Seismic hazard analysis using simulated ground-motion time histories: The case of the Sefidrud dam, Iran

This study aims at conducting probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for the Sefidrud dam located near Rudbar City. For this purpose, firstly, the characteristic earthquake recurrence model for major earthquakes on individual main faults have been combined with the smaller (smoothed) background seism...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984) 2017-08, Vol.99, p.20-34
Hauptverfasser: VahidiFard, H., Zafarani, H., Sabbagh-Yazdi, S.R., Hadian, M.A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 34
container_issue
container_start_page 20
container_title Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)
container_volume 99
creator VahidiFard, H.
Zafarani, H.
Sabbagh-Yazdi, S.R.
Hadian, M.A.
description This study aims at conducting probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for the Sefidrud dam located near Rudbar City. For this purpose, firstly, the characteristic earthquake recurrence model for major earthquakes on individual main faults have been combined with the smaller (smoothed) background seismicity of the region. Then, appropriate ground motion prediction equations were applied to estimate hazard values. Finally, in order to obtain reliable estimation of seismic hazard due to sources close to the dam site and to investigate near-field characteristics of motion, the Rudbar fault as the most prominent earthquake source in the immediate vicinity of the site is considered in seismic hazard computation using hybrid broadband simulation based ground motion parameters. The results of this method with different declustering schemes are reported for two level of seismic hazard analysis (i.e. return periods of 475 and 2475 years). Best estimate seismic hazard maps of PGA and PGV values obtained from the logic tree method is presented. By inclusion of simulation results for the Rudbar fault in the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA), maximum PGA and PGV for 475 years return period obtained around 340cm/s/s and 25cm/s, respectively. For classic PSHA without including simulation the maximum PGA and PGV for 475 years return period obtained around 450cm/s/s and 32cm/s, respectively. With the simulation-based PSHA for a 2475 years return period a maximum PGA of 650cm/s/s and PGV of 50cm/s have been estimated. Classic PSHA (without simulation) for a 2475 years return period has resulted a maximum PGA of 850cm/s/s and PGV of 65cm/s. •Evaluation of simulated scenarios at most of stations confirms their good consistency with observed data.•Rise time, stress drop, and rupture velocity of selected scenario were modified slightly to obtain 27 scenarios.•As a result, PGA and PGV of Simulated ground motions from PSHA with simulation are less than PSHA without simulation.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.04.017
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1956033450</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0267726116301762</els_id><sourcerecordid>1956033450</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-eb3c70d327df3cdf7e41f958fa6dfc4fe5a53c1e05bb6a106f8b63f056d89e913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM9LwzAcxYMoOKd_ghDwamvStGnrRWT4YzDwsAneQpZ8s2Wszcy3FeZfb8d29_Te4fMevEfILWcpZ1w-bFIMfmv3bZoxXqYsTwc5IyNelXUicv51TkYsk2VSZpJfkivEDRsIXskRWc_BY-MNXetfHS3Vrd7u0SPt0bcrir7pt7oDS1cx9K1NmtD50NLON0DXHrsQPeAjXayBGo1Ag6Pd4OfgvI29pVY393QadXtNLpzeItycdEw-X18Wk_dk9vE2nTzPEi0k6xJYClMyK7LSOmGsKyHnri4qp6V1JndQ6EIYDqxYLqXmTLpqKYVjhbRVDTUXY3J37N3F8N0DdmoT-jisQsXrQjIh8oINVHGkTAyIEZzaRd_ouFecqcOpaqNOp6rDqYrlapAh93TMwTDhx0NUaDy0BqyPYDplg_-n4Q95hoTQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1956033450</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Seismic hazard analysis using simulated ground-motion time histories: The case of the Sefidrud dam, Iran</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>VahidiFard, H. ; Zafarani, H. ; Sabbagh-Yazdi, S.R. ; Hadian, M.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>VahidiFard, H. ; Zafarani, H. ; Sabbagh-Yazdi, S.R. ; Hadian, M.A.</creatorcontrib><description>This study aims at conducting probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for the Sefidrud dam located near Rudbar City. For this purpose, firstly, the characteristic earthquake recurrence model for major earthquakes on individual main faults have been combined with the smaller (smoothed) background seismicity of the region. Then, appropriate ground motion prediction equations were applied to estimate hazard values. Finally, in order to obtain reliable estimation of seismic hazard due to sources close to the dam site and to investigate near-field characteristics of motion, the Rudbar fault as the most prominent earthquake source in the immediate vicinity of the site is considered in seismic hazard computation using hybrid broadband simulation based ground motion parameters. The results of this method with different declustering schemes are reported for two level of seismic hazard analysis (i.e. return periods of 475 and 2475 years). Best estimate seismic hazard maps of PGA and PGV values obtained from the logic tree method is presented. By inclusion of simulation results for the Rudbar fault in the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA), maximum PGA and PGV for 475 years return period obtained around 340cm/s/s and 25cm/s, respectively. For classic PSHA without including simulation the maximum PGA and PGV for 475 years return period obtained around 450cm/s/s and 32cm/s, respectively. With the simulation-based PSHA for a 2475 years return period a maximum PGA of 650cm/s/s and PGV of 50cm/s have been estimated. Classic PSHA (without simulation) for a 2475 years return period has resulted a maximum PGA of 850cm/s/s and PGV of 65cm/s. •Evaluation of simulated scenarios at most of stations confirms their good consistency with observed data.•Rise time, stress drop, and rupture velocity of selected scenario were modified slightly to obtain 27 scenarios.•As a result, PGA and PGV of Simulated ground motions from PSHA with simulation are less than PSHA without simulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0267-7261</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-341X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.04.017</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Barking: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Background seismicity ; Broadband ; Computer simulation ; Dams ; Damsites ; Earthquakes ; Faults ; Geological hazards ; Ground motion ; Hazard assessment ; Hybrid broadband simulation ; Mathematical models ; Near-field ; Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis ; Sefidrud dam ; Seismic activity ; Seismic analysis ; Seismic engineering ; Seismic hazard ; Seismicity ; Strong motion</subject><ispartof>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984), 2017-08, Vol.99, p.20-34</ispartof><rights>2017</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Aug 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-eb3c70d327df3cdf7e41f958fa6dfc4fe5a53c1e05bb6a106f8b63f056d89e913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-eb3c70d327df3cdf7e41f958fa6dfc4fe5a53c1e05bb6a106f8b63f056d89e913</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.04.017$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>VahidiFard, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zafarani, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabbagh-Yazdi, S.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadian, M.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Seismic hazard analysis using simulated ground-motion time histories: The case of the Sefidrud dam, Iran</title><title>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</title><description>This study aims at conducting probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for the Sefidrud dam located near Rudbar City. For this purpose, firstly, the characteristic earthquake recurrence model for major earthquakes on individual main faults have been combined with the smaller (smoothed) background seismicity of the region. Then, appropriate ground motion prediction equations were applied to estimate hazard values. Finally, in order to obtain reliable estimation of seismic hazard due to sources close to the dam site and to investigate near-field characteristics of motion, the Rudbar fault as the most prominent earthquake source in the immediate vicinity of the site is considered in seismic hazard computation using hybrid broadband simulation based ground motion parameters. The results of this method with different declustering schemes are reported for two level of seismic hazard analysis (i.e. return periods of 475 and 2475 years). Best estimate seismic hazard maps of PGA and PGV values obtained from the logic tree method is presented. By inclusion of simulation results for the Rudbar fault in the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA), maximum PGA and PGV for 475 years return period obtained around 340cm/s/s and 25cm/s, respectively. For classic PSHA without including simulation the maximum PGA and PGV for 475 years return period obtained around 450cm/s/s and 32cm/s, respectively. With the simulation-based PSHA for a 2475 years return period a maximum PGA of 650cm/s/s and PGV of 50cm/s have been estimated. Classic PSHA (without simulation) for a 2475 years return period has resulted a maximum PGA of 850cm/s/s and PGV of 65cm/s. •Evaluation of simulated scenarios at most of stations confirms their good consistency with observed data.•Rise time, stress drop, and rupture velocity of selected scenario were modified slightly to obtain 27 scenarios.•As a result, PGA and PGV of Simulated ground motions from PSHA with simulation are less than PSHA without simulation.</description><subject>Background seismicity</subject><subject>Broadband</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Dams</subject><subject>Damsites</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Faults</subject><subject>Geological hazards</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>Hazard assessment</subject><subject>Hybrid broadband simulation</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Near-field</subject><subject>Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis</subject><subject>Sefidrud dam</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic analysis</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Seismic hazard</subject><subject>Seismicity</subject><subject>Strong motion</subject><issn>0267-7261</issn><issn>1879-341X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkM9LwzAcxYMoOKd_ghDwamvStGnrRWT4YzDwsAneQpZ8s2Wszcy3FeZfb8d29_Te4fMevEfILWcpZ1w-bFIMfmv3bZoxXqYsTwc5IyNelXUicv51TkYsk2VSZpJfkivEDRsIXskRWc_BY-MNXetfHS3Vrd7u0SPt0bcrir7pt7oDS1cx9K1NmtD50NLON0DXHrsQPeAjXayBGo1Ag6Pd4OfgvI29pVY393QadXtNLpzeItycdEw-X18Wk_dk9vE2nTzPEi0k6xJYClMyK7LSOmGsKyHnri4qp6V1JndQ6EIYDqxYLqXmTLpqKYVjhbRVDTUXY3J37N3F8N0DdmoT-jisQsXrQjIh8oINVHGkTAyIEZzaRd_ouFecqcOpaqNOp6rDqYrlapAh93TMwTDhx0NUaDy0BqyPYDplg_-n4Q95hoTQ</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>VahidiFard, H.</creator><creator>Zafarani, H.</creator><creator>Sabbagh-Yazdi, S.R.</creator><creator>Hadian, M.A.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>Seismic hazard analysis using simulated ground-motion time histories: The case of the Sefidrud dam, Iran</title><author>VahidiFard, H. ; Zafarani, H. ; Sabbagh-Yazdi, S.R. ; Hadian, M.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a360t-eb3c70d327df3cdf7e41f958fa6dfc4fe5a53c1e05bb6a106f8b63f056d89e913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Background seismicity</topic><topic>Broadband</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Dams</topic><topic>Damsites</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Faults</topic><topic>Geological hazards</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>Hazard assessment</topic><topic>Hybrid broadband simulation</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Near-field</topic><topic>Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis</topic><topic>Sefidrud dam</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic analysis</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Seismic hazard</topic><topic>Seismicity</topic><topic>Strong motion</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>VahidiFard, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zafarani, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabbagh-Yazdi, S.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadian, M.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>VahidiFard, H.</au><au>Zafarani, H.</au><au>Sabbagh-Yazdi, S.R.</au><au>Hadian, M.A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Seismic hazard analysis using simulated ground-motion time histories: The case of the Sefidrud dam, Iran</atitle><jtitle>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</jtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>99</volume><spage>20</spage><epage>34</epage><pages>20-34</pages><issn>0267-7261</issn><eissn>1879-341X</eissn><abstract>This study aims at conducting probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for the Sefidrud dam located near Rudbar City. For this purpose, firstly, the characteristic earthquake recurrence model for major earthquakes on individual main faults have been combined with the smaller (smoothed) background seismicity of the region. Then, appropriate ground motion prediction equations were applied to estimate hazard values. Finally, in order to obtain reliable estimation of seismic hazard due to sources close to the dam site and to investigate near-field characteristics of motion, the Rudbar fault as the most prominent earthquake source in the immediate vicinity of the site is considered in seismic hazard computation using hybrid broadband simulation based ground motion parameters. The results of this method with different declustering schemes are reported for two level of seismic hazard analysis (i.e. return periods of 475 and 2475 years). Best estimate seismic hazard maps of PGA and PGV values obtained from the logic tree method is presented. By inclusion of simulation results for the Rudbar fault in the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA), maximum PGA and PGV for 475 years return period obtained around 340cm/s/s and 25cm/s, respectively. For classic PSHA without including simulation the maximum PGA and PGV for 475 years return period obtained around 450cm/s/s and 32cm/s, respectively. With the simulation-based PSHA for a 2475 years return period a maximum PGA of 650cm/s/s and PGV of 50cm/s have been estimated. Classic PSHA (without simulation) for a 2475 years return period has resulted a maximum PGA of 850cm/s/s and PGV of 65cm/s. •Evaluation of simulated scenarios at most of stations confirms their good consistency with observed data.•Rise time, stress drop, and rupture velocity of selected scenario were modified slightly to obtain 27 scenarios.•As a result, PGA and PGV of Simulated ground motions from PSHA with simulation are less than PSHA without simulation.</abstract><cop>Barking</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.04.017</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0267-7261
ispartof Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984), 2017-08, Vol.99, p.20-34
issn 0267-7261
1879-341X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1956033450
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Background seismicity
Broadband
Computer simulation
Dams
Damsites
Earthquakes
Faults
Geological hazards
Ground motion
Hazard assessment
Hybrid broadband simulation
Mathematical models
Near-field
Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis
Sefidrud dam
Seismic activity
Seismic analysis
Seismic engineering
Seismic hazard
Seismicity
Strong motion
title Seismic hazard analysis using simulated ground-motion time histories: The case of the Sefidrud dam, Iran
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T03%3A16%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Seismic%20hazard%20analysis%20using%20simulated%20ground-motion%20time%20histories:%20The%20case%20of%20the%20Sefidrud%20dam,%20Iran&rft.jtitle=Soil%20dynamics%20and%20earthquake%20engineering%20(1984)&rft.au=VahidiFard,%20H.&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=99&rft.spage=20&rft.epage=34&rft.pages=20-34&rft.issn=0267-7261&rft.eissn=1879-341X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.04.017&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1956033450%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1956033450&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0267726116301762&rfr_iscdi=true