Teaching biotechnology through case studies - can we improve higher order thinking skills of nonscience majors?
Teaching nonscience majors topics in biotechnology through case studies is the focus of this research. Our Biotechnology, Environment, and Related Issues module, developed within the Science for All framework, is aimed at elevating the level of students' scientific and technological literacy an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Science education (Salem, Mass.) Mass.), 2003-11, Vol.87 (6), p.767-793 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 793 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 767 |
container_title | Science education (Salem, Mass.) |
container_volume | 87 |
creator | Dori, Yehudit J Tal, Revital T Tsaushu, Masha |
description | Teaching nonscience majors topics in biotechnology through case studies is the focus of this research. Our Biotechnology, Environment, and Related Issues module, developed within the Science for All framework, is aimed at elevating the level of students' scientific and technological literacy and their higher order thinking skills. The research goal was to investigate nonscience major students' ability to use various thinking skills in analyzing environmental and moral conflicts presented through case studies in the Biotechnology Module. The research population consisted of about 200 nonscience majors in eight classes of grades 10-12 from heterogeneous communities. We found a significant improvement in students' knowledge and understanding and higher order thinking skills at all academic levels. The scores that low academic level students achieved in the knowledge and understanding category were higher than their high academic level peers' scores. In the higher order thinking skills - question posing, argumentation, and system thinking - a significant difference in favor of the high academic level students was found. The gap that had existed between low and high academic level students narrowed. Most students reported that the biotechnological topics that they had studied were interesting and relevant. Based on these results, we advocate a curriculum that exposes students to scientific controversies through case studies with environmental and moral implications. Our research has shown that this approach is likely to contribute to developing scientific and technological literacy along with higher order thinking skills of nonscience majors. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/sce.10081 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194906256</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ773044</ericid><sourcerecordid>526748921</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4021-4a5149177dc0611a4a61d64e506161bca5817a35a333573333a88613ce89af743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtv1DAQthBILIUDV8TBQuLAIa0dP3NCaLVdqCo4UFRulutMNt7Nxls7S7v_vg7p49TL2KP5HjMfQu8pOaaElCfJwfjR9AWaUVLpomTq70s0I4TJQrNSvkZvUloTQqkoyxkKF2Bd6_sVvvJhANf2oQurAx7aGParFjubAKdhX3tIuMhtj28A--0uhn-AW79qIeIQ61yHLLMZldLGd13CocF96JPz0DvAW7sOMX19i141tkvw7v49Qn9OFxfz78X5r-WP-bfzwnFS0oJbQXlFlaodkZRabiWtJQeRO0mvnBWaKsuEZYwJlQuzWkvKHOjKNoqzI_Rp0s2LXu8hDWYd9rHPloZWvCKyFDKDvkwgF0NKERqzi35r48FQYsY4TY7T_I8zYz_fC9rkbNdE2zufngg5TUXkqPlxwkH07nG8OFOKET7udTKNb3wHh-f9zO_54sG4mBg-DXD7yLBxY6RiSpjLn0sj9Sm_zFeZZcZ_mPC13z0dJCsmtGZ3a6Kjiw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194906256</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Teaching biotechnology through case studies - can we improve higher order thinking skills of nonscience majors?</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Dori, Yehudit J ; Tal, Revital T ; Tsaushu, Masha</creator><creatorcontrib>Dori, Yehudit J ; Tal, Revital T ; Tsaushu, Masha</creatorcontrib><description>Teaching nonscience majors topics in biotechnology through case studies is the focus of this research. Our Biotechnology, Environment, and Related Issues module, developed within the Science for All framework, is aimed at elevating the level of students' scientific and technological literacy and their higher order thinking skills. The research goal was to investigate nonscience major students' ability to use various thinking skills in analyzing environmental and moral conflicts presented through case studies in the Biotechnology Module. The research population consisted of about 200 nonscience majors in eight classes of grades 10-12 from heterogeneous communities. We found a significant improvement in students' knowledge and understanding and higher order thinking skills at all academic levels. The scores that low academic level students achieved in the knowledge and understanding category were higher than their high academic level peers' scores. In the higher order thinking skills - question posing, argumentation, and system thinking - a significant difference in favor of the high academic level students was found. The gap that had existed between low and high academic level students narrowed. Most students reported that the biotechnological topics that they had studied were interesting and relevant. Based on these results, we advocate a curriculum that exposes students to scientific controversies through case studies with environmental and moral implications. Our research has shown that this approach is likely to contribute to developing scientific and technological literacy along with higher order thinking skills of nonscience majors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0036-8326</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1098-237X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/sce.10081</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SEDUAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>Biotechnologie ; Biotechnology ; Case Studies ; Cognition & reasoning ; Conflict ; Controversial Issues (Course Content) ; Critical Thinking ; Educational research ; Educational sciences ; Environment ; Fallstudie ; Grade 10 ; Israel ; Kompetenzentwicklung ; Methodology ; Moral Issues ; Naturwissenschaften ; Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung ; Nonmajors ; Observation, experimentation ; Science Education ; Technological Literacy ; Test ; Thinking Skills ; Unterrichtsprogramm ; Untersuchung</subject><ispartof>Science education (Salem, Mass.), 2003-11, Vol.87 (6), p.767-793</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Wiley Periodicals Inc. Nov 2003</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4021-4a5149177dc0611a4a61d64e506161bca5817a35a333573333a88613ce89af743</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4021-4a5149177dc0611a4a61d64e506161bca5817a35a333573333a88613ce89af743</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsce.10081$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsce.10081$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1413,27906,27907,45556,45557</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=693588$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ773044$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15227066$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dori, Yehudit J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tal, Revital T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsaushu, Masha</creatorcontrib><title>Teaching biotechnology through case studies - can we improve higher order thinking skills of nonscience majors?</title><title>Science education (Salem, Mass.)</title><addtitle>Sci. Ed</addtitle><description>Teaching nonscience majors topics in biotechnology through case studies is the focus of this research. Our Biotechnology, Environment, and Related Issues module, developed within the Science for All framework, is aimed at elevating the level of students' scientific and technological literacy and their higher order thinking skills. The research goal was to investigate nonscience major students' ability to use various thinking skills in analyzing environmental and moral conflicts presented through case studies in the Biotechnology Module. The research population consisted of about 200 nonscience majors in eight classes of grades 10-12 from heterogeneous communities. We found a significant improvement in students' knowledge and understanding and higher order thinking skills at all academic levels. The scores that low academic level students achieved in the knowledge and understanding category were higher than their high academic level peers' scores. In the higher order thinking skills - question posing, argumentation, and system thinking - a significant difference in favor of the high academic level students was found. The gap that had existed between low and high academic level students narrowed. Most students reported that the biotechnological topics that they had studied were interesting and relevant. Based on these results, we advocate a curriculum that exposes students to scientific controversies through case studies with environmental and moral implications. Our research has shown that this approach is likely to contribute to developing scientific and technological literacy along with higher order thinking skills of nonscience majors.</description><subject>Biotechnologie</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Controversial Issues (Course Content)</subject><subject>Critical Thinking</subject><subject>Educational research</subject><subject>Educational sciences</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Fallstudie</subject><subject>Grade 10</subject><subject>Israel</subject><subject>Kompetenzentwicklung</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Moral Issues</subject><subject>Naturwissenschaften</subject><subject>Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung</subject><subject>Nonmajors</subject><subject>Observation, experimentation</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Technological Literacy</subject><subject>Test</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><subject>Unterrichtsprogramm</subject><subject>Untersuchung</subject><issn>0036-8326</issn><issn>1098-237X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UEtv1DAQthBILIUDV8TBQuLAIa0dP3NCaLVdqCo4UFRulutMNt7Nxls7S7v_vg7p49TL2KP5HjMfQu8pOaaElCfJwfjR9AWaUVLpomTq70s0I4TJQrNSvkZvUloTQqkoyxkKF2Bd6_sVvvJhANf2oQurAx7aGParFjubAKdhX3tIuMhtj28A--0uhn-AW79qIeIQ61yHLLMZldLGd13CocF96JPz0DvAW7sOMX19i141tkvw7v49Qn9OFxfz78X5r-WP-bfzwnFS0oJbQXlFlaodkZRabiWtJQeRO0mvnBWaKsuEZYwJlQuzWkvKHOjKNoqzI_Rp0s2LXu8hDWYd9rHPloZWvCKyFDKDvkwgF0NKERqzi35r48FQYsY4TY7T_I8zYz_fC9rkbNdE2zufngg5TUXkqPlxwkH07nG8OFOKET7udTKNb3wHh-f9zO_54sG4mBg-DXD7yLBxY6RiSpjLn0sj9Sm_zFeZZcZ_mPC13z0dJCsmtGZ3a6Kjiw</recordid><startdate>200311</startdate><enddate>200311</enddate><creator>Dori, Yehudit J</creator><creator>Tal, Revital T</creator><creator>Tsaushu, Masha</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley</general><general>Wiley Periodicals Inc</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200311</creationdate><title>Teaching biotechnology through case studies - can we improve higher order thinking skills of nonscience majors?</title><author>Dori, Yehudit J ; Tal, Revital T ; Tsaushu, Masha</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4021-4a5149177dc0611a4a61d64e506161bca5817a35a333573333a88613ce89af743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Biotechnologie</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Controversial Issues (Course Content)</topic><topic>Critical Thinking</topic><topic>Educational research</topic><topic>Educational sciences</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Fallstudie</topic><topic>Grade 10</topic><topic>Israel</topic><topic>Kompetenzentwicklung</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Moral Issues</topic><topic>Naturwissenschaften</topic><topic>Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung</topic><topic>Nonmajors</topic><topic>Observation, experimentation</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Technological Literacy</topic><topic>Test</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><topic>Unterrichtsprogramm</topic><topic>Untersuchung</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dori, Yehudit J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tal, Revital T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsaushu, Masha</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>Istex</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Science education (Salem, Mass.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dori, Yehudit J</au><au>Tal, Revital T</au><au>Tsaushu, Masha</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ773044</ericid><atitle>Teaching biotechnology through case studies - can we improve higher order thinking skills of nonscience majors?</atitle><jtitle>Science education (Salem, Mass.)</jtitle><addtitle>Sci. Ed</addtitle><date>2003-11</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>87</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>767</spage><epage>793</epage><pages>767-793</pages><issn>0036-8326</issn><eissn>1098-237X</eissn><coden>SEDUAV</coden><abstract>Teaching nonscience majors topics in biotechnology through case studies is the focus of this research. Our Biotechnology, Environment, and Related Issues module, developed within the Science for All framework, is aimed at elevating the level of students' scientific and technological literacy and their higher order thinking skills. The research goal was to investigate nonscience major students' ability to use various thinking skills in analyzing environmental and moral conflicts presented through case studies in the Biotechnology Module. The research population consisted of about 200 nonscience majors in eight classes of grades 10-12 from heterogeneous communities. We found a significant improvement in students' knowledge and understanding and higher order thinking skills at all academic levels. The scores that low academic level students achieved in the knowledge and understanding category were higher than their high academic level peers' scores. In the higher order thinking skills - question posing, argumentation, and system thinking - a significant difference in favor of the high academic level students was found. The gap that had existed between low and high academic level students narrowed. Most students reported that the biotechnological topics that they had studied were interesting and relevant. Based on these results, we advocate a curriculum that exposes students to scientific controversies through case studies with environmental and moral implications. Our research has shown that this approach is likely to contribute to developing scientific and technological literacy along with higher order thinking skills of nonscience majors.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/sce.10081</doi><tpages>27</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0036-8326 |
ispartof | Science education (Salem, Mass.), 2003-11, Vol.87 (6), p.767-793 |
issn | 0036-8326 1098-237X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_194906256 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Biotechnologie Biotechnology Case Studies Cognition & reasoning Conflict Controversial Issues (Course Content) Critical Thinking Educational research Educational sciences Environment Fallstudie Grade 10 Israel Kompetenzentwicklung Methodology Moral Issues Naturwissenschaften Naturwissenschaftliche Bildung Nonmajors Observation, experimentation Science Education Technological Literacy Test Thinking Skills Unterrichtsprogramm Untersuchung |
title | Teaching biotechnology through case studies - can we improve higher order thinking skills of nonscience majors? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T11%3A34%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Teaching%20biotechnology%20through%20case%20studies%20-%20can%20we%20improve%20higher%20order%20thinking%20skills%20of%20nonscience%20majors?&rft.jtitle=Science%20education%20(Salem,%20Mass.)&rft.au=Dori,%20Yehudit%20J&rft.date=2003-11&rft.volume=87&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=767&rft.epage=793&rft.pages=767-793&rft.issn=0036-8326&rft.eissn=1098-237X&rft.coden=SEDUAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/sce.10081&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E526748921%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194906256&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ773044&rfr_iscdi=true |