Inflation forecasts, the expected real rate and information efficiency
This paper examines the inflation forecast accuracy and rationality of a time series predictor, an expected inflation series constructed from surveys undertaken by the University of Michigan's Institute for Social Research, and the yield on U.S. Treasury bills. A quadratic loss function is assu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of business research 1985-01, Vol.13 (2), p.187-193 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 193 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 187 |
container_title | Journal of business research |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Leonard, David C. Solt, Michael E. |
description | This paper examines the inflation forecast accuracy and rationality of a time series predictor, an expected inflation series constructed from surveys undertaken by the University of Michigan's Institute for Social Research, and the yield on U.S. Treasury bills. A quadratic loss function is assumed, and Theil's inequality ratios are used to decompose the mean squared foreast error (MSE). Although it is the only unbiased forecast, the time series predictor does not appear to be optimal during the recent period of turbulent inflation. As for bias in the other series, the surveys are inconsistent with weak-form rational expectations and the Treasury bill is reflecting variations in more than one factor. In an examination of the latter under the assumption of no liquidity premium, the results suggest that the forecast error is in part attribute to moderate variation in the expected real rate. Given the minimal cost of observing the Treasury bill yield, the findings of this study suggest that the market, although imperfect, has performed reasonably well in forecasting inflation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0148-2963(85)90040-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_196320727</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>0148296385900402</els_id><sourcerecordid>1347969523</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-df32c499db81a64ee319e2fb704ad7daf3333a4810cdf7a6c201df9997bba1563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kVtLBSEUhSUKOl3-QQ9DvRQ05W1GfQkiuhL0Us_i6JY8nDNzUovOv89porcStoqstdx-InRA8BnBpD3HhMuaqpYdy-ZEYcxxTTfQjEjBaqGE3ESzX8k22klpjjGmGMsZurnv_cLkMPSVHyJYk3I6rfIrVPC5ApvBVRHMooomQ2V6V4W-6JaTA7wPNkBv13toy5tFgv2fdRe93Fw_X93Vj0-391eXj7Xljcq184xarpTrJDEtB2BEAfWdwNw44YxnZRguCbbOC9NaionzSinRdYY0LdtFh1PuKg5v75Cyng_vsS9XalIeR7GgooiO_hQxLlSrGsqKik8qG4eUIni9imFp4loTrEesemSmR2ZaNvobq6bF9jDZIhQ-vx4AmHcREugPzQxhZVqPG1WszIRStNRqPJKi9Mr0a16WsIspDAqzjwBRp2-e4EL5i6zdEP7v5gtD2Zbl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1347969523</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inflation forecasts, the expected real rate and information efficiency</title><source>RePEc</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Leonard, David C. ; Solt, Michael E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Leonard, David C. ; Solt, Michael E.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the inflation forecast accuracy and rationality of a time series predictor, an expected inflation series constructed from surveys undertaken by the University of Michigan's Institute for Social Research, and the yield on U.S. Treasury bills. A quadratic loss function is assumed, and Theil's inequality ratios are used to decompose the mean squared foreast error (MSE). Although it is the only unbiased forecast, the time series predictor does not appear to be optimal during the recent period of turbulent inflation. As for bias in the other series, the surveys are inconsistent with weak-form rational expectations and the Treasury bill is reflecting variations in more than one factor. In an examination of the latter under the assumption of no liquidity premium, the results suggest that the forecast error is in part attribute to moderate variation in the expected real rate. Given the minimal cost of observing the Treasury bill yield, the findings of this study suggest that the market, although imperfect, has performed reasonably well in forecasting inflation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-2963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7978</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0148-2963(85)90040-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Expected ; Forecasts ; Inflation ; Information ; Rates ; Treasury bills</subject><ispartof>Journal of business research, 1985-01, Vol.13 (2), p.187-193</ispartof><rights>1985</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Apr 1985</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-df32c499db81a64ee319e2fb704ad7daf3333a4810cdf7a6c201df9997bba1563</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-df32c499db81a64ee319e2fb704ad7daf3333a4810cdf7a6c201df9997bba1563</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(85)90040-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,4008,27869,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeejbrese/v_3a13_3ay_3a1985_3ai_3a2_3ap_3a187-193.htm$$DView record in RePEc$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leonard, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solt, Michael E.</creatorcontrib><title>Inflation forecasts, the expected real rate and information efficiency</title><title>Journal of business research</title><description>This paper examines the inflation forecast accuracy and rationality of a time series predictor, an expected inflation series constructed from surveys undertaken by the University of Michigan's Institute for Social Research, and the yield on U.S. Treasury bills. A quadratic loss function is assumed, and Theil's inequality ratios are used to decompose the mean squared foreast error (MSE). Although it is the only unbiased forecast, the time series predictor does not appear to be optimal during the recent period of turbulent inflation. As for bias in the other series, the surveys are inconsistent with weak-form rational expectations and the Treasury bill is reflecting variations in more than one factor. In an examination of the latter under the assumption of no liquidity premium, the results suggest that the forecast error is in part attribute to moderate variation in the expected real rate. Given the minimal cost of observing the Treasury bill yield, the findings of this study suggest that the market, although imperfect, has performed reasonably well in forecasting inflation.</description><subject>Expected</subject><subject>Forecasts</subject><subject>Inflation</subject><subject>Information</subject><subject>Rates</subject><subject>Treasury bills</subject><issn>0148-2963</issn><issn>1873-7978</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>X2L</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kVtLBSEUhSUKOl3-QQ9DvRQ05W1GfQkiuhL0Us_i6JY8nDNzUovOv89porcStoqstdx-InRA8BnBpD3HhMuaqpYdy-ZEYcxxTTfQjEjBaqGE3ESzX8k22klpjjGmGMsZurnv_cLkMPSVHyJYk3I6rfIrVPC5ApvBVRHMooomQ2V6V4W-6JaTA7wPNkBv13toy5tFgv2fdRe93Fw_X93Vj0-391eXj7Xljcq184xarpTrJDEtB2BEAfWdwNw44YxnZRguCbbOC9NaionzSinRdYY0LdtFh1PuKg5v75Cyng_vsS9XalIeR7GgooiO_hQxLlSrGsqKik8qG4eUIni9imFp4loTrEesemSmR2ZaNvobq6bF9jDZIhQ-vx4AmHcREugPzQxhZVqPG1WszIRStNRqPJKi9Mr0a16WsIspDAqzjwBRp2-e4EL5i6zdEP7v5gtD2Zbl</recordid><startdate>19850101</startdate><enddate>19850101</enddate><creator>Leonard, David C.</creator><creator>Solt, Michael E.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>College of Business Administration, University of Georgia</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>DKI</scope><scope>X2L</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>SFNNT</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19850101</creationdate><title>Inflation forecasts, the expected real rate and information efficiency</title><author>Leonard, David C. ; Solt, Michael E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c459t-df32c499db81a64ee319e2fb704ad7daf3333a4810cdf7a6c201df9997bba1563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Expected</topic><topic>Forecasts</topic><topic>Inflation</topic><topic>Information</topic><topic>Rates</topic><topic>Treasury bills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leonard, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solt, Michael E.</creatorcontrib><collection>RePEc IDEAS</collection><collection>RePEc</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 44</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of business research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leonard, David C.</au><au>Solt, Michael E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inflation forecasts, the expected real rate and information efficiency</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business research</jtitle><date>1985-01-01</date><risdate>1985</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>187</spage><epage>193</epage><pages>187-193</pages><issn>0148-2963</issn><eissn>1873-7978</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the inflation forecast accuracy and rationality of a time series predictor, an expected inflation series constructed from surveys undertaken by the University of Michigan's Institute for Social Research, and the yield on U.S. Treasury bills. A quadratic loss function is assumed, and Theil's inequality ratios are used to decompose the mean squared foreast error (MSE). Although it is the only unbiased forecast, the time series predictor does not appear to be optimal during the recent period of turbulent inflation. As for bias in the other series, the surveys are inconsistent with weak-form rational expectations and the Treasury bill is reflecting variations in more than one factor. In an examination of the latter under the assumption of no liquidity premium, the results suggest that the forecast error is in part attribute to moderate variation in the expected real rate. Given the minimal cost of observing the Treasury bill yield, the findings of this study suggest that the market, although imperfect, has performed reasonably well in forecasting inflation.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/0148-2963(85)90040-2</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0148-2963 |
ispartof | Journal of business research, 1985-01, Vol.13 (2), p.187-193 |
issn | 0148-2963 1873-7978 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_196320727 |
source | RePEc; Periodicals Index Online; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Expected Forecasts Inflation Information Rates Treasury bills |
title | Inflation forecasts, the expected real rate and information efficiency |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T20%3A37%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inflation%20forecasts,%20the%20expected%20real%20rate%20and%20information%20efficiency&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20research&rft.au=Leonard,%20David%20C.&rft.date=1985-01-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=187&rft.epage=193&rft.pages=187-193&rft.issn=0148-2963&rft.eissn=1873-7978&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0148-2963(85)90040-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1347969523%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1347969523&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=0148296385900402&rfr_iscdi=true |