Tariffs and Carbon Emissions

International trade and the environment are uneasy partners. Both environmentalists and free traders worry that the pursuit of one goal may obstruct the other. Nowhere is this tension more evident than in the area of climate change. Does trade liberalization increase carbon emissions? Do efforts to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International interactions 2017-11, Vol.43 (6), p.895-919
1. Verfasser: Kono, Daniel Yuichi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 919
container_issue 6
container_start_page 895
container_title International interactions
container_volume 43
creator Kono, Daniel Yuichi
description International trade and the environment are uneasy partners. Both environmentalists and free traders worry that the pursuit of one goal may obstruct the other. Nowhere is this tension more evident than in the area of climate change. Does trade liberalization increase carbon emissions? Do efforts to reduce carbon emissions lead to protectionist pressures? This paper addresses these questions by examining the relationship between CO2 emissions and tariffs in 109 to 153 countries from 1988 to 2013. Using instrumental-variable regressions to address reciprocal causation, I find that emissions reductions led to higher tariffs on manufactured goods. This suggests that carbon-intensive industries responded to carbon restrictions by lobbying against trade liberalization. In contrast, emissions did not affect tariffs on less carbon-intensive primary products, and neither type of tariff affected CO2 emissions. My results imply that efforts to combat climate change may obstruct trade liberalization, but the latter should not hinder climate change mitigation.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/03050629.2017.1311257
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1957737403</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1957737403</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-787833d7a06b957485ec5144770d0ff42136dda341adc66831ca003d2d40d5c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQR4MoWKvfQKHgeevMTrKT3pRS_0DBSz2HNNnAlnZTky3Sb-8urVdPc3m_N_CEeECYImh4AgIFVTmbloA8RUIsFV-IESrJBUspL8VoYIoBuhY3OW8AkBTrkbhf2dSEkCe29ZO5TevYTha7JucmtvlWXAW7zfXd-Y7F1-tiNX8vlp9vH_OXZeGIdFewZk3k2UK1nimWWtVOoZTM4CEEWSJV3luSaL2rKk3oLAD50kvwygGNxePJu0_x-1DnzmziIbX9S4O9kIklUE-pE-VSzDnVwexTs7PpaBDMEML8hTBDCHMO0e-eT7umDTHt7E9MW286e9zGFJJtXZMN_a_4BQTdYRU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1957737403</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tariffs and Carbon Emissions</title><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Kono, Daniel Yuichi</creator><creatorcontrib>Kono, Daniel Yuichi</creatorcontrib><description>International trade and the environment are uneasy partners. Both environmentalists and free traders worry that the pursuit of one goal may obstruct the other. Nowhere is this tension more evident than in the area of climate change. Does trade liberalization increase carbon emissions? Do efforts to reduce carbon emissions lead to protectionist pressures? This paper addresses these questions by examining the relationship between CO2 emissions and tariffs in 109 to 153 countries from 1988 to 2013. Using instrumental-variable regressions to address reciprocal causation, I find that emissions reductions led to higher tariffs on manufactured goods. This suggests that carbon-intensive industries responded to carbon restrictions by lobbying against trade liberalization. In contrast, emissions did not affect tariffs on less carbon-intensive primary products, and neither type of tariff affected CO2 emissions. My results imply that efforts to combat climate change may obstruct trade liberalization, but the latter should not hinder climate change mitigation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0305-0629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1547-7444</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03050629.2017.1311257</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Carbon ; Carbon dioxide ; Causality ; Change agents ; Changes ; Climate change ; Economic models ; Emissions ; Emissions trading ; Environment ; Free trade ; International trade ; Lobbying ; Manufactured products ; Mitigation ; Tariffs ; trade ; Trade liberalization</subject><ispartof>International interactions, 2017-11, Vol.43 (6), p.895-919</ispartof><rights>2017 Taylor &amp; Francis 2017</rights><rights>2017 Taylor &amp; Francis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-787833d7a06b957485ec5144770d0ff42136dda341adc66831ca003d2d40d5c03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-787833d7a06b957485ec5144770d0ff42136dda341adc66831ca003d2d40d5c03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kono, Daniel Yuichi</creatorcontrib><title>Tariffs and Carbon Emissions</title><title>International interactions</title><description>International trade and the environment are uneasy partners. Both environmentalists and free traders worry that the pursuit of one goal may obstruct the other. Nowhere is this tension more evident than in the area of climate change. Does trade liberalization increase carbon emissions? Do efforts to reduce carbon emissions lead to protectionist pressures? This paper addresses these questions by examining the relationship between CO2 emissions and tariffs in 109 to 153 countries from 1988 to 2013. Using instrumental-variable regressions to address reciprocal causation, I find that emissions reductions led to higher tariffs on manufactured goods. This suggests that carbon-intensive industries responded to carbon restrictions by lobbying against trade liberalization. In contrast, emissions did not affect tariffs on less carbon-intensive primary products, and neither type of tariff affected CO2 emissions. My results imply that efforts to combat climate change may obstruct trade liberalization, but the latter should not hinder climate change mitigation.</description><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Change agents</subject><subject>Changes</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>Emissions trading</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Free trade</subject><subject>International trade</subject><subject>Lobbying</subject><subject>Manufactured products</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Tariffs</subject><subject>trade</subject><subject>Trade liberalization</subject><issn>0305-0629</issn><issn>1547-7444</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQR4MoWKvfQKHgeevMTrKT3pRS_0DBSz2HNNnAlnZTky3Sb-8urVdPc3m_N_CEeECYImh4AgIFVTmbloA8RUIsFV-IESrJBUspL8VoYIoBuhY3OW8AkBTrkbhf2dSEkCe29ZO5TevYTha7JucmtvlWXAW7zfXd-Y7F1-tiNX8vlp9vH_OXZeGIdFewZk3k2UK1nimWWtVOoZTM4CEEWSJV3luSaL2rKk3oLAD50kvwygGNxePJu0_x-1DnzmziIbX9S4O9kIklUE-pE-VSzDnVwexTs7PpaBDMEML8hTBDCHMO0e-eT7umDTHt7E9MW286e9zGFJJtXZMN_a_4BQTdYRU</recordid><startdate>20171102</startdate><enddate>20171102</enddate><creator>Kono, Daniel Yuichi</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171102</creationdate><title>Tariffs and Carbon Emissions</title><author>Kono, Daniel Yuichi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-787833d7a06b957485ec5144770d0ff42136dda341adc66831ca003d2d40d5c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Change agents</topic><topic>Changes</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>Emissions trading</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Free trade</topic><topic>International trade</topic><topic>Lobbying</topic><topic>Manufactured products</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Tariffs</topic><topic>trade</topic><topic>Trade liberalization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kono, Daniel Yuichi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International interactions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kono, Daniel Yuichi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tariffs and Carbon Emissions</atitle><jtitle>International interactions</jtitle><date>2017-11-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>895</spage><epage>919</epage><pages>895-919</pages><issn>0305-0629</issn><eissn>1547-7444</eissn><abstract>International trade and the environment are uneasy partners. Both environmentalists and free traders worry that the pursuit of one goal may obstruct the other. Nowhere is this tension more evident than in the area of climate change. Does trade liberalization increase carbon emissions? Do efforts to reduce carbon emissions lead to protectionist pressures? This paper addresses these questions by examining the relationship between CO2 emissions and tariffs in 109 to 153 countries from 1988 to 2013. Using instrumental-variable regressions to address reciprocal causation, I find that emissions reductions led to higher tariffs on manufactured goods. This suggests that carbon-intensive industries responded to carbon restrictions by lobbying against trade liberalization. In contrast, emissions did not affect tariffs on less carbon-intensive primary products, and neither type of tariff affected CO2 emissions. My results imply that efforts to combat climate change may obstruct trade liberalization, but the latter should not hinder climate change mitigation.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/03050629.2017.1311257</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0305-0629
ispartof International interactions, 2017-11, Vol.43 (6), p.895-919
issn 0305-0629
1547-7444
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1957737403
source EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Carbon
Carbon dioxide
Causality
Change agents
Changes
Climate change
Economic models
Emissions
Emissions trading
Environment
Free trade
International trade
Lobbying
Manufactured products
Mitigation
Tariffs
trade
Trade liberalization
title Tariffs and Carbon Emissions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T08%3A01%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tariffs%20and%20Carbon%20Emissions&rft.jtitle=International%20interactions&rft.au=Kono,%20Daniel%20Yuichi&rft.date=2017-11-02&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=895&rft.epage=919&rft.pages=895-919&rft.issn=0305-0629&rft.eissn=1547-7444&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03050629.2017.1311257&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1957737403%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1957737403&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true