A model of design decision making based on empirical results of interviews with software designers
Despite the impact of design decisions on software design, we have little understanding about how design decisions are made. This hinders our ability to provide design metrics, processes and training that support inherent design work. By interviewing 25 software designers and using content analysis...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Information and software technology 2007-06, Vol.49 (6), p.637-653 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 653 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 637 |
container_title | Information and software technology |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Zannier, Carmen Chiasson, Mike Maurer, Frank |
description | Despite the impact of design decisions on software design, we have little understanding about how design decisions are made. This hinders our ability to provide design metrics, processes and training that support inherent design work. By interviewing 25 software designers and using content analysis and explanation building as our analysis technique, we provide qualitative and quantitative results that highlight aspects of rational and naturalistic decision making in software design. Our qualitative multi-case study results in a model of design decision making to answer the question: how do software designers make design decisions? We find the structure of the design problem determines the aspects of rational and naturalistic decision making used. The more structured the design decision, the less a designer considers options. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.010 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_196416231</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0950584907000122</els_id><sourcerecordid>1269109841</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-e0fa701e8bda07b86983cc3015231e525c3407126af01b72b562aefc29c45c753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwBhws7glrJ3aSC1JV8SdV4gJny3E2xSGJi51S8fa4Ss-cRivtzO58hNwySBkwed-ldmyDa1MOUKTAU2BwRhasLLJEAhfnZAGVgESUeXVJrkLoAFgBGSxIvaKDa7CnrqUNBrsdoxgbrBvpoL_suKW1DtjQOOOws94a3VOPYd9P4Wiy44T-x-Ih0IOdPml8Yzpoj6c09OGaXLS6D3hz0iX5eHp8X78km7fn1_Vqk5hM8ilBaHUBDMu60VDUpazKzJgMmOAZQ8GFyXIoGJe6BVYXvBaSa2wNr0wuTCGyJbmbc3fefe8xTKpzez_Gk4pVMmcy5sSlfF4y3oXgsVU7bwftfxUDdYSpOjXDVEeYCriKMKPtYbZhLBDbehWMxdFgYz2aSTXO_h_wB5b8f9s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196416231</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A model of design decision making based on empirical results of interviews with software designers</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Zannier, Carmen ; Chiasson, Mike ; Maurer, Frank</creator><creatorcontrib>Zannier, Carmen ; Chiasson, Mike ; Maurer, Frank</creatorcontrib><description>Despite the impact of design decisions on software design, we have little understanding about how design decisions are made. This hinders our ability to provide design metrics, processes and training that support inherent design work. By interviewing 25 software designers and using content analysis and explanation building as our analysis technique, we provide qualitative and quantitative results that highlight aspects of rational and naturalistic decision making in software design. Our qualitative multi-case study results in a model of design decision making to answer the question: how do software designers make design decisions? We find the structure of the design problem determines the aspects of rational and naturalistic decision making used. The more structured the design decision, the less a designer considers options.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-5849</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6025</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.010</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Content analysis ; Decision making ; Decision making models ; Design decision ; Designers ; Interviewing ; Naturalistic decision making ; Product design ; Rational decision making ; Software ; Systems design</subject><ispartof>Information and software technology, 2007-06, Vol.49 (6), p.637-653</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-e0fa701e8bda07b86983cc3015231e525c3407126af01b72b562aefc29c45c753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-e0fa701e8bda07b86983cc3015231e525c3407126af01b72b562aefc29c45c753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584907000122$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zannier, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiasson, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maurer, Frank</creatorcontrib><title>A model of design decision making based on empirical results of interviews with software designers</title><title>Information and software technology</title><description>Despite the impact of design decisions on software design, we have little understanding about how design decisions are made. This hinders our ability to provide design metrics, processes and training that support inherent design work. By interviewing 25 software designers and using content analysis and explanation building as our analysis technique, we provide qualitative and quantitative results that highlight aspects of rational and naturalistic decision making in software design. Our qualitative multi-case study results in a model of design decision making to answer the question: how do software designers make design decisions? We find the structure of the design problem determines the aspects of rational and naturalistic decision making used. The more structured the design decision, the less a designer considers options.