Prenatal care and perinatal outcome

Objective: To relate the number of prenatal consultations to perinatal outcomes. Methods: Cross-sectional study conducted from September 2014 to August 2015 using a database of pregnant women attending a public maternity hospital in the city of Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil. The research include...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista brasileira em promoção da saúde = Brazilian journal in health promotion 2017-01, Vol.30 (2)
Hauptverfasser: Iramar Baptistella do Nascimento, Fleig, Raquel, Vanessa Cardoso Pacheco, Matheus Leite Ramos de Souza, Eduardo Bach Pinheiro, Silva, Thiago Ribeiro e, Silva, Jean Carl
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page
container_title Revista brasileira em promoção da saúde = Brazilian journal in health promotion
container_volume 30
creator Iramar Baptistella do Nascimento
Fleig, Raquel
Vanessa Cardoso Pacheco
Matheus Leite Ramos de Souza
Eduardo Bach Pinheiro
Silva, Thiago Ribeiro e
Silva, Jean Carl
description Objective: To relate the number of prenatal consultations to perinatal outcomes. Methods: Cross-sectional study conducted from September 2014 to August 2015 using a database of pregnant women attending a public maternity hospital in the city of Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil. The research included single pregnancy patients divided into 2 groups: a group of 6 or less prenatal consultations and a group of 7 or more prenatal consultations. The following primary outcomes were analyzed: delivery method, prematurity, low birth weight, macrosomia, perinatal death. The analysis was carried out using a multinomial logistic regression model with a 95% confidence interval. Results: In all, 4,260 records were analyzed: 266 (6.2%) had 6 or less prenatal consultations and 3,994 (93.7%) had 7 or more prenatal consultations. The groups presented different maternal characteristics – age ≤20 years (27.4% vs 21.3% p=0.020), incomplete primary education (28.1% vs 21% p=0.006) and complete secondary education (25.9% vs 36.9% p=0.000), systemic arterial hypertension (9.77% vs 6.5% p=0.039) – and different neonatal characteristics – prematurity (23.6% vs. 6.6%, p=0.000) and full-term birth (76.3% vs 93.3% p=0.000). The group of women who had 6 consultations of less was at increased odds of prematurity (OR=2.837), low birth weight (OR=1.895) and perinatal death (OR=5.584). Conclusion: The pregnant women who had less than seven prenatal consultations are at increased odds of prematurity, low birth weight and perinatal death.
doi_str_mv 10.5020/18061230.2017.p187
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1955983747</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1955983747</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_19559837473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYJAyNNAzNTAy0De0MDAzNDI20DMyMDTXKzC0MGdi4AQJ6oJEWeBsIyMOBq7i4iwDAzNjCwtTTgblgKLUvMSSxByF5MSiVIXEvBSFgtSiTIhQfmlJcn5uKg8Da1piTnEqL5TmZlB2cw1x9tAtKMovLE0tLonPyi8tygNKxRtamppaWhibm5gbE6cKAC13NQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1955983747</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prenatal care and perinatal outcome</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Iramar Baptistella do Nascimento ; Fleig, Raquel ; Vanessa Cardoso Pacheco ; Matheus Leite Ramos de Souza ; Eduardo Bach Pinheiro ; Silva, Thiago Ribeiro e ; Silva, Jean Carl</creator><creatorcontrib>Iramar Baptistella do Nascimento ; Fleig, Raquel ; Vanessa Cardoso Pacheco ; Matheus Leite Ramos de Souza ; Eduardo Bach Pinheiro ; Silva, Thiago Ribeiro e ; Silva, Jean Carl</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To relate the number of prenatal consultations to perinatal outcomes. Methods: Cross-sectional study conducted from September 2014 to August 2015 using a database of pregnant women attending a public maternity hospital in the city of Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil. The research included single pregnancy patients divided into 2 groups: a group of 6 or less prenatal consultations and a group of 7 or more prenatal consultations. The following primary outcomes were analyzed: delivery method, prematurity, low birth weight, macrosomia, perinatal death. The analysis was carried out using a multinomial logistic regression model with a 95% confidence interval. Results: In all, 4,260 records were analyzed: 266 (6.2%) had 6 or less prenatal consultations and 3,994 (93.7%) had 7 or more prenatal consultations. The groups presented different maternal characteristics – age ≤20 years (27.4% vs 21.3% p=0.020), incomplete primary education (28.1% vs 21% p=0.006) and complete secondary education (25.9% vs 36.9% p=0.000), systemic arterial hypertension (9.77% vs 6.5% p=0.039) – and different neonatal characteristics – prematurity (23.6% vs. 6.6%, p=0.000) and full-term birth (76.3% vs 93.3% p=0.000). The group of women who had 6 consultations of less was at increased odds of prematurity (OR=2.837), low birth weight (OR=1.895) and perinatal death (OR=5.584). Conclusion: The pregnant women who had less than seven prenatal consultations are at increased odds of prematurity, low birth weight and perinatal death.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1806-1222</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1806-1230</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5020/18061230.2017.p187</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Fortaleza: Universidade de Fortaleza - Centro de Ciências da Saúde</publisher><subject>Birth weight ; Childbirth &amp; labor ; Confidence intervals ; Death ; Education ; Health risk assessment ; Hypertension ; Pregnancy ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Statistical analysis ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>Revista brasileira em promoção da saúde = Brazilian journal in health promotion, 2017-01, Vol.30 (2)</ispartof><rights>Copyright Universidade de Fortaleza - Centro de Ciências da Saúde 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Iramar Baptistella do Nascimento</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleig, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanessa Cardoso Pacheco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matheus Leite Ramos de Souza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eduardo Bach Pinheiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Thiago Ribeiro e</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Jean Carl</creatorcontrib><title>Prenatal care and perinatal outcome</title><title>Revista brasileira em promoção da saúde = Brazilian journal in health promotion</title><description>Objective: To relate the number of prenatal consultations to perinatal outcomes. Methods: Cross-sectional study conducted from September 2014 to August 2015 using a database of pregnant women attending a public maternity hospital in the city of Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil. The research included single pregnancy patients divided into 2 groups: a group of 6 or less prenatal consultations and a group of 7 or more prenatal consultations. The following primary outcomes were analyzed: delivery method, prematurity, low birth weight, macrosomia, perinatal death. The analysis was carried out using a multinomial logistic regression model with a 95% confidence interval. Results: In all, 4,260 records were analyzed: 266 (6.2%) had 6 or less prenatal consultations and 3,994 (93.7%) had 7 or more prenatal consultations. The groups presented different maternal characteristics – age ≤20 years (27.4% vs 21.3% p=0.020), incomplete primary education (28.1% vs 21% p=0.006) and complete secondary education (25.9% vs 36.9% p=0.000), systemic arterial hypertension (9.77% vs 6.5% p=0.039) – and different neonatal characteristics – prematurity (23.6% vs. 6.6%, p=0.000) and full-term birth (76.3% vs 93.3% p=0.000). The group of women who had 6 consultations of less was at increased odds of prematurity (OR=2.837), low birth weight (OR=1.895) and perinatal death (OR=5.584). Conclusion: The pregnant women who had less than seven prenatal consultations are at increased odds of prematurity, low birth weight and perinatal death.</description><subject>Birth weight</subject><subject>Childbirth &amp; labor</subject><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Death</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Health risk assessment</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1806-1222</issn><issn>1806-1230</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYJAyNNAzNTAy0De0MDAzNDI20DMyMDTXKzC0MGdi4AQJ6oJEWeBsIyMOBq7i4iwDAzNjCwtTTgblgKLUvMSSxByF5MSiVIXEvBSFgtSiTIhQfmlJcn5uKg8Da1piTnEqL5TmZlB2cw1x9tAtKMovLE0tLonPyi8tygNKxRtamppaWhibm5gbE6cKAC13NQA</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Iramar Baptistella do Nascimento</creator><creator>Fleig, Raquel</creator><creator>Vanessa Cardoso Pacheco</creator><creator>Matheus Leite Ramos de Souza</creator><creator>Eduardo Bach Pinheiro</creator><creator>Silva, Thiago Ribeiro e</creator><creator>Silva, Jean Carl</creator><general>Universidade de Fortaleza - Centro de Ciências da Saúde</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Prenatal care and perinatal outcome</title><author>Iramar Baptistella do Nascimento ; Fleig, Raquel ; Vanessa Cardoso Pacheco ; Matheus Leite Ramos de Souza ; Eduardo Bach Pinheiro ; Silva, Thiago Ribeiro e ; Silva, Jean Carl</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_19559837473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Birth weight</topic><topic>Childbirth &amp; labor</topic><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Death</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Health risk assessment</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Iramar Baptistella do Nascimento</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleig, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vanessa Cardoso Pacheco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matheus Leite Ramos de Souza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eduardo Bach Pinheiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Thiago Ribeiro e</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Jean Carl</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Proquest Nursing &amp; Allied Health Source</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Revista brasileira em promoção da saúde = Brazilian journal in health promotion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Iramar Baptistella do Nascimento</au><au>Fleig, Raquel</au><au>Vanessa Cardoso Pacheco</au><au>Matheus Leite Ramos de Souza</au><au>Eduardo Bach Pinheiro</au><au>Silva, Thiago Ribeiro e</au><au>Silva, Jean Carl</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prenatal care and perinatal outcome</atitle><jtitle>Revista brasileira em promoção da saúde = Brazilian journal in health promotion</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><issn>1806-1222</issn><eissn>1806-1230</eissn><abstract>Objective: To relate the number of prenatal consultations to perinatal outcomes. Methods: Cross-sectional study conducted from September 2014 to August 2015 using a database of pregnant women attending a public maternity hospital in the city of Joinville, Santa Catarina, Brazil. The research included single pregnancy patients divided into 2 groups: a group of 6 or less prenatal consultations and a group of 7 or more prenatal consultations. The following primary outcomes were analyzed: delivery method, prematurity, low birth weight, macrosomia, perinatal death. The analysis was carried out using a multinomial logistic regression model with a 95% confidence interval. Results: In all, 4,260 records were analyzed: 266 (6.2%) had 6 or less prenatal consultations and 3,994 (93.7%) had 7 or more prenatal consultations. The groups presented different maternal characteristics – age ≤20 years (27.4% vs 21.3% p=0.020), incomplete primary education (28.1% vs 21% p=0.006) and complete secondary education (25.9% vs 36.9% p=0.000), systemic arterial hypertension (9.77% vs 6.5% p=0.039) – and different neonatal characteristics – prematurity (23.6% vs. 6.6%, p=0.000) and full-term birth (76.3% vs 93.3% p=0.000). The group of women who had 6 consultations of less was at increased odds of prematurity (OR=2.837), low birth weight (OR=1.895) and perinatal death (OR=5.584). Conclusion: The pregnant women who had less than seven prenatal consultations are at increased odds of prematurity, low birth weight and perinatal death.</abstract><cop>Fortaleza</cop><pub>Universidade de Fortaleza - Centro de Ciências da Saúde</pub><doi>10.5020/18061230.2017.p187</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1806-1222
ispartof Revista brasileira em promoção da saúde = Brazilian journal in health promotion, 2017-01, Vol.30 (2)
issn 1806-1222
1806-1230
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1955983747
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Birth weight
Childbirth & labor
Confidence intervals
Death
Education
Health risk assessment
Hypertension
Pregnancy
Regression analysis
Regression models
Statistical analysis
Womens health
title Prenatal care and perinatal outcome
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T00%3A34%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prenatal%20care%20and%20perinatal%20outcome&rft.jtitle=Revista%20brasileira%20em%20promoc%CC%A7a%CC%83o%20da%20sau%CC%81de%20=%20Brazilian%20journal%20in%20health%20promotion&rft.au=Iramar%20Baptistella%20do%20Nascimento&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.issn=1806-1222&rft.eissn=1806-1230&rft_id=info:doi/10.5020/18061230.2017.p187&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1955983747%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1955983747&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true