Agentive Modals

This essay proposes a new theory of : ability modals and their duals, compulsion modals. After criticizing existing approaches—the existential quantificational analysis, the universal quantificational analysis, and the conditional analysis—it presents a new account that builds on both the existentia...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Philosophical review 2017-07, Vol.126 (3), p.301-343
Hauptverfasser: Mandelkern, Matthew, Schultheis, Ginger, Boylan, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 343
container_issue 3
container_start_page 301
container_title The Philosophical review
container_volume 126
creator Mandelkern, Matthew
Schultheis, Ginger
Boylan, David
description This essay proposes a new theory of : ability modals and their duals, compulsion modals. After criticizing existing approaches—the existential quantificational analysis, the universal quantificational analysis, and the conditional analysis—it presents a new account that builds on both the existential and conditional analyses. On this account, the , a sentence like ‘John can swim across the river’ says that there is some (in a sense the essay makes precise) that is such that if John tries to do it, he swims across the river. The essay argues that the act conditional analysis avoids the problems faced by existing accounts of agentive modality and shows how the act conditional analysis can be extended to an account of generic agentive modal claims. The upshot is a new vantage point on the role of agentive modal ascriptions in practical discourse: ability ascriptions serve as a kind of hypothetical guarantee, and compulsion ascriptions as a kind of nonhypothetical guarantee.
doi_str_mv 10.1215/00318108-3878483
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1950076516</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>26783765</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>26783765</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-6c9f7a599ba80a6bd3978bcd4cb20826babe23ae7ee546069f92d7b880c9cc153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j01LxDAQhoMouK7i1YsgeK5OkiaZHJfFVWHFi55DkqayVbc1aQX_vSldxYtzmcPzfvASckbhijIqrgE4RQpYcFRYIt8jMyoEFrRUsE9mIy5GfkiOUmognyjljJwuXsK233yGi4e2sm_pmBzU-YWT3Z-T59XN0_KuWD_e3i8X68JzrvpCel0rK7R2FsFKV3Gt0Pmq9I4BMumsC4zboELINSB1rVmlHCJ47T0VfE4up9wuth9DSL1p2iFuc6WhWgAoKajMKphUPrYpxVCbLm7ebfwyFMw42_zMNrvZ2XI-WZrUt_FXz6RCnkMz5xOvhtcwdDGk9Kf6v9RvAJVg-Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1950076516</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Agentive Modals</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Mandelkern, Matthew ; Schultheis, Ginger ; Boylan, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Mandelkern, Matthew ; Schultheis, Ginger ; Boylan, David</creatorcontrib><description>This essay proposes a new theory of : ability modals and their duals, compulsion modals. After criticizing existing approaches—the existential quantificational analysis, the universal quantificational analysis, and the conditional analysis—it presents a new account that builds on both the existential and conditional analyses. On this account, the , a sentence like ‘John can swim across the river’ says that there is some (in a sense the essay makes precise) that is such that if John tries to do it, he swims across the river. The essay argues that the act conditional analysis avoids the problems faced by existing accounts of agentive modality and shows how the act conditional analysis can be extended to an account of generic agentive modal claims. The upshot is a new vantage point on the role of agentive modal ascriptions in practical discourse: ability ascriptions serve as a kind of hypothetical guarantee, and compulsion ascriptions as a kind of nonhypothetical guarantee.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0031-8108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-1470</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1215/00318108-3878483</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Duke University Press</publisher><subject>Ability ; Existentialism ; Hypotheses ; Logic ; Mathematics ; Philosophy ; Quantitative analysis ; Theory and Philosophy</subject><ispartof>The Philosophical review, 2017-07, Vol.126 (3), p.301-343</ispartof><rights>2017 by Cornell University</rights><rights>Copyright Cornell University Jul 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-6c9f7a599ba80a6bd3978bcd4cb20826babe23ae7ee546069f92d7b880c9cc153</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-6c9f7a599ba80a6bd3978bcd4cb20826babe23ae7ee546069f92d7b880c9cc153</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26783765$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26783765$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mandelkern, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultheis, Ginger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boylan, David</creatorcontrib><title>Agentive Modals</title><title>The Philosophical review</title><description>This essay proposes a new theory of : ability modals and their duals, compulsion modals. After criticizing existing approaches—the existential quantificational analysis, the universal quantificational analysis, and the conditional analysis—it presents a new account that builds on both the existential and conditional analyses. On this account, the , a sentence like ‘John can swim across the river’ says that there is some (in a sense the essay makes precise) that is such that if John tries to do it, he swims across the river. The essay argues that the act conditional analysis avoids the problems faced by existing accounts of agentive modality and shows how the act conditional analysis can be extended to an account of generic agentive modal claims. The upshot is a new vantage point on the role of agentive modal ascriptions in practical discourse: ability ascriptions serve as a kind of hypothetical guarantee, and compulsion ascriptions as a kind of nonhypothetical guarantee.</description><subject>Ability</subject><subject>Existentialism</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Theory and Philosophy</subject><issn>0031-8108</issn><issn>1558-1470</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j01LxDAQhoMouK7i1YsgeK5OkiaZHJfFVWHFi55DkqayVbc1aQX_vSldxYtzmcPzfvASckbhijIqrgE4RQpYcFRYIt8jMyoEFrRUsE9mIy5GfkiOUmognyjljJwuXsK233yGi4e2sm_pmBzU-YWT3Z-T59XN0_KuWD_e3i8X68JzrvpCel0rK7R2FsFKV3Gt0Pmq9I4BMumsC4zboELINSB1rVmlHCJ47T0VfE4up9wuth9DSL1p2iFuc6WhWgAoKajMKphUPrYpxVCbLm7ebfwyFMw42_zMNrvZ2XI-WZrUt_FXz6RCnkMz5xOvhtcwdDGk9Kf6v9RvAJVg-Q</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Mandelkern, Matthew</creator><creator>Schultheis, Ginger</creator><creator>Boylan, David</creator><general>Duke University Press</general><general>Cornell University</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Agentive Modals</title><author>Mandelkern, Matthew ; Schultheis, Ginger ; Boylan, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-6c9f7a599ba80a6bd3978bcd4cb20826babe23ae7ee546069f92d7b880c9cc153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Ability</topic><topic>Existentialism</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Theory and Philosophy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mandelkern, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schultheis, Ginger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boylan, David</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Philosophical review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mandelkern, Matthew</au><au>Schultheis, Ginger</au><au>Boylan, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Agentive Modals</atitle><jtitle>The Philosophical review</jtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>301</spage><epage>343</epage><pages>301-343</pages><issn>0031-8108</issn><eissn>1558-1470</eissn><abstract>This essay proposes a new theory of : ability modals and their duals, compulsion modals. After criticizing existing approaches—the existential quantificational analysis, the universal quantificational analysis, and the conditional analysis—it presents a new account that builds on both the existential and conditional analyses. On this account, the , a sentence like ‘John can swim across the river’ says that there is some (in a sense the essay makes precise) that is such that if John tries to do it, he swims across the river. The essay argues that the act conditional analysis avoids the problems faced by existing accounts of agentive modality and shows how the act conditional analysis can be extended to an account of generic agentive modal claims. The upshot is a new vantage point on the role of agentive modal ascriptions in practical discourse: ability ascriptions serve as a kind of hypothetical guarantee, and compulsion ascriptions as a kind of nonhypothetical guarantee.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Duke University Press</pub><doi>10.1215/00318108-3878483</doi><tpages>43</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0031-8108
ispartof The Philosophical review, 2017-07, Vol.126 (3), p.301-343
issn 0031-8108
1558-1470
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1950076516
source Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Ability
Existentialism
Hypotheses
Logic
Mathematics
Philosophy
Quantitative analysis
Theory and Philosophy
title Agentive Modals
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T19%3A45%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Agentive%20Modals&rft.jtitle=The%20Philosophical%20review&rft.au=Mandelkern,%20Matthew&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=301&rft.epage=343&rft.pages=301-343&rft.issn=0031-8108&rft.eissn=1558-1470&rft_id=info:doi/10.1215/00318108-3878483&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E26783765%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1950076516&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=26783765&rfr_iscdi=true