Cain's Sin in Gen. 4:1-7: Oracular Ambiguity and How to Avoid It
First it is related how Joseph, upon hearing of his father's illness, took with him his two sons, Manasseh and Ephraim. [...]m-n-h never refers to counting human beings except in two kinds of situations: (1) establishing the impossibility of counting (Gen. 13:16; Num. 23:10; 1 Kings 3:8); and (...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Prooftexts 2005-09, Vol.25 (3), p.258-275 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | First it is related how Joseph, upon hearing of his father's illness, took with him his two sons, Manasseh and Ephraim. [...]m-n-h never refers to counting human beings except in two kinds of situations: (1) establishing the impossibility of counting (Gen. 13:16; Num. 23:10; 1 Kings 3:8); and (2) emphasizing the negative effects of such a counting (Isa. 65:12, "I will destine you [lit. [...]a census at this point was very much in David's personal and dynastic interests, as Brueggemann has shown.28 Was Cain's behavior any different upon hearing "But you must rule over him [/it]," although it was God who incited him, through oracular ambiguity, to ponder his worst fears and suspicions? For it is written: 'Let sins cease' [Ps. 104:35]. [...]consider the rest of the verse:'and they are wicked no more.' [...]the narrative is explicit. . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0272-9601 1086-3311 1086-3311 |
DOI: | 10.1353/ptx.2006.0022 |