Pluralism on Artefact Categories: A Philosophical Defence
In this paper we use our work in the philosophy of technology to formulate a pluralist view on artefact categories and categorisation principles, as studied in cognitive science. We argue, on the basis of classifications derived by philosophical reconstruction, that artefacts can be clustered in mor...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Review of philosophy and psychology 2013-09, Vol.4 (3), p.543-557 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 557 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 543 |
| container_title | Review of philosophy and psychology |
| container_volume | 4 |
| creator | Houkes, Wybo Vermaas, Pieter E. |
| description | In this paper we use our work in the philosophy of technology to formulate a pluralist view on artefact categories and categorisation principles, as studied in cognitive science. We argue, on the basis of classifications derived by philosophical reconstruction, that artefacts can be clustered in more than one way, and that each clustering may be taken as defining psychological artefact categories. We contrast this pluralism with essentialism and super-minimalism on artefact categories and we argue that pluralism is coherent with experimental results regarding the context-dependence of artefact categorisation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s13164-013-0149-0 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1962748894</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1962748894</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-c89e2c9e02e8db99ad22ca7b6177e919f7419fda4d049525cd3c93e2ab453033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtqwzAQRUVpoSHNB3Rn6NqtXrY03Zn0CYFmkb1Q5HHi4Fiu5Cz691VwKd10YB6Le2eGQ8gto_eMUvUQmWClzCkTKSXk9ILMmFY6L1hZXv7Ohb4mixgPNIUAwQBmBNbdKdiujcfM91kVRmysG7OlHXHnQ4vxMauy9b7tfPTDvnW2y56wwd7hDblqbBdx8dPnZPPyvFm-5auP1_dltcpdemrMnQbkDpBy1PUWwNacO6u2JVMKgUGjZCq1lTWVUPDC1cKBQG63shBUiDm5m9YOwX-eMI7m4E-hTxcNg5IrqTXIpGKTygUfY8DGDKE92vBlGDVnRmZiZBIjc2ZkaPLwyROTtt9h-LP5X9M3Xy9nuQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1962748894</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pluralism on Artefact Categories: A Philosophical Defence</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Houkes, Wybo ; Vermaas, Pieter E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Houkes, Wybo ; Vermaas, Pieter E.</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper we use our work in the philosophy of technology to formulate a pluralist view on artefact categories and categorisation principles, as studied in cognitive science. We argue, on the basis of classifications derived by philosophical reconstruction, that artefacts can be clustered in more than one way, and that each clustering may be taken as defining psychological artefact categories. We contrast this pluralism with essentialism and super-minimalism on artefact categories and we argue that pluralism is coherent with experimental results regarding the context-dependence of artefact categorisation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1878-5158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-5166</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13164-013-0149-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Cognitive Psychology ; Developmental Psychology ; Education ; Epistemology ; Neurosciences ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Mind ; Philosophy of Science</subject><ispartof>Review of philosophy and psychology, 2013-09, Vol.4 (3), p.543-557</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013</rights><rights>Review of Philosophy and Psychology is a copyright of Springer, (2013). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-c89e2c9e02e8db99ad22ca7b6177e919f7419fda4d049525cd3c93e2ab453033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-c89e2c9e02e8db99ad22ca7b6177e919f7419fda4d049525cd3c93e2ab453033</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13164-013-0149-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13164-013-0149-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,41487,42556,51318</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Houkes, Wybo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermaas, Pieter E.</creatorcontrib><title>Pluralism on Artefact Categories: A Philosophical Defence</title><title>Review of philosophy and psychology</title><addtitle>Rev.Phil.Psych</addtitle><description>In this paper we use our work in the philosophy of technology to formulate a pluralist view on artefact categories and categorisation principles, as studied in cognitive science. We argue, on the basis of classifications derived by philosophical reconstruction, that artefacts can be clustered in more than one way, and that each clustering may be taken as defining psychological artefact categories. We contrast this pluralism with essentialism and super-minimalism on artefact categories and we argue that pluralism is coherent with experimental results regarding the context-dependence of artefact categorisation.</description><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Developmental Psychology</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Neurosciences</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Mind</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><issn>1878-5158</issn><issn>1878-5166</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMtqwzAQRUVpoSHNB3Rn6NqtXrY03Zn0CYFmkb1Q5HHi4Fiu5Cz691VwKd10YB6Le2eGQ8gto_eMUvUQmWClzCkTKSXk9ILMmFY6L1hZXv7Ohb4mixgPNIUAwQBmBNbdKdiujcfM91kVRmysG7OlHXHnQ4vxMauy9b7tfPTDvnW2y56wwd7hDblqbBdx8dPnZPPyvFm-5auP1_dltcpdemrMnQbkDpBy1PUWwNacO6u2JVMKgUGjZCq1lTWVUPDC1cKBQG63shBUiDm5m9YOwX-eMI7m4E-hTxcNg5IrqTXIpGKTygUfY8DGDKE92vBlGDVnRmZiZBIjc2ZkaPLwyROTtt9h-LP5X9M3Xy9nuQ</recordid><startdate>20130901</startdate><enddate>20130901</enddate><creator>Houkes, Wybo</creator><creator>Vermaas, Pieter E.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130901</creationdate><title>Pluralism on Artefact Categories: A Philosophical Defence</title><author>Houkes, Wybo ; Vermaas, Pieter E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-c89e2c9e02e8db99ad22ca7b6177e919f7419fda4d049525cd3c93e2ab453033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Developmental Psychology</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Neurosciences</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Mind</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Houkes, Wybo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vermaas, Pieter E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Review of philosophy and psychology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Houkes, Wybo</au><au>Vermaas, Pieter E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pluralism on Artefact Categories: A Philosophical Defence</atitle><jtitle>Review of philosophy and psychology</jtitle><stitle>Rev.Phil.Psych</stitle><date>2013-09-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>543</spage><epage>557</epage><pages>543-557</pages><issn>1878-5158</issn><eissn>1878-5166</eissn><abstract>In this paper we use our work in the philosophy of technology to formulate a pluralist view on artefact categories and categorisation principles, as studied in cognitive science. We argue, on the basis of classifications derived by philosophical reconstruction, that artefacts can be clustered in more than one way, and that each clustering may be taken as defining psychological artefact categories. We contrast this pluralism with essentialism and super-minimalism on artefact categories and we argue that pluralism is coherent with experimental results regarding the context-dependence of artefact categorisation.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s13164-013-0149-0</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1878-5158 |
| ispartof | Review of philosophy and psychology, 2013-09, Vol.4 (3), p.543-557 |
| issn | 1878-5158 1878-5166 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1962748894 |
| source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Cognitive Psychology Developmental Psychology Education Epistemology Neurosciences Philosophy Philosophy of Mind Philosophy of Science |
| title | Pluralism on Artefact Categories: A Philosophical Defence |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T03%3A43%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pluralism%20on%20Artefact%20Categories:%20A%20Philosophical%20Defence&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20philosophy%20and%20psychology&rft.au=Houkes,%20Wybo&rft.date=2013-09-01&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=543&rft.epage=557&rft.pages=543-557&rft.issn=1878-5158&rft.eissn=1878-5166&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13164-013-0149-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1962748894%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1962748894&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |