Stock and Compensation
Compensation planning within firms creates important corporate financial problems. Theoretical models and empirical tests of hypotheses in this area should play a much larger role than currently in the modern theory of corporate finance. Employees fund a large proportion of their firm's activit...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of finance (New York) 1991-07, Vol.46 (3), p.803-823 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 823 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 803 |
container_title | The Journal of finance (New York) |
container_volume | 46 |
creator | SCHOLES, MYRON S. |
description | Compensation planning within firms creates important corporate financial problems. Theoretical models and empirical tests of hypotheses in this area should play a much larger role than currently in the modern theory of corporate finance. Employees fund a large proportion of their firm's activities through deferred compensation arrangements tied to the performance of their company. These arrangements are generally put in place for incentive reasons, to align the interests of employees more closely with those of shareholders. Moreover, tax rules encourage or discourage these arrangements at various times. Currently, both tax rules and incentive considerations encourage stock buyback programs to fund deferred compensation arrangements. Prior to the 1980s, however, tax rules favored funding in other than company stock, implying that employees likely held company stock for incentive and not for tax reasons during this time period. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03766.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194707876</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2328543</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2328543</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3606-9c014ef784a39d91d1ddbafeacc0a5b90ad92118a942b199dd9feda7f3d9ab63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkM9LwzAUx4MoOKdXz2N4bX1J2qTxpAz3Q8Z2cDDw8kibFNpt7Ww63P57WzqGV98hCbzP95v3voQMKfi0qefcp2EAnmCC-lQp6tcxcCmEf7wivUvrmvQAGPMoROyW3DmXQ1th2COPn3WZbAa6MINRudvbwuk6K4t7cpPqrbMP57tPVuP31WjqzZeT2eht7iVcgPBUAjSwqYwCzZVR1FBjYp1anSSgw1iBNopRGmkVsLiZzxiVWqNlyo3SseB9Muxs91X5fbCuxrw8VEXzI1IVSJCRbKGXDkqq0rnKprivsp2uTkgB2xQwx3ZVbFfFNgU8p4DHRvzaiX-yrT39Q4kfy_GsfTYWT51F7uqy-mvBOMjmYFEY8AbzOixztT1eMF1tUEguQ1wvJjhffwFMFxIV_wUZu35V</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194707876</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stock and Compensation</title><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>SCHOLES, MYRON S.</creator><creatorcontrib>SCHOLES, MYRON S.</creatorcontrib><description>Compensation planning within firms creates important corporate financial problems. Theoretical models and empirical tests of hypotheses in this area should play a much larger role than currently in the modern theory of corporate finance. Employees fund a large proportion of their firm's activities through deferred compensation arrangements tied to the performance of their company. These arrangements are generally put in place for incentive reasons, to align the interests of employees more closely with those of shareholders. Moreover, tax rules encourage or discourage these arrangements at various times. Currently, both tax rules and incentive considerations encourage stock buyback programs to fund deferred compensation arrangements. Prior to the 1980s, however, tax rules favored funding in other than company stock, implying that employees likely held company stock for incentive and not for tax reasons during this time period.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-1082</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6261</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03766.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JLFIAN</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Business structures ; Compensation ; Corporate taxes ; Corporations ; Decision analysis ; Decision making ; Deferred compensation ; Deferred taxes ; Employees ; Funding ; Incentives ; Income taxes ; Investment return rates ; Pension funds ; Shareholders ; Stock ; Stock options deferred compensation ; Stock shares ; Tax regulations</subject><ispartof>The Journal of finance (New York), 1991-07, Vol.46 (3), p.803-823</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1991 American Finance Association</rights><rights>1991 the American Finance Association</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishers Inc. Jul 1991</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3606-9c014ef784a39d91d1ddbafeacc0a5b90ad92118a942b199dd9feda7f3d9ab63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3606-9c014ef784a39d91d1ddbafeacc0a5b90ad92118a942b199dd9feda7f3d9ab63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2328543$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2328543$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>SCHOLES, MYRON S.</creatorcontrib><title>Stock and Compensation</title><title>The Journal of finance (New York)</title><description>Compensation planning within firms creates important corporate financial problems. Theoretical models and empirical tests of hypotheses in this area should play a much larger role than currently in the modern theory of corporate finance. Employees fund a large proportion of their firm's activities through deferred compensation arrangements tied to the performance of their company. These arrangements are generally put in place for incentive reasons, to align the interests of employees more closely with those of shareholders. Moreover, tax rules encourage or discourage these arrangements at various times. Currently, both tax rules and incentive considerations encourage stock buyback programs to fund deferred compensation arrangements. Prior to the 1980s, however, tax rules favored funding in other than company stock, implying that employees likely held company stock for incentive and not for tax reasons during this time period.</description><subject>Business structures</subject><subject>Compensation</subject><subject>Corporate taxes</subject><subject>Corporations</subject><subject>Decision analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Deferred compensation</subject><subject>Deferred taxes</subject><subject>Employees</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Income taxes</subject><subject>Investment return rates</subject><subject>Pension funds</subject><subject>Shareholders</subject><subject>Stock</subject><subject>Stock options deferred compensation</subject><subject>Stock shares</subject><subject>Tax regulations</subject><issn>0022-1082</issn><issn>1540-6261</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkM9LwzAUx4MoOKdXz2N4bX1J2qTxpAz3Q8Z2cDDw8kibFNpt7Ww63P57WzqGV98hCbzP95v3voQMKfi0qefcp2EAnmCC-lQp6tcxcCmEf7wivUvrmvQAGPMoROyW3DmXQ1th2COPn3WZbAa6MINRudvbwuk6K4t7cpPqrbMP57tPVuP31WjqzZeT2eht7iVcgPBUAjSwqYwCzZVR1FBjYp1anSSgw1iBNopRGmkVsLiZzxiVWqNlyo3SseB9Muxs91X5fbCuxrw8VEXzI1IVSJCRbKGXDkqq0rnKprivsp2uTkgB2xQwx3ZVbFfFNgU8p4DHRvzaiX-yrT39Q4kfy_GsfTYWT51F7uqy-mvBOMjmYFEY8AbzOixztT1eMF1tUEguQ1wvJjhffwFMFxIV_wUZu35V</recordid><startdate>199107</startdate><enddate>199107</enddate><creator>SCHOLES, MYRON S.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Finance Association</general><general>Blackwell Publishers Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199107</creationdate><title>Stock and Compensation</title><author>SCHOLES, MYRON S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3606-9c014ef784a39d91d1ddbafeacc0a5b90ad92118a942b199dd9feda7f3d9ab63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>Business structures</topic><topic>Compensation</topic><topic>Corporate taxes</topic><topic>Corporations</topic><topic>Decision analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Deferred compensation</topic><topic>Deferred taxes</topic><topic>Employees</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Income taxes</topic><topic>Investment return rates</topic><topic>Pension funds</topic><topic>Shareholders</topic><topic>Stock</topic><topic>Stock options deferred compensation</topic><topic>Stock shares</topic><topic>Tax regulations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>SCHOLES, MYRON S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The Journal of finance (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>SCHOLES, MYRON S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stock and Compensation</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of finance (New York)</jtitle><date>1991-07</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>803</spage><epage>823</epage><pages>803-823</pages><issn>0022-1082</issn><eissn>1540-6261</eissn><coden>JLFIAN</coden><abstract>Compensation planning within firms creates important corporate financial problems. Theoretical models and empirical tests of hypotheses in this area should play a much larger role than currently in the modern theory of corporate finance. Employees fund a large proportion of their firm's activities through deferred compensation arrangements tied to the performance of their company. These arrangements are generally put in place for incentive reasons, to align the interests of employees more closely with those of shareholders. Moreover, tax rules encourage or discourage these arrangements at various times. Currently, both tax rules and incentive considerations encourage stock buyback programs to fund deferred compensation arrangements. Prior to the 1980s, however, tax rules favored funding in other than company stock, implying that employees likely held company stock for incentive and not for tax reasons during this time period.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03766.x</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0022-1082 |
ispartof | The Journal of finance (New York), 1991-07, Vol.46 (3), p.803-823 |
issn | 0022-1082 1540-6261 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_194707876 |
source | JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
subjects | Business structures Compensation Corporate taxes Corporations Decision analysis Decision making Deferred compensation Deferred taxes Employees Funding Incentives Income taxes Investment return rates Pension funds Shareholders Stock Stock options deferred compensation Stock shares Tax regulations |
title | Stock and Compensation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T00%3A36%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stock%20and%20Compensation&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20finance%20(New%20York)&rft.au=SCHOLES,%20MYRON%20S.&rft.date=1991-07&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=803&rft.epage=823&rft.pages=803-823&rft.issn=0022-1082&rft.eissn=1540-6261&rft.coden=JLFIAN&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1991.tb03766.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2328543%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194707876&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2328543&rfr_iscdi=true |