Share of anthropophytes in the crop sequence: winter wheat – maize – spring wheat depending on tillage system

An experiment, conducted over the period 2008–2010, evaluated the effect of tillage system on the occurrence and species composition of anthropophytes in winter wheat, maize and spring wheat. Regardless of crop plant and tillage system, anthropophytes (73.9%), represented by archaeophytes and kenoph...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta Agrobotanica 2014, Vol.67 (2), p.117-122
Hauptverfasser: Sekutowski, Tomasz R., Smagacz, Janusz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 122
container_issue 2
container_start_page 117
container_title Acta Agrobotanica
container_volume 67
creator Sekutowski, Tomasz R.
Smagacz, Janusz
description An experiment, conducted over the period 2008–2010, evaluated the effect of tillage system on the occurrence and species composition of anthropophytes in winter wheat, maize and spring wheat. Regardless of crop plant and tillage system, anthropophytes (73.9%), represented by archaeophytes and kenophytes, were the main component of the flora in the crops studied, whereas apophytes accounted for the remaining 26.1%. Most archaeophytes (13 species) were found in the spring wheat crop under no-tillage, while their lowest number (6 species) occurred in the spring wheat crop under conventional tillage. The only kenophyte, Conyza canadensis, was found to occur in the spring wheat and maize crops in the no-tillage system. The following taxa were dominant species among archeophytes: Geranium pusillum, Anthemis arvensis, and Viola arvensis (regardless of tillage system and crop plant), Anthemis arvensis (in spring wheat – conventional tillage), Echinochloa crus-galli and Setaria glauca (in maize – reduced tillage and no-tillage), Chenopodium album (in maize – no-tillage) as well as Apera spica-venti, Anthemis arvensis and Papaver rhoeas (in winter wheat – no-tillage).
doi_str_mv 10.5586/aa.2014.016
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1961811075</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_61b156b01f9b4b0ca7b3fdae23aa7aca</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>1961811075</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-3ed9145fe4eed5b1a7e32be775dcb3d5e62b59d3ff7bdb47e1ba6d8c52fc62f43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UctqHDEQFCGBLI5P-YAIcgyz0WMkzeQWTBIbDDk4htxES2rtzLI7GktjzPqUf8gf-kui9Zr0pV9FdVNFyHvO1kp1-jPAWjDerhnXr8hKSMYaqczv12TFmFYN6xV_S85L2bIaSkvZmRW5uxkgI02RwrQMOc1pHg4LFjpOdBmQ-jqiBe_ucfL4hT6M04KZPgwIC33685fuYXzE56rMeZw2L6uAM07h2KfKM-52sEFaDmXB_TvyJsKu4PlLPiO337_9urhsrn_-uLr4et14ofXSSAw9b1XEFjEox8GgFA6NUcE7GRRq4VQfZIzGBdca5A506LwS0WsRW3lGrk68IcHW1uf2kA82wWifBylvLORl9Du0mjuutGM89q51zINxMgZAIQEMeKhcH09cc05VirLYbbrPU33f8l7zjnNmVEV9OqGqaKVkjP-vcmaPFlkAe7TIVosq-sMJHSFZ2OSx2NubutWMcaM6I-Q_-VuREA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1961811075</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Share of anthropophytes in the crop sequence: winter wheat – maize – spring wheat depending on tillage system</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Sekutowski, Tomasz R. ; Smagacz, Janusz</creator><creatorcontrib>Sekutowski, Tomasz R. ; Smagacz, Janusz</creatorcontrib><description>An experiment, conducted over the period 2008–2010, evaluated the effect of tillage system on the occurrence and species composition of anthropophytes in winter wheat, maize and spring wheat. Regardless of crop plant and tillage system, anthropophytes (73.9%), represented by archaeophytes and kenophytes, were the main component of the flora in the crops studied, whereas apophytes accounted for the remaining 26.1%. Most archaeophytes (13 species) were found in the spring wheat crop under no-tillage, while their lowest number (6 species) occurred in the spring wheat crop under conventional tillage. The only kenophyte, Conyza canadensis, was found to occur in the spring wheat and maize crops in the no-tillage system. The following taxa were dominant species among archeophytes: Geranium pusillum, Anthemis arvensis, and Viola arvensis (regardless of tillage system and crop plant), Anthemis arvensis (in spring wheat – conventional tillage), Echinochloa crus-galli and Setaria glauca (in maize – reduced tillage and no-tillage), Chenopodium album (in maize – no-tillage) as well as Apera spica-venti, Anthemis arvensis and Papaver rhoeas (in winter wheat – no-tillage).