How Block Booking Facilitated Self‐Enforcing Film Contracts

This paper uses the block‐booking film exhibition contracts that were the subject ofParamountto examine the role of contract terms in facilitating self‐enforcing relationships. Because of the large uncertainty in film value at the time of contracting, it is difficult to fully specify optimal exhibit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of law & economics 2000-10, Vol.43 (2), p.427-436
Hauptverfasser: Kenney, Roy W., Klein, Benjamin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 436
container_issue 2
container_start_page 427
container_title The Journal of law & economics
container_volume 43
creator Kenney, Roy W.
Klein, Benjamin
description This paper uses the block‐booking film exhibition contracts that were the subject ofParamountto examine the role of contract terms in facilitating self‐enforcing relationships. Because of the large uncertainty in film value at the time of contracting, it is difficult to fully specify optimal exhibitor performance (such as exhibition run length) ex ante. Instead, the efficient contractual arrangement contractually overconstrains exhibitors and relies on the superior reputational capital of distributors to flexibly adjust contract terms ex post. The analysis illustrates that, rather than thinking of contracts as either court enforced or self‐enforced, transactors generally combine court‐enforced and self‐enforced sanctions by using contract terms to economize on their limited reputational capital. Block booking is explained within this framework by its effects on reducing the variance in the value of the film package and, therefore, the demands placed on the distributors' reputational capital.
doi_str_mv 10.1086/467461
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_196411821</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>10.1086/467461</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>10.1086/467461</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-81af3529d868a4ae338b0ea9f570bc9078d8693f7d4a29f88498bf25820ebe5f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kL1OwzAUhS0EEqHAC7BEDGwB_ybXAwONWopUiQGYI8exUdo0LrYr1I1H4Bl5EgJBnOUO36d7pIPQOcHXBEN-w_OC5-QAJUSwIhMUxCFKMKY0owTyY3QSwgoP4ZIn6Hbh3tNp5_Q6nTq3bvvXdK5027VRRdOkT6azXx-fs946r39h223S0vXRKx3DKTqyqgvm7O9O0Mt89lwusuXj_UN5t8w0YzhmQJRlgsoGclBcGcagxkZJKwpca4kLGIhktmi4otICcAm1pQIoNrURlk3Q5fh3693bzoRYrdzO90NlRWTOCQFKBulqlLR3IXhjq61vN8rvK4Krn2WqcZlBvBjFVYjO_1sFFQNn34EvXWU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>196411821</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Block Booking Facilitated Self‐Enforcing Film Contracts</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>University of Chicago Press Journals (Full run)</source><creator>Kenney, Roy W. ; Klein, Benjamin</creator><creatorcontrib>Kenney, Roy W. ; Klein, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><description>This paper uses the block‐booking film exhibition contracts that were the subject ofParamountto examine the role of contract terms in facilitating self‐enforcing relationships. Because of the large uncertainty in film value at the time of contracting, it is difficult to fully specify optimal exhibitor performance (such as exhibition run length) ex ante. Instead, the efficient contractual arrangement contractually overconstrains exhibitors and relies on the superior reputational capital of distributors to flexibly adjust contract terms ex post. The analysis illustrates that, rather than thinking of contracts as either court enforced or self‐enforced, transactors generally combine court‐enforced and self‐enforced sanctions by using contract terms to economize on their limited reputational capital. Block booking is explained within this framework by its effects on reducing the variance in the value of the film package and, therefore, the demands placed on the distributors' reputational capital.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2186</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-5285</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1086/467461</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLLEA7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: The University of Chicago Press</publisher><subject>Capital distributions ; Contract enforcement ; Contract incentives ; Contract theory ; Contracts ; Economic value ; Fees ; Film criticism ; Market strategy ; Motion picture industry ; Movies ; Studies ; Supreme Court decisions</subject><ispartof>The Journal of law &amp; economics, 2000-10, Vol.43 (2), p.427-436</ispartof><rights>2000 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright University of Chicago Law School Oct 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-81af3529d868a4ae338b0ea9f570bc9078d8693f7d4a29f88498bf25820ebe5f3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kenney, Roy W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><title>How Block Booking Facilitated Self‐Enforcing Film Contracts</title><title>The Journal of law &amp; economics</title><description>This paper uses the block‐booking film exhibition contracts that were the subject ofParamountto examine the role of contract terms in facilitating self‐enforcing relationships. Because of the large uncertainty in film value at the time of contracting, it is difficult to fully specify optimal exhibitor performance (such as exhibition run length) ex ante. Instead, the efficient contractual arrangement contractually overconstrains exhibitors and relies on the superior reputational capital of distributors to flexibly adjust contract terms ex post. The analysis illustrates that, rather than thinking of contracts as either court enforced or self‐enforced, transactors generally combine court‐enforced and self‐enforced sanctions by using contract terms to economize on their limited reputational capital. Block booking is explained within this framework by its effects on reducing the variance in the value of the film package and, therefore, the demands placed on the distributors' reputational capital.</description><subject>Capital distributions</subject><subject>Contract enforcement</subject><subject>Contract incentives</subject><subject>Contract theory</subject><subject>Contracts</subject><subject>Economic value</subject><subject>Fees</subject><subject>Film criticism</subject><subject>Market strategy</subject><subject>Motion picture industry</subject><subject>Movies</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Supreme Court decisions</subject><issn>0022-2186</issn><issn>1537-5285</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kL1OwzAUhS0EEqHAC7BEDGwB_ybXAwONWopUiQGYI8exUdo0LrYr1I1H4Bl5EgJBnOUO36d7pIPQOcHXBEN-w_OC5-QAJUSwIhMUxCFKMKY0owTyY3QSwgoP4ZIn6Hbh3tNp5_Q6nTq3bvvXdK5027VRRdOkT6azXx-fs946r39h223S0vXRKx3DKTqyqgvm7O9O0Mt89lwusuXj_UN5t8w0YzhmQJRlgsoGclBcGcagxkZJKwpca4kLGIhktmi4otICcAm1pQIoNrURlk3Q5fh3693bzoRYrdzO90NlRWTOCQFKBulqlLR3IXhjq61vN8rvK4Krn2WqcZlBvBjFVYjO_1sFFQNn34EvXWU</recordid><startdate>20001001</startdate><enddate>20001001</enddate><creator>Kenney, Roy W.</creator><creator>Klein, Benjamin</creator><general>The University of Chicago Press</general><general>University of Chicago Law School</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K7.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001001</creationdate><title>How Block Booking Facilitated Self‐Enforcing Film Contracts</title><author>Kenney, Roy W. ; Klein, Benjamin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-81af3529d868a4ae338b0ea9f570bc9078d8693f7d4a29f88498bf25820ebe5f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Capital distributions</topic><topic>Contract enforcement</topic><topic>Contract incentives</topic><topic>Contract theory</topic><topic>Contracts</topic><topic>Economic value</topic><topic>Fees</topic><topic>Film criticism</topic><topic>Market strategy</topic><topic>Motion picture industry</topic><topic>Movies</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Supreme Court decisions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kenney, Roy W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Criminal Justice (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of law &amp; economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kenney, Roy W.</au><au>Klein, Benjamin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Block Booking Facilitated Self‐Enforcing Film Contracts</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of law &amp; economics</jtitle><date>2000-10-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>427</spage><epage>436</epage><pages>427-436</pages><issn>0022-2186</issn><eissn>1537-5285</eissn><coden>JLLEA7</coden><abstract>This paper uses the block‐booking film exhibition contracts that were the subject ofParamountto examine the role of contract terms in facilitating self‐enforcing relationships. Because of the large uncertainty in film value at the time of contracting, it is difficult to fully specify optimal exhibitor performance (such as exhibition run length) ex ante. Instead, the efficient contractual arrangement contractually overconstrains exhibitors and relies on the superior reputational capital of distributors to flexibly adjust contract terms ex post. The analysis illustrates that, rather than thinking of contracts as either court enforced or self‐enforced, transactors generally combine court‐enforced and self‐enforced sanctions by using contract terms to economize on their limited reputational capital. Block booking is explained within this framework by its effects on reducing the variance in the value of the film package and, therefore, the demands placed on the distributors' reputational capital.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>The University of Chicago Press</pub><doi>10.1086/467461</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2186
ispartof The Journal of law & economics, 2000-10, Vol.43 (2), p.427-436
issn 0022-2186
1537-5285
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_196411821
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Jstor Complete Legacy; University of Chicago Press Journals (Full run)
subjects Capital distributions
Contract enforcement
Contract incentives
Contract theory
Contracts
Economic value
Fees
Film criticism
Market strategy
Motion picture industry
Movies
Studies
Supreme Court decisions
title How Block Booking Facilitated Self‐Enforcing Film Contracts
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T05%3A40%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Block%20Booking%20Facilitated%20Self%E2%80%90Enforcing%20Film%20Contracts&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20law%20&%20economics&rft.au=Kenney,%20Roy%20W.&rft.date=2000-10-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=427&rft.epage=436&rft.pages=427-436&rft.issn=0022-2186&rft.eissn=1537-5285&rft.coden=JLLEA7&rft_id=info:doi/10.1086/467461&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E10.1086/467461%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=196411821&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=10.1086/467461&rfr_iscdi=true