Enhanced bioremediation of toxic metals and harvesting electricity through sediment microbial fuel cell

Summary Performance of sediment microbial fuel cells (SMFCs) with aerated (A‐SMFC) and nonaerated (NA‐SMFC) cathodes was evaluated at different operating conditions in toxic metal removal and power generation. The A‐ and NA‐SMFC open‐circuit voltages were respectively about 665 and 275 mV, with quit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of energy research 2017-11, Vol.41 (14), p.2345-2355
Hauptverfasser: Abbas, Syed Zaghum, Rafatullah, Mohd, Ismail, Norli, Nastro, Rosa Anna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2355
container_issue 14
container_start_page 2345
container_title International journal of energy research
container_volume 41
creator Abbas, Syed Zaghum
Rafatullah, Mohd
Ismail, Norli
Nastro, Rosa Anna
description Summary Performance of sediment microbial fuel cells (SMFCs) with aerated (A‐SMFC) and nonaerated (NA‐SMFC) cathodes was evaluated at different operating conditions in toxic metal removal and power generation. The A‐ and NA‐SMFC open‐circuit voltages were respectively about 665 and 275 mV, with quite steady performances for 120 days. The cell design points of both SMFCs were calculated by implementing polarization curves, and they were at 1 kΩ (power density 8.1 mW/m2 and current density 0.0504 mA/m2 with voltage 150 mV) for NA‐SMFC and 100 Ω (power density 252.81 mW/m2 and current density 0.954 mA/m2 with voltage of 275 mV) for A‐SMFC, respectively. Cathode potentials were at 30 kΩ 290 mV (NA‐SMFC) and 500 mV (A‐SMFC). As to the anode, at 30 KΩ, it was −180 mV (NA‐SMFC) and 190 mV (A‐SMFC). The voltammetry profiles of A‐SMFC showed maximum current (forward scan, 22.7 μA; reverse scan, −19.4 μA) followed by NA‐SMFC (forward scan, 11.3 μA; reverse scan, −9.5 μA). The cell design points of A‐SMFC and NA‐SMFC were altered after pH and temperature amendments at 200 and 700 Ω, respectively. As to metal removal rate, the maximum arsenic cadmium and lead removal was observed in A‐SMFC at pH 7.0 (77.70%, 90.86%, and 83.91%) and 45°C (66.22%, 79.03%, and 71.17%). Scanning electron microscopy confirmed, at pH 7.0 and 45°C, an optimal biofilm growth at cathode and anode graphite of both SMFCs. After 120 days of operation, genomic DNA was extracted from biofilms and analyzed for rDNA 16S sequences. Similarity search was performed by using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool algorithm against the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gen Bank showing Pseudomonas spp. dominance at both anode and cathode. The results revealed that the A‐SMFC system could be employed as an effective and long‐term tool for power generation as well as stimulated bioremediation of the polluted sediments. The present study is focused on latest advancements of aerated and non‐aerated sediment microbial fuel cells (SMFCs) for the power generation and sediment remediation from toxic metals. This study also explored the potential application of aerated and non‐aerated SMFCs at a high range of temperature and pHs, thus trying to mimic the conditions potentially occurring in different natural environments. This paper concludes with more analysis about different SMFCs exoelectrogens and electrotrophs are required to boost the toxic metals remediation, power generation, and field application.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/er.3804
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1952998983</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1952998983</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3614-9cbebe0eed1196ee7ffdca5905cf67c78d6de658e0f92af215359fbd22a3a2033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKv4FwIuXMjUZNJ5ZCmlPkAQRKG7kEluOikzk5pk1P57U-vW1Vnc755zOAhdUjKjhOS34GesJvMjNKGE84zS-eoYTQgrWcZJtTpFZyFsCEk3Wk3Qejm0clCgcWOdhx60ldG6ATuDo_u2CvcQZRewHDRupf-EEO2wxtCBit4qG3c4tt6N6xaH9NzDEHFvlXeNlR02I3RYQdedoxOTbODiT6fo_X75tnjMnl8enhZ3z5liJZ1nXDXQAAHQlPISoDJGK1lwUihTVqqqdamhLGoghufS5LRgBTeNznPJZE4Ym6Krg-_Wu48xlRUbN_ohRQrKi5zzmtd76vpApZ4heDBi620v_U5QIvYrCvBiv2Iibw7kl-1g9x8mlq-_9A-67nTk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1952998983</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhanced bioremediation of toxic metals and harvesting electricity through sediment microbial fuel cell</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Abbas, Syed Zaghum ; Rafatullah, Mohd ; Ismail, Norli ; Nastro, Rosa Anna</creator><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Syed Zaghum ; Rafatullah, Mohd ; Ismail, Norli ; Nastro, Rosa Anna</creatorcontrib><description>Summary Performance of sediment microbial fuel cells (SMFCs) with aerated (A‐SMFC) and nonaerated (NA‐SMFC) cathodes was evaluated at different operating conditions in toxic metal removal and power generation. The A‐ and NA‐SMFC open‐circuit voltages were respectively about 665 and 275 mV, with quite steady performances for 120 days. The cell design points of both SMFCs were calculated by implementing polarization curves, and they were at 1 kΩ (power density 8.1 mW/m2 and current density 0.0504 mA/m2 with voltage 150 mV) for NA‐SMFC and 100 Ω (power density 252.81 mW/m2 and current density 0.954 mA/m2 with voltage of 275 mV) for A‐SMFC, respectively. Cathode potentials were at 30 kΩ 290 mV (NA‐SMFC) and 500 mV (A‐SMFC). As to the anode, at 30 KΩ, it was −180 mV (NA‐SMFC) and 190 mV (A‐SMFC). The voltammetry profiles of A‐SMFC showed maximum current (forward scan, 22.7 μA; reverse scan, −19.4 μA) followed by NA‐SMFC (forward scan, 11.3 μA; reverse scan, −9.5 μA). The cell design points of A‐SMFC and NA‐SMFC were altered after pH and temperature amendments at 200 and 700 Ω, respectively. As to metal removal rate, the maximum arsenic cadmium and lead removal was observed in A‐SMFC at pH 7.0 (77.70%, 90.86%, and 83.91%) and 45°C (66.22%, 79.03%, and 71.17%). Scanning electron microscopy confirmed, at pH 7.0 and 45°C, an optimal biofilm growth at cathode and anode graphite of both SMFCs. After 120 days of operation, genomic DNA was extracted from biofilms and analyzed for rDNA 16S sequences. Similarity search was performed by using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool algorithm against the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gen Bank showing Pseudomonas spp. dominance at both anode and cathode. The results revealed that the A‐SMFC system could be employed as an effective and long‐term tool for power generation as well as stimulated bioremediation of the polluted sediments. The present study is focused on latest advancements of aerated and non‐aerated sediment microbial fuel cells (SMFCs) for the power generation and sediment remediation from toxic metals. This study also explored the potential application of aerated and non‐aerated SMFCs at a high range of temperature and pHs, thus trying to mimic the conditions potentially occurring in different natural environments. This paper concludes with more analysis about different SMFCs exoelectrogens and electrotrophs are required to boost the toxic metals remediation, power generation, and field application.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0363-907X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-114X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/er.3804</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Hindawi Limited</publisher><subject>Aeration ; Anodes ; Arsenic ; Biochemical fuel cells ; Biofilms ; Bioremediation ; Biotechnology ; Cadmium ; Cathodes ; Current density ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Electric potential ; Electric power generation ; electromicrobiology ; Electron microscopy ; exoelectrogens ; Fuel technology ; Gene sequencing ; Harvesting ; Heavy metals ; Hydrogen ions ; Lead ; Mathematical models ; Metals ; Microorganisms ; Nucleotide sequence ; Omega ; pH effects ; polarization ; Pollutant removal ; power density ; Profiles ; Removal ; rRNA 16S ; Scanning electron microscopy ; Sediment ; Sediment pollution ; Sediments ; toxic metals ; Voltage</subject><ispartof>International journal of energy research, 2017-11, Vol.41 (14), p.2345-2355</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2017 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3614-9cbebe0eed1196ee7ffdca5905cf67c78d6de658e0f92af215359fbd22a3a2033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3614-9cbebe0eed1196ee7ffdca5905cf67c78d6de658e0f92af215359fbd22a3a2033</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4590-3153</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fer.3804$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fer.3804$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Syed Zaghum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rafatullah, Mohd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Norli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nastro, Rosa Anna</creatorcontrib><title>Enhanced bioremediation of toxic metals and harvesting electricity through sediment microbial fuel cell</title><title>International journal of energy research</title><description>Summary Performance of sediment microbial fuel cells (SMFCs) with aerated (A‐SMFC) and nonaerated (NA‐SMFC) cathodes was evaluated at different operating conditions in toxic metal removal and power generation. The A‐ and NA‐SMFC open‐circuit voltages were respectively about 665 and 275 mV, with quite steady performances for 120 days. The cell design points of both SMFCs were calculated by implementing polarization curves, and they were at 1 kΩ (power density 8.1 mW/m2 and current density 0.0504 mA/m2 with voltage 150 mV) for NA‐SMFC and 100 Ω (power density 252.81 mW/m2 and current density 0.954 mA/m2 with voltage of 275 mV) for A‐SMFC, respectively. Cathode potentials were at 30 kΩ 290 mV (NA‐SMFC) and 500 mV (A‐SMFC). As to the anode, at 30 KΩ, it was −180 mV (NA‐SMFC) and 190 mV (A‐SMFC). The voltammetry profiles of A‐SMFC showed maximum current (forward scan, 22.7 μA; reverse scan, −19.4 μA) followed by NA‐SMFC (forward scan, 11.3 μA; reverse scan, −9.5 μA). The cell design points of A‐SMFC and NA‐SMFC were altered after pH and temperature amendments at 200 and 700 Ω, respectively. As to metal removal rate, the maximum arsenic cadmium and lead removal was observed in A‐SMFC at pH 7.0 (77.70%, 90.86%, and 83.91%) and 45°C (66.22%, 79.03%, and 71.17%). Scanning electron microscopy confirmed, at pH 7.0 and 45°C, an optimal biofilm growth at cathode and anode graphite of both SMFCs. After 120 days of operation, genomic DNA was extracted from biofilms and analyzed for rDNA 16S sequences. Similarity search was performed by using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool algorithm against the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gen Bank showing Pseudomonas spp. dominance at both anode and cathode. The results revealed that the A‐SMFC system could be employed as an effective and long‐term tool for power generation as well as stimulated bioremediation of the polluted sediments. The present study is focused on latest advancements of aerated and non‐aerated sediment microbial fuel cells (SMFCs) for the power generation and sediment remediation from toxic metals. This study also explored the potential application of aerated and non‐aerated SMFCs at a high range of temperature and pHs, thus trying to mimic the conditions potentially occurring in different natural environments. This paper concludes with more analysis about different SMFCs exoelectrogens and electrotrophs are required to boost the toxic metals remediation, power generation, and field application.</description><subject>Aeration</subject><subject>Anodes</subject><subject>Arsenic</subject><subject>Biochemical fuel cells</subject><subject>Biofilms</subject><subject>Bioremediation</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Cadmium</subject><subject>Cathodes</subject><subject>Current density</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Electric potential</subject><subject>Electric power generation</subject><subject>electromicrobiology</subject><subject>Electron microscopy</subject><subject>exoelectrogens</subject><subject>Fuel technology</subject><subject>Gene sequencing</subject><subject>Harvesting</subject><subject>Heavy metals</subject><subject>Hydrogen ions</subject><subject>Lead</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Metals</subject><subject>Microorganisms</subject><subject>Nucleotide sequence</subject><subject>Omega</subject><subject>pH effects</subject><subject>polarization</subject><subject>Pollutant removal</subject><subject>power density</subject><subject>Profiles</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>rRNA 16S</subject><subject>Scanning electron microscopy</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Sediment pollution</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>toxic metals</subject><subject>Voltage</subject><issn>0363-907X</issn><issn>1099-114X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKv4FwIuXMjUZNJ5ZCmlPkAQRKG7kEluOikzk5pk1P57U-vW1Vnc755zOAhdUjKjhOS34GesJvMjNKGE84zS-eoYTQgrWcZJtTpFZyFsCEk3Wk3Qejm0clCgcWOdhx60ldG6ATuDo_u2CvcQZRewHDRupf-EEO2wxtCBit4qG3c4tt6N6xaH9NzDEHFvlXeNlR02I3RYQdedoxOTbODiT6fo_X75tnjMnl8enhZ3z5liJZ1nXDXQAAHQlPISoDJGK1lwUihTVqqqdamhLGoghufS5LRgBTeNznPJZE4Ym6Krg-_Wu48xlRUbN_ohRQrKi5zzmtd76vpApZ4heDBi620v_U5QIvYrCvBiv2Iibw7kl-1g9x8mlq-_9A-67nTk</recordid><startdate>201711</startdate><enddate>201711</enddate><creator>Abbas, Syed Zaghum</creator><creator>Rafatullah, Mohd</creator><creator>Ismail, Norli</creator><creator>Nastro, Rosa Anna</creator><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4590-3153</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201711</creationdate><title>Enhanced bioremediation of toxic metals and harvesting electricity through sediment microbial fuel cell</title><author>Abbas, Syed Zaghum ; Rafatullah, Mohd ; Ismail, Norli ; Nastro, Rosa Anna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3614-9cbebe0eed1196ee7ffdca5905cf67c78d6de658e0f92af215359fbd22a3a2033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Aeration</topic><topic>Anodes</topic><topic>Arsenic</topic><topic>Biochemical fuel cells</topic><topic>Biofilms</topic><topic>Bioremediation</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Cadmium</topic><topic>Cathodes</topic><topic>Current density</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Electric potential</topic><topic>Electric power generation</topic><topic>electromicrobiology</topic><topic>Electron microscopy</topic><topic>exoelectrogens</topic><topic>Fuel technology</topic><topic>Gene sequencing</topic><topic>Harvesting</topic><topic>Heavy metals</topic><topic>Hydrogen ions</topic><topic>Lead</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Metals</topic><topic>Microorganisms</topic><topic>Nucleotide sequence</topic><topic>Omega</topic><topic>pH effects</topic><topic>polarization</topic><topic>Pollutant removal</topic><topic>power density</topic><topic>Profiles</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>rRNA 16S</topic><topic>Scanning electron microscopy</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Sediment pollution</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>toxic metals</topic><topic>Voltage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abbas, Syed Zaghum</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rafatullah, Mohd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, Norli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nastro, Rosa Anna</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of energy research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abbas, Syed Zaghum</au><au>Rafatullah, Mohd</au><au>Ismail, Norli</au><au>Nastro, Rosa Anna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Enhanced bioremediation of toxic metals and harvesting electricity through sediment microbial fuel cell</atitle><jtitle>International journal of energy research</jtitle><date>2017-11</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>2345</spage><epage>2355</epage><pages>2345-2355</pages><issn>0363-907X</issn><eissn>1099-114X</eissn><abstract>Summary Performance of sediment microbial fuel cells (SMFCs) with aerated (A‐SMFC) and nonaerated (NA‐SMFC) cathodes was evaluated at different operating conditions in toxic metal removal and power generation. The A‐ and NA‐SMFC open‐circuit voltages were respectively about 665 and 275 mV, with quite steady performances for 120 days. The cell design points of both SMFCs were calculated by implementing polarization curves, and they were at 1 kΩ (power density 8.1 mW/m2 and current density 0.0504 mA/m2 with voltage 150 mV) for NA‐SMFC and 100 Ω (power density 252.81 mW/m2 and current density 0.954 mA/m2 with voltage of 275 mV) for A‐SMFC, respectively. Cathode potentials were at 30 kΩ 290 mV (NA‐SMFC) and 500 mV (A‐SMFC). As to the anode, at 30 KΩ, it was −180 mV (NA‐SMFC) and 190 mV (A‐SMFC). The voltammetry profiles of A‐SMFC showed maximum current (forward scan, 22.7 μA; reverse scan, −19.4 μA) followed by NA‐SMFC (forward scan, 11.3 μA; reverse scan, −9.5 μA). The cell design points of A‐SMFC and NA‐SMFC were altered after pH and temperature amendments at 200 and 700 Ω, respectively. As to metal removal rate, the maximum arsenic cadmium and lead removal was observed in A‐SMFC at pH 7.0 (77.70%, 90.86%, and 83.91%) and 45°C (66.22%, 79.03%, and 71.17%). Scanning electron microscopy confirmed, at pH 7.0 and 45°C, an optimal biofilm growth at cathode and anode graphite of both SMFCs. After 120 days of operation, genomic DNA was extracted from biofilms and analyzed for rDNA 16S sequences. Similarity search was performed by using Basic Local Alignment Search Tool algorithm against the National Center for Biotechnology Information Gen Bank showing Pseudomonas spp. dominance at both anode and cathode. The results revealed that the A‐SMFC system could be employed as an effective and long‐term tool for power generation as well as stimulated bioremediation of the polluted sediments. The present study is focused on latest advancements of aerated and non‐aerated sediment microbial fuel cells (SMFCs) for the power generation and sediment remediation from toxic metals. This study also explored the potential application of aerated and non‐aerated SMFCs at a high range of temperature and pHs, thus trying to mimic the conditions potentially occurring in different natural environments. This paper concludes with more analysis about different SMFCs exoelectrogens and electrotrophs are required to boost the toxic metals remediation, power generation, and field application.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Hindawi Limited</pub><doi>10.1002/er.3804</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4590-3153</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0363-907X
ispartof International journal of energy research, 2017-11, Vol.41 (14), p.2345-2355
issn 0363-907X
1099-114X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1952998983
source Wiley Journals
subjects Aeration
Anodes
Arsenic
Biochemical fuel cells
Biofilms
Bioremediation
Biotechnology
Cadmium
Cathodes
Current density
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
Electric potential
Electric power generation
electromicrobiology
Electron microscopy
exoelectrogens
Fuel technology
Gene sequencing
Harvesting
Heavy metals
Hydrogen ions
Lead
Mathematical models
Metals
Microorganisms
Nucleotide sequence
Omega
pH effects
polarization
Pollutant removal
power density
Profiles
Removal
rRNA 16S
Scanning electron microscopy
Sediment
Sediment pollution
Sediments
toxic metals
Voltage
title Enhanced bioremediation of toxic metals and harvesting electricity through sediment microbial fuel cell
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T14%3A41%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Enhanced%20bioremediation%20of%20toxic%20metals%20and%20harvesting%20electricity%20through%20sediment%20microbial%20fuel%20cell&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20energy%20research&rft.au=Abbas,%20Syed%20Zaghum&rft.date=2017-11&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=2345&rft.epage=2355&rft.pages=2345-2355&rft.issn=0363-907X&rft.eissn=1099-114X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/er.3804&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1952998983%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1952998983&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true