Tariffs and Carbon Emissions
International trade and the environment are uneasy partners. Both environmentalists and free traders worry that the pursuit of one goal may obstruct the other. Nowhere is this tension more evident than in the area of climate change. Does trade liberalization increase carbon emissions? Do efforts to...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International interactions 2017-11, Vol.43 (6), p.895-919 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 919 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 895 |
container_title | International interactions |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Kono, Daniel Yuichi |
description | International trade and the environment are uneasy partners. Both environmentalists and free traders worry that the pursuit of one goal may obstruct the other. Nowhere is this tension more evident than in the area of climate change. Does trade liberalization increase carbon emissions? Do efforts to reduce carbon emissions lead to protectionist pressures? This paper addresses these questions by examining the relationship between CO2 emissions and tariffs in 109 to 153 countries from 1988 to 2013. Using instrumental-variable regressions to address reciprocal causation, I find that emissions reductions led to higher tariffs on manufactured goods. This suggests that carbon-intensive industries responded to carbon restrictions by lobbying against trade liberalization. In contrast, emissions did not affect tariffs on less carbon-intensive primary products, and neither type of tariff affected CO2 emissions. My results imply that efforts to combat climate change may obstruct trade liberalization, but the latter should not hinder climate change mitigation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/03050629.2017.1311257 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1957737403</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1957737403</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-787833d7a06b957485ec5144770d0ff42136dda341adc66831ca003d2d40d5c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQR4MoWKvfQKHgeevMTrKT3pRS_0DBSz2HNNnAlnZTky3Sb-8urVdPc3m_N_CEeECYImh4AgIFVTmbloA8RUIsFV-IESrJBUspL8VoYIoBuhY3OW8AkBTrkbhf2dSEkCe29ZO5TevYTha7JucmtvlWXAW7zfXd-Y7F1-tiNX8vlp9vH_OXZeGIdFewZk3k2UK1nimWWtVOoZTM4CEEWSJV3luSaL2rKk3oLAD50kvwygGNxePJu0_x-1DnzmziIbX9S4O9kIklUE-pE-VSzDnVwexTs7PpaBDMEML8hTBDCHMO0e-eT7umDTHt7E9MW286e9zGFJJtXZMN_a_4BQTdYRU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1957737403</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tariffs and Carbon Emissions</title><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Kono, Daniel Yuichi</creator><creatorcontrib>Kono, Daniel Yuichi</creatorcontrib><description>International trade and the environment are uneasy partners. Both environmentalists and free traders worry that the pursuit of one goal may obstruct the other. Nowhere is this tension more evident than in the area of climate change. Does trade liberalization increase carbon emissions? Do efforts to reduce carbon emissions lead to protectionist pressures? This paper addresses these questions by examining the relationship between CO2 emissions and tariffs in 109 to 153 countries from 1988 to 2013. Using instrumental-variable regressions to address reciprocal causation, I find that emissions reductions led to higher tariffs on manufactured goods. This suggests that carbon-intensive industries responded to carbon restrictions by lobbying against trade liberalization. In contrast, emissions did not affect tariffs on less carbon-intensive primary products, and neither type of tariff affected CO2 emissions. My results imply that efforts to combat climate change may obstruct trade liberalization, but the latter should not hinder climate change mitigation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-0629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-7444</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03050629.2017.1311257</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Carbon ; Carbon dioxide ; Causality ; Change agents ; Changes ; Climate change ; Economic models ; Emissions ; Emissions trading ; Environment ; Free trade ; International trade ; Lobbying ; Manufactured products ; Mitigation ; Tariffs ; trade ; Trade liberalization</subject><ispartof>International interactions, 2017-11, Vol.43 (6), p.895-919</ispartof><rights>2017 Taylor & Francis 2017</rights><rights>2017 Taylor & Francis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-787833d7a06b957485ec5144770d0ff42136dda341adc66831ca003d2d40d5c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-787833d7a06b957485ec5144770d0ff42136dda341adc66831ca003d2d40d5c03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kono, Daniel Yuichi</creatorcontrib><title>Tariffs and Carbon Emissions</title><title>International interactions</title><description>International trade and the environment are uneasy partners. Both environmentalists and free traders worry that the pursuit of one goal may obstruct the other. Nowhere is this tension more evident than in the area of climate change. Does trade liberalization increase carbon emissions? Do efforts to reduce carbon emissions lead to protectionist pressures? This paper addresses these questions by examining the relationship between CO2 emissions and tariffs in 109 to 153 countries from 1988 to 2013. Using instrumental-variable regressions to address reciprocal causation, I find that emissions reductions led to higher tariffs on manufactured goods. This suggests that carbon-intensive industries responded to carbon restrictions by lobbying against trade liberalization. In contrast, emissions did not affect tariffs on less carbon-intensive primary products, and neither type of tariff affected CO2 emissions. My results imply that efforts to combat climate change may obstruct trade liberalization, but the latter should not hinder climate change mitigation.