Overcoming the 'Window Dressing' Effect: Mitigating the Negative Effects of Inherent Skepticism Towards Corporate Social Responsibility
As more and more instances of corporate hypocrisy become public, consumers have developed an inherent general skepticism towards firms' corporate social responsibility (CSR) claims. As CSR skepticism bears heavily on consumers' attitudes and behavior, this paper draws from Construal Level...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of business ethics 2017-10, Vol.145 (3), p.599-621 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 621 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 599 |
container_title | Journal of business ethics |
container_volume | 145 |
creator | Connors, Scott Anderson-MacDonald, Stephen Thomson, Matthew |
description | As more and more instances of corporate hypocrisy become public, consumers have developed an inherent general skepticism towards firms' corporate social responsibility (CSR) claims. As CSR skepticism bears heavily on consumers' attitudes and behavior, this paper draws from Construal Level Theory to identify how it can be pre-emptively abated. We posit that this general skepticism towards CSR leads people to adopt a low-level construal mindset when processing CSR information. Across four studies, we show that matching this low-level mindset with concrete CSR messaging works to effectively mitigate the negative effects of inherent CSR skepticism on consumers' attitudes, purchase intentions, and word of mouth. The resulting construal-mindset congruency strengthens the favorability of consumer responses through increased positive elaboration and perceptions of CSR message credibility. Furthermore, this congruency effect is shown to persist over time in skeptical domains but to dissipate in less skeptical domains. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10551-015-2858-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1948922170</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>45022282</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>45022282</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-fb3709f053d660958ad862a0206ac97fdb12f3da90e9d638696ad47b7a607ebc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMtO3DAUtapW6pTyAV1UstQFq8C1E9txd9XwlChIPMTScpLrwdOZONgGBD_Q3yajQNUVd3N07z0P6RDyjcEuA1B7iYEQrAAmCl6Lunj-QGZMqLIAqdVHMgMmVVGJqvpMvqS0hHEEq2bk7_kDxjasfb-g-Rbpzo3vu_BI9yOmNB536IFz2Oaf9LfPfmHzG_EMN8sDvv4TDY6e9LcYsc_08g8O2bc-relVeLSxS3Qe4hCizUgvQ-vtil5gGkKffONXPj99JZ-cXSXcfsUtcn14cDU_Lk7Pj07mv06LtlSQC9eMoB2IspMStKhtV0tugYO0rVauaxh3ZWc1oO5kWUstbVepRlkJCpu23CI_Jt8hhrt7TNksw33sx0jDdFVrzpmCkcUmVhtDShGdGaJf2_hkGJhN32bq24x9m03f5nnU8EmTRm6_wPif8zui75NomXKI_1IqAZzzmpcvNbGO7Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1948922170</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Overcoming the 'Window Dressing' Effect: Mitigating the Negative Effects of Inherent Skepticism Towards Corporate Social Responsibility</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>Business Source Complete</source><creator>Connors, Scott ; Anderson-MacDonald, Stephen ; Thomson, Matthew</creator><creatorcontrib>Connors, Scott ; Anderson-MacDonald, Stephen ; Thomson, Matthew</creatorcontrib><description>As more and more instances of corporate hypocrisy become public, consumers have developed an inherent general skepticism towards firms' corporate social responsibility (CSR) claims. As CSR skepticism bears heavily on consumers' attitudes and behavior, this paper draws from Construal Level Theory to identify how it can be pre-emptively abated. We posit that this general skepticism towards CSR leads people to adopt a low-level construal mindset when processing CSR information. Across four studies, we show that matching this low-level mindset with concrete CSR messaging works to effectively mitigate the negative effects of inherent CSR skepticism on consumers' attitudes, purchase intentions, and word of mouth. The resulting construal-mindset congruency strengthens the favorability of consumer responses through increased positive elaboration and perceptions of CSR message credibility. Furthermore, this congruency effect is shown to persist over time in skeptical domains but to dissipate in less skeptical domains.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-4544</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0697</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10551-015-2858-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Business and Management ; Business Ethics ; Construal ; Consumer attitudes ; Consumer behavior ; Consumers ; Corporate responsibility ; Credibility ; Dressing ; Education ; Elaboration ; Ethics ; Hypocrisy ; Management ; Mouth ; Philosophy ; Public relations ; Purchase intention ; Quality of Life Research ; Skepticism ; Social responsibility</subject><ispartof>Journal of business ethics, 2017-10, Vol.145 (3), p.599-621</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015</rights><rights>Journal of Business Ethics is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-fb3709f053d660958ad862a0206ac97fdb12f3da90e9d638696ad47b7a607ebc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-fb3709f053d660958ad862a0206ac97fdb12f3da90e9d638696ad47b7a607ebc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45022282$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45022282$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27843,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Connors, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson-MacDonald, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, Matthew</creatorcontrib><title>Overcoming the 'Window Dressing' Effect: Mitigating the Negative Effects of Inherent Skepticism Towards Corporate Social Responsibility</title><title>Journal of business ethics</title><addtitle>J Bus Ethics</addtitle><description>As more and more instances of corporate hypocrisy become public, consumers have developed an inherent general skepticism towards firms' corporate social responsibility (CSR) claims. As CSR skepticism bears heavily on consumers' attitudes and behavior, this paper draws from Construal Level Theory to identify how it can be pre-emptively abated. We posit that this general skepticism towards CSR leads people to adopt a low-level construal mindset when processing CSR information. Across four studies, we show that matching this low-level mindset with concrete CSR messaging works to effectively mitigate the negative effects of inherent CSR skepticism on consumers' attitudes, purchase intentions, and word of mouth. The resulting construal-mindset congruency strengthens the favorability of consumer responses through increased positive elaboration and perceptions of CSR message credibility. Furthermore, this congruency effect is shown to persist over time in skeptical domains but to dissipate in less skeptical domains.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Business Ethics</subject><subject>Construal</subject><subject>Consumer attitudes</subject><subject>Consumer behavior</subject><subject>Consumers</subject><subject>Corporate responsibility</subject><subject>Credibility</subject><subject>Dressing</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Elaboration</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Hypocrisy</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Mouth</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Public relations</subject><subject>Purchase intention</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>Skepticism</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><issn>0167-4544</issn><issn>1573-0697</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>AVQMV</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>K50</sourceid><sourceid>M1D</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UMtO3DAUtapW6pTyAV1UstQFq8C1E9txd9XwlChIPMTScpLrwdOZONgGBD_Q3yajQNUVd3N07z0P6RDyjcEuA1B7iYEQrAAmCl6Lunj-QGZMqLIAqdVHMgMmVVGJqvpMvqS0hHEEq2bk7_kDxjasfb-g-Rbpzo3vu_BI9yOmNB536IFz2Oaf9LfPfmHzG_EMN8sDvv4TDY6e9LcYsc_08g8O2bc-relVeLSxS3Qe4hCizUgvQ-vtil5gGkKffONXPj99JZ-cXSXcfsUtcn14cDU_Lk7Pj07mv06LtlSQC9eMoB2IspMStKhtV0tugYO0rVauaxh3ZWc1oO5kWUstbVepRlkJCpu23CI_Jt8hhrt7TNksw33sx0jDdFVrzpmCkcUmVhtDShGdGaJf2_hkGJhN32bq24x9m03f5nnU8EmTRm6_wPif8zui75NomXKI_1IqAZzzmpcvNbGO7Q</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>Connors, Scott</creator><creator>Anderson-MacDonald, Stephen</creator><creator>Thomson, Matthew</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>AABKS</scope><scope>ABSDQ</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AVQMV</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K50</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K8~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1D</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Overcoming the 'Window Dressing' Effect: Mitigating the Negative Effects of Inherent Skepticism Towards Corporate Social Responsibility</title><author>Connors, Scott ; Anderson-MacDonald, Stephen ; Thomson, Matthew</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c370t-fb3709f053d660958ad862a0206ac97fdb12f3da90e9d638696ad47b7a607ebc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Business Ethics</topic><topic>Construal</topic><topic>Consumer attitudes</topic><topic>Consumer behavior</topic><topic>Consumers</topic><topic>Corporate responsibility</topic><topic>Credibility</topic><topic>Dressing</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Elaboration</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Hypocrisy</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Mouth</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Public relations</topic><topic>Purchase intention</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>Skepticism</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Connors, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson-MacDonald, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomson, Matthew</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Philosophy Collection</collection><collection>Philosophy Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Arts Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Art, Design & Architecture Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>DELNET Management Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Arts & Humanities Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Connors, Scott</au><au>Anderson-MacDonald, Stephen</au><au>Thomson, Matthew</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Overcoming the 'Window Dressing' Effect: Mitigating the Negative Effects of Inherent Skepticism Towards Corporate Social Responsibility</atitle><jtitle>Journal of business ethics</jtitle><stitle>J Bus Ethics</stitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>145</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>599</spage><epage>621</epage><pages>599-621</pages><issn>0167-4544</issn><eissn>1573-0697</eissn><abstract>As more and more instances of corporate hypocrisy become public, consumers have developed an inherent general skepticism towards firms' corporate social responsibility (CSR) claims. As CSR skepticism bears heavily on consumers' attitudes and behavior, this paper draws from Construal Level Theory to identify how it can be pre-emptively abated. We posit that this general skepticism towards CSR leads people to adopt a low-level construal mindset when processing CSR information. Across four studies, we show that matching this low-level mindset with concrete CSR messaging works to effectively mitigate the negative effects of inherent CSR skepticism on consumers' attitudes, purchase intentions, and word of mouth. The resulting construal-mindset congruency strengthens the favorability of consumer responses through increased positive elaboration and perceptions of CSR message credibility. Furthermore, this congruency effect is shown to persist over time in skeptical domains but to dissipate in less skeptical domains.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10551-015-2858-z</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-4544 |
ispartof | Journal of business ethics, 2017-10, Vol.145 (3), p.599-621 |
issn | 0167-4544 1573-0697 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1948922170 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source; PAIS Index; SpringerLink Journals; Business Source Complete |
subjects | Attitudes Business and Management Business Ethics Construal Consumer attitudes Consumer behavior Consumers Corporate responsibility Credibility Dressing Education Elaboration Ethics Hypocrisy Management Mouth Philosophy Public relations Purchase intention Quality of Life Research Skepticism Social responsibility |
title | Overcoming the 'Window Dressing' Effect: Mitigating the Negative Effects of Inherent Skepticism Towards Corporate Social Responsibility |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T04%3A08%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Overcoming%20the%20'Window%20Dressing'%20Effect:%20Mitigating%20the%20Negative%20Effects%20of%20Inherent%20Skepticism%20Towards%20Corporate%20Social%20Responsibility&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20business%20ethics&rft.au=Connors,%20Scott&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=145&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=599&rft.epage=621&rft.pages=599-621&rft.issn=0167-4544&rft.eissn=1573-0697&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10551-015-2858-z&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E45022282%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1948922170&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=45022282&rfr_iscdi=true |