Can asymmetry impact performance, collaboration and integration? An empirical study
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to examine the influence of asymmetric environments on collaboration, integration, and performance during supply chain management processes. Design/methodology/approach The study conducted in the industrial sector of two markets – Spain and Poland – considering d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The international journal of logistics management 2017-01, Vol.28 (4), p.939-963 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 963 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 939 |
container_title | The international journal of logistics management |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Michalski, Marek Montes-Botella, Jose Luis Guevara Piedra, Washington |
description | Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine the influence of asymmetric environments on collaboration, integration, and performance during supply chain management processes.
Design/methodology/approach
The study conducted in the industrial sector of two markets – Spain and Poland – considering disparate behaviors among organizations and their managers. Using data collected from 133 firms and advanced partial least squares regression modeling, a number of direct and moderating effects are hypothesized and tested.
Findings
The authors found that existing asymmetry may prevent achievement of optimum equilibrium. Seven of the ten research hypotheses were validated, providing strong support for the significant role that asymmetry can play in managing supply chains (SCs). This result suggests that managers need to consider whether maximum collaboration or integration with SC partners is possible under the strong influence of asymmetry. The findings provide rational insights to SC managers regarding adequate measures to reduce imbalanced relationships and establish equilibrium between partners under varying contexts of collaboration and integration.
Research limitations/implications
This study was conducted in only two countries, so generalizations are limited. Furthermore, there are improvements to be made in sample design to allow for further validation and enhancement of the model and method.
Practical implications
Findings provide rational insights to managers regarding when it is adequate to reduce imbalanced relationships with partners under varying contexts of collaboration and integration.
Originality/value
Collaboration and integration have been well studied in many fields but this research suggests that managers in asymmetric environments must understand that development of strategies based on integration might be impossible to realize. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/IJLM-03-2016-0084 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1958171050</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1958171050</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-a3357634a4834daf1915e3cc677a0d81db758632c031e1ba9364ebe45ca9b4fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Br0ZnNkk_TrIsrq6seFDPYZqm0qVfJt1D_70t9SJ4Ggae953hYewa4Q4Rkvvdy_5VgBQrwEgAJOqELTDWiYi0hlO2gFTHQkEqz9lFCAcYEcBkwd431HAKQ1273g-8rDuyPe-cL1pfU2PdLbdtVVHWeurLdmSbnJdN777m_YGvG-7qrvSlpYqH_pgPl-ysoCq4q9-5ZJ_bx4_Ns9i_Pe02672wUkW9ICl1HElFKpEqpwJT1E5aG8UxQZ5gno3_R3JlQaLDjFIZKZc5pS2lmSqsXLKbubfz7ffRhd4c2qNvxpMGU51gjKBhpHCmrG9D8K4wnS9r8oNBMJM7M7kzIM3kzkzuxgzMGVc7T1X-b-SPbvkDCQFwfw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1958171050</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Can asymmetry impact performance, collaboration and integration? An empirical study</title><source>https://0-www.emerald.com.wam.seals.ac.za/insight</source><creator>Michalski, Marek ; Montes-Botella, Jose Luis ; Guevara Piedra, Washington</creator><creatorcontrib>Michalski, Marek ; Montes-Botella, Jose Luis ; Guevara Piedra, Washington</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine the influence of asymmetric environments on collaboration, integration, and performance during supply chain management processes.
Design/methodology/approach
The study conducted in the industrial sector of two markets – Spain and Poland – considering disparate behaviors among organizations and their managers. Using data collected from 133 firms and advanced partial least squares regression modeling, a number of direct and moderating effects are hypothesized and tested.
Findings
The authors found that existing asymmetry may prevent achievement of optimum equilibrium. Seven of the ten research hypotheses were validated, providing strong support for the significant role that asymmetry can play in managing supply chains (SCs). This result suggests that managers need to consider whether maximum collaboration or integration with SC partners is possible under the strong influence of asymmetry. The findings provide rational insights to SC managers regarding adequate measures to reduce imbalanced relationships and establish equilibrium between partners under varying contexts of collaboration and integration.
