Sand Mountain Elite Heifer Development Program II: Heifer Performance

Sand Mountain Elite Heifer Development Program II: Heifer Performance

An abstract of a study by Kriese-Anderson et al discussing the Sand Mountain Elite Heifer Development program II is presented. Even with the poor ADG performance of groups 1 and 2 during the first 28 days, WDA of heifers in groups 1 and 2 were very close to their final ADG. This indicates they were...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of animal science 2017-01, Vol.95, p.7
Hauptverfasser: Kriese-Anderson, L A, Marks, M L, Stanford, M K, Mullenix, M K
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Breeding of animals
Cattle industry
Sand
Zoology
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 7
container_title Journal of animal science
container_volume 95
creator Kriese-Anderson, L A
Marks, M L
Stanford, M K
Mullenix, M K
description An abstract of a study by Kriese-Anderson et al discussing the Sand Mountain Elite Heifer Development program II is presented. Even with the poor ADG performance of groups 1 and 2 during the first 28 days, WDA of heifers in groups 1 and 2 were very close to their final ADG. This indicates they were on a fairly steady or even growth pattern from birth. Heifers in group 3 had a significantly lower (P < 0.05) WDA than the other 2 heifer groups until they had been in the development program for 90 days. Perhaps some of the continued differences in growth were due to compensatory gain. However, no significant differences existed between groups for final weight.
doi_str_mv 10.2527/ssasas2017.013
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1947038898</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1947038898</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_19470388983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNij0LwjAUAIMoWD9W54BzNS8xNnXVSjsIBd0l6KtU2kST1N-vg-5yww13hMyALbjkydJ7_YEzSBYMRI9EILmMBaxFn0SMcYiVAj4kI-_vjAGXqYxIdtTmSg-2M0HXhmZNHZDmWFfo6A5f2NhHiybQ0tmb0y0tis0vl-gq61ptLjghg0o3Hqdfj8l8n522efxw9tmhD-e77Zz5pDOkq4QJpVIl_rvezWpBMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1947038898</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sand Mountain Elite Heifer Development Program II: Heifer Performance</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Kriese-Anderson, L A ; Marks, M L ; Stanford, M K ; Mullenix, M K</creator><creatorcontrib>Kriese-Anderson, L A ; Marks, M L ; Stanford, M K ; Mullenix, M K</creatorcontrib><description>An abstract of a study by Kriese-Anderson et al discussing the Sand Mountain Elite Heifer Development program II is presented. Even with the poor ADG performance of groups 1 and 2 during the first 28 days, WDA of heifers in groups 1 and 2 were very close to their final ADG. This indicates they were on a fairly steady or even growth pattern from birth. Heifers in group 3 had a significantly lower (P &lt; 0.05) WDA than the other 2 heifer groups until they had been in the development program for 90 days. Perhaps some of the continued differences in growth were due to compensatory gain. However, no significant differences existed between groups for final weight.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/ssasas2017.013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Breeding of animals ; Cattle industry ; Sand ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2017-01, Vol.95, p.7</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Jan 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kriese-Anderson, L A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marks, M L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanford, M K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullenix, M K</creatorcontrib><title>Sand Mountain Elite Heifer Development Program II: Heifer Performance</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>An abstract of a study by Kriese-Anderson et al discussing the Sand Mountain Elite Heifer Development program II is presented. Even with the poor ADG performance of groups 1 and 2 during the first 28 days, WDA of heifers in groups 1 and 2 were very close to their final ADG. This indicates they were on a fairly steady or even growth pattern from birth. Heifers in group 3 had a significantly lower (P &lt; 0.05) WDA than the other 2 heifer groups until they had been in the development program for 90 days. Perhaps some of the continued differences in growth were due to compensatory gain. However, no significant differences existed between groups for final weight.</description><subject>Breeding of animals</subject><subject>Cattle industry</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNij0LwjAUAIMoWD9W54BzNS8xNnXVSjsIBd0l6KtU2kST1N-vg-5yww13hMyALbjkydJ7_YEzSBYMRI9EILmMBaxFn0SMcYiVAj4kI-_vjAGXqYxIdtTmSg-2M0HXhmZNHZDmWFfo6A5f2NhHiybQ0tmb0y0tis0vl-gq61ptLjghg0o3Hqdfj8l8n522efxw9tmhD-e77Zz5pDOkq4QJpVIl_rvezWpBMw</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Kriese-Anderson, L A</creator><creator>Marks, M L</creator><creator>Stanford, M K</creator><creator>Mullenix, M K</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Sand Mountain Elite Heifer Development Program II: Heifer Performance</title><author>Kriese-Anderson, L A ; Marks, M L ; Stanford, M K ; Mullenix, M K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_19470388983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Breeding of animals</topic><topic>Cattle industry</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kriese-Anderson, L A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marks, M L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanford, M K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mullenix, M K</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career &amp; Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kriese-Anderson, L A</au><au>Marks, M L</au><au>Stanford, M K</au><au>Mullenix, M K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sand Mountain Elite Heifer Development Program II: Heifer Performance</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>95</volume><spage>7</spage><pages>7-</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>An abstract of a study by Kriese-Anderson et al discussing the Sand Mountain Elite Heifer Development program II is presented. Even with the poor ADG performance of groups 1 and 2 during the first 28 days, WDA of heifers in groups 1 and 2 were very close to their final ADG. This indicates they were on a fairly steady or even growth pattern from birth. Heifers in group 3 had a significantly lower (P &lt; 0.05) WDA than the other 2 heifer groups until they had been in the development program for 90 days. Perhaps some of the continued differences in growth were due to compensatory gain. However, no significant differences existed between groups for final weight.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.2527/ssasas2017.013</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8812
ispartof Journal of animal science, 2017-01, Vol.95, p.7
issn 0021-8812
1525-3163
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1947038898
source Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Breeding of animals
Cattle industry
Sand
Zoology
title Sand Mountain Elite Heifer Development Program II: Heifer Performance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T06%3A36%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sand%20Mountain%20Elite%20Heifer%20Development%20Program%20II:%20Heifer%20Performance&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Kriese-Anderson,%20L%20A&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=95&rft.spage=7&rft.pages=7-&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/ssasas2017.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1947038898%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1947038898&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true