Misdirection of Labor and Capital Under Social Security/Comment
Garrison takes an Austrian School approach to assessing the economic distortions caused by the US Social Security system. It is shown that the neoclassical approach, which focuses on aggregate distortions in savings and employment, grossly underestimates the effects of Social Security. With the Aust...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Cato journal 1983-10, Vol.3 (2), p.513 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 513 |
container_title | The Cato journal |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Garrison, Roger W Burtless, Gary T |
description | Garrison takes an Austrian School approach to assessing the economic distortions caused by the US Social Security system. It is shown that the neoclassical approach, which focuses on aggregate distortions in savings and employment, grossly underestimates the effects of Social Security. With the Austrian model, distortions occurring at the individual level can be identified. Uncertainty about the future of the Social Security system and fears of its collapse make it impossible for workers to maintain patterns of consumption compatible with their time preferences, and it is difficult for businesses to forecast future consumption demands. Though system reforms based on tax exemptions for private insurance investments can create other economic distortions, they are preferable to the present system, and they are strategically necessary to bring about reform. Burtless comments that private investment alternatives offer no more certainty of return than Social Security, which provides a wide variety of benefits in addition to retirement income. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_195580809</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1045171</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_1955808093</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNirsOgjAYRhujiXh5h8ad2FIqdHIgGgedwJlUKEkJ9MdeBt9eBh_A6Tsn51ugiIqUxSw95UsUkSSbmWTJGm2c6wmhCacsQueHdq22qvEaDIYO3-ULLJamxYWctJcDfppWWVxCo2cpVROs9p9jAeOojN-hVScHp_a_3aLD9VIVt3iy8A7K-bqHYM2caio4z0lOBPvr9AVCEjkp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195580809</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Misdirection of Labor and Capital Under Social Security/Comment</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><creator>Garrison, Roger W ; Burtless, Gary T</creator><creatorcontrib>Garrison, Roger W ; Burtless, Gary T</creatorcontrib><description>Garrison takes an Austrian School approach to assessing the economic distortions caused by the US Social Security system. It is shown that the neoclassical approach, which focuses on aggregate distortions in savings and employment, grossly underestimates the effects of Social Security. With the Austrian model, distortions occurring at the individual level can be identified. Uncertainty about the future of the Social Security system and fears of its collapse make it impossible for workers to maintain patterns of consumption compatible with their time preferences, and it is difficult for businesses to forecast future consumption demands. Though system reforms based on tax exemptions for private insurance investments can create other economic distortions, they are preferable to the present system, and they are strategically necessary to bring about reform. Burtless comments that private investment alternatives offer no more certainty of return than Social Security, which provides a wide variety of benefits in addition to retirement income.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-3072</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-3468</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CAJODC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Cato Institute</publisher><subject>Capital ; Labor ; Old age benefits ; Productivity ; Social security ; Status ; Tax exempt ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>The Cato journal, 1983-10, Vol.3 (2), p.513</ispartof><rights>Copyright Cato Institute Fall 1983</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garrison, Roger W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burtless, Gary T</creatorcontrib><title>Misdirection of Labor and Capital Under Social Security/Comment</title><title>The Cato journal</title><description>Garrison takes an Austrian School approach to assessing the economic distortions caused by the US Social Security system. It is shown that the neoclassical approach, which focuses on aggregate distortions in savings and employment, grossly underestimates the effects of Social Security. With the Austrian model, distortions occurring at the individual level can be identified. Uncertainty about the future of the Social Security system and fears of its collapse make it impossible for workers to maintain patterns of consumption compatible with their time preferences, and it is difficult for businesses to forecast future consumption demands. Though system reforms based on tax exemptions for private insurance investments can create other economic distortions, they are preferable to the present system, and they are strategically necessary to bring about reform. Burtless comments that private investment alternatives offer no more certainty of return than Social Security, which provides a wide variety of benefits in addition to retirement income.</description><subject>Capital</subject><subject>Labor</subject><subject>Old age benefits</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Social security</subject><subject>Status</subject><subject>Tax exempt</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0273-3072</issn><issn>1943-3468</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNqNirsOgjAYRhujiXh5h8ad2FIqdHIgGgedwJlUKEkJ9MdeBt9eBh_A6Tsn51ugiIqUxSw95UsUkSSbmWTJGm2c6wmhCacsQueHdq22qvEaDIYO3-ULLJamxYWctJcDfppWWVxCo2cpVROs9p9jAeOojN-hVScHp_a_3aLD9VIVt3iy8A7K-bqHYM2caio4z0lOBPvr9AVCEjkp</recordid><startdate>19831001</startdate><enddate>19831001</enddate><creator>Garrison, Roger W</creator><creator>Burtless, Gary T</creator><general>Cato Institute</general><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19831001</creationdate><title>Misdirection of Labor and Capital Under Social Security/Comment</title><author>Garrison, Roger W ; Burtless, Gary T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_1955808093</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>Capital</topic><topic>Labor</topic><topic>Old age benefits</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Social security</topic><topic>Status</topic><topic>Tax exempt</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garrison, Roger W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burtless, Gary T</creatorcontrib><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Cato journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garrison, Roger W</au><au>Burtless, Gary T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Misdirection of Labor and Capital Under Social Security/Comment</atitle><jtitle>The Cato journal</jtitle><date>1983-10-01</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>513</spage><pages>513-</pages><issn>0273-3072</issn><eissn>1943-3468</eissn><coden>CAJODC</coden><abstract>Garrison takes an Austrian School approach to assessing the economic distortions caused by the US Social Security system. It is shown that the neoclassical approach, which focuses on aggregate distortions in savings and employment, grossly underestimates the effects of Social Security. With the Austrian model, distortions occurring at the individual level can be identified. Uncertainty about the future of the Social Security system and fears of its collapse make it impossible for workers to maintain patterns of consumption compatible with their time preferences, and it is difficult for businesses to forecast future consumption demands. Though system reforms based on tax exemptions for private insurance investments can create other economic distortions, they are preferable to the present system, and they are strategically necessary to bring about reform. Burtless comments that private investment alternatives offer no more certainty of return than Social Security, which provides a wide variety of benefits in addition to retirement income.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Cato Institute</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0273-3072 |
ispartof | The Cato journal, 1983-10, Vol.3 (2), p.513 |
issn | 0273-3072 1943-3468 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_195580809 |
source | PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ) |
subjects | Capital Labor Old age benefits Productivity Social security Status Tax exempt Uncertainty |
title | Misdirection of Labor and Capital Under Social Security/Comment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T09%3A07%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Misdirection%20of%20Labor%20and%20Capital%20Under%20Social%20Security/Comment&rft.jtitle=The%20Cato%20journal&rft.au=Garrison,%20Roger%20W&rft.date=1983-10-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=513&rft.pages=513-&rft.issn=0273-3072&rft.eissn=1943-3468&rft.coden=CAJODC&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1045171%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195580809&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |