Governments, Parliaments and Legislative Activity
Various strands of literature in comparative politics suggest that there is a differential impact of the type of government and their supporting legislative coalitions in parliamentary democracies, for example, in terms of their size and ideological heterogeneity, and on their potential to induce po...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Political science research and methods 2017-07, Vol.5 (3), p.529-554 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 554 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 529 |
container_title | Political science research and methods |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Bräuninger, Thomas Debus, Marc Wüst, Fabian |
description | Various strands of literature in comparative politics suggest that there is a differential impact of the type of government and their supporting legislative coalitions in parliamentary democracies, for example, in terms of their size and ideological heterogeneity, and on their potential to induce policy change. Most studies in this area focus on governments as agenda-setters, possibly neglecting the role of parliaments as a further key actor in policy making. In this article, we address the broader question as to how patterns of conflict within parliament effect legislative activity of governments and parliamentary actors. Through a simultaneous analysis of the success and event history of over 12,000 legislative bills in three parliamentary systems and one semi-presidential system from 1986 until 2003, we show how the interplay of actor motivations and institutional settings has a discriminating impact on the potential of both the government and parliament to induce policy change. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/psrm.2015.29 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1949137578</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_psrm_2015_29</cupid><sourcerecordid>1949137578</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c232t-3a66284e00fa9071f959c3941a8613e67f97a57856f225c55a37f5b3dc1d58a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1Lw0AQxRdRsNTe_AMCXpu4H9ndzLEUrUJAD3pepsluScmXu2mh_72JLeLBubwZ-L038Ai5ZzRhlOnHPvgm4ZTJhMMVmXGaQpylGVz_7prekkUIezoOUKkgnRG26Y7Wt41th7CM3tHXFf4cEbZllNtdFWocqqONVsUo1XC6IzcO62AXF52Tz-enj_VLnL9tXterPC644EMsUCmepZZSh0A1cyChEJAyzBQTVmkHGqXOpHKcy0JKFNrJrSgLVsoMlZiTh3Nu77uvgw2D2XcH344vDYMUmNCje6SWZ6rwXQjeOtP7qkF_MoyaqRcz9WKmXgyHEU8uODZbX5U7-yf1P8M3JFBjyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1949137578</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Governments, Parliaments and Legislative Activity</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Bräuninger, Thomas ; Debus, Marc ; Wüst, Fabian</creator><creatorcontrib>Bräuninger, Thomas ; Debus, Marc ; Wüst, Fabian</creatorcontrib><description>Various strands of literature in comparative politics suggest that there is a differential impact of the type of government and their supporting legislative coalitions in parliamentary democracies, for example, in terms of their size and ideological heterogeneity, and on their potential to induce policy change. Most studies in this area focus on governments as agenda-setters, possibly neglecting the role of parliaments as a further key actor in policy making. In this article, we address the broader question as to how patterns of conflict within parliament effect legislative activity of governments and parliamentary actors. Through a simultaneous analysis of the success and event history of over 12,000 legislative bills in three parliamentary systems and one semi-presidential system from 1986 until 2003, we show how the interplay of actor motivations and institutional settings has a discriminating impact on the potential of both the government and parliament to induce policy change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-8470</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-8489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/psrm.2015.29</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Bills ; Coalitions ; Comparative politics ; Conflict ; Democracy ; Heterogeneity ; Ideology ; Legislation ; Legislatures ; Members of Parliament ; Negative campaigning ; Original Articles ; Parliamentary systems ; Parliaments ; Policy making ; Political science ; Politics ; Presidential systems ; Proposals ; Reforms</subject><ispartof>Political science research and methods, 2017-07, Vol.5 (3), p.529-554</ispartof><rights>The European Political Science Association 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c232t-3a66284e00fa9071f959c3941a8613e67f97a57856f225c55a37f5b3dc1d58a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c232t-3a66284e00fa9071f959c3941a8613e67f97a57856f225c55a37f5b3dc1d58a63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847015000291/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,12845,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bräuninger, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debus, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wüst, Fabian</creatorcontrib><title>Governments, Parliaments and Legislative Activity</title><title>Political science research and methods</title><addtitle>PSRM</addtitle><description>Various strands of literature in comparative politics suggest that there is a differential impact of the type of government and their supporting legislative coalitions in parliamentary democracies, for example, in terms of their size and ideological heterogeneity, and on their potential to induce policy change. Most studies in this area focus on governments as agenda-setters, possibly neglecting the role of parliaments as a further key actor in policy making. In this article, we address the broader question as to how patterns of conflict within parliament effect legislative activity of governments and parliamentary actors. Through a simultaneous analysis of the success and event history of over 12,000 legislative bills in three parliamentary systems and one semi-presidential system from 1986 until 2003, we show how the interplay of actor motivations and institutional settings has a discriminating impact on the potential of both the government and parliament to induce policy change.</description><subject>Bills</subject><subject>Coalitions</subject><subject>Comparative politics</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Members of Parliament</subject><subject>Negative campaigning</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><subject>Parliamentary systems</subject><subject>Parliaments</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Presidential systems</subject><subject>Proposals</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><issn>2049-8470</issn><issn>2049-8489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM1Lw0AQxRdRsNTe_AMCXpu4H9ndzLEUrUJAD3pepsluScmXu2mh_72JLeLBubwZ-L038Ai5ZzRhlOnHPvgm4ZTJhMMVmXGaQpylGVz_7prekkUIezoOUKkgnRG26Y7Wt41th7CM3tHXFf4cEbZllNtdFWocqqONVsUo1XC6IzcO62AXF52Tz-enj_VLnL9tXterPC644EMsUCmepZZSh0A1cyChEJAyzBQTVmkHGqXOpHKcy0JKFNrJrSgLVsoMlZiTh3Nu77uvgw2D2XcH344vDYMUmNCje6SWZ6rwXQjeOtP7qkF_MoyaqRcz9WKmXgyHEU8uODZbX5U7-yf1P8M3JFBjyA</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Bräuninger, Thomas</creator><creator>Debus, Marc</creator><creator>Wüst, Fabian</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Governments, Parliaments and Legislative Activity</title><author>Bräuninger, Thomas ; Debus, Marc ; Wüst, Fabian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c232t-3a66284e00fa9071f959c3941a8613e67f97a57856f225c55a37f5b3dc1d58a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Bills</topic><topic>Coalitions</topic><topic>Comparative politics</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Members of Parliament</topic><topic>Negative campaigning</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><topic>Parliamentary systems</topic><topic>Parliaments</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Presidential systems</topic><topic>Proposals</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bräuninger, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debus, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wüst, Fabian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Political science research and methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bräuninger, Thomas</au><au>Debus, Marc</au><au>Wüst, Fabian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Governments, Parliaments and Legislative Activity</atitle><jtitle>Political science research and methods</jtitle><addtitle>PSRM</addtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>529</spage><epage>554</epage><pages>529-554</pages><issn>2049-8470</issn><eissn>2049-8489</eissn><abstract>Various strands of literature in comparative politics suggest that there is a differential impact of the type of government and their supporting legislative coalitions in parliamentary democracies, for example, in terms of their size and ideological heterogeneity, and on their potential to induce policy change. Most studies in this area focus on governments as agenda-setters, possibly neglecting the role of parliaments as a further key actor in policy making. In this article, we address the broader question as to how patterns of conflict within parliament effect legislative activity of governments and parliamentary actors. Through a simultaneous analysis of the success and event history of over 12,000 legislative bills in three parliamentary systems and one semi-presidential system from 1986 until 2003, we show how the interplay of actor motivations and institutional settings has a discriminating impact on the potential of both the government and parliament to induce policy change.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/psrm.2015.29</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2049-8470 |
ispartof | Political science research and methods, 2017-07, Vol.5 (3), p.529-554 |
issn | 2049-8470 2049-8489 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1949137578 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge Journals |
subjects | Bills Coalitions Comparative politics Conflict Democracy Heterogeneity Ideology Legislation Legislatures Members of Parliament Negative campaigning Original Articles Parliamentary systems Parliaments Policy making Political science Politics Presidential systems Proposals Reforms |
title | Governments, Parliaments and Legislative Activity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T02%3A01%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Governments,%20Parliaments%20and%20Legislative%20Activity&rft.jtitle=Political%20science%20research%20and%20methods&rft.au=Br%C3%A4uninger,%20Thomas&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=529&rft.epage=554&rft.pages=529-554&rft.issn=2049-8470&rft.eissn=2049-8489&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/psrm.2015.29&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1949137578%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1949137578&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_psrm_2015_29&rfr_iscdi=true |