Feeding distillers’ grains, soybean hulls, or a mixture of both to cows as a forage replacement: Effects on intake, digestibility, and ruminal fermentation characteristics
Coproduct feedstuffs offer a unique and potentially profitable avenue for cattle feeding strategies. However, research is lacking in the evaluation of varying coproducts on ruminal fermentation and digestive characteristics when included as the major component of the diet of cows. Our objective was...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2017-08, Vol.95 (8), p.3666 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 3666 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Smith, W. B. Coffey, K. P. Rhein, R. T. Kegley, E. B. Philipp, D. Powell, J. G. Caldwell, J. D. Young, A. N. |
description | Coproduct feedstuffs offer a unique and potentially profitable avenue for cattle feeding strategies. However, research is lacking in the evaluation of varying coproducts on ruminal fermentation and digestive characteristics when included as the major component of the diet of cows. Our objective was to determine the effect of coproduct feedstuffs as a forage replacement on digestive and fermentative characteristics of cows. Eight ruminally fistulated cows (672 ± 32.0 kg initial BW and approximately 9 yr of age) were stratified by BW and randomly allocated to 1 of 4 diets (2 cows·diet-1·period-1) in a 2-period study: soybean hulls (SH), distillers' dried grains with solubles (DG), an isoenergetic mixture of soybean hulls and distillers' dried grains with solubles (MX), or ad libitum hay plus 0.9 kg/d of an isoenergetic mixture of soybean hulls and distillers' dried grains with solubles (HY). Diets were formulated to meet the ME requirements of a similar, companion study. Coproduct amounts were increased over a 14-d period. This was followed by a 14-d adaptation to diet and facilities and 5 d of total fecal collections. On the final day of fecal collections, rumen fluid was sampled immediately prior to feeding and 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h after feeding for measurement of rumen VFA and ammonia concentrations. Intake of DM and OM was not different (P ≥ 0.28) among treatments, but digestibilities of DM, OM, NDF, and ADF were improved (P < 0.05) by coproduct feeding and by MX vs. the mean of SH and DG. Ruminal DM and OM fill were greater (P < 0.05) for cows offered HY than for cows offered the coproduct diets, greater for cows offered SH than for cows offered DG, and for the mean of SH and DG vs. MX. Ruminal retention time was greater (P < 0.05) for HY vs. the coproduct diets and for SH vs. DG. Apparent N absorption tended (P < 0.10) to be greater for cows offered the coproduct diets than for cows offered HY and greater for cows offered DG than for cows offered SH. Total VFA averaged across sampling times were greatest (P < 0.05) for cows offered SH, and ruminal ammonia N was greatest (P < 0.05) for cows offered either DG or MX at all sampling times. Based on these data, coproduct feedstuffs may be fed to meet the energy requirement of cows without negative effects on digestion or ruminal fermentation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2527/jas2017.1379 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1947023115</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1947023115</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1085-758e53dce308978454e0cf75b8949a5761638fae2032c370a99f26ee082bbc323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUctKA0EQXETBGL35AQ1eE51HJrPrTcSoIHjR89I76UkmbnbizCyam7_hR_hTfokT9CA0dBdUdxVdRXHK2blQQl-sMArG9TmXutorBlwJNZZ8Kvf_zYfFUYwrxrhQlRoUXzOiuesWMHcxubalEL8_PmER0HVxBNFvG8IOln3bZugDIKzde-oDgbfQ-LSE5MH4twiYC6wPuCAItGnR0Jq6dAk31pJJEXwHrkv4QqOstqCs17jWpe0IsJtD6NeuwxYshd0aJpf5ZokBTaKwc2ficXFgsY108teHxfPs5un6bvzweHt_ffUwNpyVaqxVSUrODUlWVrqcqAkxY7VqympSodLT_IfSIgkmhZGaYVVZMSVipWgaI4UcFme_dzfBv_bZab3yfcjuYs2riWZCcq4ya_TLMsHHGMjWm-DWGLY1Z_UukPovkHoXiPwB3vaBkg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1947023115</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Feeding distillers’ grains, soybean hulls, or a mixture of both to cows as a forage replacement: Effects on intake, digestibility, and ruminal fermentation characteristics</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Smith, W. B. ; Coffey, K. P. ; Rhein, R. T. ; Kegley, E. B. ; Philipp, D. ; Powell, J. G. ; Caldwell, J. D. ; Young, A. N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith, W. B. ; Coffey, K. P. ; Rhein, R. T. ; Kegley, E. B. ; Philipp, D. ; Powell, J. G. ; Caldwell, J. D. ; Young, A. N.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Coproduct feedstuffs offer a unique and potentially profitable avenue for cattle feeding strategies. However, research is lacking in the evaluation of varying coproducts on ruminal fermentation and digestive characteristics when included as the major component of the diet of cows. Our objective was to determine the effect of coproduct feedstuffs as a forage replacement on digestive and fermentative characteristics of cows. Eight ruminally fistulated cows (672 ± 32.0 kg initial BW and approximately 9 yr of age) were stratified by BW and randomly allocated to 1 of 4 diets (2 cows·diet-1·period-1) in a 2-period study: soybean hulls (SH), distillers' dried grains with solubles (DG), an isoenergetic mixture of soybean hulls and distillers' dried grains with solubles (MX), or ad libitum hay plus 0.9 kg/d of an isoenergetic mixture of soybean hulls and distillers' dried grains with solubles (HY). Diets were formulated to meet the ME requirements of a similar, companion study. Coproduct amounts were increased over a 14-d period. This was followed by a 14-d adaptation to diet and facilities and 5 d of total fecal collections. On the final day of fecal collections, rumen fluid was sampled immediately prior to feeding and 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h after feeding for measurement of rumen VFA and ammonia concentrations. Intake of DM and OM was not different (P ≥ 0.28) among treatments, but digestibilities of DM, OM, NDF, and ADF were improved (P < 0.05) by coproduct feeding and by MX vs. the mean of SH and DG. Ruminal DM and OM fill were greater (P < 0.05) for cows offered HY than for cows offered the coproduct diets, greater for cows offered SH than for cows offered DG, and for the mean of SH and DG vs. MX. Ruminal retention time was greater (P < 0.05) for HY vs. the coproduct diets and for SH vs. DG. Apparent N absorption tended (P < 0.10) to be greater for cows offered the coproduct diets than for cows offered HY and greater for cows offered DG than for cows offered SH. Total VFA averaged across sampling times were greatest (P < 0.05) for cows offered SH, and ruminal ammonia N was greatest (P < 0.05) for cows offered either DG or MX at all sampling times. Based on these data, coproduct feedstuffs may be fed to meet the energy requirement of cows without negative effects on digestion or ruminal fermentation.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2527/jas2017.1379</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Ammonia ; Cattle ; Data collection ; Diet ; Digestibility ; Feeding ; Feeds ; Fermentation ; Forage ; Grain ; Hulls ; Retention time ; Rumen ; Sampling</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2017-08, Vol.95 (8), p.3666</ispartof><rights>Copyright American Society of Animal Science Aug 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1085-758e53dce308978454e0cf75b8949a5761638fae2032c370a99f26ee082bbc323</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith, W. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coffey, K. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhein, R. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kegley, E. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philipp, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, J. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldwell, J. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, A. N.</creatorcontrib><title>Feeding distillers’ grains, soybean hulls, or a mixture of both to cows as a forage replacement: Effects on intake, digestibility, and ruminal fermentation characteristics</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description><![CDATA[Coproduct feedstuffs offer a unique and potentially profitable avenue for cattle feeding strategies. However, research is lacking in the evaluation of varying coproducts on ruminal fermentation and digestive characteristics when included as the major component of the diet of cows. Our objective was to determine the effect of coproduct feedstuffs as a forage replacement on digestive and fermentative characteristics of cows. Eight ruminally fistulated cows (672 ± 32.0 kg initial BW and approximately 9 yr of age) were stratified by BW and randomly allocated to 1 of 4 diets (2 cows·diet-1·period-1) in