Uranium from seawater – Infinite resource or improbable aspiration?
The availability of uranium drives the future of the nuclear energy industry; an upper limit on uranium prices will determine whether it is economically viable to continue utilising the present generation of light water reactors (LWRs). The alternative is a move towards fast reactors, which use less...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Progress in nuclear energy (New series) 2017-08, Vol.99, p.81-85 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 85 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 81 |
container_title | Progress in nuclear energy (New series) |
container_volume | 99 |
creator | Dungan, K. Butler, G. Livens, F.R. Warren, L.M. |
description | The availability of uranium drives the future of the nuclear energy industry; an upper limit on uranium prices will determine whether it is economically viable to continue utilising the present generation of light water reactors (LWRs). The alternative is a move towards fast reactors, which use less uranium than LWRs, however require substantial investment and development, and might never become economically viable unless uranium prices rise considerably. While terrestrial uranium resources are seen to be limited, there are approximately 4 billion tonnes of uranium in seawater and although uranium only exists at concentrations of around 3.3 ppb, selective extraction has been achieved. Even though several thorough cost estimates of the extraction process have been undertaken, the practicality of the process and the scale on which it would need to be deployed to sustain the nuclear industry is still questionable. This review aims to examine some of the limitations of the current favourite amidoxime braid system, as well as examining possible interactions with existing legal frameworks which have been put in place; in particular those protecting the marine environment. The potential for uranium extraction from seawater is clearly vast, together with the consequences for nuclear technology choices - but the implications of deploying the technology on such a large scale must be considered.
[Display omitted]
•A discussion of the effects of uranium from seawater on nuclear systems choices.•The requirements necessary to supply the global nuclear energy sector are studied.•Potential flaws have been examined, including legal frameworks within maritime law.•Considerations include feasibility and the environmental implications of deployment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.04.016 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1946431305</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0149197017300914</els_id><sourcerecordid>1946431305</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-7eb5666fdf4e567307560206565051163e5a764841e753c268f95df37930f3fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUM1KAzEYDKJgrT6CEPC8a7L52z0VKVULBS_2HNLsF8jSza7JVvHmO_iGPokp9e7pg2FmvplB6JaSkhIq77tyDAcLAcqKUFUSXmb0DM1oreqCVxU_RzNCeVPQRpFLdJVSRzKRCjFDq200wR967OLQ4wTmw0wQ8c_XN14H54OfAEdIwyFawEPEvh_jsDO7PWCTRh_N5IewuEYXzuwT3PzdOdo-rl6Xz8Xm5Wm9fNgUljE1FQp2QkrpWsdBSMWIEpJURAopiKBUMhBGSV5zCkowW8naNaJ1TDWMOOYMm6O7k28O8XaANOkuJwv5paYNl5xRRkRmiRPLxiGlCE6P0fcmfmpK9HEx3em_xfRxMU24zmjWLU46yBXePUSdrIdgofUR7KTbwf_j8AvxUXaI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1946431305</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Uranium from seawater – Infinite resource or improbable aspiration?</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Dungan, K. ; Butler, G. ; Livens, F.R. ; Warren, L.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dungan, K. ; Butler, G. ; Livens, F.R. ; Warren, L.M.</creatorcontrib><description>The availability of uranium drives the future of the nuclear energy industry; an upper limit on uranium prices will determine whether it is economically viable to continue utilising the present generation of light water reactors (LWRs). The alternative is a move towards fast reactors, which use less uranium than LWRs, however require substantial investment and development, and might never become economically viable unless uranium prices rise considerably. While terrestrial uranium resources are seen to be limited, there are approximately 4 billion tonnes of uranium in seawater and although uranium only exists at concentrations of around 3.3 ppb, selective extraction has been achieved. Even though several thorough cost estimates of the extraction process have been undertaken, the practicality of the process and the scale on which it would need to be deployed to sustain the nuclear industry is still questionable. This review aims to examine some of the limitations of the current favourite amidoxime braid system, as well as examining possible interactions with existing legal frameworks which have been put in place; in particular those protecting the marine environment. The potential for uranium extraction from seawater is clearly vast, together with the consequences for nuclear technology choices - but the implications of deploying the technology on such a large scale must be considered.
[Display omitted]
•A discussion of the effects of uranium from seawater on nuclear systems choices.•The requirements necessary to supply the global nuclear energy sector are studied.•Potential flaws have been examined, including legal frameworks within maritime law.•Considerations include feasibility and the environmental implications of deployment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-1970</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1878-4224</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.04.016</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Amidoxime ; Braiding ; Cost estimates ; Environment ; Extraction ; Fast nuclear reactors ; Light water ; Light water reactors ; Marine environment ; Nuclear ; Nuclear electric power generation ; Nuclear energy ; Nuclear engineering ; Nuclear reactors ; Seawater ; Uranium</subject><ispartof>Progress in nuclear energy (New series), 2017-08, Vol.99, p.81-85</ispartof><rights>2017 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Aug 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-7eb5666fdf4e567307560206565051163e5a764841e753c268f95df37930f3fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-7eb5666fdf4e567307560206565051163e5a764841e753c268f95df37930f3fa3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6037-7238 ; 0000-0002-9197-4630</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.04.016$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dungan, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livens, F.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, L.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Uranium from seawater – Infinite resource or improbable aspiration?</title><title>Progress in nuclear energy (New series)</title><description>The availability of uranium drives the future of the nuclear energy industry; an upper limit on uranium prices will determine whether it is economically viable to continue utilising the present generation of light water reactors (LWRs). The alternative is a move towards fast reactors, which use less uranium than LWRs, however require substantial investment and development, and might never become economically viable unless uranium prices rise considerably. While terrestrial uranium resources are seen to be limited, there are approximately 4 billion tonnes of uranium in seawater and although uranium only exists at concentrations of around 3.3 ppb, selective extraction has been achieved. Even though several thorough cost estimates of the extraction process have been undertaken, the practicality of the process and the scale on which it would need to be deployed to sustain the nuclear industry is still questionable. This review aims to examine some of the limitations of the current favourite amidoxime braid system, as well as examining possible interactions with existing legal frameworks which have been put in place; in particular those protecting the marine environment. The potential for uranium extraction from seawater is clearly vast, together with the consequences for nuclear technology choices - but the implications of deploying the technology on such a large scale must be considered.
[Display omitted]
•A discussion of the effects of uranium from seawater on nuclear systems choices.•The requirements necessary to supply the global nuclear energy sector are studied.•Potential flaws have been examined, including legal frameworks within maritime law.•Considerations include feasibility and the environmental implications of deployment.</description><subject>Amidoxime</subject><subject>Braiding</subject><subject>Cost estimates</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Extraction</subject><subject>Fast nuclear reactors</subject><subject>Light water</subject><subject>Light water reactors</subject><subject>Marine environment</subject><subject>Nuclear</subject><subject>Nuclear electric power generation</subject><subject>Nuclear energy</subject><subject>Nuclear engineering</subject><subject>Nuclear reactors</subject><subject>Seawater</subject><subject>Uranium</subject><issn>0149-1970</issn><issn>1878-4224</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUM1KAzEYDKJgrT6CEPC8a7L52z0VKVULBS_2HNLsF8jSza7JVvHmO_iGPokp9e7pg2FmvplB6JaSkhIq77tyDAcLAcqKUFUSXmb0DM1oreqCVxU_RzNCeVPQRpFLdJVSRzKRCjFDq200wR967OLQ4wTmw0wQ8c_XN14H54OfAEdIwyFawEPEvh_jsDO7PWCTRh_N5IewuEYXzuwT3PzdOdo-rl6Xz8Xm5Wm9fNgUljE1FQp2QkrpWsdBSMWIEpJURAopiKBUMhBGSV5zCkowW8naNaJ1TDWMOOYMm6O7k28O8XaANOkuJwv5paYNl5xRRkRmiRPLxiGlCE6P0fcmfmpK9HEx3em_xfRxMU24zmjWLU46yBXePUSdrIdgofUR7KTbwf_j8AvxUXaI</recordid><startdate>201708</startdate><enddate>201708</enddate><creator>Dungan, K.</creator><creator>Butler, G.</creator><creator>Livens, F.R.</creator><creator>Warren, L.M.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6037-7238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9197-4630</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201708</creationdate><title>Uranium from seawater – Infinite resource or improbable aspiration?</title><author>Dungan, K. ; Butler, G. ; Livens, F.R. ; Warren, L.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-7eb5666fdf4e567307560206565051163e5a764841e753c268f95df37930f3fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Amidoxime</topic><topic>Braiding</topic><topic>Cost estimates</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Extraction</topic><topic>Fast nuclear reactors</topic><topic>Light water</topic><topic>Light water reactors</topic><topic>Marine environment</topic><topic>Nuclear</topic><topic>Nuclear electric power generation</topic><topic>Nuclear energy</topic><topic>Nuclear engineering</topic><topic>Nuclear reactors</topic><topic>Seawater</topic><topic>Uranium</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dungan, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Livens, F.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, L.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Progress in nuclear energy (New series)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dungan, K.</au><au>Butler, G.</au><au>Livens, F.R.</au><au>Warren, L.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Uranium from seawater – Infinite resource or improbable aspiration?</atitle><jtitle>Progress in nuclear energy (New series)</jtitle><date>2017-08</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>99</volume><spage>81</spage><epage>85</epage><pages>81-85</pages><issn>0149-1970</issn><eissn>1878-4224</eissn><abstract>The availability of uranium drives the future of the nuclear energy industry; an upper limit on uranium prices will determine whether it is economically viable to continue utilising the present generation of light water reactors (LWRs). The alternative is a move towards fast reactors, which use less uranium than LWRs, however require substantial investment and development, and might never become economically viable unless uranium prices rise considerably. While terrestrial uranium resources are seen to be limited, there are approximately 4 billion tonnes of uranium in seawater and although uranium only exists at concentrations of around 3.3 ppb, selective extraction has been achieved. Even though several thorough cost estimates of the extraction process have been undertaken, the practicality of the process and the scale on which it would need to be deployed to sustain the nuclear industry is still questionable. This review aims to examine some of the limitations of the current favourite amidoxime braid system, as well as examining possible interactions with existing legal frameworks which have been put in place; in particular those protecting the marine environment. The potential for uranium extraction from seawater is clearly vast, together with the consequences for nuclear technology choices - but the implications of deploying the technology on such a large scale must be considered.
[Display omitted]
•A discussion of the effects of uranium from seawater on nuclear systems choices.•The requirements necessary to supply the global nuclear energy sector are studied.•Potential flaws have been examined, including legal frameworks within maritime law.•Considerations include feasibility and the environmental implications of deployment.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.04.016</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6037-7238</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9197-4630</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0149-1970 |
ispartof | Progress in nuclear energy (New series), 2017-08, Vol.99, p.81-85 |
issn | 0149-1970 1878-4224 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1946431305 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Amidoxime Braiding Cost estimates Environment Extraction Fast nuclear reactors Light water Light water reactors Marine environment Nuclear Nuclear electric power generation Nuclear energy Nuclear engineering Nuclear reactors Seawater Uranium |
title | Uranium from seawater – Infinite resource or improbable aspiration? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T15%3A09%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Uranium%20from%20seawater%20%E2%80%93%20Infinite%20resource%20or%20improbable%20aspiration?&rft.jtitle=Progress%20in%20nuclear%20energy%20(New%20series)&rft.au=Dungan,%20K.&rft.date=2017-08&rft.volume=99&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=85&rft.pages=81-85&rft.issn=0149-1970&rft.eissn=1878-4224&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.pnucene.2017.04.016&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1946431305%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1946431305&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0149197017300914&rfr_iscdi=true |