Korea's growth‐driven trade policies: Inclusive or exclusive?

We attempted to find whether the Korea's growth‐driven trade policies during the period of its industrialisation has contributed to output growth together with income distribution by qualitatively analysing the performance of trade policies interacting with the multilateral trading system over...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:World economy 2017-11, Vol.40 (11), p.2475-2490
Hauptverfasser: Kang, Moonsung, Park, Innwon, Rhee, Dong‐Eun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2490
container_issue 11
container_start_page 2475
container_title World economy
container_volume 40
creator Kang, Moonsung
Park, Innwon
Rhee, Dong‐Eun
description We attempted to find whether the Korea's growth‐driven trade policies during the period of its industrialisation has contributed to output growth together with income distribution by qualitatively analysing the performance of trade policies interacting with the multilateral trading system over time. In addition, we conducted a regression analysis to investigate the effect of Korea's trade growth on inclusive growth during its industrialisation period covering the period of 1976–2011. We found that the recent reform policies reported in the WTO's Trade policy review for Korea in 2016 have attempted to achieve more balanced distribution of gains from trade but not enough to lead the Korean economy to a well‐balanced welfare state. More specifically, we found the positive effects of international trade on inclusive growth driven by strong output growth effect, not by the effect on income distribution. Even though income distribution measured by Gini indices has been worsened after the East Asian financial crisis, we could not find significant evidence that Korea's rapid international trade growth has been responsible for the deteriorating income inequality.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/twec.12556
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1962103932</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1962103932</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3666-ac4242ad7ac947d5909dd98110cd0d63c8fe2b2f0cd4869036e01362493ca10b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsXn2DBgyBsnUmy2Y0XkVK1WPBS8RjSJKtb1qYmW2tvPoLP6JO4dXt2LsPPfDMDHyGnCANs67JZOzNAmmVij_SQizyVOeA-6QHLizSTFA7JUYxzABScQo9cP_jg9HlMXoJfN68_X982VB9ukTRBW5csfV2ZysWrZLww9Sq2o8SHxH3uwvUxOSh1Hd3JrvfJ0-1oOrxPJ4934-HNJDVMCJFqwymn2ubaSJ7bTIK0VhaIYCxYwUxROjqjZRt5ISQw4QCZoFwyoxFmrE_OurvL4N9XLjZq7ldh0b5UKAVFYJLRlrroKBN8jMGVahmqNx02CkFtBamtIPUnqIWxg9dV7Tb_kGr6PBp2O7_Bi2hh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1962103932</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Korea's growth‐driven trade policies: Inclusive or exclusive?</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Kang, Moonsung ; Park, Innwon ; Rhee, Dong‐Eun</creator><creatorcontrib>Kang, Moonsung ; Park, Innwon ; Rhee, Dong‐Eun</creatorcontrib><description>We attempted to find whether the Korea's growth‐driven trade policies during the period of its industrialisation has contributed to output growth together with income distribution by qualitatively analysing the performance of trade policies interacting with the multilateral trading system over time. In addition, we conducted a regression analysis to investigate the effect of Korea's trade growth on inclusive growth during its industrialisation period covering the period of 1976–2011. We found that the recent reform policies reported in the WTO's Trade policy review for Korea in 2016 have attempted to achieve more balanced distribution of gains from trade but not enough to lead the Korean economy to a well‐balanced welfare state. More specifically, we found the positive effects of international trade on inclusive growth driven by strong output growth effect, not by the effect on income distribution. Even though income distribution measured by Gini indices has been worsened after the East Asian financial crisis, we could not find significant evidence that Korea's rapid international trade growth has been responsible for the deteriorating income inequality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-5920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9701</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/twec.12556</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Economic analysis ; Economic crisis ; Economic models ; Global economy ; inclusive growth ; Income distribution ; Income inequality ; Indexes ; Industrialization ; International trade ; Korea ; Multilateralism ; Reforms ; Regression analysis ; Trade policy ; Trading ; Welfare state ; WTO</subject><ispartof>World economy, 2017-11, Vol.40 (11), p.2475-2490</ispartof><rights>2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3666-ac4242ad7ac947d5909dd98110cd0d63c8fe2b2f0cd4869036e01362493ca10b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3666-ac4242ad7ac947d5909dd98110cd0d63c8fe2b2f0cd4869036e01362493ca10b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ftwec.12556$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ftwec.12556$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27866,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kang, Moonsung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Innwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhee, Dong‐Eun</creatorcontrib><title>Korea's growth‐driven trade policies: Inclusive or exclusive?</title><title>World economy</title><description>We attempted to find whether the Korea's growth‐driven trade policies during the period of its industrialisation has contributed to output growth together with income distribution by qualitatively analysing the performance of trade policies interacting with the multilateral trading system over time. In addition, we conducted a regression analysis to investigate the effect of Korea's trade growth on inclusive growth during its industrialisation period covering the period of 1976–2011. We found that the recent reform policies reported in the WTO's Trade policy review for Korea in 2016 have attempted to achieve more balanced distribution of gains from trade but not enough to lead the Korean economy to a well‐balanced welfare state. More specifically, we found the positive effects of international trade on inclusive growth driven by strong output growth effect, not by the effect on income distribution. Even though income distribution measured by Gini indices has been worsened after the East Asian financial crisis, we could not find significant evidence that Korea's rapid international trade growth has been responsible for the deteriorating income inequality.</description><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Economic crisis</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Global economy</subject><subject>inclusive growth</subject><subject>Income distribution</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Indexes</subject><subject>Industrialization</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>Korea</subject><subject>Multilateralism</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Trade policy</subject><subject>Trading</subject><subject>Welfare state</subject><subject>WTO</subject><issn>0378-5920</issn><issn>1467-9701</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsXn2DBgyBsnUmy2Y0XkVK1WPBS8RjSJKtb1qYmW2tvPoLP6JO4dXt2LsPPfDMDHyGnCANs67JZOzNAmmVij_SQizyVOeA-6QHLizSTFA7JUYxzABScQo9cP_jg9HlMXoJfN68_X982VB9ukTRBW5csfV2ZysWrZLww9Sq2o8SHxH3uwvUxOSh1Hd3JrvfJ0-1oOrxPJ4934-HNJDVMCJFqwymn2ubaSJ7bTIK0VhaIYCxYwUxROjqjZRt5ISQw4QCZoFwyoxFmrE_OurvL4N9XLjZq7ldh0b5UKAVFYJLRlrroKBN8jMGVahmqNx02CkFtBamtIPUnqIWxg9dV7Tb_kGr6PBp2O7_Bi2hh</recordid><startdate>201711</startdate><enddate>201711</enddate><creator>Kang, Moonsung</creator><creator>Park, Innwon</creator><creator>Rhee, Dong‐Eun</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201711</creationdate><title>Korea's growth‐driven trade policies: Inclusive or exclusive?</title><author>Kang, Moonsung ; Park, Innwon ; Rhee, Dong‐Eun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3666-ac4242ad7ac947d5909dd98110cd0d63c8fe2b2f0cd4869036e01362493ca10b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Economic crisis</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Global economy</topic><topic>inclusive growth</topic><topic>Income distribution</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Indexes</topic><topic>Industrialization</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>Korea</topic><topic>Multilateralism</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Trade policy</topic><topic>Trading</topic><topic>Welfare state</topic><topic>WTO</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kang, Moonsung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Park, Innwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhee, Dong‐Eun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>World economy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kang, Moonsung</au><au>Park, Innwon</au><au>Rhee, Dong‐Eun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Korea's growth‐driven trade policies: Inclusive or exclusive?</atitle><jtitle>World economy</jtitle><date>2017-11</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>2475</spage><epage>2490</epage><pages>2475-2490</pages><issn>0378-5920</issn><eissn>1467-9701</eissn><abstract>We attempted to find whether the Korea's growth‐driven trade policies during the period of its industrialisation has contributed to output growth together with income distribution by qualitatively analysing the performance of trade policies interacting with the multilateral trading system over time. In addition, we conducted a regression analysis to investigate the effect of Korea's trade growth on inclusive growth during its industrialisation period covering the period of 1976–2011. We found that the recent reform policies reported in the WTO's Trade policy review for Korea in 2016 have attempted to achieve more balanced distribution of gains from trade but not enough to lead the Korean economy to a well‐balanced welfare state. More specifically, we found the positive effects of international trade on inclusive growth driven by strong output growth effect, not by the effect on income distribution. Even though income distribution measured by Gini indices has been worsened after the East Asian financial crisis, we could not find significant evidence that Korea's rapid international trade growth has been responsible for the deteriorating income inequality.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/twec.12556</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-5920
ispartof World economy, 2017-11, Vol.40 (11), p.2475-2490
issn 0378-5920
1467-9701
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1962103932
source Wiley Journals; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Business Source Complete; Political Science Complete
subjects Economic analysis
Economic crisis
Economic models
Global economy
inclusive growth
Income distribution
Income inequality
Indexes
Industrialization
International trade
Korea
Multilateralism
Reforms
Regression analysis
Trade policy
Trading
Welfare state
WTO
title Korea's growth‐driven trade policies: Inclusive or exclusive?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T07%3A52%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Korea's%20growth%E2%80%90driven%20trade%20policies:%20Inclusive%20or%20exclusive?&rft.jtitle=World%20economy&rft.au=Kang,%20Moonsung&rft.date=2017-11&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=2475&rft.epage=2490&rft.pages=2475-2490&rft.issn=0378-5920&rft.eissn=1467-9701&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/twec.12556&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1962103932%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1962103932&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true