Governments, Parliaments and Legislative Activity

Various strands of literature in comparative politics suggest that there is a differential impact of the type of government and their supporting legislative coalitions in parliamentary democracies, for example, in terms of their size and ideological heterogeneity, and on their potential to induce po...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Political science research and methods 2017-07, Vol.5 (3), p.529-554
Hauptverfasser: Bräuninger, Thomas, Debus, Marc, Wüst, Fabian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 554
container_issue 3
container_start_page 529
container_title Political science research and methods
container_volume 5
creator Bräuninger, Thomas
Debus, Marc
Wüst, Fabian
description Various strands of literature in comparative politics suggest that there is a differential impact of the type of government and their supporting legislative coalitions in parliamentary democracies, for example, in terms of their size and ideological heterogeneity, and on their potential to induce policy change. Most studies in this area focus on governments as agenda-setters, possibly neglecting the role of parliaments as a further key actor in policy making. In this article, we address the broader question as to how patterns of conflict within parliament effect legislative activity of governments and parliamentary actors. Through a simultaneous analysis of the success and event history of over 12,000 legislative bills in three parliamentary systems and one semi-presidential system from 1986 until 2003, we show how the interplay of actor motivations and institutional settings has a discriminating impact on the potential of both the government and parliament to induce policy change.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/psrm.2015.29
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1949137578</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_psrm_2015_29</cupid><sourcerecordid>1949137578</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c232t-3a66284e00fa9071f959c3941a8613e67f97a57856f225c55a37f5b3dc1d58a63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1Lw0AQxRdRsNTe_AMCXpu4H9ndzLEUrUJAD3pepsluScmXu2mh_72JLeLBubwZ-L038Ai5ZzRhlOnHPvgm4ZTJhMMVmXGaQpylGVz_7prekkUIezoOUKkgnRG26Y7Wt41th7CM3tHXFf4cEbZllNtdFWocqqONVsUo1XC6IzcO62AXF52Tz-enj_VLnL9tXterPC644EMsUCmepZZSh0A1cyChEJAyzBQTVmkHGqXOpHKcy0JKFNrJrSgLVsoMlZiTh3Nu77uvgw2D2XcH344vDYMUmNCje6SWZ6rwXQjeOtP7qkF_MoyaqRcz9WKmXgyHEU8uODZbX5U7-yf1P8M3JFBjyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1949137578</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Governments, Parliaments and Legislative Activity</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Cambridge Journals</source><creator>Bräuninger, Thomas ; Debus, Marc ; Wüst, Fabian</creator><creatorcontrib>Bräuninger, Thomas ; Debus, Marc ; Wüst, Fabian</creatorcontrib><description>Various strands of literature in comparative politics suggest that there is a differential impact of the type of government and their supporting legislative coalitions in parliamentary democracies, for example, in terms of their size and ideological heterogeneity, and on their potential to induce policy change. Most studies in this area focus on governments as agenda-setters, possibly neglecting the role of parliaments as a further key actor in policy making. In this article, we address the broader question as to how patterns of conflict within parliament effect legislative activity of governments and parliamentary actors. Through a simultaneous analysis of the success and event history of over 12,000 legislative bills in three parliamentary systems and one semi-presidential system from 1986 until 2003, we show how the interplay of actor motivations and institutional settings has a discriminating impact on the potential of both the government and parliament to induce policy change.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2049-8470</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2049-8489</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/psrm.2015.29</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Bills ; Coalitions ; Comparative politics ; Conflict ; Democracy ; Heterogeneity ; Ideology ; Legislation ; Legislatures ; Members of Parliament ; Negative campaigning ; Original Articles ; Parliamentary systems ; Parliaments ; Policy making ; Political science ; Politics ; Presidential systems ; Proposals ; Reforms</subject><ispartof>Political science research and methods, 2017-07, Vol.5 (3), p.529-554</ispartof><rights>The European Political Science Association 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c232t-3a66284e00fa9071f959c3941a8613e67f97a57856f225c55a37f5b3dc1d58a63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c232t-3a66284e00fa9071f959c3941a8613e67f97a57856f225c55a37f5b3dc1d58a63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847015000291/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,780,784,12845,27924,27925,55628</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bräuninger, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debus, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wüst, Fabian</creatorcontrib><title>Governments, Parliaments and Legislative Activity</title><title>Political science research and methods</title><addtitle>PSRM</addtitle><description>Various strands of literature in comparative politics suggest that there is a differential impact of the type of government and their supporting legislative coalitions in parliamentary democracies, for example, in terms of their size and ideological heterogeneity, and on their potential to induce policy change. Most studies in this area focus on governments as agenda-setters, possibly neglecting the role of parliaments as a further key actor in policy making. In this article, we address the broader question as to how patterns of conflict within parliament effect legislative activity of governments and parliamentary actors. Through a simultaneous analysis of the success and event history of over 12,000 legislative bills in three parliamentary systems and one semi-presidential system from 1986 until 2003, we show how the interplay of actor motivations and institutional settings has a discriminating impact on the potential of both the government and parliament to induce policy change.</description><subject>Bills</subject><subject>Coalitions</subject><subject>Comparative politics</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Ideology</subject><subject>Legislation</subject><subject>Legislatures</subject><subject>Members of Parliament</subject><subject>Negative campaigning</subject><subject>Original Articles</subject><subject>Parliamentary systems</subject><subject>Parliaments</subject><subject>Policy making</subject><subject>Political science</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Presidential systems</subject><subject>Proposals</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><issn>2049-8470</issn><issn>2049-8489</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkM1Lw0AQxRdRsNTe_AMCXpu4H9ndzLEUrUJAD3pepsluScmXu2mh_72JLeLBubwZ-L038Ai5ZzRhlOnHPvgm4ZTJhMMVmXGaQpylGVz_7prekkUIezoOUKkgnRG26Y7Wt41th7CM3tHXFf4cEbZllNtdFWocqqONVsUo1XC6IzcO62AXF52Tz-enj_VLnL9tXterPC644EMsUCmepZZSh0A1cyChEJAyzBQTVmkHGqXOpHKcy0JKFNrJrSgLVsoMlZiTh3Nu77uvgw2D2XcH344vDYMUmNCje6SWZ6rwXQjeOtP7qkF_MoyaqRcz9WKmXgyHEU8uODZbX5U7-yf1P8M3JFBjyA</recordid><startdate>201707</startdate><enddate>201707</enddate><creator>Bräuninger, Thomas</creator><creator>Debus, Marc</creator><creator>Wüst, Fabian</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201707</creationdate><title>Governments, Parliaments and Legislative Activity</title><author>Bräuninger, Thomas ; Debus, Marc ; Wüst, Fabian</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c232t-3a66284e00fa9071f959c3941a8613e67f97a57856f225c55a37f5b3dc1d58a63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Bills</topic><topic>Coalitions</topic><topic>Comparative politics</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Ideology</topic><topic>Legislation</topic><topic>Legislatures</topic><topic>Members of Parliament</topic><topic>Negative campaigning</topic><topic>Original Articles</topic><topic>Parliamentary systems</topic><topic>Parliaments</topic><topic>Policy making</topic><topic>Political science</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Presidential systems</topic><topic>Proposals</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bräuninger, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Debus, Marc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wüst, Fabian</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Political science research and methods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bräuninger, Thomas</au><au>Debus, Marc</au><au>Wüst, Fabian</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Governments, Parliaments and Legislative Activity</atitle><jtitle>Political science research and methods</jtitle><addtitle>PSRM</addtitle><date>2017-07</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>529</spage><epage>554</epage><pages>529-554</pages><issn>2049-8470</issn><eissn>2049-8489</eissn><abstract>Various strands of literature in comparative politics suggest that there is a differential impact of the type of government and their supporting legislative coalitions in parliamentary democracies, for example, in terms of their size and ideological heterogeneity, and on their potential to induce policy change. Most studies in this area focus on governments as agenda-setters, possibly neglecting the role of parliaments as a further key actor in policy making. In this article, we address the broader question as to how patterns of conflict within parliament effect legislative activity of governments and parliamentary actors. Through a simultaneous analysis of the success and event history of over 12,000 legislative bills in three parliamentary systems and one semi-presidential system from 1986 until 2003, we show how the interplay of actor motivations and institutional settings has a discriminating impact on the potential of both the government and parliament to induce policy change.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/psrm.2015.29</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2049-8470
ispartof Political science research and methods, 2017-07, Vol.5 (3), p.529-554
issn 2049-8470
2049-8489
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1949137578
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Cambridge Journals
subjects Bills
Coalitions
Comparative politics
Conflict
Democracy
Heterogeneity
Ideology
Legislation
Legislatures
Members of Parliament
Negative campaigning
Original Articles
Parliamentary systems
Parliaments
Policy making
Political science
Politics
Presidential systems
Proposals
Reforms
title Governments, Parliaments and Legislative Activity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T02%3A01%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Governments,%20Parliaments%20and%20Legislative%20Activity&rft.jtitle=Political%20science%20research%20and%20methods&rft.au=Br%C3%A4uninger,%20Thomas&rft.date=2017-07&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=529&rft.epage=554&rft.pages=529-554&rft.issn=2049-8470&rft.eissn=2049-8489&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/psrm.2015.29&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1949137578%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1949137578&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_psrm_2015_29&rfr_iscdi=true