Do Economics Departments with Lower Tenure Probabilities Pay Higher Faculty Salaries?
The simplest competitive labor market model asserts that if tenure is a desirable job characteristic for professors, they should be willing to pay for it by accepting lower salaries. Conversely, if an institution unilaterally reduces the probability that its assistant professors receive tenure, it w...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The review of economics and statistics 1998-11, Vol.80 (4), p.503-512 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 512 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 503 |
container_title | The review of economics and statistics |
container_volume | 80 |
creator | Ehrenberg, Ronald G. Pieper, Paul J. Willis, Rachel A. |
description | The simplest competitive labor market model asserts that if tenure is a desirable job characteristic for professors, they should be willing to pay for it by accepting lower salaries. Conversely, if an institution unilaterally reduces the probability that its assistant professors receive tenure, it will have to pay higher salaries to attract new faculty. Our paper tests this theory using data on salary offers accepted by new assistant professors at economics departments in the United States during the 1974-75 to 1980-81 period, along with data on the proportion of new Ph.D.s hired by each department between 1970 and 1980 that received tenure in the department or at a comparable or higher quality department within the first eight years of receipt of their Ph.D.s. We find evidence that supports the hypothesis that a tradeoff existed. Equally importantly, departments that offered low tenure probabilities to assistant professors also paid higher salaries to their tenured faculty. We attribute this to low tenure probabilities inducing higher effort from assistant professors and thus leading to higher productivity of faculty ultimately promoted to tenure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1162/003465398557780 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194687149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>2646833</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>2646833</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-fcdff2338b07ff07efcef377fccd347c6e809912eb66dddb2953b39b464369243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFPGzEQRi3USk0p5156sNojWhh7vPb6VFVJgEqRGgk4W7teuzhK4tTegMKvx1EQqhCcfPjevM8zhHxlcMaY5OcAKGSNuqlrpRo4IiNWI1SaCf6BjPZpVeL6E_mc8wIAmGI4IreTSKc2ruMq2EwnbtOmYeXWQ6YPYbijs_jgEr1x621ydJ5i13ZhGYbgMp23O3oV_t6V_KK12-Wwo9ftsk0l-_mFfPTtMruT5_eY3F5Mb8ZX1ezP5e_xr1llayaGytvee47YdKC8B-W8dR6V8tb2KJSVrgGtGXedlH3fd1zX2KHuhBQoNRd4TL4fvJsU_21dHswibtO6VBqmhWwUE7pAP96FJApWa5B76vxA2RRzTs6bTQqrNu0MA7M_sHl14DIxPkyswn_KVAruGwjCIAjGtOHAWREY0OYxbN6wnL5heb_z24Fe5CGmly9yWZZFxCfCGJaV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1634159069</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Do Economics Departments with Lower Tenure Probabilities Pay Higher Faculty Salaries?</title><source>JSTOR Mathematics and Statistics</source><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>MIT Press Journals</source><creator>Ehrenberg, Ronald G. ; Pieper, Paul J. ; Willis, Rachel A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ehrenberg, Ronald G. ; Pieper, Paul J. ; Willis, Rachel A.</creatorcontrib><description>The simplest competitive labor market model asserts that if tenure is a desirable job characteristic for professors, they should be willing to pay for it by accepting lower salaries. Conversely, if an institution unilaterally reduces the probability that its assistant professors receive tenure, it will have to pay higher salaries to attract new faculty. Our paper tests this theory using data on salary offers accepted by new assistant professors at economics departments in the United States during the 1974-75 to 1980-81 period, along with data on the proportion of new Ph.D.s hired by each department between 1970 and 1980 that received tenure in the department or at a comparable or higher quality department within the first eight years of receipt of their Ph.D.s. We find evidence that supports the hypothesis that a tradeoff existed. Equally importantly, departments that offered low tenure probabilities to assistant professors also paid higher salaries to their tenured faculty. We attribute this to low tenure probabilities inducing higher effort from assistant professors and thus leading to higher productivity of faculty ultimately promoted to tenure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-6535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-9142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1162/003465398557780</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RECSA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>238 Main St., Suite 500, Cambridge, MA 02142-1046, USA: MIT Press</publisher><subject>Academic tenure ; Coefficients ; College faculty ; Colleges & universities ; Departments ; Economic models ; Economic theory ; Economics ; Labor market ; Labor markets ; Probabilities ; Probability ; Productivity ; Salary ; Teachers ; Tenure ; Tradeoffs ; Universities ; Variable coefficients ; Wages & salaries ; Willingness to pay</subject><ispartof>The review of economics and statistics, 1998-11, Vol.80 (4), p.503-512</ispartof><rights>Copyright 1998 The President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology</rights><rights>Copyright MIT Press Journals Nov 1998</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-fcdff2338b07ff07efcef377fccd347c6e809912eb66dddb2953b39b464369243</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-fcdff2338b07ff07efcef377fccd347c6e809912eb66dddb2953b39b464369243</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2646833$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/2646833$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,832,27869,27924,27925,54009,54010,58017,58021,58250,58254</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ehrenberg, Ronald G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pieper, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willis, Rachel A.</creatorcontrib><title>Do Economics Departments with Lower Tenure Probabilities Pay Higher Faculty Salaries?</title><title>The review of economics and statistics</title><description>The simplest competitive labor market model asserts that if tenure is a desirable job characteristic for professors, they should be willing to pay for it by accepting lower salaries. Conversely, if an institution unilaterally reduces the probability that its assistant professors receive tenure, it will have to pay higher salaries to attract new faculty. Our paper tests this theory using data on salary offers accepted by new assistant professors at economics departments in the United States during the 1974-75 to 1980-81 period, along with data on the proportion of new Ph.D.s hired by each department between 1970 and 1980 that received tenure in the department or at a comparable or higher quality department within the first eight years of receipt of their Ph.D.s. We find evidence that supports the hypothesis that a tradeoff existed. Equally importantly, departments that offered low tenure probabilities to assistant professors also paid higher salaries to their tenured faculty. We attribute this to low tenure probabilities inducing higher effort from assistant professors and thus leading to higher productivity of faculty ultimately promoted to tenure.</description><subject>Academic tenure</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>College faculty</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Labor markets</subject><subject>Probabilities</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Salary</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Tenure</subject><subject>Tradeoffs</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Variable coefficients</subject><subject>Wages & salaries</subject><subject>Willingness to pay</subject><issn>0034-6535</issn><issn>1530-9142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>K30</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEFPGzEQRi3USk0p5156sNojWhh7vPb6VFVJgEqRGgk4W7teuzhK4tTegMKvx1EQqhCcfPjevM8zhHxlcMaY5OcAKGSNuqlrpRo4IiNWI1SaCf6BjPZpVeL6E_mc8wIAmGI4IreTSKc2ruMq2EwnbtOmYeXWQ6YPYbijs_jgEr1x621ydJ5i13ZhGYbgMp23O3oV_t6V_KK12-Wwo9ftsk0l-_mFfPTtMruT5_eY3F5Mb8ZX1ezP5e_xr1llayaGytvee47YdKC8B-W8dR6V8tb2KJSVrgGtGXedlH3fd1zX2KHuhBQoNRd4TL4fvJsU_21dHswibtO6VBqmhWwUE7pAP96FJApWa5B76vxA2RRzTs6bTQqrNu0MA7M_sHl14DIxPkyswn_KVAruGwjCIAjGtOHAWREY0OYxbN6wnL5heb_z24Fe5CGmly9yWZZFxCfCGJaV</recordid><startdate>19981101</startdate><enddate>19981101</enddate><creator>Ehrenberg, Ronald G.</creator><creator>Pieper, Paul J.</creator><creator>Willis, Rachel A.</creator><general>MIT Press</general><general>Harvard University Press, etc</general><general>MIT Press Journals, The</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>EOLOZ</scope><scope>FKUCP</scope><scope>IOIBA</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19981101</creationdate><title>Do Economics Departments with Lower Tenure Probabilities Pay Higher Faculty Salaries?</title><author>Ehrenberg, Ronald G. ; Pieper, Paul J. ; Willis, Rachel A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c514t-fcdff2338b07ff07efcef377fccd347c6e809912eb66dddb2953b39b464369243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Academic tenure</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>College faculty</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Labor markets</topic><topic>Probabilities</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Salary</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Tenure</topic><topic>Tradeoffs</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Variable coefficients</topic><topic>Wages & salaries</topic><topic>Willingness to pay</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ehrenberg, Ronald G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pieper, Paul J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willis, Rachel A.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 01</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 04</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 29</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The review of economics and statistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ehrenberg, Ronald G.</au><au>Pieper, Paul J.</au><au>Willis, Rachel A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Do Economics Departments with Lower Tenure Probabilities Pay Higher Faculty Salaries?</atitle><jtitle>The review of economics and statistics</jtitle><date>1998-11-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>80</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>503</spage><epage>512</epage><pages>503-512</pages><issn>0034-6535</issn><eissn>1530-9142</eissn><coden>RECSA9</coden><abstract>The simplest competitive labor market model asserts that if tenure is a desirable job characteristic for professors, they should be willing to pay for it by accepting lower salaries. Conversely, if an institution unilaterally reduces the probability that its assistant professors receive tenure, it will have to pay higher salaries to attract new faculty. Our paper tests this theory using data on salary offers accepted by new assistant professors at economics departments in the United States during the 1974-75 to 1980-81 period, along with data on the proportion of new Ph.D.s hired by each department between 1970 and 1980 that received tenure in the department or at a comparable or higher quality department within the first eight years of receipt of their Ph.D.s. We find evidence that supports the hypothesis that a tradeoff existed. Equally importantly, departments that offered low tenure probabilities to assistant professors also paid higher salaries to their tenured faculty. We attribute this to low tenure probabilities inducing higher effort from assistant professors and thus leading to higher productivity of faculty ultimately promoted to tenure.</abstract><cop>238 Main St., Suite 500, Cambridge, MA 02142-1046, USA</cop><pub>MIT Press</pub><doi>10.1162/003465398557780</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0034-6535 |
ispartof | The review of economics and statistics, 1998-11, Vol.80 (4), p.503-512 |
issn | 0034-6535 1530-9142 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_194687149 |
source | JSTOR Mathematics and Statistics; Periodicals Index Online; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; MIT Press Journals |
subjects | Academic tenure Coefficients College faculty Colleges & universities Departments Economic models Economic theory Economics Labor market Labor markets Probabilities Probability Productivity Salary Teachers Tenure Tradeoffs Universities Variable coefficients Wages & salaries Willingness to pay |
title | Do Economics Departments with Lower Tenure Probabilities Pay Higher Faculty Salaries? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A35%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Do%20Economics%20Departments%20with%20Lower%20Tenure%20Probabilities%20Pay%20Higher%20Faculty%20Salaries?&rft.jtitle=The%20review%20of%20economics%20and%20statistics&rft.au=Ehrenberg,%20Ronald%20G.&rft.date=1998-11-01&rft.volume=80&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=503&rft.epage=512&rft.pages=503-512&rft.issn=0034-6535&rft.eissn=1530-9142&rft.coden=RECSA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1162/003465398557780&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E2646833%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1634159069&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=2646833&rfr_iscdi=true |