Employers' Viewpoint on Clinical Education
ISSUE: This qualitative study gathered the opinions of healthcare employers to better understand the importance, benefits, obstacles, and evolving issues related to allied health (AH) clinical education from the employers' perspective, with the goal to identify opportunities to strengthen and i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of allied health 2017-10, Vol.46 (3), p.131-137 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 137 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 131 |
container_title | Journal of allied health |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | O'Brien, Christopher W. Anderson, Roy Ayzenberg, Benjamin Chute, Patricia Farnsworth, Tracy McLaughlin, Robert Romig, Barbara Samonian, Yasmen Sample, Jacquelyn Tynsky, Troy Wallace, Barbara Weinstein, Marcie O'Sullivan Maillet, Julie |
description | ISSUE: This qualitative study gathered the opinions of healthcare employers to better understand the importance, benefits, obstacles, and evolving issues related to allied health (AH) clinical education from the employers' perspective, with the goal to identify opportunities
to strengthen and improve clinical-educational partnerships. METHOD: Member deans of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) provided names and contact information of employers that routinely educate their students. Interviews were scheduled with employers who
responded to Clinical Education Task Force (CETF) invitation. Twenty-one interviews were conducted by CETF members in early 2016 and analyzed utilizing qualitative software. OUTCOMES: Themes included benefits of working with students and hiring trainees, and obstacles of time and effort
required to host students. A trend was noted in gaps between educational preparation and clinical performance. Recent changes highlighted increased technology and regulation, while anticipated changes included more focus on learning on site, longer clinical experiences, and payment for clinical
education. CONCLUSION: Collaboration between educators and employers is essential to ensure that curriculum and outcomes match the needs of the field and effectively prepare students as entry-level clinicians. J Allied Health 2017; 46(3):131-137 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1948917923</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>asahp/jah/2017/00000046/00000003/art00004</ingid><jstor_id>48721977</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>48721977</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i250t-742a0afd5f9763d790c045f919ac29ea46c91608c0d8d09d6d7d41563ffe5733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhosoOKc_QSh4IQiFk48mzeUY8wMGuxniXQhNuqV0aU1SZf56263glefmfL08h_NeJDMkaJ5RoB-XyQxAQMYpRtfJTQg1AJCcoVnytDp0TXs0Pjym79Z8d611MW1dumyss6Vq0pXuSxVt626Tq0o1wdxNeZ5sn1fb5Wu23ry8LRfrzOIc4nhEgap0XgnOiOYCSqBDg4QqsTCKslIgBkUJutAgNNNcU5QzUlUm54TMk4cztvPtZ29ClHXbezdclMNDhUBc4FF1f1bVIbZedt4elD9KWnCMBOfDfnHeW7czLqo_iApq38la7SUGxCWcgrKpACKVj6fRwNj8w7DlhBltHV2VX5Q5MhAxggIziSgiUptK9U2UUXm5-5GBkl9Y2HXs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1948917923</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Employers' Viewpoint on Clinical Education</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>O'Brien, Christopher W. ; Anderson, Roy ; Ayzenberg, Benjamin ; Chute, Patricia ; Farnsworth, Tracy ; McLaughlin, Robert ; Romig, Barbara ; Samonian, Yasmen ; Sample, Jacquelyn ; Tynsky, Troy ; Wallace, Barbara ; Weinstein, Marcie ; O'Sullivan Maillet, Julie</creator><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Christopher W. ; Anderson, Roy ; Ayzenberg, Benjamin ; Chute, Patricia ; Farnsworth, Tracy ; McLaughlin, Robert ; Romig, Barbara ; Samonian, Yasmen ; Sample, Jacquelyn ; Tynsky, Troy ; Wallace, Barbara ; Weinstein, Marcie ; O'Sullivan Maillet, Julie</creatorcontrib><description>ISSUE: This qualitative study gathered the opinions of healthcare employers to better understand the importance, benefits, obstacles, and evolving issues related to allied health (AH) clinical education from the employers' perspective, with the goal to identify opportunities
to strengthen and improve clinical-educational partnerships. METHOD: Member deans of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) provided names and contact information of employers that routinely educate their students. Interviews were scheduled with employers who
responded to Clinical Education Task Force (CETF) invitation. Twenty-one interviews were conducted by CETF members in early 2016 and analyzed utilizing qualitative software. OUTCOMES: Themes included benefits of working with students and hiring trainees, and obstacles of time and effort
required to host students. A trend was noted in gaps between educational preparation and clinical performance. Recent changes highlighted increased technology and regulation, while anticipated changes included more focus on learning on site, longer clinical experiences, and payment for clinical
education. CONCLUSION: Collaboration between educators and employers is essential to ensure that curriculum and outcomes match the needs of the field and effectively prepare students as entry-level clinicians. J Allied Health 2017; 46(3):131-137</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-7421</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1945-404X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: The Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Allied Health Occupations Education ; ASAHP TASK FORCE REPORT ; Collaborative learning ; Compensation (Remuneration) ; Continuing education ; Cooperative Learning ; Cost benefit analysis ; Cost Effectiveness ; Costs ; Curricula ; Dietetics ; Economic analysis ; Education ; Educational Technology ; Employers ; Evidence-based nursing ; Field study ; Health Occupations ; Interviews ; Job Skills ; Literature Reviews ; Nursing ; Occupational therapy ; Opportunities ; Partnerships in Education ; Peer Teaching ; Physical therapy ; Productivity ; Professions ; Qualitative research ; Sampling ; Schools ; Speech Language Pathology ; Speech therapy ; Student retention ; Student Satisfaction ; Students ; Supervisors ; Task forces ; Telephone Surveys ; Thinking Skills</subject><ispartof>Journal of allied health, 2017-10, Vol.46 (3), p.131-137</ispartof><rights>2017 Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions</rights><rights>Copyright Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions Fall 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/48721977$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48721977$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,57992,58225</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Christopher W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Roy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayzenberg, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chute, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farnsworth, Tracy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romig, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samonian, Yasmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sample, Jacquelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tynsky, Troy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Marcie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan Maillet, Julie</creatorcontrib><title>Employers' Viewpoint on Clinical Education</title><title>Journal of allied health</title><description>ISSUE: This qualitative study gathered the opinions of healthcare employers to better understand the importance, benefits, obstacles, and evolving issues related to allied health (AH) clinical education from the employers' perspective, with the goal to identify opportunities
to strengthen and improve clinical-educational partnerships. METHOD: Member deans of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) provided names and contact information of employers that routinely educate their students. Interviews were scheduled with employers who
responded to Clinical Education Task Force (CETF) invitation. Twenty-one interviews were conducted by CETF members in early 2016 and analyzed utilizing qualitative software. OUTCOMES: Themes included benefits of working with students and hiring trainees, and obstacles of time and effort
required to host students. A trend was noted in gaps between educational preparation and clinical performance. Recent changes highlighted increased technology and regulation, while anticipated changes included more focus on learning on site, longer clinical experiences, and payment for clinical
education. CONCLUSION: Collaboration between educators and employers is essential to ensure that curriculum and outcomes match the needs of the field and effectively prepare students as entry-level clinicians. J Allied Health 2017; 46(3):131-137</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Allied Health Occupations Education</subject><subject>ASAHP TASK FORCE REPORT</subject><subject>Collaborative learning</subject><subject>Compensation (Remuneration)</subject><subject>Continuing education</subject><subject>Cooperative Learning</subject><subject>Cost benefit analysis</subject><subject>Cost Effectiveness</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Dietetics</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Employers</subject><subject>Evidence-based nursing</subject><subject>Field study</subject><subject>Health Occupations</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Job Skills</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Occupational therapy</subject><subject>Opportunities</subject><subject>Partnerships in Education</subject><subject>Peer Teaching</subject><subject>Physical therapy</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Professions</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Speech Language Pathology</subject><subject>Speech therapy</subject><subject>Student retention</subject><subject>Student Satisfaction</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Supervisors</subject><subject>Task forces</subject><subject>Telephone Surveys</subject><subject>Thinking Skills</subject><issn>0090-7421</issn><issn>1945-404X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kF1LwzAUhosoOKc_QSh4IQiFk48mzeUY8wMGuxniXQhNuqV0aU1SZf56263glefmfL08h_NeJDMkaJ5RoB-XyQxAQMYpRtfJTQg1AJCcoVnytDp0TXs0Pjym79Z8d611MW1dumyss6Vq0pXuSxVt626Tq0o1wdxNeZ5sn1fb5Wu23ry8LRfrzOIc4nhEgap0XgnOiOYCSqBDg4QqsTCKslIgBkUJutAgNNNcU5QzUlUm54TMk4cztvPtZ29ClHXbezdclMNDhUBc4FF1f1bVIbZedt4elD9KWnCMBOfDfnHeW7czLqo_iApq38la7SUGxCWcgrKpACKVj6fRwNj8w7DlhBltHV2VX5Q5MhAxggIziSgiUptK9U2UUXm5-5GBkl9Y2HXs</recordid><startdate>20171001</startdate><enddate>20171001</enddate><creator>O'Brien, Christopher W.</creator><creator>Anderson, Roy</creator><creator>Ayzenberg, Benjamin</creator><creator>Chute, Patricia</creator><creator>Farnsworth, Tracy</creator><creator>McLaughlin, Robert</creator><creator>Romig, Barbara</creator><creator>Samonian, Yasmen</creator><creator>Sample, Jacquelyn</creator><creator>Tynsky, Troy</creator><creator>Wallace, Barbara</creator><creator>Weinstein, Marcie</creator><creator>O'Sullivan Maillet, Julie</creator><general>The Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions</general><general>John Colbert</general><general>Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171001</creationdate><title>Employers' Viewpoint on Clinical Education</title><author>O'Brien, Christopher W. ; Anderson, Roy ; Ayzenberg, Benjamin ; Chute, Patricia ; Farnsworth, Tracy ; McLaughlin, Robert ; Romig, Barbara ; Samonian, Yasmen ; Sample, Jacquelyn ; Tynsky, Troy ; Wallace, Barbara ; Weinstein, Marcie ; O'Sullivan Maillet, Julie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i250t-742a0afd5f9763d790c045f919ac29ea46c91608c0d8d09d6d7d41563ffe5733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Allied Health Occupations Education</topic><topic>ASAHP TASK FORCE REPORT</topic><topic>Collaborative learning</topic><topic>Compensation (Remuneration)</topic><topic>Continuing education</topic><topic>Cooperative Learning</topic><topic>Cost benefit analysis</topic><topic>Cost Effectiveness</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Dietetics</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Employers</topic><topic>Evidence-based nursing</topic><topic>Field study</topic><topic>Health Occupations</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Job Skills</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Occupational therapy</topic><topic>Opportunities</topic><topic>Partnerships in Education</topic><topic>Peer Teaching</topic><topic>Physical therapy</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Professions</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Speech Language Pathology</topic><topic>Speech therapy</topic><topic>Student retention</topic><topic>Student Satisfaction</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Supervisors</topic><topic>Task forces</topic><topic>Telephone Surveys</topic><topic>Thinking Skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O'Brien, Christopher W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anderson, Roy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ayzenberg, Benjamin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chute, Patricia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Farnsworth, Tracy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McLaughlin, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romig, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samonian, Yasmen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sample, Jacquelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tynsky, Troy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Barbara</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weinstein, Marcie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Sullivan Maillet, Julie</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of allied health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O'Brien, Christopher W.</au><au>Anderson, Roy</au><au>Ayzenberg, Benjamin</au><au>Chute, Patricia</au><au>Farnsworth, Tracy</au><au>McLaughlin, Robert</au><au>Romig, Barbara</au><au>Samonian, Yasmen</au><au>Sample, Jacquelyn</au><au>Tynsky, Troy</au><au>Wallace, Barbara</au><au>Weinstein, Marcie</au><au>O'Sullivan Maillet, Julie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Employers' Viewpoint on Clinical Education</atitle><jtitle>Journal of allied health</jtitle><date>2017-10-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>137</epage><pages>131-137</pages><issn>0090-7421</issn><eissn>1945-404X</eissn><abstract>ISSUE: This qualitative study gathered the opinions of healthcare employers to better understand the importance, benefits, obstacles, and evolving issues related to allied health (AH) clinical education from the employers' perspective, with the goal to identify opportunities
to strengthen and improve clinical-educational partnerships. METHOD: Member deans of the Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions (ASAHP) provided names and contact information of employers that routinely educate their students. Interviews were scheduled with employers who
responded to Clinical Education Task Force (CETF) invitation. Twenty-one interviews were conducted by CETF members in early 2016 and analyzed utilizing qualitative software. OUTCOMES: Themes included benefits of working with students and hiring trainees, and obstacles of time and effort
required to host students. A trend was noted in gaps between educational preparation and clinical performance. Recent changes highlighted increased technology and regulation, while anticipated changes included more focus on learning on site, longer clinical experiences, and payment for clinical
education. CONCLUSION: Collaboration between educators and employers is essential to ensure that curriculum and outcomes match the needs of the field and effectively prepare students as entry-level clinicians. J Allied Health 2017; 46(3):131-137</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>The Association of Schools of Allied Health Professions</pub><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-7421 |
ispartof | Journal of allied health, 2017-10, Vol.46 (3), p.131-137 |
issn | 0090-7421 1945-404X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1948917923 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy |
subjects | Academic Achievement Allied Health Occupations Education ASAHP TASK FORCE REPORT Collaborative learning Compensation (Remuneration) Continuing education Cooperative Learning Cost benefit analysis Cost Effectiveness Costs Curricula Dietetics Economic analysis Education Educational Technology Employers Evidence-based nursing Field study Health Occupations Interviews Job Skills Literature Reviews Nursing Occupational therapy Opportunities Partnerships in Education Peer Teaching Physical therapy Productivity Professions Qualitative research Sampling Schools Speech Language Pathology Speech therapy Student retention Student Satisfaction Students Supervisors Task forces Telephone Surveys Thinking Skills |
title | Employers' Viewpoint on Clinical Education |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T15%3A27%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Employers'%20Viewpoint%20on%20Clinical%20Education&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20allied%20health&rft.au=O'Brien,%20Christopher%20W.&rft.date=2017-10-01&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=137&rft.pages=131-137&rft.issn=0090-7421&rft.eissn=1945-404X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E48721977%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1948917923&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ingid=asahp/jah/2017/00000046/00000003/art00004&rft_jstor_id=48721977&rfr_iscdi=true |