</description><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Decision making models</subject><subject>Design decision</subject><subject>Designers</subject><subject>Interviewing</subject><subject>Naturalistic decision making</subject><subject>Product design</subject><subject>Rational decision making</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Systems design</subject><issn>0950-5849</issn><issn>1873-6025</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwBhws7glrJ3aSC1JV8SdV4gJny3E2xSGJi51S8fa4Ss-cRivtzO58hNwySBkwed-ldmyDa1MOUKTAU2BwRhasLLJEAhfnZAGVgESUeXVJrkLoAFgBGSxIvaKDa7CnrqUNBrsdoxgbrBvpoL_suKW1DtjQOOOws94a3VOPYd9P4Wiy44T-x-Ih0IOdPml8Yzpoj6c09OGaXLS6D3hz0iX5eHp8X78km7fn1_Vqk5hM8ilBaHUBDMu60VDUpazKzJgMmOAZQ8GFyXIoGJe6BVYXvBaSa2wNr0wuTCGyJbmbc3fefe8xTKpzez_Gk4pVMmcy5sSlfF4y3oXgsVU7bwftfxUDdYSpOjXDVEeYCriKMKPtYbZhLBDbehWMxdFgYz2aSTXO_h_wB5b8f9s</recordid><startdate>20070601</startdate><enddate>20070601</enddate><creator>Zannier, Carmen</creator><creator>Chiasson, Mike</creator><creator>Maurer, Frank</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070601</creationdate><title>A model of design decision making based on empirical results of interviews with software designers</title><author>Zannier, Carmen ; Chiasson, Mike ; Maurer, Frank</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-e0fa701e8bda07b86983cc3015231e525c3407126af01b72b562aefc29c45c753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Decision making models</topic><topic>Design decision</topic><topic>Designers</topic><topic>Interviewing</topic><topic>Naturalistic decision making</topic><topic>Product design</topic><topic>Rational decision making</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Systems design</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zannier, Carmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chiasson, Mike</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maurer, Frank</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Information and software technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zannier, Carmen</au><au>Chiasson, Mike</au><au>Maurer, Frank</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A model of design decision making based on empirical results of interviews with software designers</atitle><jtitle>Information and software technology</jtitle><date>2007-06-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>637</spage><epage>653</epage><pages>637-653</pages><issn>0950-5849</issn><eissn>1873-6025</eissn><abstract>Despite the impact of design decisions on software design, we have little understanding about how design decisions are made. This hinders our ability to provide design metrics, processes and training that support inherent design work. By interviewing 25 software designers and using content analysis and explanation building as our analysis technique, we provide qualitative and quantitative results that highlight aspects of rational and naturalistic decision making in software design. Our qualitative multi-case study results in a model of design decision making to answer the question: how do software designers make design decisions? We find the structure of the design problem determines the aspects of rational and naturalistic decision making used. The more structured the design decision, the less a designer considers options.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.010</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0950-5849 |
ispartof | Information and software technology, 2007-06, Vol.49 (6), p.637-653 |
issn | 0950-5849 1873-6025 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_196416231 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Content analysis Decision making Decision making models Design decision Designers Interviewing Naturalistic decision making Product design Rational decision making Software Systems design |
title | A model of design decision making based on empirical results of interviews with software designers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T19%3A50%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20model%20of%20design%20decision%20making%20based%20on%20empirical%20results%20of%20interviews%20with%20software%20designers&rft.jtitle=Information%20and%20software%20technology&rft.au=Zannier,%20Carmen&rft.date=2007-06-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=637&rft.epage=653&rft.pages=637-653&rft.issn=0950-5849&rft.eissn=1873-6025&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.infsof.2007.02.010&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1269109841%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196416231&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0950584907000122&rfr_iscdi=true |