United States versus United Shoe Machinery Corporation: On the Merits

Two developments have stimulated renewed interest in the merits of US v. United Shoe Machinery Corp. (1953), perhaps the most famous antitrust case. The first is the realization that the duration of United's leases was inconsistent with the durable-goods-monopoly argument. Whereas short-term le...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	The Journal of law & economics 1993-04, Vol.36 (1), p.33-70
Hauptverfasser:	Masten, Scott E., Snyder, Edward A.
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Antitrust Clothing industry Contracts Durable goods Equipment leases Factories Federal court decisions Federal district courts Leases Leasing Machinery Monopolies Monopolistic competition Rental industry Rental property Shoemaking Shoes
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!