Systematic source, path and site effects on ground motion variability: the case study of Northern Italy
In this paper, we separate the residuals of ground motion prediction equations into different components, calculating the repeatable site-specific ( δ S 2 S s ), location-specific ( δ L 2 L r ) and path-specific ( δ P 2 P e r ) correction for the median model. In this way, we can reduce the total st...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Bulletin of earthquake engineering 2017-11, Vol.15 (11), p.4563-4583 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4583 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 4563 |
container_title | Bulletin of earthquake engineering |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Lanzano, Giovanni Pacor, Francesca Luzi, Lucia D’Amico, Maria Puglia, Rodolfo Felicetta, Chiara |
description | In this paper, we separate the residuals of ground motion prediction equations into different components, calculating the repeatable site-specific (
δ
S
2
S
s
), location-specific (
δ
L
2
L
r
) and path-specific (
δ
P
2
P
e
r
) correction for the median model. In this way, we can reduce the total standard deviation (sigma) of the ground-motion model by Lanzano et al. (Bull Seismol Soc Am 106(1):73–92,
2016
), removing these components and overcome the ergodic assumption. These repeatable terms are empirically estimated using a dataset composed by acceleration waveforms of Italian events mainly occurred in the Po plain and Eastern Alps (Northern Italy), in the time interval 1976–2015. The analysis is carried out on 2241 recordings, from 88 shallow earthquakes recorded by 168 sites. A local model, specifically tailored for Northern Italy, is used as the reference GMPE, which predicts the geometric mean of the horizontal peak ground accelerations and response spectral ordinates in the period range 0.04–4 s. Because most of the propagation paths sampled only once, the path-specific components and the resulting aleatory variability are also calculated from the spatial correlation of residuals, following the approach of Lin et al. (Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(5):2281–2295,
2011
). We find a significant reduction of the overall ground motion variability to an extent comparable to what observed from previous studies on empirical and simulated datasets. The estimated median corrections and variance components can be used in probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for a single site and a single path in Northern Italy. As an example, we compute the hazard curves at some sites by means of three different approaches (ergodic, partially non-ergodic and full non-ergodic), in order to quantify the impact of relaxing the ergodic assumption. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10518-017-0170-2 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1948919025</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1948919025</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-38fe8c70a0900cbe77662c2570ad4dfd5588cc8734ed193543ce8d87098620243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcLPElcA6iWOHG0I8KlVwACRuluus21RtXGwHKX-PSzhw4bDah2Zmd4eQcwZXDEBcBwacyQyY2Adk-QGZMC6KjJW8OvypIRMV-zgmJyGsAXIuapiQ5esQIm51bA0NrvcGL-lOxxXVXUNDG5GitWhioK6jS-_6NN662KbuS_tWL9pNG4cbGldIjQ5IQ-ybgTpLn51PQ9_RWdSb4ZQcWb0JePabp-T94f7t7imbvzzO7m7nmS6Bx6yQFqURoKEGMAsUoqpyk24F3ZSNbTiX0hgpihIbVhe8LAzKRgqoZZVDXhZTcjHq7rz77DFEtU5fdWmlYnUpa1anzxOKjSjjXQgerdr5dqv9oBiovZ9q9FMlL_cBKk-cfOSEhO2W6P8o_0v6BvPueB4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1948919025</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Systematic source, path and site effects on ground motion variability: the case study of Northern Italy</title><source>SpringerLink_现刊</source><creator>Lanzano, Giovanni ; Pacor, Francesca ; Luzi, Lucia ; D’Amico, Maria ; Puglia, Rodolfo ; Felicetta, Chiara</creator><creatorcontrib>Lanzano, Giovanni ; Pacor, Francesca ; Luzi, Lucia ; D’Amico, Maria ; Puglia, Rodolfo ; Felicetta, Chiara</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we separate the residuals of ground motion prediction equations into different components, calculating the repeatable site-specific (
δ
S
2
S
s
), location-specific (
δ
L
2
L
r
) and path-specific (
δ
P
2
P
e
r
) correction for the median model. In this way, we can reduce the total standard deviation (sigma) of the ground-motion model by Lanzano et al. (Bull Seismol Soc Am 106(1):73–92,
2016
), removing these components and overcome the ergodic assumption. These repeatable terms are empirically estimated using a dataset composed by acceleration waveforms of Italian events mainly occurred in the Po plain and Eastern Alps (Northern Italy), in the time interval 1976–2015. The analysis is carried out on 2241 recordings, from 88 shallow earthquakes recorded by 168 sites. A local model, specifically tailored for Northern Italy, is used as the reference GMPE, which predicts the geometric mean of the horizontal peak ground accelerations and response spectral ordinates in the period range 0.04–4 s. Because most of the propagation paths sampled only once, the path-specific components and the resulting aleatory variability are also calculated from the spatial correlation of residuals, following the approach of Lin et al. (Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(5):2281–2295,
2011
). We find a significant reduction of the overall ground motion variability to an extent comparable to what observed from previous studies on empirical and simulated datasets. The estimated median corrections and variance components can be used in probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for a single site and a single path in Northern Italy. As an example, we compute the hazard curves at some sites by means of three different approaches (ergodic, partially non-ergodic and full non-ergodic), in order to quantify the impact of relaxing the ergodic assumption.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1570-761X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10518-017-0170-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Case studies ; Civil Engineering ; Components ; Computer simulation ; Corrections ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquakes ; Empirical analysis ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Ergodic processes ; Geological hazards ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Ground motion ; Hazard assessment ; Hydrogeology ; Mathematical models ; Original Research Paper ; Seismic activity ; Seismic engineering ; Seismic hazard ; Structural Geology ; Variability ; Variance analysis ; Waveforms</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2017-11, Vol.15 (11), p.4563-4583</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017</rights><rights>Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-38fe8c70a0900cbe77662c2570ad4dfd5588cc8734ed193543ce8d87098620243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-38fe8c70a0900cbe77662c2570ad4dfd5588cc8734ed193543ce8d87098620243</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7947-4281</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10518-017-0170-2$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10518-017-0170-2$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lanzano, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacor, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luzi, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Amico, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puglia, Rodolfo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felicetta, Chiara</creatorcontrib><title>Systematic source, path and site effects on ground motion variability: the case study of Northern Italy</title><title>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</title><addtitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</addtitle><description>In this paper, we separate the residuals of ground motion prediction equations into different components, calculating the repeatable site-specific (
δ
S
2
S
s
), location-specific (
δ
L
2
L
r
) and path-specific (
δ
P
2
P
e
r
) correction for the median model. In this way, we can reduce the total standard deviation (sigma) of the ground-motion model by Lanzano et al. (Bull Seismol Soc Am 106(1):73–92,
2016
), removing these components and overcome the ergodic assumption. These repeatable terms are empirically estimated using a dataset composed by acceleration waveforms of Italian events mainly occurred in the Po plain and Eastern Alps (Northern Italy), in the time interval 1976–2015. The analysis is carried out on 2241 recordings, from 88 shallow earthquakes recorded by 168 sites. A local model, specifically tailored for Northern Italy, is used as the reference GMPE, which predicts the geometric mean of the horizontal peak ground accelerations and response spectral ordinates in the period range 0.04–4 s. Because most of the propagation paths sampled only once, the path-specific components and the resulting aleatory variability are also calculated from the spatial correlation of residuals, following the approach of Lin et al. (Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(5):2281–2295,
2011
). We find a significant reduction of the overall ground motion variability to an extent comparable to what observed from previous studies on empirical and simulated datasets. The estimated median corrections and variance components can be used in probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for a single site and a single path in Northern Italy. As an example, we compute the hazard curves at some sites by means of three different approaches (ergodic, partially non-ergodic and full non-ergodic), in order to quantify the impact of relaxing the ergodic assumption.</description><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Components</subject><subject>Computer simulation</subject><subject>Corrections</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Ergodic processes</subject><subject>Geological hazards</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>Hazard assessment</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Original Research Paper</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Seismic hazard</subject><subject>Structural Geology</subject><subject>Variability</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><subject>Waveforms</subject><issn>1570-761X</issn><issn>1573-1456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMIHcLPElcA6iWOHG0I8KlVwACRuluus21RtXGwHKX-PSzhw4bDah2Zmd4eQcwZXDEBcBwacyQyY2Adk-QGZMC6KjJW8OvypIRMV-zgmJyGsAXIuapiQ5esQIm51bA0NrvcGL-lOxxXVXUNDG5GitWhioK6jS-_6NN662KbuS_tWL9pNG4cbGldIjQ5IQ-ybgTpLn51PQ9_RWdSb4ZQcWb0JePabp-T94f7t7imbvzzO7m7nmS6Bx6yQFqURoKEGMAsUoqpyk24F3ZSNbTiX0hgpihIbVhe8LAzKRgqoZZVDXhZTcjHq7rz77DFEtU5fdWmlYnUpa1anzxOKjSjjXQgerdr5dqv9oBiovZ9q9FMlL_cBKk-cfOSEhO2W6P8o_0v6BvPueB4</recordid><startdate>20171101</startdate><enddate>20171101</enddate><creator>Lanzano, Giovanni</creator><creator>Pacor, Francesca</creator><creator>Luzi, Lucia</creator><creator>D’Amico, Maria</creator><creator>Puglia, Rodolfo</creator><creator>Felicetta, Chiara</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7947-4281</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20171101</creationdate><title>Systematic source, path and site effects on ground motion variability: the case study of Northern Italy</title><author>Lanzano, Giovanni ; Pacor, Francesca ; Luzi, Lucia ; D’Amico, Maria ; Puglia, Rodolfo ; Felicetta, Chiara</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a405t-38fe8c70a0900cbe77662c2570ad4dfd5588cc8734ed193543ce8d87098620243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Components</topic><topic>Computer simulation</topic><topic>Corrections</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Ergodic processes</topic><topic>Geological hazards</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>Hazard assessment</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Original Research Paper</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Seismic hazard</topic><topic>Structural Geology</topic><topic>Variability</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><topic>Waveforms</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lanzano, Giovanni</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pacor, Francesca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luzi, Lucia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>D’Amico, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puglia, Rodolfo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felicetta, Chiara</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lanzano, Giovanni</au><au>Pacor, Francesca</au><au>Luzi, Lucia</au><au>D’Amico, Maria</au><au>Puglia, Rodolfo</au><au>Felicetta, Chiara</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Systematic source, path and site effects on ground motion variability: the case study of Northern Italy</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle><stitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</stitle><date>2017-11-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>4563</spage><epage>4583</epage><pages>4563-4583</pages><issn>1570-761X</issn><eissn>1573-1456</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we separate the residuals of ground motion prediction equations into different components, calculating the repeatable site-specific (
δ
S
2
S
s
), location-specific (
δ
L
2
L
r
) and path-specific (
δ
P
2
P
e
r
) correction for the median model. In this way, we can reduce the total standard deviation (sigma) of the ground-motion model by Lanzano et al. (Bull Seismol Soc Am 106(1):73–92,
2016
), removing these components and overcome the ergodic assumption. These repeatable terms are empirically estimated using a dataset composed by acceleration waveforms of Italian events mainly occurred in the Po plain and Eastern Alps (Northern Italy), in the time interval 1976–2015. The analysis is carried out on 2241 recordings, from 88 shallow earthquakes recorded by 168 sites. A local model, specifically tailored for Northern Italy, is used as the reference GMPE, which predicts the geometric mean of the horizontal peak ground accelerations and response spectral ordinates in the period range 0.04–4 s. Because most of the propagation paths sampled only once, the path-specific components and the resulting aleatory variability are also calculated from the spatial correlation of residuals, following the approach of Lin et al. (Bull Seismol Soc Am 101(5):2281–2295,
2011
). We find a significant reduction of the overall ground motion variability to an extent comparable to what observed from previous studies on empirical and simulated datasets. The estimated median corrections and variance components can be used in probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for a single site and a single path in Northern Italy. As an example, we compute the hazard curves at some sites by means of three different approaches (ergodic, partially non-ergodic and full non-ergodic), in order to quantify the impact of relaxing the ergodic assumption.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10518-017-0170-2</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7947-4281</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1570-761X |
ispartof | Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2017-11, Vol.15 (11), p.4563-4583 |
issn | 1570-761X 1573-1456 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1948919025 |
source | SpringerLink_现刊 |
subjects | Case studies Civil Engineering Components Computer simulation Corrections Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Earthquakes Empirical analysis Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology Ergodic processes Geological hazards Geophysics/Geodesy Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Ground motion Hazard assessment Hydrogeology Mathematical models Original Research Paper Seismic activity Seismic engineering Seismic hazard Structural Geology Variability Variance analysis Waveforms |
title | Systematic source, path and site effects on ground motion variability: the case study of Northern Italy |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T09%3A43%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Systematic%20source,%20path%20and%20site%20effects%20on%20ground%20motion%20variability:%20the%20case%20study%20of%20Northern%20Italy&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20earthquake%20engineering&rft.au=Lanzano,%20Giovanni&rft.date=2017-11-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=4563&rft.epage=4583&rft.pages=4563-4583&rft.issn=1570-761X&rft.eissn=1573-1456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10518-017-0170-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1948919025%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1948919025&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |