Education, growth, and income inequality
Estimates of the effect of education on GDP (the social return) have been hard to reconcile with micro evidence on the private return to schooling. We present a simple explanation combining two ideas: imperfect substitution and endogenous skill-biased technological progress and use cross-country pan...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The review of economics and statistics 2008-02, Vol.90 (1), p.89-104 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 104 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 89 |
container_title | The review of economics and statistics |
container_volume | 90 |
creator | Teulings, Coen Rens, Thijs van |
description | Estimates of the effect of education on GDP (the social return) have been hard to reconcile with micro evidence on the private return to schooling. We present a simple explanation combining two ideas: imperfect substitution and endogenous skill-biased technological progress and use cross-country panel data on inequality and GDP to test these ideas. A one-year increase in the level of education reduces the private return by 2 percentage points, consistent with Katz-Murphy's (1992) elasticity of substitution. We find no evidence for reversal of this initial effect as in Acemoglu (2002). In the short run, the social return equals the private return. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1162/rest.90.1.89 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194679696</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>40043127</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>40043127</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-73df1e02bfcc3ba5ae4236466f3cc76b3218bc3dbb2b01b27f8e8fb2c6f2e53e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1LAzEUxIMoWKs3T4JQPPXQrUleNpscpdQPKHjRc0iyiW5pNzXZRfrfm7KiHjw9hvkxwxuELgmeE8LpbXSpm8ss5kIeoREpAReSMHqMRhgDK3gJ5Sk6S2mNMSYVgRGaLuve6q4J7WzyFsNn9z6b6LaeNK0NW5eP--j1pun25-jE601yF993jF7vly-Lx2L1_PC0uFsVlgHvigpqTxymxlsLRpfaMQqcce7B2ooboEQYC7Ux1GBiaOWFE95Qyz11JTgYo5shdxfDR58fUuvQxzZXKiIZrySXPEOzAbIxpBSdV7vYbHXcK4LVYQp1mELJLJSQGZ8O-Lb5G_c_ej2g69SF-BPLMGZAaJX9q8Gvm91vq6BMlAy-ABkecRg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194679696</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Education, growth, and income inequality</title><source>JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>MIT Press Journals</source><creator>Teulings, Coen ; Rens, Thijs van</creator><creatorcontrib>Teulings, Coen ; Rens, Thijs van</creatorcontrib><description>Estimates of the effect of education on GDP (the social return) have been hard to reconcile with micro evidence on the private return to schooling. We present a simple explanation combining two ideas: imperfect substitution and endogenous skill-biased technological progress and use cross-country panel data on inequality and GDP to test these ideas. A one-year increase in the level of education reduces the private return by 2 percentage points, consistent with Katz-Murphy's (1992) elasticity of substitution. We find no evidence for reversal of this initial effect as in Acemoglu (2002). In the short run, the social return equals the private return.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-6535</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-9142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1162/rest.90.1.89</identifier><identifier>CODEN: RECSA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: MIT Press</publisher><subject>Bildungsertrag ; Bildungsökonomie ; Coefficients ; Economic statistics ; Economic theory ; Education ; Educational attainment ; Einkommensverteilung ; Estimators ; GDP ; Gross Domestic Product ; Growth models ; Higher education ; Human capital ; Humankapital ; Income inequality ; Labor economics ; Lohnstruktur ; Outcomes of education ; Schätzung ; Statistical variance ; Studies ; Theorie ; Wachstumstheorie ; Welt ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>The review of economics and statistics, 2008-02, Vol.90 (1), p.89-104</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2008 the President and Fellows of Harvard College and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology</rights><rights>Copyright MIT Press Journals Feb 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-73df1e02bfcc3ba5ae4236466f3cc76b3218bc3dbb2b01b27f8e8fb2c6f2e53e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-73df1e02bfcc3ba5ae4236466f3cc76b3218bc3dbb2b01b27f8e8fb2c6f2e53e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/40043127$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/40043127$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,832,27924,27925,54009,54010,58017,58021,58250,58254</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=824854$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Teulings, Coen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rens, Thijs van</creatorcontrib><title>Education, growth, and income inequality</title><title>The review of economics and statistics</title><description>Estimates of the effect of education on GDP (the social return) have been hard to reconcile with micro evidence on the private return to schooling. We present a simple explanation combining two ideas: imperfect substitution and endogenous skill-biased technological progress and use cross-country panel data on inequality and GDP to test these ideas. A one-year increase in the level of education reduces the private return by 2 percentage points, consistent with Katz-Murphy's (1992) elasticity of substitution. We find no evidence for reversal of this initial effect as in Acemoglu (2002). In the short run, the social return equals the private return.</description><subject>Bildungsertrag</subject><subject>Bildungsökonomie</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Economic statistics</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational attainment</subject><subject>Einkommensverteilung</subject><subject>Estimators</subject><subject>GDP</subject><subject>Gross Domestic Product</subject><subject>Growth models</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Human capital</subject><subject>Humankapital</subject><subject>Income inequality</subject><subject>Labor economics</subject><subject>Lohnstruktur</subject><subject>Outcomes of education</subject><subject>Schätzung</subject><subject>Statistical variance</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Theorie</subject><subject>Wachstumstheorie</subject><subject>Welt</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>0034-6535</issn><issn>1530-9142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkM1LAzEUxIMoWKs3T4JQPPXQrUleNpscpdQPKHjRc0iyiW5pNzXZRfrfm7KiHjw9hvkxwxuELgmeE8LpbXSpm8ss5kIeoREpAReSMHqMRhgDK3gJ5Sk6S2mNMSYVgRGaLuve6q4J7WzyFsNn9z6b6LaeNK0NW5eP--j1pun25-jE601yF993jF7vly-Lx2L1_PC0uFsVlgHvigpqTxymxlsLRpfaMQqcce7B2ooboEQYC7Ux1GBiaOWFE95Qyz11JTgYo5shdxfDR58fUuvQxzZXKiIZrySXPEOzAbIxpBSdV7vYbHXcK4LVYQp1mELJLJSQGZ8O-Lb5G_c_ej2g69SF-BPLMGZAaJX9q8Gvm91vq6BMlAy-ABkecRg</recordid><startdate>20080201</startdate><enddate>20080201</enddate><creator>Teulings, Coen</creator><creator>Rens, Thijs van</creator><general>MIT Press</general><general>The MIT Press</general><general>MIT Press Journals, The</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080201</creationdate><title>Education, growth, and income inequality</title><author>Teulings, Coen ; Rens, Thijs van</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-73df1e02bfcc3ba5ae4236466f3cc76b3218bc3dbb2b01b27f8e8fb2c6f2e53e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Bildungsertrag</topic><topic>Bildungsökonomie</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Economic statistics</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational attainment</topic><topic>Einkommensverteilung</topic><topic>Estimators</topic><topic>GDP</topic><topic>Gross Domestic Product</topic><topic>Growth models</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Human capital</topic><topic>Humankapital</topic><topic>Income inequality</topic><topic>Labor economics</topic><topic>Lohnstruktur</topic><topic>Outcomes of education</topic><topic>Schätzung</topic><topic>Statistical variance</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Theorie</topic><topic>Wachstumstheorie</topic><topic>Welt</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Teulings, Coen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rens, Thijs van</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The review of economics and statistics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Teulings, Coen</au><au>Rens, Thijs van</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Education, growth, and income inequality</atitle><jtitle>The review of economics and statistics</jtitle><date>2008-02-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>90</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>104</epage><pages>89-104</pages><issn>0034-6535</issn><eissn>1530-9142</eissn><coden>RECSA9</coden><abstract>Estimates of the effect of education on GDP (the social return) have been hard to reconcile with micro evidence on the private return to schooling. We present a simple explanation combining two ideas: imperfect substitution and endogenous skill-biased technological progress and use cross-country panel data on inequality and GDP to test these ideas. A one-year increase in the level of education reduces the private return by 2 percentage points, consistent with Katz-Murphy's (1992) elasticity of substitution. We find no evidence for reversal of this initial effect as in Acemoglu (2002). In the short run, the social return equals the private return.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>MIT Press</pub><doi>10.1162/rest.90.1.89</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0034-6535 |
ispartof | The review of economics and statistics, 2008-02, Vol.90 (1), p.89-104 |
issn | 0034-6535 1530-9142 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_194679696 |
source | JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; MIT Press Journals |
subjects | Bildungsertrag Bildungsökonomie Coefficients Economic statistics Economic theory Education Educational attainment Einkommensverteilung Estimators GDP Gross Domestic Product Growth models Higher education Human capital Humankapital Income inequality Labor economics Lohnstruktur Outcomes of education Schätzung Statistical variance Studies Theorie Wachstumstheorie Welt Workforce |
title | Education, growth, and income inequality |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T15%3A39%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Education,%20growth,%20and%20income%20inequality&rft.jtitle=The%20review%20of%20economics%20and%20statistics&rft.au=Teulings,%20Coen&rft.date=2008-02-01&rft.volume=90&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=104&rft.pages=89-104&rft.issn=0034-6535&rft.eissn=1530-9142&rft.coden=RECSA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1162/rest.90.1.89&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E40043127%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194679696&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=40043127&rfr_iscdi=true |