Clinical predictive factors of subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease

High-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) constitutes one of the most effective treatments for advanced forms of Parkinson's disease. The cost and potential risks of this procedure encourage the determination of clinical characteristics of patients that will have the best post...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Brain (London, England : 1878) England : 1878), 2002-03, Vol.125 (Pt 3), p.575-583
Hauptverfasser: WELTER, M. L, HOUETO, J. L, AGID, Y, TEZENAS DU MONTCEL, S, MESNAGE, V, BONNET, A. M, PILLON, B, ARNULF, I, PIDOUX, B, DORMONT, D, CORNU, P
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 583
container_issue Pt 3
container_start_page 575
container_title Brain (London, England : 1878)
container_volume 125
creator WELTER, M. L
HOUETO, J. L
AGID, Y
TEZENAS DU MONTCEL, S
MESNAGE, V
BONNET, A. M
PILLON, B
ARNULF, I
PIDOUX, B
DORMONT, D
CORNU, P
description High-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) constitutes one of the most effective treatments for advanced forms of Parkinson's disease. The cost and potential risks of this procedure encourage the determination of clinical characteristics of patients that will have the best postoperative outcome. Forty-one Parkinson's disease patients underwent surgery for bilateral STN stimulation. The selection criteria were severe parkinsonian motor disability, clear response of symptoms to levodopa, occurrence of disabling levodopa-related motor complications and the absence of dementia and significant abnormalities on brain MRI. Clinical evaluation was performed 1 month before and 6 months after surgery. The improvement in the activities of daily living subscale of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Part II (UPDRS II) and parkinsonian motor disability (UPDRS III) was greater when the preoperative scores for activities of daily living and parkinsonian motor disability, in particular axial symptoms, such as gait disorders and postural instability assessed at the time of maximal clinical improvement (on drug), were lower. Age and disease duration were not predictive, but parkinsonian motor disability tended to be more improved in patients with younger age and shorter disease duration. The severity of levodopa-related motor complications was not a predictive factor. The outcome of STN stimulation was excellent in levodopa-responsive forms of Parkinson's disease, i.e. in patients with selective brain dopaminergic lesions, and moderate in patients with axial motor symptoms and cognitive impairment known to be less responsive or unresponsive to levodopa treatment, i.e. when brain non-dopaminergic lesions develop in addition to the degeneration of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system. The results are consistent with the classical inclusion criteria for STN stimulation, but imply that the decision to operate on the oldest patients and/or patients with gait and postural disorders, who are poorly responsive to levodopa, should be weighed carefully.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/brain/awf050
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_195432193</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>332912221</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-87069a4bd3c3b1bc21690848255a5865c5c69dc14ada4c1211fb74248050b1b33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0E1Lw0AQgOFFFFurN8-yCOLF2J39avYoxS-o6EHPYbJJcGuyqbuJ4r83tQFPc3mYYV5CToFdAzNingd0fo7fFVNsj0xBapZwUHqfTBljOkmNYhNyFOOaMZCC60MyAUgXXIOckqdl7byzWNNNKAtnO_dV0gpt14ZI24rGPu_escbGWRo71_Q1dq711Hn6guHD-dj6y0gLF0uM5TE5qLCO5ck4Z-Tt7vZ1-ZCsnu8flzerxEqZdkm6YNqgzAthRQ655aANS2XKlUKVamWV1aawILFAaYEDVPlCcpkOLw5eiBk53-3dhPazL2OXrds--OFkBkYNT4LZoqsdsqGNMZRVtgmuwfCTAcu26bK_dNku3cDPxp193pTFPx5bDeBiBBiHYFVAb138d0KBMcDFL1zdd6c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195432193</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical predictive factors of subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>WELTER, M. L ; HOUETO, J. L ; AGID, Y ; TEZENAS DU MONTCEL, S ; MESNAGE, V ; BONNET, A. M ; PILLON, B ; ARNULF, I ; PIDOUX, B ; DORMONT, D ; CORNU, P</creator><creatorcontrib>WELTER, M. L ; HOUETO, J. L ; AGID, Y ; TEZENAS DU MONTCEL, S ; MESNAGE, V ; BONNET, A. M ; PILLON, B ; ARNULF, I ; PIDOUX, B ; DORMONT, D ; CORNU, P</creatorcontrib><description>High-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) constitutes one of the most effective treatments for advanced forms of Parkinson's disease. The cost and potential risks of this procedure encourage the determination of clinical characteristics of patients that will have the best postoperative outcome. Forty-one Parkinson's disease patients underwent surgery for bilateral STN stimulation. The selection criteria were severe parkinsonian motor disability, clear response of symptoms to levodopa, occurrence of disabling levodopa-related motor complications and the absence of dementia and significant abnormalities on brain MRI. Clinical evaluation was performed 1 month before and 6 months after surgery. The improvement in the activities of daily living subscale of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Part II (UPDRS II) and parkinsonian motor disability (UPDRS III) was greater when the preoperative scores for activities of daily living and parkinsonian motor disability, in particular axial symptoms, such as gait disorders and postural instability assessed at the time of maximal clinical improvement (on drug), were lower. Age and disease duration were not predictive, but parkinsonian motor disability tended to be more improved in patients with younger age and shorter disease duration. The severity of levodopa-related motor complications was not a predictive factor. The outcome of STN stimulation was excellent in levodopa-responsive forms of Parkinson's disease, i.e. in patients with selective brain dopaminergic lesions, and moderate in patients with axial motor symptoms and cognitive impairment known to be less responsive or unresponsive to levodopa treatment, i.e. when brain non-dopaminergic lesions develop in addition to the degeneration of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system. The results are consistent with the classical inclusion criteria for STN stimulation, but imply that the decision to operate on the oldest patients and/or patients with gait and postural disorders, who are poorly responsive to levodopa, should be weighed carefully.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-8950</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2156</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/brain/awf050</identifier><identifier>PMID: 11872614</identifier><identifier>CODEN: BRAIAK</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Age Factors ; Age of Onset ; Aged ; Antiparkinson Agents - adverse effects ; Antiparkinson Agents - therapeutic use ; Biological and medical sciences ; Causality ; Disease Progression ; Diseases of the nervous system ; Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced - complications ; Electric Stimulation Therapy ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Parkinson Disease - physiopathology ; Parkinson Disease - therapy ; Parkinson's disease ; Patient Selection ; Predictive Value of Tests ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Subthalamic Nucleus - physiopathology ; Subthalamic Nucleus - surgery ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Brain (London, England : 1878), 2002-03, Vol.125 (Pt 3), p.575-583</ispartof><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Mar 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-87069a4bd3c3b1bc21690848255a5865c5c69dc14ada4c1211fb74248050b1b33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-87069a4bd3c3b1bc21690848255a5865c5c69dc14ada4c1211fb74248050b1b33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27933,27934</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13519912$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11872614$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>WELTER, M. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOUETO, J. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AGID, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TEZENAS DU MONTCEL, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MESNAGE, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BONNET, A. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PILLON, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARNULF, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PIDOUX, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DORMONT, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CORNU, P</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical predictive factors of subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease</title><title>Brain (London, England : 1878)</title><addtitle>Brain</addtitle><description>High-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) constitutes one of the most effective treatments for advanced forms of Parkinson's disease. The cost and potential risks of this procedure encourage the determination of clinical characteristics of patients that will have the best postoperative outcome. Forty-one Parkinson's disease patients underwent surgery for bilateral STN stimulation. The selection criteria were severe parkinsonian motor disability, clear response of symptoms to levodopa, occurrence of disabling levodopa-related motor complications and the absence of dementia and significant abnormalities on brain MRI. Clinical evaluation was performed 1 month before and 6 months after surgery. The improvement in the activities of daily living subscale of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Part II (UPDRS II) and parkinsonian motor disability (UPDRS III) was greater when the preoperative scores for activities of daily living and parkinsonian motor disability, in particular axial symptoms, such as gait disorders and postural instability assessed at the time of maximal clinical improvement (on drug), were lower. Age and disease duration were not predictive, but parkinsonian motor disability tended to be more improved in patients with younger age and shorter disease duration. The severity of levodopa-related motor complications was not a predictive factor. The outcome of STN stimulation was excellent in levodopa-responsive forms of Parkinson's disease, i.e. in patients with selective brain dopaminergic lesions, and moderate in patients with axial motor symptoms and cognitive impairment known to be less responsive or unresponsive to levodopa treatment, i.e. when brain non-dopaminergic lesions develop in addition to the degeneration of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system. The results are consistent with the classical inclusion criteria for STN stimulation, but imply that the decision to operate on the oldest patients and/or patients with gait and postural disorders, who are poorly responsive to levodopa, should be weighed carefully.</description><subject>Age Factors</subject><subject>Age of Onset</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Antiparkinson Agents - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antiparkinson Agents - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Disease Progression</subject><subject>Diseases of the nervous system</subject><subject>Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced - complications</subject><subject>Electric Stimulation Therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease - physiopathology</subject><subject>Parkinson Disease - therapy</subject><subject>Parkinson's disease</subject><subject>Patient Selection</subject><subject>Predictive Value of Tests</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Subthalamic Nucleus - physiopathology</subject><subject>Subthalamic Nucleus - surgery</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0006-8950</issn><issn>1460-2156</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0E1Lw0AQgOFFFFurN8-yCOLF2J39avYoxS-o6EHPYbJJcGuyqbuJ4r83tQFPc3mYYV5CToFdAzNingd0fo7fFVNsj0xBapZwUHqfTBljOkmNYhNyFOOaMZCC60MyAUgXXIOckqdl7byzWNNNKAtnO_dV0gpt14ZI24rGPu_escbGWRo71_Q1dq711Hn6guHD-dj6y0gLF0uM5TE5qLCO5ck4Z-Tt7vZ1-ZCsnu8flzerxEqZdkm6YNqgzAthRQ655aANS2XKlUKVamWV1aawILFAaYEDVPlCcpkOLw5eiBk53-3dhPazL2OXrds--OFkBkYNT4LZoqsdsqGNMZRVtgmuwfCTAcu26bK_dNku3cDPxp193pTFPx5bDeBiBBiHYFVAb138d0KBMcDFL1zdd6c</recordid><startdate>20020301</startdate><enddate>20020301</enddate><creator>WELTER, M. L</creator><creator>HOUETO, J. L</creator><creator>AGID, Y</creator><creator>TEZENAS DU MONTCEL, S</creator><creator>MESNAGE, V</creator><creator>BONNET, A. M</creator><creator>PILLON, B</creator><creator>ARNULF, I</creator><creator>PIDOUX, B</creator><creator>DORMONT, D</creator><creator>CORNU, P</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020301</creationdate><title>Clinical predictive factors of subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease</title><author>WELTER, M. L ; HOUETO, J. L ; AGID, Y ; TEZENAS DU MONTCEL, S ; MESNAGE, V ; BONNET, A. M ; PILLON, B ; ARNULF, I ; PIDOUX, B ; DORMONT, D ; CORNU, P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-87069a4bd3c3b1bc21690848255a5865c5c69dc14ada4c1211fb74248050b1b33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Age Factors</topic><topic>Age of Onset</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Antiparkinson Agents - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antiparkinson Agents - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Disease Progression</topic><topic>Diseases of the nervous system</topic><topic>Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced - complications</topic><topic>Electric Stimulation Therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease - physiopathology</topic><topic>Parkinson Disease - therapy</topic><topic>Parkinson's disease</topic><topic>Patient Selection</topic><topic>Predictive Value of Tests</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Subthalamic Nucleus - physiopathology</topic><topic>Subthalamic Nucleus - surgery</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>WELTER, M. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>HOUETO, J. L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AGID, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TEZENAS DU MONTCEL, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MESNAGE, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>BONNET, A. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PILLON, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ARNULF, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>PIDOUX, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DORMONT, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>CORNU, P</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Brain (London, England : 1878)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>WELTER, M. L</au><au>HOUETO, J. L</au><au>AGID, Y</au><au>TEZENAS DU MONTCEL, S</au><au>MESNAGE, V</au><au>BONNET, A. M</au><au>PILLON, B</au><au>ARNULF, I</au><au>PIDOUX, B</au><au>DORMONT, D</au><au>CORNU, P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical predictive factors of subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease</atitle><jtitle>Brain (London, England : 1878)</jtitle><addtitle>Brain</addtitle><date>2002-03-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>125</volume><issue>Pt 3</issue><spage>575</spage><epage>583</epage><pages>575-583</pages><issn>0006-8950</issn><eissn>1460-2156</eissn><coden>BRAIAK</coden><abstract>High-frequency stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) constitutes one of the most effective treatments for advanced forms of Parkinson's disease. The cost and potential risks of this procedure encourage the determination of clinical characteristics of patients that will have the best postoperative outcome. Forty-one Parkinson's disease patients underwent surgery for bilateral STN stimulation. The selection criteria were severe parkinsonian motor disability, clear response of symptoms to levodopa, occurrence of disabling levodopa-related motor complications and the absence of dementia and significant abnormalities on brain MRI. Clinical evaluation was performed 1 month before and 6 months after surgery. The improvement in the activities of daily living subscale of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Part II (UPDRS II) and parkinsonian motor disability (UPDRS III) was greater when the preoperative scores for activities of daily living and parkinsonian motor disability, in particular axial symptoms, such as gait disorders and postural instability assessed at the time of maximal clinical improvement (on drug), were lower. Age and disease duration were not predictive, but parkinsonian motor disability tended to be more improved in patients with younger age and shorter disease duration. The severity of levodopa-related motor complications was not a predictive factor. The outcome of STN stimulation was excellent in levodopa-responsive forms of Parkinson's disease, i.e. in patients with selective brain dopaminergic lesions, and moderate in patients with axial motor symptoms and cognitive impairment known to be less responsive or unresponsive to levodopa treatment, i.e. when brain non-dopaminergic lesions develop in addition to the degeneration of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system. The results are consistent with the classical inclusion criteria for STN stimulation, but imply that the decision to operate on the oldest patients and/or patients with gait and postural disorders, who are poorly responsive to levodopa, should be weighed carefully.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>11872614</pmid><doi>10.1093/brain/awf050</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-8950
ispartof Brain (London, England : 1878), 2002-03, Vol.125 (Pt 3), p.575-583
issn 0006-8950
1460-2156
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_195432193
source MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)
subjects Age Factors
Age of Onset
Aged
Antiparkinson Agents - adverse effects
Antiparkinson Agents - therapeutic use
Biological and medical sciences
Causality
Disease Progression
Diseases of the nervous system
Dyskinesia, Drug-Induced - complications
Electric Stimulation Therapy
Female
Humans
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Parkinson Disease - physiopathology
Parkinson Disease - therapy
Parkinson's disease
Patient Selection
Predictive Value of Tests
Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)
Subthalamic Nucleus - physiopathology
Subthalamic Nucleus - surgery
Treatment Outcome
title Clinical predictive factors of subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson's disease
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-02T17%3A56%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20predictive%20factors%20of%20subthalamic%20stimulation%20in%20Parkinson's%20disease&rft.jtitle=Brain%20(London,%20England%20:%201878)&rft.au=WELTER,%20M.%20L&rft.date=2002-03-01&rft.volume=125&rft.issue=Pt%203&rft.spage=575&rft.epage=583&rft.pages=575-583&rft.issn=0006-8950&rft.eissn=1460-2156&rft.coden=BRAIAK&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/brain/awf050&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E332912221%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195432193&rft_id=info:pmid/11872614&rfr_iscdi=true