</description><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Change agents</subject><subject>Changes</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions trading</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Free trade</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>Lobbying</subject><subject>Manufactured products</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Tariffs</subject><subject>trade</subject><subject>Trade liberalization</subject><issn>0305-0629</issn><issn>1547-7444</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQR4MoWKvfQKHgeevMTrKT3pRS_0DBSz2HNNnAlnZTky3Sb-8urVdPc3m_N_CEeECYImh4AgIFVTmbloA8RUIsFV-IESrJBUspL8VoYIoBuhY3OW8AkBTrkbhf2dSEkCe29ZO5TevYTha7JucmtvlWXAW7zfXd-Y7F1-tiNX8vlp9vH_OXZeGIdFewZk3k2UK1nimWWtVOoZTM4CEEWSJV3luSaL2rKk3oLAD50kvwygGNxePJu0_x-1DnzmziIbX9S4O9kIklUE-pE-VSzDnVwexTs7PpaBDMEML8hTBDCHMO0e-eT7umDTHt7E9MW286e9zGFJJtXZMN_a_4BQTdYRU</recordid><startdate>20171102</startdate><enddate>20171102</enddate><creator>Kono, Daniel Yuichi</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171102</creationdate><title>Tariffs and Carbon Emissions</title><author>Kono, Daniel Yuichi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-787833d7a06b957485ec5144770d0ff42136dda341adc66831ca003d2d40d5c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Change agents</topic><topic>Changes</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions trading</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Free trade</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>Lobbying</topic><topic>Manufactured products</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Tariffs</topic><topic>trade</topic><topic>Trade liberalization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kono, Daniel Yuichi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International interactions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kono, Daniel Yuichi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tariffs and Carbon Emissions</atitle><jtitle>International interactions</jtitle><date>2017-11-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>895</spage><epage>919</epage><pages>895-919</pages><issn>0305-0629</issn><eissn>1547-7444</eissn><abstract>International trade and the environment are uneasy partners. Both environmentalists and free traders worry that the pursuit of one goal may obstruct the other. Nowhere is this tension more evident than in the area of climate change. Does trade liberalization increase carbon emissions? Do efforts to reduce carbon emissions lead to protectionist pressures? This paper addresses these questions by examining the relationship between CO2 emissions and tariffs in 109 to 153 countries from 1988 to 2013. Using instrumental-variable regressions to address reciprocal causation, I find that emissions reductions led to higher tariffs on manufactured goods. This suggests that carbon-intensive industries responded to carbon restrictions by lobbying against trade liberalization. In contrast, emissions did not affect tariffs on less carbon-intensive primary products, and neither type of tariff affected CO2 emissions. My results imply that efforts to combat climate change may obstruct trade liberalization, but the latter should not hinder climate change mitigation.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/03050629.2017.1311257</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0305-0629 |
ispartof | International interactions, 2017-11, Vol.43 (6), p.895-919 |
issn | 0305-0629 1547-7444 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1957737403 |
source | EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Carbon Carbon dioxide Causality Change agents Changes Climate change Economic models Emissions Emissions trading Environment Free trade International trade Lobbying Manufactured products Mitigation Tariffs trade Trade liberalization |
title | Tariffs and Carbon Emissions |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T08%3A01%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tariffs%20and%20Carbon%20Emissions&rft.jtitle=International%20interactions&rft.au=Kono,%20Daniel%20Yuichi&rft.date=2017-11-02&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=895&rft.epage=919&rft.pages=895-919&rft.issn=0305-0629&rft.eissn=1547-7444&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03050629.2017.1311257&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1957737403%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1957737403&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |