6496798bc74ee792657e545c96aeb9e63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-234db26f1502bc1722d91e0c56ed7b4b6496798bc74ee792657e545c96aeb9e63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dybå, Tore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dingsøyr, Torgeir</creatorcontrib><title>Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review</title><title>Information and software technology</title><description>Agile software development represents a major departure from traditional, plan-based approaches to software engineering. A systematic review of empirical studies of agile software development up to and including 2005 was conducted. The search strategy identified 1996 studies, of which 36 were identified as empirical studies. The studies were grouped into four themes: introduction and adoption, human and social factors, perceptions on agile methods, and comparative studies. The review investigates what is currently known about the benefits and limitations of, and the strength of evidence for, agile methods. Implications for research and practice are presented. The main implication for research is a need for more and better empirical studies of agile software development within a common research agenda. For the industrial readership, the review provides a map of findings, according to topic, that can be compared for relevance to their own settings and situations.</description><subject>Agile software development</subject><subject>Empirical software engineering</subject><subject>Evidence-based software engineering</subject><subject>Extreme programming</subject><subject>Research synthesis</subject><subject>Scrum</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Software engineering</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Systems development</subject><issn>0950-5849</issn><issn>1873-6025</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwByws9gljJ7ZjFkhVKQ-pEhtYW4kzQY7yKLbbir8nVVizms29Z3QPIbcMUgZM3repG5owNikHKFJgKYA8IwtWqCyRwMU5WYAWkIgi15fkKoQWgCnIYEGeNv3OeWfLjoa4rx0GOja0_HId0okYj6VHWuMBu3HX4xAf6IqGnxCxL6Oz1OPB4fGaXDRlF_Dm7y7J5_PmY_2abN9f3tarbWKzLIsJz_K64rJhAnhlmeK81gzBCom1qvJK5loqXVRW5YhKcykUilxYLUusNMpsSe5m7s6P33sM0bTj3g_TS8O0zJkqCjGF8jlk_RiCx8bsvOtL_2MYmJMu05pZlznpMsDMpGuqPc41nAZMo7wJ1uFgsXYebTT16P4H_AI5-nUE</recordid><startdate>20080801</startdate><enddate>20080801</enddate><creator>Dybå, Tore</creator><creator>Dingsøyr, Torgeir</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080801</creationdate><title>Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review</title><author>Dybå, Tore ; Dingsøyr, Torgeir</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c333t-234db26f1502bc1722d91e0c56ed7b4b6496798bc74ee792657e545c96aeb9e63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Agile software development</topic><topic>Empirical software engineering</topic><topic>Evidence-based software engineering</topic><topic>Extreme programming</topic><topic>Research synthesis</topic><topic>Scrum</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Software engineering</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Systems development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dybå, Tore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dingsøyr, Torgeir</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Information and software technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dybå, Tore</au><au>Dingsøyr, Torgeir</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Information and software technology</jtitle><date>2008-08-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>833</spage><epage>859</epage><pages>833-859</pages><issn>0950-5849</issn><eissn>1873-6025</eissn><abstract>Agile software development represents a major departure from traditional, plan-based approaches to software engineering. A systematic review of empirical studies of agile software development up to and including 2005 was conducted. The search strategy identified 1996 studies, of which 36 were identified as empirical studies. The studies were grouped into four themes: introduction and adoption, human and social factors, perceptions on agile methods, and comparative studies. The review investigates what is currently known about the benefits and limitations of, and the strength of evidence for, agile methods. Implications for research and practice are presented. The main implication for research is a need for more and better empirical studies of agile software development within a common research agenda. For the industrial readership, the review provides a map of findings, according to topic, that can be compared for relevance to their own settings and situations.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0950-5849 |
| ispartof | Information and software technology, 2008-08, Vol.50 (9), p.833-859 |
| issn | 0950-5849 1873-6025 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_196417885 |
| source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
| subjects | Agile software development Empirical software engineering Evidence-based software engineering Extreme programming Research synthesis Scrum Software Software engineering Studies Systematic review Systems development |
| title | Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T01%3A58%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Empirical%20studies%20of%20agile%20software%20development:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Information%20and%20software%20technology&rft.au=Dyb%C3%A5,%20Tore&rft.date=2008-08-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=833&rft.epage=859&rft.pages=833-859&rft.issn=0950-5849&rft.eissn=1873-6025&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1497444961%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196417885&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0950584908000256&rfr_iscdi=true |