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0065-0951</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 2300-357X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2300-357X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5586/aa.2014.016</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Warsaw: Polish Botanical Society</publisher><subject>Anthemis arvensis ; anthropophytes ; Apera spica-venti ; Chenopodium album ; Conyza canadensis ; Corn ; Crops ; Echinochloa crus-galli ; maize ; Nitrogen ; Papaver rhoeas ; Setaria glauca ; Species composition ; spring wheat ; Tillage ; tillage system ; Triticum aestivum ; Wheat ; winter wheat</subject><ispartof>Acta Agrobotanica, 2014, Vol.67 (2), p.117-122</ispartof><rights>Copyright (c) 2014 Tomasz R. Sekutowski, Janusz Smagacz. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0 (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-3ed9145fe4eed5b1a7e32be775dcb3d5e62b59d3ff7bdb47e1ba6d8c52fc62f43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,4010,27900,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sekutowski, Tomasz R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smagacz, Janusz</creatorcontrib><title>Share of anthropophytes in the crop sequence: winter wheat – maize – spring wheat depending on tillage system</title><title>Acta Agrobotanica</title><description>An experiment, conducted over the period 2008–2010, evaluated the effect of tillage system on the occurrence and species composition of anthropophytes in winter wheat, maize and spring wheat. Regardless of crop plant and tillage system, anthropophytes (73.9%), represented by archaeophytes and kenophytes, were the main component of the flora in the crops studied, whereas apophytes accounted for the remaining 26.1%. Most archaeophytes (13 species) were found in the spring wheat crop under no-tillage, while their lowest number (6 species) occurred in the spring wheat crop under conventional tillage. The only kenophyte, Conyza canadensis, was found to occur in the spring wheat and maize crops in the no-tillage system. The following taxa were dominant species among archeophytes: Geranium pusillum, Anthemis arvensis, and Viola arvensis (regardless of tillage system and crop plant), Anthemis arvensis (in spring wheat – conventional tillage), Echinochloa crus-galli and Setaria glauca (in maize – reduced tillage and no-tillage), Chenopodium album (in maize – no-tillage) as well as Apera spica-venti, Anthemis arvensis and Papaver rhoeas (in winter wheat – no-tillage).</description><subject>Anthemis arvensis</subject><subject>anthropophytes</subject><subject>Apera spica-venti</subject><subject>Chenopodium album</subject><subject>Conyza canadensis</subject><subject>Corn</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Echinochloa crus-galli</subject><subject>maize</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Papaver rhoeas</subject><subject>Setaria glauca</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>spring wheat</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>tillage system</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><subject>winter wheat</subject><issn>0065-0951</issn><issn>2300-357X</issn><issn>2300-357X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UctqHDEQFCGBLI5P-YAIcgyz0WMkzeQWTBIbDDk4htxES2rtzLI7GktjzPqUf8gf-kui9Zr0pV9FdVNFyHvO1kp1-jPAWjDerhnXr8hKSMYaqczv12TFmFYN6xV_S85L2bIaSkvZmRW5uxkgI02RwrQMOc1pHg4LFjpOdBmQ-jqiBe_ucfL4hT6M04KZPgwIC33685fuYXzE56rMeZw2L6uAM07h2KfKM-52sEFaDmXB_TvyJsKu4PlLPiO337_9urhsrn_-uLr4et14ofXSSAw9b1XEFjEox8GgFA6NUcE7GRRq4VQfZIzGBdca5A506LwS0WsRW3lGrk68IcHW1uf2kA82wWifBylvLORl9Du0mjuutGM89q51zINxMgZAIQEMeKhcH09cc05VirLYbbrPU33f8l7zjnNmVEV9OqGqaKVkjP-vcmaPFlkAe7TIVosq-sMJHSFZ2OSx2NubutWMcaM6I-Q_-VuREA</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Sekutowski, Tomasz R.</creator><creator>Smagacz, Janusz</creator><general>Polish Botanical Society</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>Share of anthropophytes in the crop sequence: winter wheat – maize – spring wheat depending on tillage system</title><author>Sekutowski, Tomasz R. ; Smagacz, Janusz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c266t-3ed9145fe4eed5b1a7e32be775dcb3d5e62b59d3ff7bdb47e1ba6d8c52fc62f43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Anthemis arvensis</topic><topic>anthropophytes</topic><topic>Apera spica-venti</topic><topic>Chenopodium album</topic><topic>Conyza canadensis</topic><topic>Corn</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Echinochloa crus-galli</topic><topic>maize</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Papaver rhoeas</topic><topic>Setaria glauca</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>spring wheat</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>tillage system</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><topic>winter wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sekutowski, Tomasz R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smagacz, Janusz</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Acta Agrobotanica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sekutowski, Tomasz R.</au><au>Smagacz, Janusz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Share of anthropophytes in the crop sequence: winter wheat – maize – spring wheat depending on tillage system</atitle><jtitle>Acta Agrobotanica</jtitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>67</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>117</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>117-122</pages><issn>0065-0951</issn><issn>2300-357X</issn><eissn>2300-357X</eissn><abstract>An experiment, conducted over the period 2008–2010, evaluated the effect of tillage system on the occurrence and species composition of anthropophytes in winter wheat, maize and spring wheat. Regardless of crop plant and tillage system, anthropophytes (73.9%), represented by archaeophytes and kenophytes, were the main component of the flora in the crops studied, whereas apophytes accounted for the remaining 26.1%. Most archaeophytes (13 species) were found in the spring wheat crop under no-tillage, while their lowest number (6 species) occurred in the spring wheat crop under conventional tillage. The only kenophyte, Conyza canadensis, was found to occur in the spring wheat and maize crops in the no-tillage system. The following taxa were dominant species among archeophytes: Geranium pusillum, Anthemis arvensis, and Viola arvensis (regardless of tillage system and crop plant), Anthemis arvensis (in spring wheat – conventional tillage), Echinochloa crus-galli and Setaria glauca (in maize – reduced tillage and no-tillage), Chenopodium album (in maize – no-tillage) as well as Apera spica-venti, Anthemis arvensis and Papaver rhoeas (in winter wheat – no-tillage).</abstract><cop>Warsaw</cop><pub>Polish Botanical Society</pub><doi>10.5586/aa.2014.016</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0065-0951
ispartof Acta Agrobotanica, 2014, Vol.67 (2), p.117-122
issn 0065-0951
2300-357X
2300-357X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1961811075
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Anthemis arvensis
anthropophytes
Apera spica-venti
Chenopodium album
Conyza canadensis
Corn
Crops
Echinochloa crus-galli
maize
Nitrogen
Papaver rhoeas
Setaria glauca
Species composition
spring wheat
Tillage
tillage system
Triticum aestivum
Wheat
winter wheat
title Share of anthropophytes in the crop sequence: winter wheat – maize – spring wheat depending on tillage system
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T21%3A48%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Share%20of%20anthropophytes%20in%20the%20crop%20sequence:%20winter%20wheat%20%E2%80%93%20maize%20%E2%80%93%20spring%20wheat%20depending%20on%20tillage%20system&rft.jtitle=Acta%20Agrobotanica&rft.au=Sekutowski,%20Tomasz%20R.&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=67&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=117&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=117-122&rft.issn=0065-0951&rft.eissn=2300-357X&rft_id=info:doi/10.5586/aa.2014.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E1961811075%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1961811075&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_61b156b01f9b4b0ca7b3fdae23aa7aca&rfr_iscdi=true