Virus-induced non-specific signals cause cell cycle progression of primed CD8+ T cells but don not induce cell differentiation

In this report the significance of virus-induced non-specific T cell activation was re-evaluated using transgenic mice in which about half of the CD8(+) T cells expressed a TCR specific for amino acids 33-41 of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus glycoprotein I. This allowed tracing of cells with kno...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International immunology 1999-09, Vol.11 (9), p.1463
Hauptverfasser: Susanne Ording Andreasen, Christensen, Jan Pravsgaard, Marker, Ole, Thomsen, Allan Randrup
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page 1463
container_title International immunology
container_volume 11
creator Susanne Ording Andreasen
Christensen, Jan Pravsgaard
Marker, Ole
Thomsen, Allan Randrup
description In this report the significance of virus-induced non-specific T cell activation was re-evaluated using transgenic mice in which about half of the CD8(+) T cells expressed a TCR specific for amino acids 33-41 of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus glycoprotein I. This allowed tracing of cells with known specificity and priming history in an environment also containing a normal heterogeneous CD8(+) population which served as an intrinsic control. Three parameters of T cell activation were analyzed: cell cycle progression, phenotypic conversion and cytolytic activity. Following injection of the IFN inducer poly(I:C), proliferation of memory (CD44(hi)) CD8(+) T cells but no phenotypic or functional activation was observed. Following injection of an unrelated virus [vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)], naive TCR transgenic cells did not become significantly activated with respect to any of the parameters investigated. In contrast, memory TCR transgenic cells were found to proliferate extensively early after VSV infection (day 0-3), whereas limited proliferation was observed later (day 3-6) when proliferation of non-transgenic CD8(+) T cells is maximal. This aborted response did not result from anergy to TCR stimulation, as memory TCR transgenic cells proliferated vigorously upon stimulation with their nominal peptide. Despite the massive proliferation of memory cells observed early after VSV infection, no phenotypic or functional activation was observed. Together these findings indicate that both non-specific and antigen-specific signals contribute to the initial virus-induced proliferation of CD8(+) T cells, but for further proliferation and differentiation to take place, TCR-ligand interaction is required. The implications for maintenance of T cell memory is discussed.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_195012402</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>45246366</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_1950124023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNTktuwjAQtSoqNVDuMGJbWXJiaJI1tOIAiG0UnDEalNrgsRdsOHvdwgFYPT2974soyuWnkpWu64koVLvSsinr5k1MmU9KKV21uhC3PYXEktyQDA7gvJN8RkOWDDAdXT8ymD4xgsFxBHM1I8I5-GNAZvIOvM2UfnJ2vWk-YPfvYzikCEOWnY9wL78XDGQtBnSR-pjj7-LV5gmcP3AmFt9fu_VW5olLQo7dyafw96Ir25Uqq6Wq9FOmX-ddUF0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>195012402</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Virus-induced non-specific signals cause cell cycle progression of primed CD8+ T cells but don not induce cell differentiation</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Susanne Ording Andreasen ; Christensen, Jan Pravsgaard ; Marker, Ole ; Thomsen, Allan Randrup</creator><creatorcontrib>Susanne Ording Andreasen ; Christensen, Jan Pravsgaard ; Marker, Ole ; Thomsen, Allan Randrup</creatorcontrib><description>In this report the significance of virus-induced non-specific T cell activation was re-evaluated using transgenic mice in which about half of the CD8(+) T cells expressed a TCR specific for amino acids 33-41 of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus glycoprotein I. This allowed tracing of cells with known specificity and priming history in an environment also containing a normal heterogeneous CD8(+) population which served as an intrinsic control. Three parameters of T cell activation were analyzed: cell cycle progression, phenotypic conversion and cytolytic activity. Following injection of the IFN inducer poly(I:C), proliferation of memory (CD44(hi)) CD8(+) T cells but no phenotypic or functional activation was observed. Following injection of an unrelated virus [vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)], naive TCR transgenic cells did not become significantly activated with respect to any of the parameters investigated. In contrast, memory TCR transgenic cells were found to proliferate extensively early after VSV infection (day 0-3), whereas limited proliferation was observed later (day 3-6) when proliferation of non-transgenic CD8(+) T cells is maximal. This aborted response did not result from anergy to TCR stimulation, as memory TCR transgenic cells proliferated vigorously upon stimulation with their nominal peptide. Despite the massive proliferation of memory cells observed early after VSV infection, no phenotypic or functional activation was observed. Together these findings indicate that both non-specific and antigen-specific signals contribute to the initial virus-induced proliferation of CD8(+) T cells, but for further proliferation and differentiation to take place, TCR-ligand interaction is required. The implications for maintenance of T cell memory is discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0953-8178</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2377</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</publisher><ispartof>International immunology, 1999-09, Vol.11 (9), p.1463</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press Sep 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Susanne Ording Andreasen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Jan Pravsgaard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marker, Ole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomsen, Allan Randrup</creatorcontrib><title>Virus-induced non-specific signals cause cell cycle progression of primed CD8+ T cells but don not induce cell differentiation</title><title>International immunology</title><description>In this report the significance of virus-induced non-specific T cell activation was re-evaluated using transgenic mice in which about half of the CD8(+) T cells expressed a TCR specific for amino acids 33-41 of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus glycoprotein I. This allowed tracing of cells with known specificity and priming history in an environment also containing a normal heterogeneous CD8(+) population which served as an intrinsic control. Three parameters of T cell activation were analyzed: cell cycle progression, phenotypic conversion and cytolytic activity. Following injection of the IFN inducer poly(I:C), proliferation of memory (CD44(hi)) CD8(+) T cells but no phenotypic or functional activation was observed. Following injection of an unrelated virus [vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)], naive TCR transgenic cells did not become significantly activated with respect to any of the parameters investigated. In contrast, memory TCR transgenic cells were found to proliferate extensively early after VSV infection (day 0-3), whereas limited proliferation was observed later (day 3-6) when proliferation of non-transgenic CD8(+) T cells is maximal. This aborted response did not result from anergy to TCR stimulation, as memory TCR transgenic cells proliferated vigorously upon stimulation with their nominal peptide. Despite the massive proliferation of memory cells observed early after VSV infection, no phenotypic or functional activation was observed. Together these findings indicate that both non-specific and antigen-specific signals contribute to the initial virus-induced proliferation of CD8(+) T cells, but for further proliferation and differentiation to take place, TCR-ligand interaction is required. The implications for maintenance of T cell memory is discussed.</description><issn>0953-8178</issn><issn>1460-2377</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNTktuwjAQtSoqNVDuMGJbWXJiaJI1tOIAiG0UnDEalNrgsRdsOHvdwgFYPT2974soyuWnkpWu64koVLvSsinr5k1MmU9KKV21uhC3PYXEktyQDA7gvJN8RkOWDDAdXT8ymD4xgsFxBHM1I8I5-GNAZvIOvM2UfnJ2vWk-YPfvYzikCEOWnY9wL78XDGQtBnSR-pjj7-LV5gmcP3AmFt9fu_VW5olLQo7dyafw96Ir25Uqq6Wq9FOmX-ddUF0</recordid><startdate>19990901</startdate><enddate>19990901</enddate><creator>Susanne Ording Andreasen</creator><creator>Christensen, Jan Pravsgaard</creator><creator>Marker, Ole</creator><creator>Thomsen, Allan Randrup</creator><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19990901</creationdate><title>Virus-induced non-specific signals cause cell cycle progression of primed CD8+ T cells but don not induce cell differentiation</title><author>Susanne Ording Andreasen ; Christensen, Jan Pravsgaard ; Marker, Ole ; Thomsen, Allan Randrup</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_1950124023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Susanne Ording Andreasen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, Jan Pravsgaard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marker, Ole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomsen, Allan Randrup</creatorcontrib><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Calcium &amp; Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International immunology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Susanne Ording Andreasen</au><au>Christensen, Jan Pravsgaard</au><au>Marker, Ole</au><au>Thomsen, Allan Randrup</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Virus-induced non-specific signals cause cell cycle progression of primed CD8+ T cells but don not induce cell differentiation</atitle><jtitle>International immunology</jtitle><date>1999-09-01</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>1463</spage><pages>1463-</pages><issn>0953-8178</issn><eissn>1460-2377</eissn><abstract>In this report the significance of virus-induced non-specific T cell activation was re-evaluated using transgenic mice in which about half of the CD8(+) T cells expressed a TCR specific for amino acids 33-41 of lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus glycoprotein I. This allowed tracing of cells with known specificity and priming history in an environment also containing a normal heterogeneous CD8(+) population which served as an intrinsic control. Three parameters of T cell activation were analyzed: cell cycle progression, phenotypic conversion and cytolytic activity. Following injection of the IFN inducer poly(I:C), proliferation of memory (CD44(hi)) CD8(+) T cells but no phenotypic or functional activation was observed. Following injection of an unrelated virus [vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV)], naive TCR transgenic cells did not become significantly activated with respect to any of the parameters investigated. In contrast, memory TCR transgenic cells were found to proliferate extensively early after VSV infection (day 0-3), whereas limited proliferation was observed later (day 3-6) when proliferation of non-transgenic CD8(+) T cells is maximal. This aborted response did not result from anergy to TCR stimulation, as memory TCR transgenic cells proliferated vigorously upon stimulation with their nominal peptide. Despite the massive proliferation of memory cells observed early after VSV infection, no phenotypic or functional activation was observed. Together these findings indicate that both non-specific and antigen-specific signals contribute to the initial virus-induced proliferation of CD8(+) T cells, but for further proliferation and differentiation to take place, TCR-ligand interaction is required. The implications for maintenance of T cell memory is discussed.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0953-8178
ispartof International immunology, 1999-09, Vol.11 (9), p.1463
issn 0953-8178
1460-2377
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_195012402
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title Virus-induced non-specific signals cause cell cycle progression of primed CD8+ T cells but don not induce cell differentiation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T22%3A13%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Virus-induced%20non-specific%20signals%20cause%20cell%20cycle%20progression%20of%20primed%20CD8+%20T%20cells%20but%20don%20not%20induce%20cell%20differentiation&rft.jtitle=International%20immunology&rft.au=Susanne%20Ording%20Andreasen&rft.date=1999-09-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=1463&rft.pages=1463-&rft.issn=0953-8178&rft.eissn=1460-2377&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E45246366%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=195012402&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true