How Block Booking Facilitated Self‐Enforcing Film Contracts
This paper uses the block‐booking film exhibition contracts that were the subject ofParamountto examine the role of contract terms in facilitating self‐enforcing relationships. Because of the large uncertainty in film value at the time of contracting, it is difficult to fully specify optimal exhibit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of law & economics 2000-10, Vol.43 (2), p.427-436 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 436 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 427 |
container_title | The Journal of law & economics |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Kenney, Roy W. Klein, Benjamin |
description | This paper uses the block‐booking film exhibition contracts that were the subject ofParamountto examine the role of contract terms in facilitating self‐enforcing relationships. Because of the large uncertainty in film value at the time of contracting, it is difficult to fully specify optimal exhibitor performance (such as exhibition run length) ex ante. Instead, the efficient contractual arrangement contractually overconstrains exhibitors and relies on the superior reputational capital of distributors to flexibly adjust contract terms ex post. The analysis illustrates that, rather than thinking of contracts as either court enforced or self‐enforced, transactors generally combine court‐enforced and self‐enforced sanctions by using contract terms to economize on their limited reputational capital. Block booking is explained within this framework by its effects on reducing the variance in the value of the film package and, therefore, the demands placed on the distributors' reputational capital. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1086/467461 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_196411821</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/467461</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/467461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-81af3529d868a4ae338b0ea9f570bc9078d8693f7d4a29f88498bf25820ebe5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kL1OwzAUhS0EEqHAC7BEDGwB_ybXAwONWopUiQGYI8exUdo0LrYr1I1H4Bl5EgJBnOUO36d7pIPQOcHXBEN-w_OC5-QAJUSwIhMUxCFKMKY0owTyY3QSwgoP4ZIn6Hbh3tNp5_Q6nTq3bvvXdK5027VRRdOkT6azXx-fs946r39h223S0vXRKx3DKTqyqgvm7O9O0Mt89lwusuXj_UN5t8w0YzhmQJRlgsoGclBcGcagxkZJKwpca4kLGIhktmi4otICcAm1pQIoNrURlk3Q5fh3693bzoRYrdzO90NlRWTOCQFKBulqlLR3IXhjq61vN8rvK4Krn2WqcZlBvBjFVYjO_1sFFQNn34EvXWU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196411821</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Block Booking Facilitated Self‐Enforcing Film Contracts</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>University of Chicago Press Journals (Full run)</source><creator>Kenney, Roy W. ; Klein, Benjamin</creator><creatorcontrib>Kenney, Roy W. ; Klein, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><description>This paper uses the block‐booking film exhibition contracts that were the subject ofParamountto examine the role of contract terms in facilitating self‐enforcing relationships. Because of the large uncertainty in film value at the time of contracting, it is difficult to fully specify optimal exhibitor performance (such as exhibition run length) ex ante. Instead, the efficient contractual arrangement contractually overconstrains exhibitors and relies on the superior reputational capital of distributors to flexibly adjust contract terms ex post. The analysis illustrates that, rather than thinking of contracts as either court enforced or self‐enforced, transactors generally combine court‐enforced and self‐enforced sanctions by using contract terms to economize on their limited reputational capital. Block booking is explained within this framework by its effects on reducing the variance in the value of the film package and, therefore, the demands placed on the distributors' reputational capital.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2186</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/467461</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLLEA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Capital distributions ; Contract enforcement ; Contract incentives ; Contract theory ; Contracts ; Economic value ; Fees ; Film criticism ; Market strategy ; Motion picture industry ; Movies ; Studies ; Supreme Court decisions</subject><ispartof>The Journal of law & economics, 2000-10, Vol.43 (2), p.427-436</ispartof><rights>2000 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago Law School Oct 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-81af3529d868a4ae338b0ea9f570bc9078d8693f7d4a29f88498bf25820ebe5f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kenney, Roy W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><title>How Block Booking Facilitated Self‐Enforcing Film Contracts</title><title>The Journal of law & economics</title><description>This paper uses the block‐booking film exhibition contracts that were the subject ofParamountto examine the role of contract terms in facilitating self‐enforcing relationships. Because of the large uncertainty in film value at the time of contracting, it is difficult to fully specify optimal exhibitor performance (such as exhibition run length) ex ante. Instead, the efficient contractual arrangement contractually overconstrains exhibitors and relies on the superior reputational capital of distributors to flexibly adjust contract terms ex post. The analysis illustrates that, rather than thinking of contracts as either court enforced or self‐enforced, transactors generally combine court‐enforced and self‐enforced sanctions by using contract terms to economize on their limited reputational capital. Block booking is explained within this framework by its effects on reducing the variance in the value of the film package and, therefore, the demands placed on the distributors' reputational capital.</description><subject>Capital distributions</subject><subject>Contract enforcement</subject><subject>Contract incentives</subject><subject>Contract theory</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Economic value</subject><subject>Fees</subject><subject>Film criticism</subject><subject>Market strategy</subject><subject>Motion picture industry</subject><subject>Movies</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supreme Court decisions</subject><issn>0022-2186</issn><issn>1537-5285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kL1OwzAUhS0EEqHAC7BEDGwB_ybXAwONWopUiQGYI8exUdo0LrYr1I1H4Bl5EgJBnOUO36d7pIPQOcHXBEN-w_OC5-QAJUSwIhMUxCFKMKY0owTyY3QSwgoP4ZIn6Hbh3tNp5_Q6nTq3bvvXdK5027VRRdOkT6azXx-fs946r39h223S0vXRKx3DKTqyqgvm7O9O0Mt89lwusuXj_UN5t8w0YzhmQJRlgsoGclBcGcagxkZJKwpca4kLGIhktmi4otICcAm1pQIoNrURlk3Q5fh3693bzoRYrdzO90NlRWTOCQFKBulqlLR3IXhjq61vN8rvK4Krn2WqcZlBvBjFVYjO_1sFFQNn34EvXWU</recordid><startdate>20001001</startdate><enddate>20001001</enddate><creator>Kenney, Roy W.</creator><creator>Klein, Benjamin</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Law School</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001001</creationdate><title>How Block Booking Facilitated Self‐Enforcing Film Contracts</title><author>Kenney, Roy W. ; Klein, Benjamin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-81af3529d868a4ae338b0ea9f570bc9078d8693f7d4a29f88498bf25820ebe5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Capital distributions</topic><topic>Contract enforcement</topic><topic>Contract incentives</topic><topic>Contract theory</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Economic value</topic><topic>Fees</topic><topic>Film criticism</topic><topic>Market strategy</topic><topic>Motion picture industry</topic><topic>Movies</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supreme Court decisions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kenney, Roy W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of law & economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kenney, Roy W.</au><au>Klein, Benjamin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Block Booking Facilitated Self‐Enforcing Film Contracts</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of law & economics</jtitle><date>2000-10-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>427</spage><epage>436</epage><pages>427-436</pages><issn>0022-2186</issn><eissn>1537-5285</eissn><coden>JLLEA7</coden><abstract>This paper uses the block‐booking film exhibition contracts that were the subject ofParamountto examine the role of contract terms in facilitating self‐enforcing relationships. Because of the large uncertainty in film value at the time of contracting, it is difficult to fully specify optimal exhibitor performance (such as exhibition run length) ex ante. Instead, the efficient contractual arrangement contractually overconstrains exhibitors and relies on the superior reputational capital of distributors to flexibly adjust contract terms ex post. The analysis illustrates that, rather than thinking of contracts as either court enforced or self‐enforced, transactors generally combine court‐enforced and self‐enforced sanctions by using contract terms to economize on their limited reputational capital. Block booking is explained within this framework by its effects on reducing the variance in the value of the film package and, therefore, the demands placed on the distributors' reputational capital.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/467461</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-2186 |
ispartof | The Journal of law & economics, 2000-10, Vol.43 (2), p.427-436 |
issn | 0022-2186 1537-5285 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_196411821 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Jstor Complete Legacy; University of Chicago Press Journals (Full run) |
subjects | Capital distributions Contract enforcement Contract incentives Contract theory Contracts Economic value Fees Film criticism Market strategy Motion picture industry Movies Studies Supreme Court decisions |
title | How Block Booking Facilitated Self‐Enforcing Film Contracts |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T05%3A40%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Block%20Booking%20Facilitated%20Self%E2%80%90Enforcing%20Film%20Contracts&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20law%20&%20economics&rft.au=Kenney,%20Roy%20W.&rft.date=2000-10-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=427&rft.epage=436&rft.pages=427-436&rft.issn=0022-2186&rft.eissn=1537-5285&rft.coden=JLLEA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/467461&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/467461%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196411821&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/467461&rfr_iscdi=true |