Education, growth, and income inequality

Estimates of the effect of education on GDP (the social return) have been hard to reconcile with micro evidence on the private return to schooling. We present a simple explanation combining two ideas: imperfect substitution and endogenous skill-biased technological progress and use cross-country pan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The review of economics and statistics 2008-02, Vol.90 (1), p.89-104
Hauptverfasser: Teulings, Coen, Rens, Thijs van
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 104
container_issue 1
container_start_page 89
container_title The review of economics and statistics
container_volume 90
creator Teulings, Coen
Rens, Thijs van
description Estimates of the effect of education on GDP (the social return) have been hard to reconcile with micro evidence on the private return to schooling. We present a simple explanation combining two ideas: imperfect substitution and endogenous skill-biased technological progress and use cross-country panel data on inequality and GDP to test these ideas. A one-year increase in the level of education reduces the private return by 2 percentage points, consistent with Katz-Murphy's (1992) elasticity of substitution. We find no evidence for reversal of this initial effect as in Acemoglu (2002). In the short run, the social return equals the private return.
doi_str_mv 10.1162/rest.90.1.89
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194679696</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40043127</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40043127</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-73df1e02bfcc3ba5ae4236466f3cc76b3218bc3dbb2b01b27f8e8fb2c6f2e53e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1LAzEUxIMoWKs3T4JQPPXQrUleNpscpdQPKHjRc0iyiW5pNzXZRfrfm7KiHjw9hvkxwxuELgmeE8LpbXSpm8ss5kIeoREpAReSMHqMRhgDK3gJ5Sk6S2mNMSYVgRGaLuve6q4J7WzyFsNn9z6b6LaeNK0NW5eP--j1pun25-jE601yF993jF7vly-Lx2L1_PC0uFsVlgHvigpqTxymxlsLRpfaMQqcce7B2ooboEQYC7Ux1GBiaOWFE95Qyz11JTgYo5shdxfDR58fUuvQxzZXKiIZrySXPEOzAbIxpBSdV7vYbHXcK4LVYQp1mELJLJSQGZ8O-Lb5G_c_ej2g69SF-BPLMGZAaJX9q8Gvm91vq6BMlAy-ABkecRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194679696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Education, growth, and income inequality</title><source>JSTOR Mathematics &amp; Statistics</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>MIT Press Journals</source><creator>Teulings, Coen ; Rens, Thijs van</creator><creatorcontrib>Teulings, Coen ; Rens, Thijs van</creatorcontrib><description>Estimates of the effect of education on GDP (the social return) have been hard to reconcile with micro evidence on the private return to schooling. We present a simple explanation combining two ideas: imperfect substitution and endogenous skill-biased technological progress and use cross-country panel data on inequality and GDP to test these ideas. A one-year increase in the level of education reduces the private return by 2 percentage points, consistent with Katz-Murphy's (1992) elasticity of substitution. We find no evidence for reversal of this initial effect as in Acemoglu (2002). In the short run, the social return equals the private return.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-6535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-9142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1162/rest.90.1.89</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RECSA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: MIT Press</publisher><subject>Bildungsertrag ; Bildungsökonomie ; Coefficients ; Economic statistics ; Economic theory ; Education ; Educational attainment ; Einkommensverteilung ; Estimators ; GDP ; Gross Domestic Product ; Growth models ; Higher education ; Human capital ; Humankapital ; Income inequality ; Labor economics ; Lohnstruktur ; Outcomes of education ; Schätzung ; Statistical variance ; Studies ; Theorie ; Wachstumstheorie ; Welt ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>The review of economics and statistics, 2008-02, Vol.90 (1), p.89-104</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology</rights><rights>Copyright MIT Press Journals Feb 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-73df1e02bfcc3ba5ae4236466f3cc76b3218bc3dbb2b01b27f8e8fb2c6f2e53e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-73df1e02bfcc3ba5ae4236466f3cc76b3218bc3dbb2b01b27f8e8fb2c6f2e53e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40043127$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40043127$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,832,27924,27925,54009,54010,58017,58021,58250,58254</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=824854$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Teulings, Coen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rens, Thijs van</creatorcontrib><title>Education, growth, and income inequality</title><title>The review of economics and statistics</title><description>Estimates of the effect of education on GDP (the social return) have been hard to reconcile with micro evidence on the private return to schooling. We present a simple explanation combining two ideas: imperfect substitution and endogenous skill-biased technological progress and use cross-country panel data on inequality and GDP to test these ideas. A one-year increase in the level of education reduces the private return by 2 percentage points, consistent with Katz-Murphy's (1992) elasticity of substitution. We find no evidence for reversal of this initial effect as in Acemoglu (2002). In the short run, the social return equals the private return.</description><subject>Bildungsertrag</subject><subject>Bildungsökonomie</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Economic statistics</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational attainment</subject><subject>Einkommensverteilung</subject><subject>Estimators</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Growth models</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Human capital</subject><subject>Humankapital</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Labor economics</subject><subject>Lohnstruktur</subject><subject>Outcomes of education</subject><subject>Schätzung</subject><subject>Statistical variance</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Theorie</subject><subject>Wachstumstheorie</subject><subject>Welt</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>0034-6535</issn><issn>1530-9142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkM1LAzEUxIMoWKs3T4JQPPXQrUleNpscpdQPKHjRc0iyiW5pNzXZRfrfm7KiHjw9hvkxwxuELgmeE8LpbXSpm8ss5kIeoREpAReSMHqMRhgDK3gJ5Sk6S2mNMSYVgRGaLuve6q4J7WzyFsNn9z6b6LaeNK0NW5eP--j1pun25-jE601yF993jF7vly-Lx2L1_PC0uFsVlgHvigpqTxymxlsLRpfaMQqcce7B2ooboEQYC7Ux1GBiaOWFE95Qyz11JTgYo5shdxfDR58fUuvQxzZXKiIZrySXPEOzAbIxpBSdV7vYbHXcK4LVYQp1mELJLJSQGZ8O-Lb5G_c_ej2g69SF-BPLMGZAaJX9q8Gvm91vq6BMlAy-ABkecRg</recordid><startdate>20080201</startdate><enddate>20080201</enddate><creator>Teulings, Coen</creator><creator>Rens, Thijs van</creator><general>MIT Press</general><general>The MIT Press</general><general>MIT Press Journals, The</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080201</creationdate><title>Education, growth, and income inequality</title><author>Teulings, Coen ; Rens, Thijs van</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-73df1e02bfcc3ba5ae4236466f3cc76b3218bc3dbb2b01b27f8e8fb2c6f2e53e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Bildungsertrag</topic><topic>Bildungsökonomie</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Economic statistics</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational attainment</topic><topic>Einkommensverteilung</topic><topic>Estimators</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Growth models</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Human capital</topic><topic>Humankapital</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Labor economics</topic><topic>Lohnstruktur</topic><topic>Outcomes of education</topic><topic>Schätzung</topic><topic>Statistical variance</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Theorie</topic><topic>Wachstumstheorie</topic><topic>Welt</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Teulings, Coen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rens, Thijs van</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The review of economics and statistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Teulings, Coen</au><au>Rens, Thijs van</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Education, growth, and income inequality</atitle><jtitle>The review of economics and statistics</jtitle><date>2008-02-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>104</epage><pages>89-104</pages><issn>0034-6535</issn><eissn>1530-9142</eissn><coden>RECSA9</coden><abstract>Estimates of the effect of education on GDP (the social return) have been hard to reconcile with micro evidence on the private return to schooling. We present a simple explanation combining two ideas: imperfect substitution and endogenous skill-biased technological progress and use cross-country panel data on inequality and GDP to test these ideas. A one-year increase in the level of education reduces the private return by 2 percentage points, consistent with Katz-Murphy's (1992) elasticity of substitution. We find no evidence for reversal of this initial effect as in Acemoglu (2002). In the short run, the social return equals the private return.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>MIT Press</pub><doi>10.1162/rest.90.1.89</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-6535
ispartof The review of economics and statistics, 2008-02, Vol.90 (1), p.89-104
issn 0034-6535
1530-9142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_194679696
source JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; MIT Press Journals
subjects Bildungsertrag
Bildungsökonomie
Coefficients
Economic statistics
Economic theory
Education
Educational attainment
Einkommensverteilung
Estimators
GDP
Gross Domestic Product
Growth models
Higher education
Human capital
Humankapital
Income inequality
Labor economics
Lohnstruktur
Outcomes of education
Schätzung
Statistical variance
Studies
Theorie
Wachstumstheorie
Welt
Workforce
title Education, growth, and income inequality
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T15%3A39%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Education,%20growth,%20and%20income%20inequality&rft.jtitle=The%20review%20of%20economics%20and%20statistics&rft.au=Teulings,%20Coen&rft.date=2008-02-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=104&rft.pages=89-104&rft.issn=0034-6535&rft.eissn=1530-9142&rft.coden=RECSA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1162/rest.90.1.89&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40043127%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194679696&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40043127&rfr_iscdi=true