Effects of biofloc technology on reproduction and ovarian recrudescence in Nile tilapia
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the reproductive cycle, morphological changes of ovary and mobilization of energy reserves in Nile tilapia reared with biofloc technology (BFT). In general, the growth and reproductive performance were highly similar between BFT and Control system (clear...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Aquaculture research 2017-12, Vol.48 (12), p.5965-5972 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 5972 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 12 |
| container_start_page | 5965 |
| container_title | Aquaculture research |
| container_volume | 48 |
| creator | Ramos de Alvarenga, Érika Moreira de Sales, Suellen Cristina Soares de Brito, Túlio Santos, Cláudia Regina Dias Serafim Corrêa, Rebeca Oliveira Alves, Gabriel Francisco Guimarães Manduca, Ludson Maldonado Turra, Eduardo |
| description | The objectives of this study were to evaluate the reproductive cycle, morphological changes of ovary and mobilization of energy reserves in Nile tilapia reared with biofloc technology (BFT). In general, the growth and reproductive performance were highly similar between BFT and Control system (clear water). Difference between the systems was found in the hepatosomatic index (using mixed‐effects models), which suggested that BFT can alter the energy mobilization in the post‐spawning period. The absolute and relative fecundity, fertilization rate, number of larvae produced per female, gonadosomatic index, proportion of oogenesis cells, number of post‐ovulatory and atretic follicles were similar between the two systems. We also did not detect a reduction in the reproductive cycle length in Nile tilapia reared in BFT. Because there was no evidence of the negative effects of BFT on Nile tilapia reproduction, we concluded that BFT might be used for breeder stocking of this species. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/are.13420 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1962104414</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1962104414</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3320-aac8297599b647f9913e25d1cf3459718095278a5d53958c469aecc9c393c0ef3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEEmNw4B9E4sShW9IkbXOcpjGQJpAQCG5R5iaQqTQjaUH992SUK77Ylh9_vQhdUjKjyeY6mBllPCdHaEJZIbKcEnl8iIXIhChfT9FZjDtCKCeMTtDLyloDXcTe4q3ztvGAOwPvrW_824B9i4PZB1_30LmU6LbG_ksHpw8FCH1tIpgWDHYtvneNwZ1r9N7pc3RidRPNxZ-foueb1dPyNts8rO-Wi00GjOUk0xqqXJZCym3BSyslZSYXNQXLuJAlrYgUeVlpUQsmRQW8kNoASGCSATGWTdHVODcd-dmb2Kmd70ObVioqi_Q855Qn6nqkIPgYg7FqH9yHDoOiRB10U0k39atbYucj-53eGf4H1eJxNXb8AKcObl4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1962104414</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of biofloc technology on reproduction and ovarian recrudescence in Nile tilapia</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Ramos de Alvarenga, Érika ; Moreira de Sales, Suellen Cristina ; Soares de Brito, Túlio ; Santos, Cláudia Regina ; Dias Serafim Corrêa, Rebeca ; Oliveira Alves, Gabriel Francisco ; Guimarães Manduca, Ludson ; Maldonado Turra, Eduardo</creator><creatorcontrib>Ramos de Alvarenga, Érika ; Moreira de Sales, Suellen Cristina ; Soares de Brito, Túlio ; Santos, Cláudia Regina ; Dias Serafim Corrêa, Rebeca ; Oliveira Alves, Gabriel Francisco ; Guimarães Manduca, Ludson ; Maldonado Turra, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><description>The objectives of this study were to evaluate the reproductive cycle, morphological changes of ovary and mobilization of energy reserves in Nile tilapia reared with biofloc technology (BFT). In general, the growth and reproductive performance were highly similar between BFT and Control system (clear water). Difference between the systems was found in the hepatosomatic index (using mixed‐effects models), which suggested that BFT can alter the energy mobilization in the post‐spawning period. The absolute and relative fecundity, fertilization rate, number of larvae produced per female, gonadosomatic index, proportion of oogenesis cells, number of post‐ovulatory and atretic follicles were similar between the two systems. We also did not detect a reduction in the reproductive cycle length in Nile tilapia reared in BFT. Because there was no evidence of the negative effects of BFT on Nile tilapia reproduction, we concluded that BFT might be used for breeder stocking of this species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-557X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2109</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/are.13420</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Biofloc technology ; Biological fertilization ; Cells ; Energy reserves ; Fecundity ; Fertilization ; Fish ; Follicles ; Freshwater fishes ; Gonadosomatic index ; Larvae ; Oogenesis ; Oreochromis niloticus ; Ovaries ; ovary morphometry ; post‐spawn period ; Reproduction ; Reproductive cycle ; Spawning ; Stocking ; Technology ; Tilapia</subject><ispartof>Aquaculture research, 2017-12, Vol.48 (12), p.5965-5972</ispartof><rights>2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3320-aac8297599b647f9913e25d1cf3459718095278a5d53958c469aecc9c393c0ef3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3320-aac8297599b647f9913e25d1cf3459718095278a5d53958c469aecc9c393c0ef3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3489-989X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fare.13420$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fare.13420$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ramos de Alvarenga, Érika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreira de Sales, Suellen Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soares de Brito, Túlio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Cláudia Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias Serafim Corrêa, Rebeca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira Alves, Gabriel Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guimarães Manduca, Ludson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maldonado Turra, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of biofloc technology on reproduction and ovarian recrudescence in Nile tilapia</title><title>Aquaculture research</title><description>The objectives of this study were to evaluate the reproductive cycle, morphological changes of ovary and mobilization of energy reserves in Nile tilapia reared with biofloc technology (BFT). In general, the growth and reproductive performance were highly similar between BFT and Control system (clear water). Difference between the systems was found in the hepatosomatic index (using mixed‐effects models), which suggested that BFT can alter the energy mobilization in the post‐spawning period. The absolute and relative fecundity, fertilization rate, number of larvae produced per female, gonadosomatic index, proportion of oogenesis cells, number of post‐ovulatory and atretic follicles were similar between the two systems. We also did not detect a reduction in the reproductive cycle length in Nile tilapia reared in BFT. Because there was no evidence of the negative effects of BFT on Nile tilapia reproduction, we concluded that BFT might be used for breeder stocking of this species.</description><subject>Biofloc technology</subject><subject>Biological fertilization</subject><subject>Cells</subject><subject>Energy reserves</subject><subject>Fecundity</subject><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Follicles</subject><subject>Freshwater fishes</subject><subject>Gonadosomatic index</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Oogenesis</subject><subject>Oreochromis niloticus</subject><subject>Ovaries</subject><subject>ovary morphometry</subject><subject>post‐spawn period</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Reproductive cycle</subject><subject>Spawning</subject><subject>Stocking</subject><subject>Technology</subject><subject>Tilapia</subject><issn>1355-557X</issn><issn>1365-2109</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhiMEEmNw4B9E4sShW9IkbXOcpjGQJpAQCG5R5iaQqTQjaUH992SUK77Ylh9_vQhdUjKjyeY6mBllPCdHaEJZIbKcEnl8iIXIhChfT9FZjDtCKCeMTtDLyloDXcTe4q3ztvGAOwPvrW_824B9i4PZB1_30LmU6LbG_ksHpw8FCH1tIpgWDHYtvneNwZ1r9N7pc3RidRPNxZ-foueb1dPyNts8rO-Wi00GjOUk0xqqXJZCym3BSyslZSYXNQXLuJAlrYgUeVlpUQsmRQW8kNoASGCSATGWTdHVODcd-dmb2Kmd70ObVioqi_Q855Qn6nqkIPgYg7FqH9yHDoOiRB10U0k39atbYucj-53eGf4H1eJxNXb8AKcObl4</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Ramos de Alvarenga, Érika</creator><creator>Moreira de Sales, Suellen Cristina</creator><creator>Soares de Brito, Túlio</creator><creator>Santos, Cláudia Regina</creator><creator>Dias Serafim Corrêa, Rebeca</creator><creator>Oliveira Alves, Gabriel Francisco</creator><creator>Guimarães Manduca, Ludson</creator><creator>Maldonado Turra, Eduardo</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3489-989X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>Effects of biofloc technology on reproduction and ovarian recrudescence in Nile tilapia</title><author>Ramos de Alvarenga, Érika ; Moreira de Sales, Suellen Cristina ; Soares de Brito, Túlio ; Santos, Cláudia Regina ; Dias Serafim Corrêa, Rebeca ; Oliveira Alves, Gabriel Francisco ; Guimarães Manduca, Ludson ; Maldonado Turra, Eduardo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3320-aac8297599b647f9913e25d1cf3459718095278a5d53958c469aecc9c393c0ef3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Biofloc technology</topic><topic>Biological fertilization</topic><topic>Cells</topic><topic>Energy reserves</topic><topic>Fecundity</topic><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Follicles</topic><topic>Freshwater fishes</topic><topic>Gonadosomatic index</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Oogenesis</topic><topic>Oreochromis niloticus</topic><topic>Ovaries</topic><topic>ovary morphometry</topic><topic>post‐spawn period</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Reproductive cycle</topic><topic>Spawning</topic><topic>Stocking</topic><topic>Technology</topic><topic>Tilapia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ramos de Alvarenga, Érika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreira de Sales, Suellen Cristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soares de Brito, Túlio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santos, Cláudia Regina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dias Serafim Corrêa, Rebeca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira Alves, Gabriel Francisco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guimarães Manduca, Ludson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maldonado Turra, Eduardo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Aquaculture research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ramos de Alvarenga, Érika</au><au>Moreira de Sales, Suellen Cristina</au><au>Soares de Brito, Túlio</au><au>Santos, Cláudia Regina</au><au>Dias Serafim Corrêa, Rebeca</au><au>Oliveira Alves, Gabriel Francisco</au><au>Guimarães Manduca, Ludson</au><au>Maldonado Turra, Eduardo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of biofloc technology on reproduction and ovarian recrudescence in Nile tilapia</atitle><jtitle>Aquaculture research</jtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>5965</spage><epage>5972</epage><pages>5965-5972</pages><issn>1355-557X</issn><eissn>1365-2109</eissn><abstract>The objectives of this study were to evaluate the reproductive cycle, morphological changes of ovary and mobilization of energy reserves in Nile tilapia reared with biofloc technology (BFT). In general, the growth and reproductive performance were highly similar between BFT and Control system (clear water). Difference between the systems was found in the hepatosomatic index (using mixed‐effects models), which suggested that BFT can alter the energy mobilization in the post‐spawning period. The absolute and relative fecundity, fertilization rate, number of larvae produced per female, gonadosomatic index, proportion of oogenesis cells, number of post‐ovulatory and atretic follicles were similar between the two systems. We also did not detect a reduction in the reproductive cycle length in Nile tilapia reared in BFT. Because there was no evidence of the negative effects of BFT on Nile tilapia reproduction, we concluded that BFT might be used for breeder stocking of this species.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><doi>10.1111/are.13420</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3489-989X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1355-557X |
| ispartof | Aquaculture research, 2017-12, Vol.48 (12), p.5965-5972 |
| issn | 1355-557X 1365-2109 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1962104414 |
| source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Biofloc technology Biological fertilization Cells Energy reserves Fecundity Fertilization Fish Follicles Freshwater fishes Gonadosomatic index Larvae Oogenesis Oreochromis niloticus Ovaries ovary morphometry post‐spawn period Reproduction Reproductive cycle Spawning Stocking Technology Tilapia |
| title | Effects of biofloc technology on reproduction and ovarian recrudescence in Nile tilapia |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T20%3A11%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20biofloc%20technology%20on%20reproduction%20and%20ovarian%20recrudescence%20in%20Nile%20tilapia&rft.jtitle=Aquaculture%20research&rft.au=Ramos%20de%20Alvarenga,%20%C3%89rika&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=5965&rft.epage=5972&rft.pages=5965-5972&rft.issn=1355-557X&rft.eissn=1365-2109&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/are.13420&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1962104414%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1962104414&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |