On Testing the Efficacy of Selective Credit Controls: Comment

Hamburger and Zwick (1979) and Maris (1981) presented tests designed to determine the efficacy of selective credit controls on expenditures on consumer durables. Neither of these tests properly address the issue. The Hamburgerwick equation only captures indirect effects of selective credit controls....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of money, credit and banking credit and banking, 1983-02, Vol.15 (1), p.120-122
1. Verfasser: Molho, Lazaros E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 122
container_issue 1
container_start_page 120
container_title Journal of money, credit and banking
container_volume 15
creator Molho, Lazaros E.
description Hamburger and Zwick (1979) and Maris (1981) presented tests designed to determine the efficacy of selective credit controls on expenditures on consumer durables. Neither of these tests properly address the issue. The Hamburgerwick equation only captures indirect effects of selective credit controls. It does not allow for differential effects of the flow of credit on expenditure in the current period. Maris applies the Sims test for causality on data on expenditures on durables and changes in consumer credit extensions. No selective credit controls were used during the sample period. Even if controls had been used, causality tests should not be interpreted as providing evidence on their impact.
doi_str_mv 10.2307/1992147
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_195353606</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>1992147</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>1992147</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c211t-f753cdd405c197853a665671490da5d653d8d935d435c19fed1c20fd6416ae33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKw0AUBuBBFIxVfIVBBFfROXNLRnAhoV6g0IXZhzAXTUgydWYq9O2b0m5dnbP4-M_hR-gWyCNlpHgCpSjw4gxlIFiZcwnyHGWEUJrTslCX6CrGnhCiBIcMvawnXNuYuukbpx-Ll851utU77B3-soPVqfuzuArWdAlXfkrBD_F53sbRTukaXbh2iPbmNBeoflvW1Ue-Wr9_Vq-rXFOAlLtCMG0MJ0KDKkrBWimFLIArYlphpGCmNIoJw9lBOGtAU-KM5CBby9gC3R1jN8H_budvm95vwzRfbEAJJpgkckYPR6SDjzFY12xCN7Zh1wBpDs00p2ZmeX-UfUw-_Mv2yiJeKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195353606</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On Testing the Efficacy of Selective Credit Controls: Comment</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Molho, Lazaros E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Molho, Lazaros E.</creatorcontrib><description>Hamburger and Zwick (1979) and Maris (1981) presented tests designed to determine the efficacy of selective credit controls on expenditures on consumer durables. Neither of these tests properly address the issue. The Hamburgerwick equation only captures indirect effects of selective credit controls. It does not allow for differential effects of the flow of credit on expenditure in the current period. Maris applies the Sims test for causality on data on expenditures on durables and changes in consumer credit extensions. No selective credit controls were used during the sample period. Even if controls had been used, causality tests should not be interpreted as providing evidence on their impact.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2879</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2307/1992147</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JMCBBT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Columbus: Ohio State University Press</publisher><subject>Causality ; Consumer credit ; Consumer spending ; Credit control ; Credit control policy ; Credit policies ; Debt service ; Durable goods ; Expenditures ; Financial liabilities ; Installment credit ; Monetary policy ; Notes, Comments, Replies ; Personal debt ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Journal of money, credit and banking, 1983-02, Vol.15 (1), p.120-122</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1983 Ohio State University Press</rights><rights>Copyright Ohio State University Press Feb 1983</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c211t-f753cdd405c197853a665671490da5d653d8d935d435c19fed1c20fd6416ae33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1992147$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/1992147$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Molho, Lazaros E.</creatorcontrib><title>On Testing the Efficacy of Selective Credit Controls: Comment</title><title>Journal of money, credit and banking</title><description>Hamburger and Zwick (1979) and Maris (1981) presented tests designed to determine the efficacy of selective credit controls on expenditures on consumer durables. Neither of these tests properly address the issue. The Hamburgerwick equation only captures indirect effects of selective credit controls. It does not allow for differential effects of the flow of credit on expenditure in the current period. Maris applies the Sims test for causality on data on expenditures on durables and changes in consumer credit extensions. No selective credit controls were used during the sample period. Even if controls had been used, causality tests should not be interpreted as providing evidence on their impact.</description><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Consumer credit</subject><subject>Consumer spending</subject><subject>Credit control</subject><subject>Credit control policy</subject><subject>Credit policies</subject><subject>Debt service</subject><subject>Durable goods</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Financial liabilities</subject><subject>Installment credit</subject><subject>Monetary policy</subject><subject>Notes, Comments, Replies</subject><subject>Personal debt</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>0022-2879</issn><issn>1538-4616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1983</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10MtKw0AUBuBBFIxVfIVBBFfROXNLRnAhoV6g0IXZhzAXTUgydWYq9O2b0m5dnbP4-M_hR-gWyCNlpHgCpSjw4gxlIFiZcwnyHGWEUJrTslCX6CrGnhCiBIcMvawnXNuYuukbpx-Ll851utU77B3-soPVqfuzuArWdAlXfkrBD_F53sbRTukaXbh2iPbmNBeoflvW1Ue-Wr9_Vq-rXFOAlLtCMG0MJ0KDKkrBWimFLIArYlphpGCmNIoJw9lBOGtAU-KM5CBby9gC3R1jN8H_budvm95vwzRfbEAJJpgkckYPR6SDjzFY12xCN7Zh1wBpDs00p2ZmeX-UfUw-_Mv2yiJeKA</recordid><startdate>19830201</startdate><enddate>19830201</enddate><creator>Molho, Lazaros E.</creator><general>Ohio State University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19830201</creationdate><title>On Testing the Efficacy of Selective Credit Controls: Comment</title><author>Molho, Lazaros E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c211t-f753cdd405c197853a665671490da5d653d8d935d435c19fed1c20fd6416ae33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1983</creationdate><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Consumer credit</topic><topic>Consumer spending</topic><topic>Credit control</topic><topic>Credit control policy</topic><topic>Credit policies</topic><topic>Debt service</topic><topic>Durable goods</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Financial liabilities</topic><topic>Installment credit</topic><topic>Monetary policy</topic><topic>Notes, Comments, Replies</topic><topic>Personal debt</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Molho, Lazaros E.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of money, credit and banking</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Molho, Lazaros E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On Testing the Efficacy of Selective Credit Controls: Comment</atitle><jtitle>Journal of money, credit and banking</jtitle><date>1983-02-01</date><risdate>1983</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>120</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>120-122</pages><issn>0022-2879</issn><eissn>1538-4616</eissn><coden>JMCBBT</coden><abstract>Hamburger and Zwick (1979) and Maris (1981) presented tests designed to determine the efficacy of selective credit controls on expenditures on consumer durables. Neither of these tests properly address the issue. The Hamburgerwick equation only captures indirect effects of selective credit controls. It does not allow for differential effects of the flow of credit on expenditure in the current period. Maris applies the Sims test for causality on data on expenditures on durables and changes in consumer credit extensions. No selective credit controls were used during the sample period. Even if controls had been used, causality tests should not be interpreted as providing evidence on their impact.</abstract><cop>Columbus</cop><pub>Ohio State University Press</pub><doi>10.2307/1992147</doi><tpages>3</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2879
ispartof Journal of money, credit and banking, 1983-02, Vol.15 (1), p.120-122
issn 0022-2879
1538-4616
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_195353606
source JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Causality
Consumer credit
Consumer spending
Credit control
Credit control policy
Credit policies
Debt service
Durable goods
Expenditures
Financial liabilities
Installment credit
Monetary policy
Notes, Comments, Replies
Personal debt
Studies
title On Testing the Efficacy of Selective Credit Controls: Comment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T01%3A43%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20Testing%20the%20Efficacy%20of%20Selective%20Credit%20Controls:%20Comment&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20money,%20credit%20and%20banking&rft.au=Molho,%20Lazaros%20E.&rft.date=1983-02-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=120&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=120-122&rft.issn=0022-2879&rft.eissn=1538-4616&rft.coden=JMCBBT&rft_id=info:doi/10.2307/1992147&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E1992147%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195353606&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=1992147&rfr_iscdi=true