Overcoming the 'Window Dressing' Effect: Mitigating the Negative Effects of Inherent Skepticism Towards Corporate Social Responsibility

As more and more instances of corporate hypocrisy become public, consumers have developed an inherent general skepticism towards firms' corporate social responsibility (CSR) claims. As CSR skepticism bears heavily on consumers' attitudes and behavior, this paper draws from Construal Level...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of business ethics 2017-10, Vol.145 (3), p.599-621
Hauptverfasser: Connors, Scott, Anderson-MacDonald, Stephen, Thomson, Matthew
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 621
container_issue 3
container_start_page 599
container_title Journal of business ethics
container_volume 145
creator Connors, Scott
Anderson-MacDonald, Stephen
Thomson, Matthew
description As more and more instances of corporate hypocrisy become public, consumers have developed an inherent general skepticism towards firms' corporate social responsibility (CSR) claims. As CSR skepticism bears heavily on consumers' attitudes and behavior, this paper draws from Construal Level Theory to identify how it can be pre-emptively abated. We posit that this general skepticism towards CSR leads people to adopt a low-level construal mindset when processing CSR information. Across four studies, we show that matching this low-level mindset with concrete CSR messaging works to effectively mitigate the negative effects of inherent CSR skepticism on consumers' attitudes, purchase intentions, and word of mouth. The resulting construal-mindset congruency strengthens the favorability of consumer responses through increased positive elaboration and perceptions of CSR message credibility. Furthermore, this congruency effect is shown to persist over time in skeptical domains but to dissipate in less skeptical domains.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10551-015-2858-z
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1948922170</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45022282</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45022282</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-fb3709f053d660958ad862a0206ac97fdb12f3da90e9d638696ad47b7a607ebc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtO3DAUtapW6pTyAV1UstQFq8C1E9txd9XwlChIPMTScpLrwdOZONgGBD_Q3yajQNUVd3N07z0P6RDyjcEuA1B7iYEQrAAmCl6Lunj-QGZMqLIAqdVHMgMmVVGJqvpMvqS0hHEEq2bk7_kDxjasfb-g-Rbpzo3vu_BI9yOmNB536IFz2Oaf9LfPfmHzG_EMN8sDvv4TDY6e9LcYsc_08g8O2bc-relVeLSxS3Qe4hCizUgvQ-vtil5gGkKffONXPj99JZ-cXSXcfsUtcn14cDU_Lk7Pj07mv06LtlSQC9eMoB2IspMStKhtV0tugYO0rVauaxh3ZWc1oO5kWUstbVepRlkJCpu23CI_Jt8hhrt7TNksw33sx0jDdFVrzpmCkcUmVhtDShGdGaJf2_hkGJhN32bq24x9m03f5nnU8EmTRm6_wPif8zui75NomXKI_1IqAZzzmpcvNbGO7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1948922170</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Overcoming the 'Window Dressing' Effect: Mitigating the Negative Effects of Inherent Skepticism Towards Corporate Social Responsibility</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Connors, Scott ; Anderson-MacDonald, Stephen ; Thomson, Matthew</creator><creatorcontrib>Connors, Scott ; Anderson-MacDonald, Stephen ; Thomson, Matthew</creatorcontrib><description>As more and more instances of corporate hypocrisy become public, consumers have developed an inherent general skepticism towards firms' corporate social responsibility (CSR) claims. As CSR skepticism bears heavily on consumers' attitudes and behavior, this paper draws from Construal Level Theory to identify how it can be pre-emptively abated. We posit that this general skepticism towards CSR leads people to adopt a low-level construal mindset when processing CSR information. Across four studies, we show that matching this low-level mindset with concrete CSR messaging works to effectively mitigate the negative effects of inherent CSR skepticism on consumers' attitudes, purchase intentions, and word of mouth. The resulting construal-mindset congruency strengthens the favorability of consumer responses through increased positive elaboration and perceptions of CSR message credibility. Furthermore, this congruency effect is shown to persist over time in skeptical domains but to dissipate in less skeptical domains.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4544</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2858-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Business and Management ; Business Ethics ; Construal ; Consumer attitudes ; Consumer behavior ; Consumers ; Corporate responsibility ; Credibility ; Dressing ; Education ; Elaboration ; Ethics ; Hypocrisy ; Management ; Mouth ; Philosophy ; Public relations ; Purchase intention ; Quality of Life Research ; Skepticism ; Social responsibility</subject><ispartof>Journal of business ethics, 2017-10, Vol.145 (3), p.599-621</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015</rights><rights>Journal of Business Ethics is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-fb3709f053d660958ad862a0206ac97fdb12f3da90e9d638696ad47b7a607ebc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-fb3709f053d660958ad862a0206ac97fdb12f3da90e9d638696ad47b7a607ebc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45022282$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45022282$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27843,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Connors, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson-MacDonald, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, Matthew</creatorcontrib><title>Overcoming the 'Window Dressing' Effect: Mitigating the Negative Effects of Inherent Skepticism Towards Corporate Social Responsibility</title><title>Journal of business ethics</title><addtitle>J Bus Ethics</addtitle><description>As more and more instances of corporate hypocrisy become public, consumers have developed an inherent general skepticism towards firms' corporate social responsibility (CSR) claims. As CSR skepticism bears heavily on consumers' attitudes and behavior, this paper draws from Construal Level Theory to identify how it can be pre-emptively abated. We posit that this general skepticism towards CSR leads people to adopt a low-level construal mindset when processing CSR information. Across four studies, we show that matching this low-level mindset with concrete CSR messaging works to effectively mitigate the negative effects of inherent CSR skepticism on consumers' attitudes, purchase intentions, and word of mouth. The resulting construal-mindset congruency strengthens the favorability of consumer responses through increased positive elaboration and perceptions of CSR message credibility. Furthermore, this congruency effect is shown to persist over time in skeptical domains but to dissipate in less skeptical domains.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Business Ethics</subject><subject>Construal</subject><subject>Consumer attitudes</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Corporate responsibility</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Dressing</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Elaboration</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Hypocrisy</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Mouth</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Public relations</subject><subject>Purchase intention</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Skepticism</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><issn>0167-4544</issn><issn>1573-0697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtO3DAUtapW6pTyAV1UstQFq8C1E9txd9XwlChIPMTScpLrwdOZONgGBD_Q3yajQNUVd3N07z0P6RDyjcEuA1B7iYEQrAAmCl6Lunj-QGZMqLIAqdVHMgMmVVGJqvpMvqS0hHEEq2bk7_kDxjasfb-g-Rbpzo3vu_BI9yOmNB536IFz2Oaf9LfPfmHzG_EMN8sDvv4TDY6e9LcYsc_08g8O2bc-relVeLSxS3Qe4hCizUgvQ-vtil5gGkKffONXPj99JZ-cXSXcfsUtcn14cDU_Lk7Pj07mv06LtlSQC9eMoB2IspMStKhtV0tugYO0rVauaxh3ZWc1oO5kWUstbVepRlkJCpu23CI_Jt8hhrt7TNksw33sx0jDdFVrzpmCkcUmVhtDShGdGaJf2_hkGJhN32bq24x9m03f5nnU8EmTRm6_wPif8zui75NomXKI_1IqAZzzmpcvNbGO7Q</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Connors, Scott</creator><creator>Anderson-MacDonald, Stephen</creator><creator>Thomson, Matthew</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Overcoming the 'Window Dressing' Effect: Mitigating the Negative Effects of Inherent Skepticism Towards Corporate Social Responsibility</title><author>Connors, Scott ; Anderson-MacDonald, Stephen ; Thomson, Matthew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-fb3709f053d660958ad862a0206ac97fdb12f3da90e9d638696ad47b7a607ebc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Business Ethics</topic><topic>Construal</topic><topic>Consumer attitudes</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Corporate responsibility</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Dressing</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Elaboration</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Hypocrisy</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Mouth</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Public relations</topic><topic>Purchase intention</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Skepticism</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Connors, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson-MacDonald, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, Matthew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design &amp; Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts &amp; Humanities Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Connors, Scott</au><au>Anderson-MacDonald, Stephen</au><au>Thomson, Matthew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Overcoming the 'Window Dressing' Effect: Mitigating the Negative Effects of Inherent Skepticism Towards Corporate Social Responsibility</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle><stitle>J Bus Ethics</stitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>145</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>599</spage><epage>621</epage><pages>599-621</pages><issn>0167-4544</issn><eissn>1573-0697</eissn><abstract>As more and more instances of corporate hypocrisy become public, consumers have developed an inherent general skepticism towards firms' corporate social responsibility (CSR) claims. As CSR skepticism bears heavily on consumers' attitudes and behavior, this paper draws from Construal Level Theory to identify how it can be pre-emptively abated. We posit that this general skepticism towards CSR leads people to adopt a low-level construal mindset when processing CSR information. Across four studies, we show that matching this low-level mindset with concrete CSR messaging works to effectively mitigate the negative effects of inherent CSR skepticism on consumers' attitudes, purchase intentions, and word of mouth. The resulting construal-mindset congruency strengthens the favorability of consumer responses through increased positive elaboration and perceptions of CSR message credibility. Furthermore, this congruency effect is shown to persist over time in skeptical domains but to dissipate in less skeptical domains.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10551-015-2858-z</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0167-4544
ispartof Journal of business ethics, 2017-10, Vol.145 (3), p.599-621
issn 0167-4544
1573-0697
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1948922170
source Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source; PAIS Index; SpringerLink Journals; Business Source Complete
subjects Attitudes
Business and Management
Business Ethics
Construal
Consumer attitudes
Consumer behavior
Consumers
Corporate responsibility
Credibility
Dressing
Education
Elaboration
Ethics
Hypocrisy
Management
Mouth
Philosophy
Public relations
Purchase intention
Quality of Life Research
Skepticism
Social responsibility
title Overcoming the 'Window Dressing' Effect: Mitigating the Negative Effects of Inherent Skepticism Towards Corporate Social Responsibility
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T04%3A08%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Overcoming%20the%20'Window%20Dressing'%20Effect:%20Mitigating%20the%20Negative%20Effects%20of%20Inherent%20Skepticism%20Towards%20Corporate%20Social%20Responsibility&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20ethics&rft.au=Connors,%20Scott&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=145&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=599&rft.epage=621&rft.pages=599-621&rft.issn=0167-4544&rft.eissn=1573-0697&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10551-015-2858-z&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45022282%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1948922170&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45022282&rfr_iscdi=true