Research limitations/implications
This study was conducted in only two countries, so generalizations are limited. Furthermore, there are improvements to be made in sample design to allow for further validation and enhancement of the model and method.
Practical implications
Findings provide rational insights to managers regarding when it is adequate to reduce imbalanced relationships with partners under varying contexts of collaboration and integration.
Originality/value
Collaboration and integration have been well studied in many fields but this research suggests that managers in asymmetric environments must understand that development of strategies based on integration might be impossible to realize.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-4093</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6550</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/IJLM-03-2016-0084</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ponte Vedra Beach: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Asymmetry ; Behavior ; Collaboration ; Competitive advantage ; Customer satisfaction ; Equilibrium ; Hypothesis testing ; Information sharing ; Integrated approach ; Knowledge sharing ; Literature reviews ; Logistics ; Managers ; Studies ; Suppliers ; Supply chain management</subject><ispartof>The international journal of logistics management, 2017-01, Vol.28 (4), p.939-963</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-a3357634a4834daf1915e3cc677a0d81db758632c031e1ba9364ebe45ca9b4fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-a3357634a4834daf1915e3cc677a0d81db758632c031e1ba9364ebe45ca9b4fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJLM-03-2016-0084/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21693,27922,27923,53242</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Michalski, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montes-Botella, Jose Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guevara Piedra, Washington</creatorcontrib><title>Can asymmetry impact performance, collaboration and integration? An empirical study</title><title>The international journal of logistics management</title><description>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine the influence of asymmetric environments on collaboration, integration, and performance during supply chain management processes.
Design/methodology/approach
The study conducted in the industrial sector of two markets – Spain and Poland – considering disparate behaviors among organizations and their managers. Using data collected from 133 firms and advanced partial least squares regression modeling, a number of direct and moderating effects are hypothesized and tested.
Findings
The authors found that existing asymmetry may prevent achievement of optimum equilibrium. Seven of the ten research hypotheses were validated, providing strong support for the significant role that asymmetry can play in managing supply chains (SCs). This result suggests that managers need to consider whether maximum collaboration or integration with SC partners is possible under the strong influence of asymmetry. The findings provide rational insights to SC managers regarding adequate measures to reduce imbalanced relationships and establish equilibrium between partners under varying contexts of collaboration and integration.
Research limitations/implications
This study was conducted in only two countries, so generalizations are limited. Furthermore, there are improvements to be made in sample design to allow for further validation and enhancement of the model and method.
Practical implications
Findings provide rational insights to managers regarding when it is adequate to reduce imbalanced relationships with partners under varying contexts of collaboration and integration.
