Utilization of Metacognitive Judgments in the Allocation of Study during Multitrial Learning

We contrasted several ways that an individual's judgments of learning (JOLs) can be utilized when allocating additional study ("restudy") during the learning of Swahili-English translation equivalents. The findings demonstrate how metacognitive monitoring can be utilized to benefit mu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Psychological science 1994-07, Vol.5 (4), p.207-213
Hauptverfasser: Nelson, Thomas O., Dunlosky, John, Graf, Aurora, Narens, Louis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 213
container_issue 4
container_start_page 207
container_title Psychological science
container_volume 5
creator Nelson, Thomas O.
Dunlosky, John
Graf, Aurora
Narens, Louis
description We contrasted several ways that an individual's judgments of learning (JOLs) can be utilized when allocating additional study ("restudy") during the learning of Swahili-English translation equivalents. The findings demonstrate how metacognitive monitoring can be utilized to benefit multitrial learning. Computer-controlled allocation of restudy based on people's JOLs was equivalent to most people's own allocation of restudy (indicating that the computer algorithm can provide a sufficient account of people's allocation of restudy) and was more effective than a computer-controlled allocation based on normative performance (indicating that people's metacognitive monitoring of idiosyncratic knowledge has functional utility in causal chains for learning).
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00502.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_195580465</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40063103</jstor_id><sage_id>10.1111_j.1467-9280.1994.tb00502.x</sage_id><sourcerecordid>40063103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-29c5236019e8a8adf4fbb3f7e4b14360d4ef2f8885cab222969cdc91d9054ac03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkF9LwzAUxYMoOKcfQQh770zSNG18G8O_THzQvQkhTdOa0rUzSWXz05vSMXz0vlw495x74AfADKM5DnNTzzFlacRJFgTO6dznCCWIzHcnYHI8nYIJ4gmLUp6yc3DhXI3CpDGbgI-1N435kd50LexK-KK9VF3VGm--NXzui2qjW--gaaH_1HDRNJ06mt98X-xh0VvTVvClb7zx1sgGrrS0bdAuwVkpG6evDnsK1vd378vHaPX68LRcrCJFCfMR4SohMUOY60xmsihpmedxmWqaYxr0guqSlFmWJUrmhBDOuCoUxwVHCZUKxVMwG_9ubffVa-dF3fW2DZUC8yTJEGVJMN2OJmU756wuxdaajbR7gZEYYIpaDMTEQEwMMMUBptiFcDqGnaz0n-__SV6Pydr5zh47KUIsxiiOfwEsmYUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195580465</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utilization of Metacognitive Judgments in the Allocation of Study during Multitrial Learning</title><source>SAGE Publications</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Nelson, Thomas O. ; Dunlosky, John ; Graf, Aurora ; Narens, Louis</creator><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Thomas O. ; Dunlosky, John ; Graf, Aurora ; Narens, Louis</creatorcontrib><description>We contrasted several ways that an individual's judgments of learning (JOLs) can be utilized when allocating additional study ("restudy") during the learning of Swahili-English translation equivalents. The findings demonstrate how metacognitive monitoring can be utilized to benefit multitrial learning. Computer-controlled allocation of restudy based on people's JOLs was equivalent to most people's own allocation of restudy (indicating that the computer algorithm can provide a sufficient account of people's allocation of restudy) and was more effective than a computer-controlled allocation based on normative performance (indicating that people's metacognitive monitoring of idiosyncratic knowledge has functional utility in causal chains for learning).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-7976</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9280</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00502.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PSYSET</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Cognition ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; Conditional probabilities ; Experimental psychology ; Experimentation ; Independent study ; Judgment ; Learning ; Memory ; Metacognition ; Normativity ; Psychology</subject><ispartof>Psychological science, 1994-07, Vol.5 (4), p.207-213</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1994 American Psychological Society</rights><rights>1994 Association for Psychological Science</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. Jul 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-29c5236019e8a8adf4fbb3f7e4b14360d4ef2f8885cab222969cdc91d9054ac03</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-29c5236019e8a8adf4fbb3f7e4b14360d4ef2f8885cab222969cdc91d9054ac03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40063103$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40063103$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,21798,27901,27902,43597,43598,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Thomas O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunlosky, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graf, Aurora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narens, Louis</creatorcontrib><title>Utilization of Metacognitive Judgments in the Allocation of Study during Multitrial Learning</title><title>Psychological science</title><addtitle>Psychol Sci</addtitle><description>We contrasted several ways that an individual's judgments of learning (JOLs) can be utilized when allocating additional study ("restudy") during the learning of Swahili-English translation equivalents. The findings demonstrate how metacognitive monitoring can be utilized to benefit multitrial learning. Computer-controlled allocation of restudy based on people's JOLs was equivalent to most people's own allocation of restudy (indicating that the computer algorithm can provide a sufficient account of people's allocation of restudy) and was more effective than a computer-controlled allocation based on normative performance (indicating that people's metacognitive monitoring of idiosyncratic knowledge has functional utility in causal chains for learning).</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>Conditional probabilities</subject><subject>Experimental psychology</subject><subject>Experimentation</subject><subject>Independent study</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Normativity</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><issn>0956-7976</issn><issn>1467-9280</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkF9LwzAUxYMoOKcfQQh770zSNG18G8O_THzQvQkhTdOa0rUzSWXz05vSMXz0vlw495x74AfADKM5DnNTzzFlacRJFgTO6dznCCWIzHcnYHI8nYIJ4gmLUp6yc3DhXI3CpDGbgI-1N435kd50LexK-KK9VF3VGm--NXzui2qjW--gaaH_1HDRNJ06mt98X-xh0VvTVvClb7zx1sgGrrS0bdAuwVkpG6evDnsK1vd378vHaPX68LRcrCJFCfMR4SohMUOY60xmsihpmedxmWqaYxr0guqSlFmWJUrmhBDOuCoUxwVHCZUKxVMwG_9ubffVa-dF3fW2DZUC8yTJEGVJMN2OJmU756wuxdaajbR7gZEYYIpaDMTEQEwMMMUBptiFcDqGnaz0n-__SV6Pydr5zh47KUIsxiiOfwEsmYUg</recordid><startdate>19940701</startdate><enddate>19940701</enddate><creator>Nelson, Thomas O.</creator><creator>Dunlosky, John</creator><creator>Graf, Aurora</creator><creator>Narens, Louis</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940701</creationdate><title>Utilization of Metacognitive Judgments in the Allocation of Study during Multitrial Learning</title><author>Nelson, Thomas O. ; Dunlosky, John ; Graf, Aurora ; Narens, Louis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c426t-29c5236019e8a8adf4fbb3f7e4b14360d4ef2f8885cab222969cdc91d9054ac03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>Conditional probabilities</topic><topic>Experimental psychology</topic><topic>Experimentation</topic><topic>Independent study</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Normativity</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nelson, Thomas O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dunlosky, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graf, Aurora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Narens, Louis</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Psychological science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nelson, Thomas O.</au><au>Dunlosky, John</au><au>Graf, Aurora</au><au>Narens, Louis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Utilization of Metacognitive Judgments in the Allocation of Study during Multitrial Learning</atitle><jtitle>Psychological science</jtitle><addtitle>Psychol Sci</addtitle><date>1994-07-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>207</spage><epage>213</epage><pages>207-213</pages><issn>0956-7976</issn><eissn>1467-9280</eissn><coden>PSYSET</coden><abstract>We contrasted several ways that an individual's judgments of learning (JOLs) can be utilized when allocating additional study ("restudy") during the learning of Swahili-English translation equivalents. The findings demonstrate how metacognitive monitoring can be utilized to benefit multitrial learning. Computer-controlled allocation of restudy based on people's JOLs was equivalent to most people's own allocation of restudy (indicating that the computer algorithm can provide a sufficient account of people's allocation of restudy) and was more effective than a computer-controlled allocation based on normative performance (indicating that people's metacognitive monitoring of idiosyncratic knowledge has functional utility in causal chains for learning).</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00502.x</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-7976
ispartof Psychological science, 1994-07, Vol.5 (4), p.207-213
issn 0956-7976
1467-9280
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_195580465
source SAGE Publications; Business Source Complete; JSTOR
subjects Algorithms
Cognition
Cognition & reasoning
Conditional probabilities
Experimental psychology
Experimentation
Independent study
Judgment
Learning
Memory
Metacognition
Normativity
Psychology
title Utilization of Metacognitive Judgments in the Allocation of Study during Multitrial Learning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T00%3A45%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utilization%20of%20Metacognitive%20Judgments%20in%20the%20Allocation%20of%20Study%20during%20Multitrial%20Learning&rft.jtitle=Psychological%20science&rft.au=Nelson,%20Thomas%20O.&rft.date=1994-07-01&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=207&rft.epage=213&rft.pages=207-213&rft.issn=0956-7976&rft.eissn=1467-9280&rft.coden=PSYSET&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00502.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40063103%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195580465&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40063103&rft_sage_id=10.1111_j.1467-9280.1994.tb00502.x&rfr_iscdi=true