The Effects of Expected and Perceived Receiver Response on Source Attitudes: Abstract
In a 2 X 2 experimental design, communication sources were given an expectation of the response (positive or negative) they might receive from a group of listeners. As they delivered persuasive messages, they were administered positive or negative nonverbal response by a trained audience. The source...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of communication 1972-09, Vol.22 (3), p.289 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 289 |
container_title | Journal of communication |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Gardiner, James C |
description | In a 2 X 2 experimental design, communication sources were given an expectation of the response (positive or negative) they might receive from a group of listeners. As they delivered persuasive messages, they were administered positive or negative nonverbal response by a trained audience. The sources' attitudes toward their own performances and toward the receivers were measured. As predicted, sources who expected positive response but received negative response apparently restored balance by devaluing their performances, while sources who expected negative response but received positive response apparently restored balance by evaluating the receivers favorably. Cognitive balance theory was generally successful in predicting attitudes of communication sources in a setting where receiver response was manipulated. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194654326</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>608473491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_1946543263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi8EKwjAQRIMoWKv_sHgvJG0M9ChSEbyI9l5Ku8EWSWo3FT_fRfwAT_OGNzMTkdJGJqk2Zi4iKVOV5LkyS7Ei6iX3TMlInMs7QmEtNoHAWyjeAyO2ULsWLjg22L24XfELIwMN3hGCd3DzE3vYh9CFqUVai4WtH4SbX8ZieyzKwykZRv-ckELV88OxqlSuzU5nqcn-Gn0AL-s9aA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194654326</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effects of Expected and Perceived Receiver Response on Source Attitudes: Abstract</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gardiner, James C</creator><creatorcontrib>Gardiner, James C</creatorcontrib><description>In a 2 X 2 experimental design, communication sources were given an expectation of the response (positive or negative) they might receive from a group of listeners. As they delivered persuasive messages, they were administered positive or negative nonverbal response by a trained audience. The sources' attitudes toward their own performances and toward the receivers were measured. As predicted, sources who expected positive response but received negative response apparently restored balance by devaluing their performances, while sources who expected negative response but received positive response apparently restored balance by evaluating the receivers favorably. Cognitive balance theory was generally successful in predicting attitudes of communication sources in a setting where receiver response was manipulated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2466</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCMNAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Audiences ; Communication ; Eye contact ; Hypotheses ; Roles ; Speaking</subject><ispartof>Journal of communication, 1972-09, Vol.22 (3), p.289</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Sep 1972</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gardiner, James C</creatorcontrib><title>The Effects of Expected and Perceived Receiver Response on Source Attitudes: Abstract</title><title>Journal of communication</title><description>In a 2 X 2 experimental design, communication sources were given an expectation of the response (positive or negative) they might receive from a group of listeners. As they delivered persuasive messages, they were administered positive or negative nonverbal response by a trained audience. The sources' attitudes toward their own performances and toward the receivers were measured. As predicted, sources who expected positive response but received negative response apparently restored balance by devaluing their performances, while sources who expected negative response but received positive response apparently restored balance by evaluating the receivers favorably. Cognitive balance theory was generally successful in predicting attitudes of communication sources in a setting where receiver response was manipulated.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Eye contact</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Roles</subject><subject>Speaking</subject><issn>0021-9916</issn><issn>1460-2466</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1972</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqNi8EKwjAQRIMoWKv_sHgvJG0M9ChSEbyI9l5Ku8EWSWo3FT_fRfwAT_OGNzMTkdJGJqk2Zi4iKVOV5LkyS7Ei6iX3TMlInMs7QmEtNoHAWyjeAyO2ULsWLjg22L24XfELIwMN3hGCd3DzE3vYh9CFqUVai4WtH4SbX8ZieyzKwykZRv-ckELV88OxqlSuzU5nqcn-Gn0AL-s9aA</recordid><startdate>19720901</startdate><enddate>19720901</enddate><creator>Gardiner, James C</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>19720901</creationdate><title>The Effects of Expected and Perceived Receiver Response on Source Attitudes</title><author>Gardiner, James C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_1946543263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1972</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Eye contact</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Roles</topic><topic>Speaking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gardiner, James C</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Journal of communication</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gardiner, James C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effects of Expected and Perceived Receiver Response on Source Attitudes: Abstract</atitle><jtitle>Journal of communication</jtitle><date>1972-09-01</date><risdate>1972</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>289</spage><pages>289-</pages><issn>0021-9916</issn><eissn>1460-2466</eissn><coden>JCMNAA</coden><abstract>In a 2 X 2 experimental design, communication sources were given an expectation of the response (positive or negative) they might receive from a group of listeners. As they delivered persuasive messages, they were administered positive or negative nonverbal response by a trained audience. The sources' attitudes toward their own performances and toward the receivers were measured. As predicted, sources who expected positive response but received negative response apparently restored balance by devaluing their performances, while sources who expected negative response but received positive response apparently restored balance by evaluating the receivers favorably. Cognitive balance theory was generally successful in predicting attitudes of communication sources in a setting where receiver response was manipulated.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-9916 |
ispartof | Journal of communication, 1972-09, Vol.22 (3), p.289 |
issn | 0021-9916 1460-2466 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_194654326 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Attitudes Audiences Communication Eye contact Hypotheses Roles Speaking |
title | The Effects of Expected and Perceived Receiver Response on Source Attitudes: Abstract |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T22%3A55%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effects%20of%20Expected%20and%20Perceived%20Receiver%20Response%20on%20Source%20Attitudes:%20Abstract&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20communication&rft.au=Gardiner,%20James%20C&rft.date=1972-09-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=289&rft.pages=289-&rft.issn=0021-9916&rft.eissn=1460-2466&rft.coden=JCMNAA&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E608473491%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194654326&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |