Pharmacokinetics of Transdermal Etofenamate and Diclofenac in Healthy Volunteers
Little is known about the course of the plasma concentration and the bioavailability of non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) contained in dermal patches. We compared an etofenamate prototype patch (patent EP 1833471) and a commercially available diclofenac epolamine patch regarding the bio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology 2017-11, Vol.121 (5), p.423-429 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 429 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 423 |
container_title | Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology |
container_volume | 121 |
creator | Drago, Sara Imboden, Roger Schlatter, Philipp Buylaert, Mirabel Krähenbühl, Stephan Drewe, Juergen |
description | Little is known about the course of the plasma concentration and the bioavailability of non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) contained in dermal patches. We compared an etofenamate prototype patch (patent EP 1833471) and a commercially available diclofenac epolamine patch regarding the bioavailability of the active ingredients relative to respective i.m. applications and regarding their plasma concentration–time course. Twenty‐four healthy human volunteers were treated using a parallel group design (n = 12 per group) with a single dermal patch (removed after 12 hr) followed (after a latency of 48 hr) by eight consecutive dermal patches every 12 hr to reach steady‐state conditions. The patches were generally well tolerated, but one volunteer treated with etofenamate developed an allergic contact dermatitis. After the first patch, Cmax was 0.81 ± 0.11 (mean ± S.E.M.) ng/mL (reached 12 hr after patch removal) for diclofenac and 31.3 ± 3.8 ng/mL for flufenamic acid (reached at patch removal), the main metabolite of etofenamate. Etofenamate was not detectable. After repetitive dosing, trough plasma concentrations after the eighth dose were 1.72 ± 0.32 ng/mL for diclofenac and 48.7 ± 6.6 ng/mL for flufenamic acid. Bioavailabilities (single dose) relative to i.m. applications were 0.22 ± 0.04% for diclofenac and 1.15 ± 0.06% for flufenamic acid. In conclusion, the relative bioavailability (compared to the respective i.m. application) of both drugs is low. The maximal plasma concentrations after topical administration of these drugs are well below the IC50 values for COX‐1 and COX‐2, explaining the absence of dose‐dependent toxicities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/bcpt.12818 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1949347895</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1949347895</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4198-c446e8aa462683a3f8bdc51f1de1ae38acacfe147a96771deea33da83ba7d0993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk5v_AES8E7YbJq0SS91TicM3MX0Npymp6yzHzNpkf17s1V36bnICS8Pz4GXkGsWTJif-9Rs2wkLFVMnZMikCMdSCX56_PNoQC6c2wRBKAULzskgVFHMRMiGZLlcg63ANJ9FjW1hHG1yurJQuwx9XtJZ2-RYQwUtUqgz-lSY8pAYWtR0jlC26x39aMqubhGtuyRnOZQOr373iLw_z1bT-Xjx9vI6fViMjWCJ8q-IUQGIOIwVB56rNDMRy1mGDJArMGByZEJCEkvpUwTOM1A8BZkFScJH5Lb3bm3z1aFr9abpbO1PapaIhAupkshTdz1lbOOcxVxvbVGB3WkW6H15el-ePpTn4ZtfZZdWmB3Rv7Y8wHrguyhx949KP06Xq176AxVcetE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1949347895</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pharmacokinetics of Transdermal Etofenamate and Diclofenac in Healthy Volunteers</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Drago, Sara ; Imboden, Roger ; Schlatter, Philipp ; Buylaert, Mirabel ; Krähenbühl, Stephan ; Drewe, Juergen</creator><creatorcontrib>Drago, Sara ; Imboden, Roger ; Schlatter, Philipp ; Buylaert, Mirabel ; Krähenbühl, Stephan ; Drewe, Juergen</creatorcontrib><description>Little is known about the course of the plasma concentration and the bioavailability of non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) contained in dermal patches. We compared an etofenamate prototype patch (patent EP 1833471) and a commercially available diclofenac epolamine patch regarding the bioavailability of the active ingredients relative to respective i.m. applications and regarding their plasma concentration–time course. Twenty‐four healthy human volunteers were treated using a parallel group design (n = 12 per group) with a single dermal patch (removed after 12 hr) followed (after a latency of 48 hr) by eight consecutive dermal patches every 12 hr to reach steady‐state conditions. The patches were generally well tolerated, but one volunteer treated with etofenamate developed an allergic contact dermatitis. After the first patch, Cmax was 0.81 ± 0.11 (mean ± S.E.M.) ng/mL (reached 12 hr after patch removal) for diclofenac and 31.3 ± 3.8 ng/mL for flufenamic acid (reached at patch removal), the main metabolite of etofenamate. Etofenamate was not detectable. After repetitive dosing, trough plasma concentrations after the eighth dose were 1.72 ± 0.32 ng/mL for diclofenac and 48.7 ± 6.6 ng/mL for flufenamic acid. Bioavailabilities (single dose) relative to i.m. applications were 0.22 ± 0.04% for diclofenac and 1.15 ± 0.06% for flufenamic acid. In conclusion, the relative bioavailability (compared to the respective i.m. application) of both drugs is low. The maximal plasma concentrations after topical administration of these drugs are well below the IC50 values for COX‐1 and COX‐2, explaining the absence of dose‐dependent toxicities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-7835</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-7843</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.12818</identifier><identifier>PMID: 28561421</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Administration, Cutaneous ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration & dosage ; Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - pharmacokinetics ; Bioavailability ; Biological Availability ; Contact dermatitis ; Cross-Over Studies ; Cyclooxygenase-1 ; Cyclooxygenase-2 ; Dermatitis ; Diclofenac ; Diclofenac - administration & dosage ; Diclofenac - pharmacokinetics ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Drug dosages ; Female ; Flufenamic Acid - administration & dosage ; Flufenamic Acid - analogs & derivatives ; Flufenamic Acid - metabolism ; Flufenamic Acid - pharmacokinetics ; Humans ; Inflammation ; Inhibitory Concentration 50 ; Injections, Intramuscular ; Latency ; Male ; Metabolites ; Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs ; Patches (structures) ; Pharmacokinetics ; Plasma ; Skin ; Transdermal Patch ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology, 2017-11, Vol.121 (5), p.423-429</ispartof><rights>2017 Nordic Association for the Publication of BCPT (former Nordic Pharmacological Society)</rights><rights>2017 Nordic Association for the Publication of BCPT (former Nordic Pharmacological Society).</rights><rights>Copyright © 2017 Nordic Association for the Publication of BCPT (former Nordic Pharmacological Society). Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4198-c446e8aa462683a3f8bdc51f1de1ae38acacfe147a96771deea33da83ba7d0993</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4198-c446e8aa462683a3f8bdc51f1de1ae38acacfe147a96771deea33da83ba7d0993</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbcpt.12818$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbcpt.12818$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28561421$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Drago, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imboden, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlatter, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buylaert, Mirabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krähenbühl, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drewe, Juergen</creatorcontrib><title>Pharmacokinetics of Transdermal Etofenamate and Diclofenac in Healthy Volunteers</title><title>Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology</title><addtitle>Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol</addtitle><description>Little is known about the course of the plasma concentration and the bioavailability of non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) contained in dermal patches. We compared an etofenamate prototype patch (patent EP 1833471) and a commercially available diclofenac epolamine patch regarding the bioavailability of the active ingredients relative to respective i.m. applications and regarding their plasma concentration–time course. Twenty‐four healthy human volunteers were treated using a parallel group design (n = 12 per group) with a single dermal patch (removed after 12 hr) followed (after a latency of 48 hr) by eight consecutive dermal patches every 12 hr to reach steady‐state conditions. The patches were generally well tolerated, but one volunteer treated with etofenamate developed an allergic contact dermatitis. After the first patch, Cmax was 0.81 ± 0.11 (mean ± S.E.M.) ng/mL (reached 12 hr after patch removal) for diclofenac and 31.3 ± 3.8 ng/mL for flufenamic acid (reached at patch removal), the main metabolite of etofenamate. Etofenamate was not detectable. After repetitive dosing, trough plasma concentrations after the eighth dose were 1.72 ± 0.32 ng/mL for diclofenac and 48.7 ± 6.6 ng/mL for flufenamic acid. Bioavailabilities (single dose) relative to i.m. applications were 0.22 ± 0.04% for diclofenac and 1.15 ± 0.06% for flufenamic acid. In conclusion, the relative bioavailability (compared to the respective i.m. application) of both drugs is low. The maximal plasma concentrations after topical administration of these drugs are well below the IC50 values for COX‐1 and COX‐2, explaining the absence of dose‐dependent toxicities.</description><subject>Administration, Cutaneous</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Bioavailability</subject><subject>Biological Availability</subject><subject>Contact dermatitis</subject><subject>Cross-Over Studies</subject><subject>Cyclooxygenase-1</subject><subject>Cyclooxygenase-2</subject><subject>Dermatitis</subject><subject>Diclofenac</subject><subject>Diclofenac - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Diclofenac - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Drug dosages</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Flufenamic Acid - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Flufenamic Acid - analogs & derivatives</subject><subject>Flufenamic Acid - metabolism</subject><subject>Flufenamic Acid - pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Inhibitory Concentration 50</subject><subject>Injections, Intramuscular</subject><subject>Latency</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Metabolites</subject><subject>Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs</subject><subject>Patches (structures)</subject><subject>Pharmacokinetics</subject><subject>Plasma</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>Transdermal Patch</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1742-7835</issn><issn>1742-7843</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMobk5v_AES8E7YbJq0SS91TicM3MX0Npymp6yzHzNpkf17s1V36bnICS8Pz4GXkGsWTJif-9Rs2wkLFVMnZMikCMdSCX56_PNoQC6c2wRBKAULzskgVFHMRMiGZLlcg63ANJ9FjW1hHG1yurJQuwx9XtJZ2-RYQwUtUqgz-lSY8pAYWtR0jlC26x39aMqubhGtuyRnOZQOr373iLw_z1bT-Xjx9vI6fViMjWCJ8q-IUQGIOIwVB56rNDMRy1mGDJArMGByZEJCEkvpUwTOM1A8BZkFScJH5Lb3bm3z1aFr9abpbO1PapaIhAupkshTdz1lbOOcxVxvbVGB3WkW6H15el-ePpTn4ZtfZZdWmB3Rv7Y8wHrguyhx949KP06Xq176AxVcetE</recordid><startdate>201711</startdate><enddate>201711</enddate><creator>Drago, Sara</creator><creator>Imboden, Roger</creator><creator>Schlatter, Philipp</creator><creator>Buylaert, Mirabel</creator><creator>Krähenbühl, Stephan</creator><creator>Drewe, Juergen</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201711</creationdate><title>Pharmacokinetics of Transdermal Etofenamate and Diclofenac in Healthy Volunteers</title><author>Drago, Sara ; Imboden, Roger ; Schlatter, Philipp ; Buylaert, Mirabel ; Krähenbühl, Stephan ; Drewe, Juergen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4198-c446e8aa462683a3f8bdc51f1de1ae38acacfe147a96771deea33da83ba7d0993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Administration, Cutaneous</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Bioavailability</topic><topic>Biological Availability</topic><topic>Contact dermatitis</topic><topic>Cross-Over Studies</topic><topic>Cyclooxygenase-1</topic><topic>Cyclooxygenase-2</topic><topic>Dermatitis</topic><topic>Diclofenac</topic><topic>Diclofenac - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Diclofenac - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Drug dosages</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Flufenamic Acid - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Flufenamic Acid - analogs & derivatives</topic><topic>Flufenamic Acid - metabolism</topic><topic>Flufenamic Acid - pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Inhibitory Concentration 50</topic><topic>Injections, Intramuscular</topic><topic>Latency</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Metabolites</topic><topic>Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs</topic><topic>Patches (structures)</topic><topic>Pharmacokinetics</topic><topic>Plasma</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>Transdermal Patch</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Drago, Sara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imboden, Roger</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlatter, Philipp</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buylaert, Mirabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krähenbühl, Stephan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drewe, Juergen</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Drago, Sara</au><au>Imboden, Roger</au><au>Schlatter, Philipp</au><au>Buylaert, Mirabel</au><au>Krähenbühl, Stephan</au><au>Drewe, Juergen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pharmacokinetics of Transdermal Etofenamate and Diclofenac in Healthy Volunteers</atitle><jtitle>Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology</jtitle><addtitle>Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol</addtitle><date>2017-11</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>423</spage><epage>429</epage><pages>423-429</pages><issn>1742-7835</issn><eissn>1742-7843</eissn><abstract>Little is known about the course of the plasma concentration and the bioavailability of non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) contained in dermal patches. We compared an etofenamate prototype patch (patent EP 1833471) and a commercially available diclofenac epolamine patch regarding the bioavailability of the active ingredients relative to respective i.m. applications and regarding their plasma concentration–time course. Twenty‐four healthy human volunteers were treated using a parallel group design (n = 12 per group) with a single dermal patch (removed after 12 hr) followed (after a latency of 48 hr) by eight consecutive dermal patches every 12 hr to reach steady‐state conditions. The patches were generally well tolerated, but one volunteer treated with etofenamate developed an allergic contact dermatitis. After the first patch, Cmax was 0.81 ± 0.11 (mean ± S.E.M.) ng/mL (reached 12 hr after patch removal) for diclofenac and 31.3 ± 3.8 ng/mL for flufenamic acid (reached at patch removal), the main metabolite of etofenamate. Etofenamate was not detectable. After repetitive dosing, trough plasma concentrations after the eighth dose were 1.72 ± 0.32 ng/mL for diclofenac and 48.7 ± 6.6 ng/mL for flufenamic acid. Bioavailabilities (single dose) relative to i.m. applications were 0.22 ± 0.04% for diclofenac and 1.15 ± 0.06% for flufenamic acid. In conclusion, the relative bioavailability (compared to the respective i.m. application) of both drugs is low. The maximal plasma concentrations after topical administration of these drugs are well below the IC50 values for COX‐1 and COX‐2, explaining the absence of dose‐dependent toxicities.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>28561421</pmid><doi>10.1111/bcpt.12818</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1742-7835 |
ispartof | Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology, 2017-11, Vol.121 (5), p.423-429 |
issn | 1742-7835 1742-7843 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1949347895 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Administration, Cutaneous Adolescent Adult Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - administration & dosage Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal - pharmacokinetics Bioavailability Biological Availability Contact dermatitis Cross-Over Studies Cyclooxygenase-1 Cyclooxygenase-2 Dermatitis Diclofenac Diclofenac - administration & dosage Diclofenac - pharmacokinetics Drug Administration Schedule Drug dosages Female Flufenamic Acid - administration & dosage Flufenamic Acid - analogs & derivatives Flufenamic Acid - metabolism Flufenamic Acid - pharmacokinetics Humans Inflammation Inhibitory Concentration 50 Injections, Intramuscular Latency Male Metabolites Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs Patches (structures) Pharmacokinetics Plasma Skin Transdermal Patch Young Adult |
title | Pharmacokinetics of Transdermal Etofenamate and Diclofenac in Healthy Volunteers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T02%3A25%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pharmacokinetics%20of%20Transdermal%20Etofenamate%20and%20Diclofenac%20in%20Healthy%20Volunteers&rft.jtitle=Basic%20&%20clinical%20pharmacology%20&%20toxicology&rft.au=Drago,%20Sara&rft.date=2017-11&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=423&rft.epage=429&rft.pages=423-429&rft.issn=1742-7835&rft.eissn=1742-7843&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bcpt.12818&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1949347895%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1949347895&rft_id=info:pmid/28561421&rfr_iscdi=true |