The Effects of Expected and Perceived Receiver Response on Source Attitudes: Abstract

In a 2 X 2 experimental design, communication sources were given an expectation of the response (positive or negative) they might receive from a group of listeners. As they delivered persuasive messages, they were administered positive or negative nonverbal response by a trained audience. The source...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of communication 1972-09, Vol.22 (3), p.289
1. Verfasser: Gardiner, James C
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 289
container_title Journal of communication
container_volume 22
creator Gardiner, James C
description In a 2 X 2 experimental design, communication sources were given an expectation of the response (positive or negative) they might receive from a group of listeners. As they delivered persuasive messages, they were administered positive or negative nonverbal response by a trained audience. The sources' attitudes toward their own performances and toward the receivers were measured. As predicted, sources who expected positive response but received negative response apparently restored balance by devaluing their performances, while sources who expected negative response but received positive response apparently restored balance by evaluating the receivers favorably. Cognitive balance theory was generally successful in predicting attitudes of communication sources in a setting where receiver response was manipulated.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194654326</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>608473491</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_1946543263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNi8EKwjAQRIMoWKv_sHgvJG0M9ChSEbyI9l5Ku8EWSWo3FT_fRfwAT_OGNzMTkdJGJqk2Zi4iKVOV5LkyS7Ei6iX3TMlInMs7QmEtNoHAWyjeAyO2ULsWLjg22L24XfELIwMN3hGCd3DzE3vYh9CFqUVai4WtH4SbX8ZieyzKwykZRv-ckELV88OxqlSuzU5nqcn-Gn0AL-s9aA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194654326</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effects of Expected and Perceived Receiver Response on Source Attitudes: Abstract</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Gardiner, James C</creator><creatorcontrib>Gardiner, James C</creatorcontrib><description>In a 2 X 2 experimental design, communication sources were given an expectation of the response (positive or negative) they might receive from a group of listeners. As they delivered persuasive messages, they were administered positive or negative nonverbal response by a trained audience. The sources' attitudes toward their own performances and toward the receivers were measured. As predicted, sources who expected positive response but received negative response apparently restored balance by devaluing their performances, while sources who expected negative response but received positive response apparently restored balance by evaluating the receivers favorably. Cognitive balance theory was generally successful in predicting attitudes of communication sources in a setting where receiver response was manipulated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1460-2466</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCMNAA</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Audiences ; Communication ; Eye contact ; Hypotheses ; Roles ; Speaking</subject><ispartof>Journal of communication, 1972-09, Vol.22 (3), p.289</ispartof><rights>Copyright Oxford University Press(England) Sep 1972</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gardiner, James C</creatorcontrib><title>The Effects of Expected and Perceived Receiver Response on Source Attitudes: Abstract</title><title>Journal of communication</title><description>In a 2 X 2 experimental design, communication sources were given an expectation of the response (positive or negative) they might receive from a group of listeners. As they delivered persuasive messages, they were administered positive or negative nonverbal response by a trained audience. The sources' attitudes toward their own performances and toward the receivers were measured. As predicted, sources who expected positive response but received negative response apparently restored balance by devaluing their performances, while sources who expected negative response but received positive response apparently restored balance by evaluating the receivers favorably. Cognitive balance theory was generally successful in predicting attitudes of communication sources in a setting where receiver response was manipulated.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Eye contact</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Roles</subject><subject>Speaking</subject><issn>0021-9916</issn><issn>1460-2466</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1972</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqNi8EKwjAQRIMoWKv_sHgvJG0M9ChSEbyI9l5Ku8EWSWo3FT_fRfwAT_OGNzMTkdJGJqk2Zi4iKVOV5LkyS7Ei6iX3TMlInMs7QmEtNoHAWyjeAyO2ULsWLjg22L24XfELIwMN3hGCd3DzE3vYh9CFqUVai4WtH4SbX8ZieyzKwykZRv-ckELV88OxqlSuzU5nqcn-Gn0AL-s9aA</recordid><startdate>19720901</startdate><enddate>19720901</enddate><creator>Gardiner, James C</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>19720901</creationdate><title>The Effects of Expected and Perceived Receiver Response on Source Attitudes</title><author>Gardiner, James C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_1946543263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1972</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Eye contact</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Roles</topic><topic>Speaking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gardiner, James C</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Journal of communication</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gardiner, James C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effects of Expected and Perceived Receiver Response on Source Attitudes: Abstract</atitle><jtitle>Journal of communication</jtitle><date>1972-09-01</date><risdate>1972</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>289</spage><pages>289-</pages><issn>0021-9916</issn><eissn>1460-2466</eissn><coden>JCMNAA</coden><abstract>In a 2 X 2 experimental design, communication sources were given an expectation of the response (positive or negative) they might receive from a group of listeners. As they delivered persuasive messages, they were administered positive or negative nonverbal response by a trained audience. The sources' attitudes toward their own performances and toward the receivers were measured. As predicted, sources who expected positive response but received negative response apparently restored balance by devaluing their performances, while sources who expected negative response but received positive response apparently restored balance by evaluating the receivers favorably. Cognitive balance theory was generally successful in predicting attitudes of communication sources in a setting where receiver response was manipulated.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9916
ispartof Journal of communication, 1972-09, Vol.22 (3), p.289
issn 0021-9916
1460-2466
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_194654326
source Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Attitudes
Audiences
Communication
Eye contact
Hypotheses
Roles
Speaking
title The Effects of Expected and Perceived Receiver Response on Source Attitudes: Abstract
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T22%3A55%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effects%20of%20Expected%20and%20Perceived%20Receiver%20Response%20on%20Source%20Attitudes:%20Abstract&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20communication&rft.au=Gardiner,%20James%20C&rft.date=1972-09-01&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=289&rft.pages=289-&rft.issn=0021-9916&rft.eissn=1460-2466&rft.coden=JCMNAA&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E608473491%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194654326&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true