a 2-period study: soybean hulls (SH), distillers' dried grains with solubles (DG), an isoenergetic mixture of soybean hulls and distillers' dried grains with solubles (MX), or ad libitum hay plus 0.9 kg/d of an isoenergetic mixture of soybean hulls and distillers' dried grains with solubles (HY). Diets were formulated to meet the ME requirements of a similar, companion study. Coproduct amounts were increased over a 14-d period. This was followed by a 14-d adaptation to diet and facilities and 5 d of total fecal collections. On the final day of fecal collections, rumen fluid was sampled immediately prior to feeding and 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h after feeding for measurement of rumen VFA and ammonia concentrations. Intake of DM and OM was not different (P ≥ 0.28) among treatments, but digestibilities of DM, OM, NDF, and ADF were improved (P < 0.05) by coproduct feeding and by MX vs. the mean of SH and DG. Ruminal DM and OM fill were greater (P < 0.05) for cows offered HY than for cows offered the coproduct diets, greater for cows offered SH than for cows offered DG, and for the mean of SH and DG vs. MX. Ruminal retention time was greater (P < 0.05) for HY vs. the coproduct diets and for SH vs. DG. Apparent N absorption tended (P < 0.10) to be greater for cows offered the coproduct diets than for cows offered HY and greater for cows offered DG than for cows offered SH. Total VFA averaged across sampling times were greatest (P < 0.05) for cows offered SH, and ruminal ammonia N was greatest (P < 0.05) for cows offered either DG or MX at all sampling times. Based on these data, coproduct feedstuffs may be fed to meet the energy requirement of cows without negative effects on digestion or ruminal fermentation.]]></description><subject>Ammonia</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Digestibility</subject><subject>Feeding</subject><subject>Feeds</subject><subject>Fermentation</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Grain</subject><subject>Hulls</subject><subject>Retention time</subject><subject>Rumen</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><issn>1525-3163</issn><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUctKA0EQXETBGL35AQ1eE51HJrPrTcSoIHjR89I76UkmbnbizCyam7_hR_hTfokT9CA0dBdUdxVdRXHK2blQQl-sMArG9TmXutorBlwJNZZ8Kvf_zYfFUYwrxrhQlRoUXzOiuesWMHcxubalEL8_PmER0HVxBNFvG8IOln3bZugDIKzde-oDgbfQ-LSE5MH4twiYC6wPuCAItGnR0Jq6dAk31pJJEXwHrkv4QqOstqCs17jWpe0IsJtD6NeuwxYshd0aJpf5ZokBTaKwc2ficXFgsY108teHxfPs5un6bvzweHt_ffUwNpyVaqxVSUrODUlWVrqcqAkxY7VqympSodLT_IfSIgkmhZGaYVVZMSVipWgaI4UcFme_dzfBv_bZab3yfcjuYs2riWZCcq4ya_TLMsHHGMjWm-DWGLY1Z_UukPovkHoXiPwB3vaBkg</recordid><startdate>20170801</startdate><enddate>20170801</enddate><creator>Smith, W. B.</creator><creator>Coffey, K. P.</creator><creator>Rhein, R. T.</creator><creator>Kegley, E. B.</creator><creator>Philipp, D.</creator><creator>Powell, J. G.</creator><creator>Caldwell, J. D.</creator><creator>Young, A. N.</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RQ</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170801</creationdate><title>Feeding distillers’ grains, soybean hulls, or a mixture of both to cows as a forage replacement: Effects on intake, digestibility, and ruminal fermentation characteristics</title><author>Smith, W. B. ; Coffey, K. P. ; Rhein, R. T. ; Kegley, E. B. ; Philipp, D. ; Powell, J. G. ; Caldwell, J. D. ; Young, A. N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1085-758e53dce308978454e0cf75b8949a5761638fae2032c370a99f26ee082bbc323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Ammonia</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Digestibility</topic><topic>Feeding</topic><topic>Feeds</topic><topic>Fermentation</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Grain</topic><topic>Hulls</topic><topic>Retention time</topic><topic>Rumen</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith, W. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coffey, K. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhein, R. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kegley, E. B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philipp, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Powell, J. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Caldwell, J. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Young, A. N.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Career & Technical Education Database</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith, W. B.</au><au>Coffey, K. P.</au><au>Rhein, R. T.</au><au>Kegley, E. B.</au><au>Philipp, D.</au><au>Powell, J. G.</au><au>Caldwell, J. D.</au><au>Young, A. N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Feeding distillers’ grains, soybean hulls, or a mixture of both to cows as a forage replacement: Effects on intake, digestibility, and ruminal fermentation characteristics</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2017-08-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>3666</spage><pages>3666-</pages><issn>1525-3163</issn><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Coproduct feedstuffs offer a unique and potentially profitable avenue for cattle feeding strategies. However, research is lacking in the evaluation of varying coproducts on ruminal fermentation and digestive characteristics when included as the major component of the diet of cows. Our objective was to determine the effect of coproduct feedstuffs as a forage replacement on digestive and fermentative characteristics of cows. Eight ruminally fistulated cows (672 ± 32.0 kg initial BW and approximately 9 yr of age) were stratified by BW and randomly allocated to 1 of 4 diets (2 cows·diet-1·period-1) in a 2-period study: soybean hulls (SH), distillers' dried grains with solubles (DG), an isoenergetic mixture of soybean hulls and distillers' dried grains with solubles (MX), or ad libitum hay plus 0.9 kg/d of an isoenergetic mixture of soybean hulls and distillers' dried grains with solubles (HY). Diets were formulated to meet the ME requirements of a similar, companion study. Coproduct amounts were increased over a 14-d period. This was followed by a 14-d adaptation to diet and facilities and 5 d of total fecal collections. On the final day of fecal collections, rumen fluid was sampled immediately prior to feeding and 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 h after feeding for measurement of rumen VFA and ammonia concentrations. Intake of DM and OM was not different (P ≥ 0.28) among treatments, but digestibilities of DM, OM, NDF, and ADF were improved (P < 0.05) by coproduct feeding and by MX vs. the mean of SH and DG. Ruminal DM and OM fill were greater (P < 0.05) for cows offered HY than for cows offered the coproduct diets, greater for cows offered SH than for cows offered DG, and for the mean of SH and DG vs. MX. Ruminal retention time was greater (P < 0.05) for HY vs. the coproduct diets and for SH vs. DG. Apparent N absorption tended (P < 0.10) to be greater for cows offered the coproduct diets than for cows offered HY and greater for cows offered DG than for cows offered SH. Total VFA averaged across sampling times were greatest (P < 0.05) for cows offered SH, and ruminal ammonia N was greatest (P < 0.05) for cows offered either DG or MX at all sampling times. Based on these data, coproduct feedstuffs may be fed to meet the energy requirement of cows without negative effects on digestion or ruminal fermentation.]]></abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.2527/jas2017.1379</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1525-3163 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2017-08, Vol.95 (8), p.3666 |
issn | 1525-3163 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1947023115 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Ammonia Cattle Data collection Diet Digestibility Feeding Feeds Fermentation Forage Grain Hulls Retention time Rumen Sampling |
title | Feeding distillers’ grains, soybean hulls, or a mixture of both to cows as a forage replacement: Effects on intake, digestibility, and ruminal fermentation characteristics |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T00%3A24%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Feeding%20distillers%E2%80%99%20grains,%20soybean%20hulls,%20or%20a%20mixture%20of%20both%20to%20cows%20as%20a%20forage%20replacement:%20Effects%20on%20intake,%20digestibility,%20and%20ruminal%20fermentation%20characteristics&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Smith,%20W.%20B.&rft.date=2017-08-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=3666&rft.pages=3666-&rft.issn=1525-3163&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.2527/jas2017.1379&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1947023115%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1947023115&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |