Emplacement and temporal constraints of the Gondwanan intrusive complexes of northern Patagonia: La Esperanza plutono-volcanic case

Two main lines of evidence disagree whether or not the Patagonian blocks collided with Gondwana. All models invoke the voluminous magmatism of the La Esperanza Complex as evidence for active subduction magmatic arc or to a postcollisional setting. The evolution of this bimodal igneous suite is reass...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tectonophysics 2017-08, Vol.712-713, p.249-269
Hauptverfasser: Martínez Dopico, Carmen I., López de Luchi, Mónica G., Rapalini, Augusto E., Wemmer, Klaus, Fanning, C. Mark, Basei, Miguel A.S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 269
container_issue
container_start_page 249
container_title Tectonophysics
container_volume 712-713
creator Martínez Dopico, Carmen I.
López de Luchi, Mónica G.
Rapalini, Augusto E.
Wemmer, Klaus
Fanning, C. Mark
Basei, Miguel A.S.
description Two main lines of evidence disagree whether or not the Patagonian blocks collided with Gondwana. All models invoke the voluminous magmatism of the La Esperanza Complex as evidence for active subduction magmatic arc or to a postcollisional setting. The evolution of this bimodal igneous suite is reassessed with field, geochronological (SHRIMP U-Pb zircon and K-Ar mica) and petrophysical data. Emplacement of high-K calk-alkaline granitic magmas occurred at shallow crustal levels (2–8±2km depth) related to the development and collapse of a caldera associated with a regional NW-SE structural trend. Magmatism involved intermediate hybrid pulses at 273±2Ma and 255±2Ma (Prieto Granodiorite) that shifted like a yo-yo to acidic magmas at 260±2Ma and 250±2Ma (Donosa and Calvo granites). Absence of solid-state deformation features and the low anisotropy degrees in the granites indicate that its fabric is magmatic in origin. Magnetic fabric in granodiorites displays a concentrical pattern with subhorizontal foliations and lineations. Parallel to the volcanic axis, magnetic foliations and moderately plunging lineations indicate a common feeder system for plutonics and volcanics. Donosa Granite shows a discordant pattern with WNW-ESE ENE-WSW trending low plunging lineations and foliations. The plutono-volcanic system construction (273–255Ma) followed NW-SE and NE-SW diamond shape faults trends and supracrustal discontinuities. Magmatic Climax is bracketed at 260Ma. The collapse of the edifice is evidenced by the intrusion of acid magma plugs and dike swarms between 250 and 246Ma. A similar age range was identified in other areas of Patagonia related to syn and postcollisional tectonic events. No evidence of tectonic activity such as major uplift, metamorphism or thrusting was found excepting regional strike-slip faulting and extension. Therefore, La Esperanza Complex is a high crustal level episode, and as such may not have structurally recorded an active collision during its crystallization and cooling. [Display omitted] •La Esperanza Plutono-volcanic Complex shows a protracted subvolcanic magmatic activity between 273 and 245Ma.•Volcanic activity is bracketed between ca 265 and 245Ma.•AMS and microstructures indicate that the fabrics were acquired in the magmatic state with no overimposed deformation.•A change in far field structural control is recorded at ca ~260Ma, contemporaneously with magmatic climax.•Collapse of the magmatic edifice might have occurred between 25
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.tecto.2017.05.015
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1956027851</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0040195117301981</els_id><sourcerecordid>1956027851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a354t-c8b027caa13efb35b7fd8569a5e08263ed2f67d0098b16ff57f7b60bc7861d6a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFO3DAQhi1EJRbKE3CxxDlhnGAni9RDhRaKtBIc2rM1ccatV1k7tb1b2isvXsNy5jTS6Pv_0XyMXQioBQh1takzmRzqBkRXg6xByCO2EH23rNpGqWO2ALiGSiylOGGnKW0AQAmpFuxltZ0nNLQlnzn6kWfaziHixE3wKUd0PiceLM-_iN8HP_5Bj56Xbdwlt6eClQJ6pjfIh1i46PkTZvwZvMMbvka-SjNF9P-Qz9MuBx-qfZgMeme4wUSf2SeLU6Lz93nGftytvt9-q9aP9w-3X9cVtvI6V6YfoOkMomjJDq0cOjv2Ui1REvSNamlsrOpGgGU_CGWt7Gw3KBhM1ysxKmzP2OWhd47h945S1puwi76c1MWMKuW9FIVqD5SJIaVIVs_RbTH-1QL0q2290W-29attDVIX2yX15ZCi8sDeUdTJOPKGRhcLrMfgPsz_B9lmjL4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1956027851</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Emplacement and temporal constraints of the Gondwanan intrusive complexes of northern Patagonia: La Esperanza plutono-volcanic case</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Martínez Dopico, Carmen I. ; López de Luchi, Mónica G. ; Rapalini, Augusto E. ; Wemmer, Klaus ; Fanning, C. Mark ; Basei, Miguel A.S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Martínez Dopico, Carmen I. ; López de Luchi, Mónica G. ; Rapalini, Augusto E. ; Wemmer, Klaus ; Fanning, C. Mark ; Basei, Miguel A.S.</creatorcontrib><description>Two main lines of evidence disagree whether or not the Patagonian blocks collided with Gondwana. All models invoke the voluminous magmatism of the La Esperanza Complex as evidence for active subduction magmatic arc or to a postcollisional setting. The evolution of this bimodal igneous suite is reassessed with field, geochronological (SHRIMP U-Pb zircon and K-Ar mica) and petrophysical data. Emplacement of high-K calk-alkaline granitic magmas occurred at shallow crustal levels (2–8±2km depth) related to the development and collapse of a caldera associated with a regional NW-SE structural trend. Magmatism involved intermediate hybrid pulses at 273±2Ma and 255±2Ma (Prieto Granodiorite) that shifted like a yo-yo to acidic magmas at 260±2Ma and 250±2Ma (Donosa and Calvo granites). Absence of solid-state deformation features and the low anisotropy degrees in the granites indicate that its fabric is magmatic in origin. Magnetic fabric in granodiorites displays a concentrical pattern with subhorizontal foliations and lineations. Parallel to the volcanic axis, magnetic foliations and moderately plunging lineations indicate a common feeder system for plutonics and volcanics. Donosa Granite shows a discordant pattern with WNW-ESE ENE-WSW trending low plunging lineations and foliations. The plutono-volcanic system construction (273–255Ma) followed NW-SE and NE-SW diamond shape faults trends and supracrustal discontinuities. Magmatic Climax is bracketed at 260Ma. The collapse of the edifice is evidenced by the intrusion of acid magma plugs and dike swarms between 250 and 246Ma. A similar age range was identified in other areas of Patagonia related to syn and postcollisional tectonic events. No evidence of tectonic activity such as major uplift, metamorphism or thrusting was found excepting regional strike-slip faulting and extension. Therefore, La Esperanza Complex is a high crustal level episode, and as such may not have structurally recorded an active collision during its crystallization and cooling. [Display omitted] •La Esperanza Plutono-volcanic Complex shows a protracted subvolcanic magmatic activity between 273 and 245Ma.•Volcanic activity is bracketed between ca 265 and 245Ma.•AMS and microstructures indicate that the fabrics were acquired in the magmatic state with no overimposed deformation.•A change in far field structural control is recorded at ca ~260Ma, contemporaneously with magmatic climax.•Collapse of the magmatic edifice might have occurred between 255Ma and 245Ma (minimum).•Regional massive magma production was triggered either by a change in the subduction style or a far away collisional event.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0040-1951</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3266</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2017.05.015</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Anisotropy ; Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility ; Collapse ; Crystallization ; Deformation ; Diamonds ; Evolution ; Fabrics ; Faults ; Geochronology ; Geological faults ; Gondwana ; Granite ; Intrusion ; Lava ; Magma ; Metamorphism ; Metamorphism (geology) ; Mica ; Patagonia ; Permian ; Plate tectonics ; Plugs ; Radiometric dating ; Regional development ; SHRIMP U-Pb dating ; Solid state physics ; Strike-slip faults ; Studies ; Subduction ; Subduction (geology) ; Subvolcanic magmatic complexes ; Uplift ; Zircon</subject><ispartof>Tectonophysics, 2017-08, Vol.712-713, p.249-269</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Aug 21, 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a354t-c8b027caa13efb35b7fd8569a5e08263ed2f67d0098b16ff57f7b60bc7861d6a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a354t-c8b027caa13efb35b7fd8569a5e08263ed2f67d0098b16ff57f7b60bc7861d6a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tecto.2017.05.015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martínez Dopico, Carmen I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López de Luchi, Mónica G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapalini, Augusto E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wemmer, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fanning, C. Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basei, Miguel A.S.</creatorcontrib><title>Emplacement and temporal constraints of the Gondwanan intrusive complexes of northern Patagonia: La Esperanza plutono-volcanic case</title><title>Tectonophysics</title><description>Two main lines of evidence disagree whether or not the Patagonian blocks collided with Gondwana. All models invoke the voluminous magmatism of the La Esperanza Complex as evidence for active subduction magmatic arc or to a postcollisional setting. The evolution of this bimodal igneous suite is reassessed with field, geochronological (SHRIMP U-Pb zircon and K-Ar mica) and petrophysical data. Emplacement of high-K calk-alkaline granitic magmas occurred at shallow crustal levels (2–8±2km depth) related to the development and collapse of a caldera associated with a regional NW-SE structural trend. Magmatism involved intermediate hybrid pulses at 273±2Ma and 255±2Ma (Prieto Granodiorite) that shifted like a yo-yo to acidic magmas at 260±2Ma and 250±2Ma (Donosa and Calvo granites). Absence of solid-state deformation features and the low anisotropy degrees in the granites indicate that its fabric is magmatic in origin. Magnetic fabric in granodiorites displays a concentrical pattern with subhorizontal foliations and lineations. Parallel to the volcanic axis, magnetic foliations and moderately plunging lineations indicate a common feeder system for plutonics and volcanics. Donosa Granite shows a discordant pattern with WNW-ESE ENE-WSW trending low plunging lineations and foliations. The plutono-volcanic system construction (273–255Ma) followed NW-SE and NE-SW diamond shape faults trends and supracrustal discontinuities. Magmatic Climax is bracketed at 260Ma. The collapse of the edifice is evidenced by the intrusion of acid magma plugs and dike swarms between 250 and 246Ma. A similar age range was identified in other areas of Patagonia related to syn and postcollisional tectonic events. No evidence of tectonic activity such as major uplift, metamorphism or thrusting was found excepting regional strike-slip faulting and extension. Therefore, La Esperanza Complex is a high crustal level episode, and as such may not have structurally recorded an active collision during its crystallization and cooling. [Display omitted] •La Esperanza Plutono-volcanic Complex shows a protracted subvolcanic magmatic activity between 273 and 245Ma.•Volcanic activity is bracketed between ca 265 and 245Ma.•AMS and microstructures indicate that the fabrics were acquired in the magmatic state with no overimposed deformation.•A change in far field structural control is recorded at ca ~260Ma, contemporaneously with magmatic climax.•Collapse of the magmatic edifice might have occurred between 255Ma and 245Ma (minimum).•Regional massive magma production was triggered either by a change in the subduction style or a far away collisional event.</description><subject>Anisotropy</subject><subject>Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility</subject><subject>Collapse</subject><subject>Crystallization</subject><subject>Deformation</subject><subject>Diamonds</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Fabrics</subject><subject>Faults</subject><subject>Geochronology</subject><subject>Geological faults</subject><subject>Gondwana</subject><subject>Granite</subject><subject>Intrusion</subject><subject>Lava</subject><subject>Magma</subject><subject>Metamorphism</subject><subject>Metamorphism (geology)</subject><subject>Mica</subject><subject>Patagonia</subject><subject>Permian</subject><subject>Plate tectonics</subject><subject>Plugs</subject><subject>Radiometric dating</subject><subject>Regional development</subject><subject>SHRIMP U-Pb dating</subject><subject>Solid state physics</subject><subject>Strike-slip faults</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Subduction</subject><subject>Subduction (geology)</subject><subject>Subvolcanic magmatic complexes</subject><subject>Uplift</subject><subject>Zircon</subject><issn>0040-1951</issn><issn>1879-3266</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFO3DAQhi1EJRbKE3CxxDlhnGAni9RDhRaKtBIc2rM1ccatV1k7tb1b2isvXsNy5jTS6Pv_0XyMXQioBQh1takzmRzqBkRXg6xByCO2EH23rNpGqWO2ALiGSiylOGGnKW0AQAmpFuxltZ0nNLQlnzn6kWfaziHixE3wKUd0PiceLM-_iN8HP_5Bj56Xbdwlt6eClQJ6pjfIh1i46PkTZvwZvMMbvka-SjNF9P-Qz9MuBx-qfZgMeme4wUSf2SeLU6Lz93nGftytvt9-q9aP9w-3X9cVtvI6V6YfoOkMomjJDq0cOjv2Ui1REvSNamlsrOpGgGU_CGWt7Gw3KBhM1ysxKmzP2OWhd47h945S1puwi76c1MWMKuW9FIVqD5SJIaVIVs_RbTH-1QL0q2290W-29attDVIX2yX15ZCi8sDeUdTJOPKGRhcLrMfgPsz_B9lmjL4</recordid><startdate>20170821</startdate><enddate>20170821</enddate><creator>Martínez Dopico, Carmen I.</creator><creator>López de Luchi, Mónica G.</creator><creator>Rapalini, Augusto E.</creator><creator>Wemmer, Klaus</creator><creator>Fanning, C. Mark</creator><creator>Basei, Miguel A.S.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170821</creationdate><title>Emplacement and temporal constraints of the Gondwanan intrusive complexes of northern Patagonia: La Esperanza plutono-volcanic case</title><author>Martínez Dopico, Carmen I. ; López de Luchi, Mónica G. ; Rapalini, Augusto E. ; Wemmer, Klaus ; Fanning, C. Mark ; Basei, Miguel A.S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a354t-c8b027caa13efb35b7fd8569a5e08263ed2f67d0098b16ff57f7b60bc7861d6a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Anisotropy</topic><topic>Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility</topic><topic>Collapse</topic><topic>Crystallization</topic><topic>Deformation</topic><topic>Diamonds</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Fabrics</topic><topic>Faults</topic><topic>Geochronology</topic><topic>Geological faults</topic><topic>Gondwana</topic><topic>Granite</topic><topic>Intrusion</topic><topic>Lava</topic><topic>Magma</topic><topic>Metamorphism</topic><topic>Metamorphism (geology)</topic><topic>Mica</topic><topic>Patagonia</topic><topic>Permian</topic><topic>Plate tectonics</topic><topic>Plugs</topic><topic>Radiometric dating</topic><topic>Regional development</topic><topic>SHRIMP U-Pb dating</topic><topic>Solid state physics</topic><topic>Strike-slip faults</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Subduction</topic><topic>Subduction (geology)</topic><topic>Subvolcanic magmatic complexes</topic><topic>Uplift</topic><topic>Zircon</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martínez Dopico, Carmen I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López de Luchi, Mónica G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rapalini, Augusto E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wemmer, Klaus</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fanning, C. Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Basei, Miguel A.S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Tectonophysics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martínez Dopico, Carmen I.</au><au>López de Luchi, Mónica G.</au><au>Rapalini, Augusto E.</au><au>Wemmer, Klaus</au><au>Fanning, C. Mark</au><au>Basei, Miguel A.S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Emplacement and temporal constraints of the Gondwanan intrusive complexes of northern Patagonia: La Esperanza plutono-volcanic case</atitle><jtitle>Tectonophysics</jtitle><date>2017-08-21</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>712-713</volume><spage>249</spage><epage>269</epage><pages>249-269</pages><issn>0040-1951</issn><eissn>1879-3266</eissn><abstract>Two main lines of evidence disagree whether or not the Patagonian blocks collided with Gondwana. All models invoke the voluminous magmatism of the La Esperanza Complex as evidence for active subduction magmatic arc or to a postcollisional setting. The evolution of this bimodal igneous suite is reassessed with field, geochronological (SHRIMP U-Pb zircon and K-Ar mica) and petrophysical data. Emplacement of high-K calk-alkaline granitic magmas occurred at shallow crustal levels (2–8±2km depth) related to the development and collapse of a caldera associated with a regional NW-SE structural trend. Magmatism involved intermediate hybrid pulses at 273±2Ma and 255±2Ma (Prieto Granodiorite) that shifted like a yo-yo to acidic magmas at 260±2Ma and 250±2Ma (Donosa and Calvo granites). Absence of solid-state deformation features and the low anisotropy degrees in the granites indicate that its fabric is magmatic in origin. Magnetic fabric in granodiorites displays a concentrical pattern with subhorizontal foliations and lineations. Parallel to the volcanic axis, magnetic foliations and moderately plunging lineations indicate a common feeder system for plutonics and volcanics. Donosa Granite shows a discordant pattern with WNW-ESE ENE-WSW trending low plunging lineations and foliations. The plutono-volcanic system construction (273–255Ma) followed NW-SE and NE-SW diamond shape faults trends and supracrustal discontinuities. Magmatic Climax is bracketed at 260Ma. The collapse of the edifice is evidenced by the intrusion of acid magma plugs and dike swarms between 250 and 246Ma. A similar age range was identified in other areas of Patagonia related to syn and postcollisional tectonic events. No evidence of tectonic activity such as major uplift, metamorphism or thrusting was found excepting regional strike-slip faulting and extension. Therefore, La Esperanza Complex is a high crustal level episode, and as such may not have structurally recorded an active collision during its crystallization and cooling. [Display omitted] •La Esperanza Plutono-volcanic Complex shows a protracted subvolcanic magmatic activity between 273 and 245Ma.•Volcanic activity is bracketed between ca 265 and 245Ma.•AMS and microstructures indicate that the fabrics were acquired in the magmatic state with no overimposed deformation.•A change in far field structural control is recorded at ca ~260Ma, contemporaneously with magmatic climax.•Collapse of the magmatic edifice might have occurred between 255Ma and 245Ma (minimum).•Regional massive magma production was triggered either by a change in the subduction style or a far away collisional event.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.tecto.2017.05.015</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0040-1951
ispartof Tectonophysics, 2017-08, Vol.712-713, p.249-269
issn 0040-1951
1879-3266
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1956027851
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Anisotropy
Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility
Collapse
Crystallization
Deformation
Diamonds
Evolution
Fabrics
Faults
Geochronology
Geological faults
Gondwana
Granite
Intrusion
Lava
Magma
Metamorphism
Metamorphism (geology)
Mica
Patagonia
Permian
Plate tectonics
Plugs
Radiometric dating
Regional development
SHRIMP U-Pb dating
Solid state physics
Strike-slip faults
Studies
Subduction
Subduction (geology)
Subvolcanic magmatic complexes
Uplift
Zircon
title Emplacement and temporal constraints of the Gondwanan intrusive complexes of northern Patagonia: La Esperanza plutono-volcanic case
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T05%3A01%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Emplacement%20and%20temporal%20constraints%20of%20the%20Gondwanan%20intrusive%20complexes%20of%20northern%20Patagonia:%20La%20Esperanza%20plutono-volcanic%20case&rft.jtitle=Tectonophysics&rft.au=Mart%C3%ADnez%20Dopico,%20Carmen%20I.&rft.date=2017-08-21&rft.volume=712-713&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=269&rft.pages=249-269&rft.issn=0040-1951&rft.eissn=1879-3266&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.tecto.2017.05.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1956027851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1956027851&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0040195117301981&rfr_iscdi=true