Originality/value
Collaboration and integration have been well studied in many fields but this research suggests that managers in asymmetric environments must understand that development of strategies based on integration might be impossible to realize.</description><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Competitive advantage</subject><subject>Customer satisfaction</subject><subject>Equilibrium</subject><subject>Hypothesis testing</subject><subject>Information sharing</subject><subject>Integrated approach</subject><subject>Knowledge sharing</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Managers</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Suppliers</subject><subject>Supply chain management</subject><issn>0957-4093</issn><issn>1758-6550</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptkE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AG8Br0ZnNkk_TrIsrq6seFDPYZqm0qVfJt1D_70t9SJ4Ggae953hYewa4Q4Rkvvdy_5VgBQrwEgAJOqELTDWiYi0hlO2gFTHQkEqz9lFCAcYEcBkwd431HAKQ1273g-8rDuyPe-cL1pfU2PdLbdtVVHWeurLdmSbnJdN777m_YGvG-7qrvSlpYqH_pgPl-ysoCq4q9-5ZJ_bx4_Ns9i_Pe02672wUkW9ICl1HElFKpEqpwJT1E5aG8UxQZ5gno3_R3JlQaLDjFIZKZc5pS2lmSqsXLKbubfz7ffRhd4c2qNvxpMGU51gjKBhpHCmrG9D8K4wnS9r8oNBMJM7M7kzIM3kzkzuxgzMGVc7T1X-b-SPbvkDCQFwfw</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Michalski, Marek</creator><creator>Montes-Botella, Jose Luis</creator><creator>Guevara Piedra, Washington</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Can asymmetry impact performance, collaboration and integration? An empirical study</title><author>Michalski, Marek ; Montes-Botella, Jose Luis ; Guevara Piedra, Washington</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-a3357634a4834daf1915e3cc677a0d81db758632c031e1ba9364ebe45ca9b4fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Competitive advantage</topic><topic>Customer satisfaction</topic><topic>Equilibrium</topic><topic>Hypothesis testing</topic><topic>Information sharing</topic><topic>Integrated approach</topic><topic>Knowledge sharing</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Managers</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Suppliers</topic><topic>Supply chain management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Michalski, Marek</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montes-Botella, Jose Luis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guevara Piedra, Washington</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ABI-INFORM Complete</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The international journal of logistics management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Michalski, Marek</au><au>Montes-Botella, Jose Luis</au><au>Guevara Piedra, Washington</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Can asymmetry impact performance, collaboration and integration? An empirical study</atitle><jtitle>The international journal of logistics management</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>939</spage><epage>963</epage><pages>939-963</pages><issn>0957-4093</issn><eissn>1758-6550</eissn><abstract>Purpose
The purpose of this paper is to examine the influence of asymmetric environments on collaboration, integration, and performance during supply chain management processes.
Design/methodology/approach
The study conducted in the industrial sector of two markets – Spain and Poland – considering disparate behaviors among organizations and their managers. Using data collected from 133 firms and advanced partial least squares regression modeling, a number of direct and moderating effects are hypothesized and tested.
Findings
The authors found that existing asymmetry may prevent achievement of optimum equilibrium. Seven of the ten research hypotheses were validated, providing strong support for the significant role that asymmetry can play in managing supply chains (SCs). This result suggests that managers need to consider whether maximum collaboration or integration with SC partners is possible under the strong influence of asymmetry. The findings provide rational insights to SC managers regarding adequate measures to reduce imbalanced relationships and establish equilibrium between partners under varying contexts of collaboration and integration.
Research limitations/implications
This study was conducted in only two countries, so generalizations are limited. Furthermore, there are improvements to be made in sample design to allow for further validation and enhancement of the model and method.
Practical implications
Findings provide rational insights to managers regarding when it is adequate to reduce imbalanced relationships with partners under varying contexts of collaboration and integration.
Originality/value
Collaboration and integration have been well studied in many fields but this research suggests that managers in asymmetric environments must understand that development of strategies based on integration might be impossible to realize.</abstract><cop>Ponte Vedra Beach</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/IJLM-03-2016-0084</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0957-4093 |
ispartof | The international journal of logistics management, 2017-01, Vol.28 (4), p.939-963 |
issn | 0957-4093 1758-6550 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1958171050 |
source | https://0-www.emerald.com.wam.seals.ac.za/insight |
subjects | Asymmetry Behavior Collaboration Competitive advantage Customer satisfaction Equilibrium Hypothesis testing Information sharing Integrated approach Knowledge sharing Literature reviews Logistics Managers Studies Suppliers Supply chain management |
title | Can asymmetry impact performance, collaboration and integration? An empirical study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T17%3A03%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Can%20asymmetry%20impact%20performance,%20collaboration%20and%20integration?%20An%20empirical%20study&rft.jtitle=The%20international%20journal%20of%20logistics%20management&rft.au=Michalski,%20Marek&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=939&rft.epage=963&rft.pages=939-963&rft.issn=0957-4093&rft.eissn=1758-6550&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/IJLM-03-2016-0084&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1958171050%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1958171050&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |