Pragmatism and Radical Behaviorism: A Response to Leigland

Pragmatism and Radical Behaviorism: A Response to Leigland

Leigland notes that the relation between radical behaviorism and pragmatism is complex and cites Richard Rorty as an exemplar of pragmatism. But Rorty promotes a bizarre version of pragmatism, not to be associated with radical behaviorism or with pragmatism as Peirce conceived it. Rorty is a monist...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Behavior and philosophy 2004-01, Vol.32 (2), p.313-315
1. Verfasser: Malone, John C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Behaviorism
Humanism
Ontology
Philosophy
Philosophy of action
Pragmatism
Theory of values and moral philosophy. Philosophy of action
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 315
container_issue 2
container_start_page 313
container_title Behavior and philosophy
container_volume 32
creator Malone, John C.
description Leigland notes that the relation between radical behaviorism and pragmatism is complex and cites Richard Rorty as an exemplar of pragmatism. But Rorty promotes a bizarre version of pragmatism, not to be associated with radical behaviorism or with pragmatism as Peirce conceived it. Rorty is a monist and a brilliant writer, but he dismisses religion and science in favor of a humanistic ontology that is based on "imaginative literature." Skinner would never agree with such a position, and those who would understand pragmatism are advised to read Peirce, not Rorty.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_195988647</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>27759489</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>27759489</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j234t-8700c2a592d72535eab4f6f91cfd5bbe9419bdc31eca7a7db24e19e83985f8a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9zt9LwzAQB_AiCs7pnyAEwcdCkkuaZG9z-AsKytDncm3TmdI1NekE_3sDGz7dcffhvneWLZgRkANwfZ56KiHXIPRldhVjTylVHIpFtnoPuNvj7OKe4NiSLbauwYE82C_8cT6k-YqsydbGyY_RktmT0rrdkOx1dtHhEO3NqS6zz6fHj81LXr49v27WZd5zEHOuFaUNR2l4q7gEabEWXdEZ1nStrGtrBDN12wCzDSpUbc2FZcZqMFp2GjUss7vj3Sn474ONc9X7QxhTZMWMNFoXQiV0f0IY0_9dwLFxsZqC22P4rZiiKZvS5G6Pro-zD_97rpQ0Qhv4A6NXWf4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195988647</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pragmatism and Radical Behaviorism: A Response to Leigland</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Malone, John C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Malone, John C.</creatorcontrib><description>Leigland notes that the relation between radical behaviorism and pragmatism is complex and cites Richard Rorty as an exemplar of pragmatism. But Rorty promotes a bizarre version of pragmatism, not to be associated with radical behaviorism or with pragmatism as Peirce conceived it. Rorty is a monist and a brilliant writer, but he dismisses religion and science in favor of a humanistic ontology that is based on "imaginative literature." Skinner would never agree with such a position, and those who would understand pragmatism are advised to read Peirce, not Rorty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8348</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-3328</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies</publisher><subject>Behaviorism ; Humanism ; Ontology ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of action ; Pragmatism ; Theory of values and moral philosophy. Philosophy of action</subject><ispartof>Behavior and philosophy, 2004-01, Vol.32 (2), p.313-315</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2004 Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/27759489$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/27759489$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17025300$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Malone, John C.</creatorcontrib><title>Pragmatism and Radical Behaviorism: A Response to Leigland</title><title>Behavior and philosophy</title><description>Leigland notes that the relation between radical behaviorism and pragmatism is complex and cites Richard Rorty as an exemplar of pragmatism. But Rorty promotes a bizarre version of pragmatism, not to be associated with radical behaviorism or with pragmatism as Peirce conceived it. Rorty is a monist and a brilliant writer, but he dismisses religion and science in favor of a humanistic ontology that is based on "imaginative literature." Skinner would never agree with such a position, and those who would understand pragmatism are advised to read Peirce, not Rorty.</description><subject>Behaviorism</subject><subject>Humanism</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of action</subject><subject>Pragmatism</subject><subject>Theory of values and moral philosophy. Philosophy of action</subject><issn>1053-8348</issn><issn>1943-3328</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><recordid>eNo9zt9LwzAQB_AiCs7pnyAEwcdCkkuaZG9z-AsKytDncm3TmdI1NekE_3sDGz7dcffhvneWLZgRkANwfZ56KiHXIPRldhVjTylVHIpFtnoPuNvj7OKe4NiSLbauwYE82C_8cT6k-YqsydbGyY_RktmT0rrdkOx1dtHhEO3NqS6zz6fHj81LXr49v27WZd5zEHOuFaUNR2l4q7gEabEWXdEZ1nStrGtrBDN12wCzDSpUbc2FZcZqMFp2GjUss7vj3Sn474ONc9X7QxhTZMWMNFoXQiV0f0IY0_9dwLFxsZqC22P4rZiiKZvS5G6Pro-zD_97rpQ0Qhv4A6NXWf4</recordid><startdate>20040101</startdate><enddate>20040101</enddate><creator>Malone, John C.</creator><general>Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040101</creationdate><title>Pragmatism and Radical Behaviorism: A Response to Leigland</title><author>Malone, John C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j234t-8700c2a592d72535eab4f6f91cfd5bbe9419bdc31eca7a7db24e19e83985f8a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Behaviorism</topic><topic>Humanism</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of action</topic><topic>Pragmatism</topic><topic>Theory of values and moral philosophy. Philosophy of action</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Malone, John C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Behavior and philosophy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Malone, John C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pragmatism and Radical Behaviorism: A Response to Leigland</atitle><jtitle>Behavior and philosophy</jtitle><date>2004-01-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>313</spage><epage>315</epage><pages>313-315</pages><issn>1053-8348</issn><eissn>1943-3328</eissn><abstract>Leigland notes that the relation between radical behaviorism and pragmatism is complex and cites Richard Rorty as an exemplar of pragmatism. But Rorty promotes a bizarre version of pragmatism, not to be associated with radical behaviorism or with pragmatism as Peirce conceived it. Rorty is a monist and a brilliant writer, but he dismisses religion and science in favor of a humanistic ontology that is based on "imaginative literature." Skinner would never agree with such a position, and those who would understand pragmatism are advised to read Peirce, not Rorty.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, MA</cop><pub>Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies</pub><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-8348
ispartof Behavior and philosophy, 2004-01, Vol.32 (2), p.313-315
issn 1053-8348
1943-3328
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_195988647
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Behaviorism
Humanism
Ontology
Philosophy
Philosophy of action
Pragmatism
Theory of values and moral philosophy. Philosophy of action
title Pragmatism and Radical Behaviorism: A Response to Leigland
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T02%3A04%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pragmatism%20and%20Radical%20Behaviorism:%20A%20Response%20to%20Leigland&rft.jtitle=Behavior%20and%20philosophy&rft.au=Malone,%20John%20C.&rft.date=2004-01-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=313&rft.epage=315&rft.pages=313-315&rft.issn=1053-8348&rft.eissn=1943-3328&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E27759489%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195988647&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=27759489&rfr_iscdi=true