Many NHS centres offering self funded in vitro fertilisation are poor performers
Like primary care trusts before them, many clinical commissioning groups are ignoring the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2004 and 2013 guidance on providing three NHS funded IVF cycles. 1 Couples are left to dig deep, paying thousands of pounds for NICE recommended treatmen...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMJ (Online) 2013-08, Vol.347 (aug09 2), p.f5028-f5028 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | f5028 |
---|---|
container_issue | aug09 2 |
container_start_page | f5028 |
container_title | BMJ (Online) |
container_volume | 347 |
creator | Al-Shawaf, Talha Sabatini, Luca Rawaf, Salman |
description | Like primary care trusts before them, many clinical commissioning groups are ignoring the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2004 and 2013 guidance on providing three NHS funded IVF cycles. 1 Couples are left to dig deep, paying thousands of pounds for NICE recommended treatments to centres that perhaps have failed them before. The findings of the BMJ investigation are worrying because self funded or top-up care is offered to couples even by hospital trusts who are not fully licensed by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/bmj.f5028 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1945840103</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1945840103</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1293-bcbf1e10c385041659edc9613082e650ee3141c1a12c2569201859d0192003173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCpbqwX8Q0IuHrZnNZjc5yqJWaKtg1WPYj4mktps12Yr9925d8eZpBubhHXgJOQM2AeDpVblZTYxgsTwgI8hEGoHk_JCMmBIqksDlMTkNYcUYi3kmVSpG5HFeNDu6mD7RCpvOY6DOGPS2eaMB14aabVNjTW1DP23nHe1vnV3bUHTWNbTwSFvnPG3RG-c36MMJOTLFOuDp7xyT59ubZT6NZg939_n1LCohVjwqq9IAAqu4FCyBVCisK5UCZzLGVDBEDglUUEBcxSJVMQMpVM2g3xiHjI_J-ZDbevexxdDpldv6pn-pQSVCJgwY79XloCrvQvBodOvtpvA7DUzvO9N9Z_qns95Gg7Whw68_WPh3nWY8E3rxkut5Ipd8noN-7f3F4PcR_8d-AyI_d7Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1945840103</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Many NHS centres offering self funded in vitro fertilisation are poor performers</title><source>BMJ Journals Online Archive</source><source>JSTOR</source><creator>Al-Shawaf, Talha ; Sabatini, Luca ; Rawaf, Salman</creator><creatorcontrib>Al-Shawaf, Talha ; Sabatini, Luca ; Rawaf, Salman</creatorcontrib><description>Like primary care trusts before them, many clinical commissioning groups are ignoring the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2004 and 2013 guidance on providing three NHS funded IVF cycles. 1 Couples are left to dig deep, paying thousands of pounds for NICE recommended treatments to centres that perhaps have failed them before. The findings of the BMJ investigation are worrying because self funded or top-up care is offered to couples even by hospital trusts who are not fully licensed by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0959-8138</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1833</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f5028</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: British Medical Journal Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Fertilization ; In vitro fertilization</subject><ispartof>BMJ (Online), 2013-08, Vol.347 (aug09 2), p.f5028-f5028</ispartof><rights>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2013</rights><rights>Copyright: 2013 © BMJ Publishing Group Ltd 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/347/bmj.f5028.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://bmj.com/content/347/bmj.f5028.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>114,115,314,780,784,3196,23571,27924,27925,77600,77631</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Al-Shawaf, Talha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabatini, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawaf, Salman</creatorcontrib><title>Many NHS centres offering self funded in vitro fertilisation are poor performers</title><title>BMJ (Online)</title><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><description>Like primary care trusts before them, many clinical commissioning groups are ignoring the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2004 and 2013 guidance on providing three NHS funded IVF cycles. 1 Couples are left to dig deep, paying thousands of pounds for NICE recommended treatments to centres that perhaps have failed them before. The findings of the BMJ investigation are worrying because self funded or top-up care is offered to couples even by hospital trusts who are not fully licensed by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA).</description><subject>Fertilization</subject><subject>In vitro fertilization</subject><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp10E1LAzEQBuAgCpbqwX8Q0IuHrZnNZjc5yqJWaKtg1WPYj4mktps12Yr9925d8eZpBubhHXgJOQM2AeDpVblZTYxgsTwgI8hEGoHk_JCMmBIqksDlMTkNYcUYi3kmVSpG5HFeNDu6mD7RCpvOY6DOGPS2eaMB14aabVNjTW1DP23nHe1vnV3bUHTWNbTwSFvnPG3RG-c36MMJOTLFOuDp7xyT59ubZT6NZg939_n1LCohVjwqq9IAAqu4FCyBVCisK5UCZzLGVDBEDglUUEBcxSJVMQMpVM2g3xiHjI_J-ZDbevexxdDpldv6pn-pQSVCJgwY79XloCrvQvBodOvtpvA7DUzvO9N9Z_qns95Gg7Whw68_WPh3nWY8E3rxkut5Ipd8noN-7f3F4PcR_8d-AyI_d7Y</recordid><startdate>20130809</startdate><enddate>20130809</enddate><creator>Al-Shawaf, Talha</creator><creator>Sabatini, Luca</creator><creator>Rawaf, Salman</creator><general>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130809</creationdate><title>Many NHS centres offering self funded in vitro fertilisation are poor performers</title><author>Al-Shawaf, Talha ; Sabatini, Luca ; Rawaf, Salman</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1293-bcbf1e10c385041659edc9613082e650ee3141c1a12c2569201859d0192003173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Fertilization</topic><topic>In vitro fertilization</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Al-Shawaf, Talha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabatini, Luca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rawaf, Salman</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest - Health & Medical Complete保健、医学与药学数据库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>BMJ (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Al-Shawaf, Talha</au><au>Sabatini, Luca</au><au>Rawaf, Salman</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Many NHS centres offering self funded in vitro fertilisation are poor performers</atitle><jtitle>BMJ (Online)</jtitle><addtitle>BMJ</addtitle><date>2013-08-09</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>347</volume><issue>aug09 2</issue><spage>f5028</spage><epage>f5028</epage><pages>f5028-f5028</pages><issn>0959-8138</issn><issn>1756-1833</issn><eissn>1756-1833</eissn><abstract>Like primary care trusts before them, many clinical commissioning groups are ignoring the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2004 and 2013 guidance on providing three NHS funded IVF cycles. 1 Couples are left to dig deep, paying thousands of pounds for NICE recommended treatments to centres that perhaps have failed them before. The findings of the BMJ investigation are worrying because self funded or top-up care is offered to couples even by hospital trusts who are not fully licensed by the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA).</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</pub><doi>10.1136/bmj.f5028</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0959-8138 |
ispartof | BMJ (Online), 2013-08, Vol.347 (aug09 2), p.f5028-f5028 |
issn | 0959-8138 1756-1833 1756-1833 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1945840103 |
source | BMJ Journals Online Archive; JSTOR |
subjects | Fertilization In vitro fertilization |
title | Many NHS centres offering self funded in vitro fertilisation are poor performers |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T10%3A18%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Many%20NHS%20centres%20offering%20self%20funded%20in%20vitro%20fertilisation%20are%20poor%20performers&rft.jtitle=BMJ%20(Online)&rft.au=Al-Shawaf,%20Talha&rft.date=2013-08-09&rft.volume=347&rft.issue=aug09%202&rft.spage=f5028&rft.epage=f5028&rft.pages=f5028-f5028&rft.issn=0959-8138&rft.eissn=1756-1833&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/bmj.f5028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1945840103%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1945840103&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |