Comparative assessment of the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA and oral therapies (anticholinergics and mirabegron) for overactive bladder: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis
Objectives To compare the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA, mirabegron, and anticholinergics in adults with idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) using network meta‐analysis (NMA). Patients and Methods Information sources were searched for blinded randomised controlled trials (RCTs), of ≥2 weeks duratio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BJU international 2017-11, Vol.120 (5), p.611-622 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 622 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 611 |
container_title | BJU international |
container_volume | 120 |
creator | Drake, Marcus J. Nitti, Victor W. Ginsberg, David A. Brucker, Benjamin M. Hepp, Zsolt McCool, Rachael Glanville, Julie M. Fleetwood, Kelly James, Daniel Chapple, Christopher R. |
description | Objectives
To compare the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA, mirabegron, and anticholinergics in adults with idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) using network meta‐analysis (NMA).
Patients and Methods
Information sources were searched for blinded randomised controlled trials (RCTs), of ≥2 weeks duration, comparing any dose of onabotulinumtoxinA, eligible oral/transdermal anticholinergics, or mirabegron, with each other or placebo, in adults with OAB. Bayesian random‐effects models were used to synthesise the results at week 12: NMA for responder analyses and network meta‐regression (NMR) for change from baseline analyses. The NMR was used to adjust for differences in baseline severity between studies. Sensitivity analysis, excluding studies considered to be at a high risk of methodological bias, was conducted.
Results
In all, 56 RCTs were included in the networks. For each outcome, results are reported for all licensed treatment doses. For each NMR, results are based on patients with an average number of episodes of the outcome at baseline. After 12 weeks, all treatments were more efficacious than placebo. Patients who received onabotulinumtoxinA (100 U) had, on average, the greatest reductions in urinary incontinence episodes (UIE), urgency episodes, and micturition frequency, and the highest odds of achieving decreases of 100% and ≥50% from baseline in UIE/day. When comparing onabotulinumtoxinA with other pharmacotherapies, mean differences favoured onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U over all comparators for UIE and urgency episodes (credible intervals excluded zero) and all but two of the comparators for micturition frequency. OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U was also associated with higher odds of achieving a 100% and ≥50% decrease in UIE/day than most other licensed treatments in the network. The exclusion of studies with a high risk of bias had little impact on the conclusions.
Conclusion
The results indicate that, after 12 weeks, onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U provides greater relief of OAB symptoms compared with most other licensed doses of other pharmacotherapies in the network. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/bju.13945 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1951041859</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1951041859</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-6502a44250619c2286e923eaf8a35c95bb6972bf10e68a50b2e7289e3159d50c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi1ERf_AgRdAlrjQw7Z2EntjbmUFtFUlLlTiFo2dSeslsRfb2SW3PgKvw-vwJHh3W274Mp7Rb76Z0UfIa87OeH7nejme8VJV4hk54pWsZhVn354__ZmSh-Q4xiVjuSDFC3JY1HLO5rU8Ir8XflhBgGTXSCFGjHFAl6jvaLpHil1nDZhpm3sH2qext24ckv9p3QUF11IfoN-yAVYWI30HLllz7zOG4c6auIMGG0DjXfDulHY-UL_OvNkN1T20LYb3FGicYsIh72JowLXFza7XYdr48J0OmODPwy9w0E_RxpfkoIM-4qvHeEJuP338uric3Xz5fLW4uJmZsq7FTApWQFUVgkmuTJEvR1WUCF0NpTBKaC3VvNAdZyhrEEwXOC9qhSUXqhXMlCfk7V53FfyPEWNqln4MeYnYcCU4q3gtVKZO95QJPsaAXbMKdoAwNZw1W5OabFKzMymzbx4VRz1g-498ciUD53tgY3uc_q_UfLi-3Uv-BRtRoK0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1951041859</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative assessment of the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA and oral therapies (anticholinergics and mirabegron) for overactive bladder: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Drake, Marcus J. ; Nitti, Victor W. ; Ginsberg, David A. ; Brucker, Benjamin M. ; Hepp, Zsolt ; McCool, Rachael ; Glanville, Julie M. ; Fleetwood, Kelly ; James, Daniel ; Chapple, Christopher R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Drake, Marcus J. ; Nitti, Victor W. ; Ginsberg, David A. ; Brucker, Benjamin M. ; Hepp, Zsolt ; McCool, Rachael ; Glanville, Julie M. ; Fleetwood, Kelly ; James, Daniel ; Chapple, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To compare the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA, mirabegron, and anticholinergics in adults with idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) using network meta‐analysis (NMA).
Patients and Methods
Information sources were searched for blinded randomised controlled trials (RCTs), of ≥2 weeks duration, comparing any dose of onabotulinumtoxinA, eligible oral/transdermal anticholinergics, or mirabegron, with each other or placebo, in adults with OAB. Bayesian random‐effects models were used to synthesise the results at week 12: NMA for responder analyses and network meta‐regression (NMR) for change from baseline analyses. The NMR was used to adjust for differences in baseline severity between studies. Sensitivity analysis, excluding studies considered to be at a high risk of methodological bias, was conducted.
Results
In all, 56 RCTs were included in the networks. For each outcome, results are reported for all licensed treatment doses. For each NMR, results are based on patients with an average number of episodes of the outcome at baseline. After 12 weeks, all treatments were more efficacious than placebo. Patients who received onabotulinumtoxinA (100 U) had, on average, the greatest reductions in urinary incontinence episodes (UIE), urgency episodes, and micturition frequency, and the highest odds of achieving decreases of 100% and ≥50% from baseline in UIE/day. When comparing onabotulinumtoxinA with other pharmacotherapies, mean differences favoured onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U over all comparators for UIE and urgency episodes (credible intervals excluded zero) and all but two of the comparators for micturition frequency. OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U was also associated with higher odds of achieving a 100% and ≥50% decrease in UIE/day than most other licensed treatments in the network. The exclusion of studies with a high risk of bias had little impact on the conclusions.
Conclusion
The results indicate that, after 12 weeks, onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U provides greater relief of OAB symptoms compared with most other licensed doses of other pharmacotherapies in the network.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-4096</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-410X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bju.13945</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28670786</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Acetanilides - administration & dosage ; Acetanilides - therapeutic use ; Administration, Oral ; Anticholinergics ; Bayesian analysis ; botulinum toxins ; Botulinum Toxins, Type A - administration & dosage ; Botulinum Toxins, Type A - therapeutic use ; Cholinergic Antagonists - administration & dosage ; Cholinergic Antagonists - therapeutic use ; Clinical trials ; Drug therapy ; Humans ; Licenses ; Mathematical models ; Meta-analysis ; mirabegron ; OAB ; overactive ; Sensitivity analysis ; Thiazoles - administration & dosage ; Thiazoles - therapeutic use ; Treatment Outcome ; type A ; Urinary bladder ; Urinary Bladder, Overactive - drug therapy ; Urinary incontinence ; Urination</subject><ispartof>BJU international, 2017-11, Vol.120 (5), p.611-622</ispartof><rights>2017 The Authors BJU International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International</rights><rights>2017 The Authors BJU International published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of BJU International.</rights><rights>BJUI © 2017 BJU International</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-6502a44250619c2286e923eaf8a35c95bb6972bf10e68a50b2e7289e3159d50c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-6502a44250619c2286e923eaf8a35c95bb6972bf10e68a50b2e7289e3159d50c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6230-2552 ; 0000-0002-1253-8524 ; 0000-0002-1382-3095</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbju.13945$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbju.13945$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28670786$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Drake, Marcus J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nitti, Victor W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginsberg, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brucker, Benjamin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hepp, Zsolt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCool, Rachael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glanville, Julie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleetwood, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapple, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative assessment of the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA and oral therapies (anticholinergics and mirabegron) for overactive bladder: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis</title><title>BJU international</title><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><description>Objectives
To compare the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA, mirabegron, and anticholinergics in adults with idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) using network meta‐analysis (NMA).
Patients and Methods
Information sources were searched for blinded randomised controlled trials (RCTs), of ≥2 weeks duration, comparing any dose of onabotulinumtoxinA, eligible oral/transdermal anticholinergics, or mirabegron, with each other or placebo, in adults with OAB. Bayesian random‐effects models were used to synthesise the results at week 12: NMA for responder analyses and network meta‐regression (NMR) for change from baseline analyses. The NMR was used to adjust for differences in baseline severity between studies. Sensitivity analysis, excluding studies considered to be at a high risk of methodological bias, was conducted.
Results
In all, 56 RCTs were included in the networks. For each outcome, results are reported for all licensed treatment doses. For each NMR, results are based on patients with an average number of episodes of the outcome at baseline. After 12 weeks, all treatments were more efficacious than placebo. Patients who received onabotulinumtoxinA (100 U) had, on average, the greatest reductions in urinary incontinence episodes (UIE), urgency episodes, and micturition frequency, and the highest odds of achieving decreases of 100% and ≥50% from baseline in UIE/day. When comparing onabotulinumtoxinA with other pharmacotherapies, mean differences favoured onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U over all comparators for UIE and urgency episodes (credible intervals excluded zero) and all but two of the comparators for micturition frequency. OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U was also associated with higher odds of achieving a 100% and ≥50% decrease in UIE/day than most other licensed treatments in the network. The exclusion of studies with a high risk of bias had little impact on the conclusions.
Conclusion
The results indicate that, after 12 weeks, onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U provides greater relief of OAB symptoms compared with most other licensed doses of other pharmacotherapies in the network.</description><subject>Acetanilides - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Acetanilides - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Administration, Oral</subject><subject>Anticholinergics</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>botulinum toxins</subject><subject>Botulinum Toxins, Type A - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Botulinum Toxins, Type A - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Cholinergic Antagonists - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Cholinergic Antagonists - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Drug therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Licenses</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>mirabegron</subject><subject>OAB</subject><subject>overactive</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Thiazoles - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Thiazoles - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>type A</subject><subject>Urinary bladder</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder, Overactive - drug therapy</subject><subject>Urinary incontinence</subject><subject>Urination</subject><issn>1464-4096</issn><issn>1464-410X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kc9u1DAQxi1ERf_AgRdAlrjQw7Z2EntjbmUFtFUlLlTiFo2dSeslsRfb2SW3PgKvw-vwJHh3W274Mp7Rb76Z0UfIa87OeH7nejme8VJV4hk54pWsZhVn354__ZmSh-Q4xiVjuSDFC3JY1HLO5rU8Ir8XflhBgGTXSCFGjHFAl6jvaLpHil1nDZhpm3sH2qext24ckv9p3QUF11IfoN-yAVYWI30HLllz7zOG4c6auIMGG0DjXfDulHY-UL_OvNkN1T20LYb3FGicYsIh72JowLXFza7XYdr48J0OmODPwy9w0E_RxpfkoIM-4qvHeEJuP338uric3Xz5fLW4uJmZsq7FTApWQFUVgkmuTJEvR1WUCF0NpTBKaC3VvNAdZyhrEEwXOC9qhSUXqhXMlCfk7V53FfyPEWNqln4MeYnYcCU4q3gtVKZO95QJPsaAXbMKdoAwNZw1W5OabFKzMymzbx4VRz1g-498ciUD53tgY3uc_q_UfLi-3Uv-BRtRoK0</recordid><startdate>201711</startdate><enddate>201711</enddate><creator>Drake, Marcus J.</creator><creator>Nitti, Victor W.</creator><creator>Ginsberg, David A.</creator><creator>Brucker, Benjamin M.</creator><creator>Hepp, Zsolt</creator><creator>McCool, Rachael</creator><creator>Glanville, Julie M.</creator><creator>Fleetwood, Kelly</creator><creator>James, Daniel</creator><creator>Chapple, Christopher R.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6230-2552</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1253-8524</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1382-3095</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201711</creationdate><title>Comparative assessment of the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA and oral therapies (anticholinergics and mirabegron) for overactive bladder: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis</title><author>Drake, Marcus J. ; Nitti, Victor W. ; Ginsberg, David A. ; Brucker, Benjamin M. ; Hepp, Zsolt ; McCool, Rachael ; Glanville, Julie M. ; Fleetwood, Kelly ; James, Daniel ; Chapple, Christopher R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3885-6502a44250619c2286e923eaf8a35c95bb6972bf10e68a50b2e7289e3159d50c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Acetanilides - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Acetanilides - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Administration, Oral</topic><topic>Anticholinergics</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>botulinum toxins</topic><topic>Botulinum Toxins, Type A - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Botulinum Toxins, Type A - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Cholinergic Antagonists - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Cholinergic Antagonists - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Drug therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Licenses</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>mirabegron</topic><topic>OAB</topic><topic>overactive</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Thiazoles - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Thiazoles - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>type A</topic><topic>Urinary bladder</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder, Overactive - drug therapy</topic><topic>Urinary incontinence</topic><topic>Urination</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Drake, Marcus J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nitti, Victor W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginsberg, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brucker, Benjamin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hepp, Zsolt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCool, Rachael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glanville, Julie M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleetwood, Kelly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>James, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chapple, Christopher R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Drake, Marcus J.</au><au>Nitti, Victor W.</au><au>Ginsberg, David A.</au><au>Brucker, Benjamin M.</au><au>Hepp, Zsolt</au><au>McCool, Rachael</au><au>Glanville, Julie M.</au><au>Fleetwood, Kelly</au><au>James, Daniel</au><au>Chapple, Christopher R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative assessment of the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA and oral therapies (anticholinergics and mirabegron) for overactive bladder: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>BJU international</jtitle><addtitle>BJU Int</addtitle><date>2017-11</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>120</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>611</spage><epage>622</epage><pages>611-622</pages><issn>1464-4096</issn><eissn>1464-410X</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To compare the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA, mirabegron, and anticholinergics in adults with idiopathic overactive bladder (OAB) using network meta‐analysis (NMA).
Patients and Methods
Information sources were searched for blinded randomised controlled trials (RCTs), of ≥2 weeks duration, comparing any dose of onabotulinumtoxinA, eligible oral/transdermal anticholinergics, or mirabegron, with each other or placebo, in adults with OAB. Bayesian random‐effects models were used to synthesise the results at week 12: NMA for responder analyses and network meta‐regression (NMR) for change from baseline analyses. The NMR was used to adjust for differences in baseline severity between studies. Sensitivity analysis, excluding studies considered to be at a high risk of methodological bias, was conducted.
Results
In all, 56 RCTs were included in the networks. For each outcome, results are reported for all licensed treatment doses. For each NMR, results are based on patients with an average number of episodes of the outcome at baseline. After 12 weeks, all treatments were more efficacious than placebo. Patients who received onabotulinumtoxinA (100 U) had, on average, the greatest reductions in urinary incontinence episodes (UIE), urgency episodes, and micturition frequency, and the highest odds of achieving decreases of 100% and ≥50% from baseline in UIE/day. When comparing onabotulinumtoxinA with other pharmacotherapies, mean differences favoured onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U over all comparators for UIE and urgency episodes (credible intervals excluded zero) and all but two of the comparators for micturition frequency. OnabotulinumtoxinA 100 U was also associated with higher odds of achieving a 100% and ≥50% decrease in UIE/day than most other licensed treatments in the network. The exclusion of studies with a high risk of bias had little impact on the conclusions.
Conclusion
The results indicate that, after 12 weeks, onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U provides greater relief of OAB symptoms compared with most other licensed doses of other pharmacotherapies in the network.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28670786</pmid><doi>10.1111/bju.13945</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6230-2552</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1253-8524</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1382-3095</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1464-4096 |
ispartof | BJU international, 2017-11, Vol.120 (5), p.611-622 |
issn | 1464-4096 1464-410X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1951041859 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Acetanilides - administration & dosage Acetanilides - therapeutic use Administration, Oral Anticholinergics Bayesian analysis botulinum toxins Botulinum Toxins, Type A - administration & dosage Botulinum Toxins, Type A - therapeutic use Cholinergic Antagonists - administration & dosage Cholinergic Antagonists - therapeutic use Clinical trials Drug therapy Humans Licenses Mathematical models Meta-analysis mirabegron OAB overactive Sensitivity analysis Thiazoles - administration & dosage Thiazoles - therapeutic use Treatment Outcome type A Urinary bladder Urinary Bladder, Overactive - drug therapy Urinary incontinence Urination |
title | Comparative assessment of the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA and oral therapies (anticholinergics and mirabegron) for overactive bladder: a systematic review and network meta‐analysis |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T15%3A31%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20assessment%20of%20the%20efficacy%20of%20onabotulinumtoxinA%20and%20oral%20therapies%20(anticholinergics%20and%20mirabegron)%20for%20overactive%20bladder:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20network%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=BJU%20international&rft.au=Drake,%20Marcus%20J.&rft.date=2017-11&rft.volume=120&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=611&rft.epage=622&rft.pages=611-622&rft.issn=1464-4096&rft.eissn=1464-410X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bju.13945&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1951041859%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1951041859&rft_id=info:pmid/28670786&rfr_iscdi=true |