Severe water deficit restricts biomass production of Lolium perenne L. and Trifolium repens L. and causes foliar nitrogen but not carbohydrate limitation
Aims We investigated whether drought-induced impairment of grassland species can be explained directly by plant water deficit or by water-driven limitation of nitrogen (N) and/or carbohydrate sources. Methods In a field experiment, a severe drought treatment was applied on monocultures of Lolium per...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Plant and soil 2017-12, Vol.421 (1/2), p.367-381 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 381 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1/2 |
container_start_page | 367 |
container_title | Plant and soil |
container_volume | 421 |
creator | Hofer, Daniel Suter, Matthias Buchmann, Nina Lüscher, Andreas |
description | Aims We investigated whether drought-induced impairment of grassland species can be explained directly by plant water deficit or by water-driven limitation of nitrogen (N) and/or carbohydrate sources. Methods In a field experiment, a severe drought treatment was applied on monocultures of Lolium perenne L. (cv. Alligator) (Lp) and Trifolium repens L. (cv. Hebe) (Tr) by using rainout shelters excluding all precipitation, and effects were compared to a rainfed control. Three species-fertiliser treatments were set up, crossed with the drought treatment. The two species were fertilised equally with N (200 kg N ha−1 year−1), and an additional high N fertilisation treatment was established for L. perenne (LphighN, 500 kg N ha−1 year−1). Results Severe soil water deficit led to significantly lower leaf water potentials in all species-fertiliser treatments (P < 0.001) down to approximately −1.2 MPa and, on average, to a 79% reduction in living plant biomass above 7 cm harvest height (P < 0.001), indicating strong plant water deficits. Under the drought treatment, living plant biomass above 7 cm did not differ among species-fertiliser treatments. Plant-available soil N was 84% lower (P ≤ 0.01) and plant N concentrations were 24% less (P < 0.001) under the drought than under the rainfed control treatment, with Lp always being more N limited than LphighN and Tr. Nitrate concentrations in water-limited plants were generally very low (< 0.85 mg g−1 dry matter), whereas non-structural carbohydrates were distinctly greater under the drought treatment in Lp (+62%), LphighN (+46%), and Tr (+18%). Conclusions Restricted biomass production of these forage species under severe drought can primarily be explained by plant water deficits and secondarily by drought-induced limitation of N supply. However, growth seems not to be limited by carbohydrate source activity, as carbohydrates accumulated with water deficiency. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11104-017-3439-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1963301525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A518490963</galeid><jstor_id>26651100</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A518490963</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-e57f6df80bd46177343f2f1440876c06d8fc739e2c0aa4e81bad298ff641f6803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc-KFDEQxoMoOI4-gAch4LlnK53udPdxWXQVBjy4greQTlfGDDPJWEkr8yi-rWnaFU-SQ0jV96s_-Rh7LWAnALqbJISApgLRVbKRQ3V9wjai7WTVglRP2QZA1hV0w9fn7EVKR1jeQm3Yr8_4Awn5T5OR-ITOW585YcrkbU589PFsUuIXitNss4-BR8f38eTnM78UMgTk-x03YeIP5N2aILxgSI9xa-aEiS85Qzz4TPGAgY9z5iHmkqYxfrtOVEbgJ3_22Sx9XrJnzpwSvvpzb9mX9-8e7j5U-0_3H-9u95VtasgVtp1Tk-thnBoluq5s72onmgb6TllQU-9sJwesLRjTYC9GM9VD75xqhFM9yC17u9YtK36fy-L6GGcKpaUWg5ISRFu3RbVbVQdzQu2Di5mMLWfCs7cxlI8r8dtW9M0AC7ZlYgUsxZQInb6QPxu6agF6sUyvlulimV4s09fC1CuTijYckP4Z5T_QmxU6phzpb5daqbZIQf4G94Klww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1963301525</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Severe water deficit restricts biomass production of Lolium perenne L. and Trifolium repens L. and causes foliar nitrogen but not carbohydrate limitation</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Hofer, Daniel ; Suter, Matthias ; Buchmann, Nina ; Lüscher, Andreas</creator><creatorcontrib>Hofer, Daniel ; Suter, Matthias ; Buchmann, Nina ; Lüscher, Andreas</creatorcontrib><description>Aims We investigated whether drought-induced impairment of grassland species can be explained directly by plant water deficit or by water-driven limitation of nitrogen (N) and/or carbohydrate sources. Methods In a field experiment, a severe drought treatment was applied on monocultures of Lolium perenne L. (cv. Alligator) (Lp) and Trifolium repens L. (cv. Hebe) (Tr) by using rainout shelters excluding all precipitation, and effects were compared to a rainfed control. Three species-fertiliser treatments were set up, crossed with the drought treatment. The two species were fertilised equally with N (200 kg N ha−1 year−1), and an additional high N fertilisation treatment was established for L. perenne (LphighN, 500 kg N ha−1 year−1). Results Severe soil water deficit led to significantly lower leaf water potentials in all species-fertiliser treatments (P < 0.001) down to approximately −1.2 MPa and, on average, to a 79% reduction in living plant biomass above 7 cm harvest height (P < 0.001), indicating strong plant water deficits. Under the drought treatment, living plant biomass above 7 cm did not differ among species-fertiliser treatments. Plant-available soil N was 84% lower (P ≤ 0.01) and plant N concentrations were 24% less (P < 0.001) under the drought than under the rainfed control treatment, with Lp always being more N limited than LphighN and Tr. Nitrate concentrations in water-limited plants were generally very low (< 0.85 mg g−1 dry matter), whereas non-structural carbohydrates were distinctly greater under the drought treatment in Lp (+62%), LphighN (+46%), and Tr (+18%). Conclusions Restricted biomass production of these forage species under severe drought can primarily be explained by plant water deficits and secondarily by drought-induced limitation of N supply. However, growth seems not to be limited by carbohydrate source activity, as carbohydrates accumulated with water deficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0032-079X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-5036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11104-017-3439-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer</publisher><subject>Aquatic reptiles ; Biomass ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Carbohydrates ; Clovers (Legumes) ; Drought ; Dry matter ; Ecology ; Environmental aspects ; Fertilization ; Fertilizers ; Forage ; Grasslands ; Life Sciences ; Lolium perenne ; Moisture content ; Monoculture ; Nitrogen ; Plant biomass ; Plant growth ; Plant Physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Plant-water relationships ; Plants (botany) ; Regular Article ; Shelters ; Soil Science & Conservation ; Soil water ; Species ; Trifolium repens ; Water deficit ; Water potential</subject><ispartof>Plant and soil, 2017-12, Vol.421 (1/2), p.367-381</ispartof><rights>Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2017</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Springer</rights><rights>Plant and Soil is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-e57f6df80bd46177343f2f1440876c06d8fc739e2c0aa4e81bad298ff641f6803</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-e57f6df80bd46177343f2f1440876c06d8fc739e2c0aa4e81bad298ff641f6803</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26651100$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26651100$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298,57996,58229</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hofer, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suter, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchmann, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lüscher, Andreas</creatorcontrib><title>Severe water deficit restricts biomass production of Lolium perenne L. and Trifolium repens L. and causes foliar nitrogen but not carbohydrate limitation</title><title>Plant and soil</title><addtitle>Plant Soil</addtitle><description>Aims We investigated whether drought-induced impairment of grassland species can be explained directly by plant water deficit or by water-driven limitation of nitrogen (N) and/or carbohydrate sources. Methods In a field experiment, a severe drought treatment was applied on monocultures of Lolium perenne L. (cv. Alligator) (Lp) and Trifolium repens L. (cv. Hebe) (Tr) by using rainout shelters excluding all precipitation, and effects were compared to a rainfed control. Three species-fertiliser treatments were set up, crossed with the drought treatment. The two species were fertilised equally with N (200 kg N ha−1 year−1), and an additional high N fertilisation treatment was established for L. perenne (LphighN, 500 kg N ha−1 year−1). Results Severe soil water deficit led to significantly lower leaf water potentials in all species-fertiliser treatments (P < 0.001) down to approximately −1.2 MPa and, on average, to a 79% reduction in living plant biomass above 7 cm harvest height (P < 0.001), indicating strong plant water deficits. Under the drought treatment, living plant biomass above 7 cm did not differ among species-fertiliser treatments. Plant-available soil N was 84% lower (P ≤ 0.01) and plant N concentrations were 24% less (P < 0.001) under the drought than under the rainfed control treatment, with Lp always being more N limited than LphighN and Tr. Nitrate concentrations in water-limited plants were generally very low (< 0.85 mg g−1 dry matter), whereas non-structural carbohydrates were distinctly greater under the drought treatment in Lp (+62%), LphighN (+46%), and Tr (+18%). Conclusions Restricted biomass production of these forage species under severe drought can primarily be explained by plant water deficits and secondarily by drought-induced limitation of N supply. However, growth seems not to be limited by carbohydrate source activity, as carbohydrates accumulated with water deficiency.</description><subject>Aquatic reptiles</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Carbohydrates</subject><subject>Clovers (Legumes)</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Dry matter</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>Fertilizers</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Lolium perenne</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Monoculture</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Plant biomass</subject><subject>Plant growth</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant-water relationships</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Regular Article</subject><subject>Shelters</subject><subject>Soil Science & Conservation</subject><subject>Soil water</subject><subject>Species</subject><subject>Trifolium repens</subject><subject>Water deficit</subject><subject>Water potential</subject><issn>0032-079X</issn><issn>1573-5036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc-KFDEQxoMoOI4-gAch4LlnK53udPdxWXQVBjy4greQTlfGDDPJWEkr8yi-rWnaFU-SQ0jV96s_-Rh7LWAnALqbJISApgLRVbKRQ3V9wjai7WTVglRP2QZA1hV0w9fn7EVKR1jeQm3Yr8_4Awn5T5OR-ITOW585YcrkbU589PFsUuIXitNss4-BR8f38eTnM78UMgTk-x03YeIP5N2aILxgSI9xa-aEiS85Qzz4TPGAgY9z5iHmkqYxfrtOVEbgJ3_22Sx9XrJnzpwSvvpzb9mX9-8e7j5U-0_3H-9u95VtasgVtp1Tk-thnBoluq5s72onmgb6TllQU-9sJwesLRjTYC9GM9VD75xqhFM9yC17u9YtK36fy-L6GGcKpaUWg5ISRFu3RbVbVQdzQu2Di5mMLWfCs7cxlI8r8dtW9M0AC7ZlYgUsxZQInb6QPxu6agF6sUyvlulimV4s09fC1CuTijYckP4Z5T_QmxU6phzpb5daqbZIQf4G94Klww</recordid><startdate>20171201</startdate><enddate>20171201</enddate><creator>Hofer, Daniel</creator><creator>Suter, Matthias</creator><creator>Buchmann, Nina</creator><creator>Lüscher, Andreas</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171201</creationdate><title>Severe water deficit restricts biomass production of Lolium perenne L. and Trifolium repens L. and causes foliar nitrogen but not carbohydrate limitation</title><author>Hofer, Daniel ; Suter, Matthias ; Buchmann, Nina ; Lüscher, Andreas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-e57f6df80bd46177343f2f1440876c06d8fc739e2c0aa4e81bad298ff641f6803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aquatic reptiles</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Carbohydrates</topic><topic>Clovers (Legumes)</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Dry matter</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>Fertilizers</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Lolium perenne</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Monoculture</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Plant biomass</topic><topic>Plant growth</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant-water relationships</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Regular Article</topic><topic>Shelters</topic><topic>Soil Science & Conservation</topic><topic>Soil water</topic><topic>Species</topic><topic>Trifolium repens</topic><topic>Water deficit</topic><topic>Water potential</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hofer, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suter, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buchmann, Nina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lüscher, Andreas</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hofer, Daniel</au><au>Suter, Matthias</au><au>Buchmann, Nina</au><au>Lüscher, Andreas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Severe water deficit restricts biomass production of Lolium perenne L. and Trifolium repens L. and causes foliar nitrogen but not carbohydrate limitation</atitle><jtitle>Plant and soil</jtitle><stitle>Plant Soil</stitle><date>2017-12-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>421</volume><issue>1/2</issue><spage>367</spage><epage>381</epage><pages>367-381</pages><issn>0032-079X</issn><eissn>1573-5036</eissn><abstract>Aims We investigated whether drought-induced impairment of grassland species can be explained directly by plant water deficit or by water-driven limitation of nitrogen (N) and/or carbohydrate sources. Methods In a field experiment, a severe drought treatment was applied on monocultures of Lolium perenne L. (cv. Alligator) (Lp) and Trifolium repens L. (cv. Hebe) (Tr) by using rainout shelters excluding all precipitation, and effects were compared to a rainfed control. Three species-fertiliser treatments were set up, crossed with the drought treatment. The two species were fertilised equally with N (200 kg N ha−1 year−1), and an additional high N fertilisation treatment was established for L. perenne (LphighN, 500 kg N ha−1 year−1). Results Severe soil water deficit led to significantly lower leaf water potentials in all species-fertiliser treatments (P < 0.001) down to approximately −1.2 MPa and, on average, to a 79% reduction in living plant biomass above 7 cm harvest height (P < 0.001), indicating strong plant water deficits. Under the drought treatment, living plant biomass above 7 cm did not differ among species-fertiliser treatments. Plant-available soil N was 84% lower (P ≤ 0.01) and plant N concentrations were 24% less (P < 0.001) under the drought than under the rainfed control treatment, with Lp always being more N limited than LphighN and Tr. Nitrate concentrations in water-limited plants were generally very low (< 0.85 mg g−1 dry matter), whereas non-structural carbohydrates were distinctly greater under the drought treatment in Lp (+62%), LphighN (+46%), and Tr (+18%). Conclusions Restricted biomass production of these forage species under severe drought can primarily be explained by plant water deficits and secondarily by drought-induced limitation of N supply. However, growth seems not to be limited by carbohydrate source activity, as carbohydrates accumulated with water deficiency.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s11104-017-3439-y</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0032-079X |
ispartof | Plant and soil, 2017-12, Vol.421 (1/2), p.367-381 |
issn | 0032-079X 1573-5036 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1963301525 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Aquatic reptiles Biomass Biomedical and Life Sciences Carbohydrates Clovers (Legumes) Drought Dry matter Ecology Environmental aspects Fertilization Fertilizers Forage Grasslands Life Sciences Lolium perenne Moisture content Monoculture Nitrogen Plant biomass Plant growth Plant Physiology Plant Sciences Plant-water relationships Plants (botany) Regular Article Shelters Soil Science & Conservation Soil water Species Trifolium repens Water deficit Water potential |
title | Severe water deficit restricts biomass production of Lolium perenne L. and Trifolium repens L. and causes foliar nitrogen but not carbohydrate limitation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T20%3A17%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Severe%20water%20deficit%20restricts%20biomass%20production%20of%20Lolium%20perenne%20L.%20and%20Trifolium%20repens%20L.%20and%20causes%20foliar%20nitrogen%20but%20not%20carbohydrate%20limitation&rft.jtitle=Plant%20and%20soil&rft.au=Hofer,%20Daniel&rft.date=2017-12-01&rft.volume=421&rft.issue=1/2&rft.spage=367&rft.epage=381&rft.pages=367-381&rft.issn=0032-079X&rft.eissn=1573-5036&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11104-017-3439-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA518490963%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1963301525&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A518490963&rft_jstor_id=26651100&rfr_iscdi=true |