Late Pleistocene proboscidean population dynamics in the North American Midcontinent

Understanding megafaunal population dynamics is critical to testing and refining scenarios of how extinctions occurred during the terminal Pleistocene. Large‐scale, collections‐based, chronological and taphonomic analyses of midwestern Proboscidea suggest divergent population histories in mammoths a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Boreas 2017-10, Vol.46 (4), p.772-782
Hauptverfasser: Widga, Chris, Lengyel, Stacey N., Saunders, Jeffrey, Hodgins, Gregory, Walker, J. Douglas,  Wanamaker, Alan D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 782
container_issue 4
container_start_page 772
container_title Boreas
container_volume 46
creator Widga, Chris
Lengyel, Stacey N.
Saunders, Jeffrey
Hodgins, Gregory
Walker, J. Douglas
 Wanamaker, Alan D.
description Understanding megafaunal population dynamics is critical to testing and refining scenarios of how extinctions occurred during the terminal Pleistocene. Large‐scale, collections‐based, chronological and taphonomic analyses of midwestern Proboscidea suggest divergent population histories in mammoths and mastodons after the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). Although extinction of both taxa occurred in the very late Bølling‐Allerød (B‐A) or early Younger Dryas (YD), Mammuthus is dominant during the LGM with a decreasing presence in the region until extirpation. Mammut americanum however, is absent during the LGM but becomes the dominant taxon during the subsequent B‐A. Trace and physical evidence of large carnivores in post‐LGM proboscidean assemblages is extremely rare, suggesting apex predators had minimal impact on mammoth and mastodon populations at this time. The ultimate mechanism(s) of extinction remain unclear; however, the wide geographical distribution of late Mammut and an increase in the frequency of multi‐animal death assemblages is consistent with a large, destabilized population experiencing periodic boom‐bust cycling at the end of the B‐A. We suggest this pattern is due to the collapse of trophic controls on proboscidean populations prior to the LGM and a subsequent system‐wide shift from top‐down to bottom‐up regulatory mechanisms in Proboscidea.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/bor.12235
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_24P</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1945722596</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1945722596</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3555-db71d551ed5d0b7fa31ae9ba6be72e8032f025479ad0e3ee5ea6ad858dcfe76f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MlOwzAQBmALgUQpHHgDS5w4pPUSZzmWik0qFKFytpx4orpK7WC7Qn17DOHKXObyzaIfoWtKZjTVvHF-Rhnj4gRNqCAs41UlTtGEcEKyOq_4OboIYUcIyTnJJ2izUhHwWw8mRNeCBTx417jQGg3K4sENh15F4yzWR6v2pg3YWBy3gF-dj1u82IM3bZIvRrfORmPBxkt01qk-wNVfn6KPh_vN8ilbrR-fl4tVprgQItNNSbUQFLTQpCk7xamCulFFAyWDinDWESbyslaaAAcQoAqlK1HptoOy6PgU3Yx708-fBwhR7tzB23RS0joXJWOiLpK6HVXrXQgeOjl4s1f-KCmRP6HJFJr8DS3Z-Wi_TA_H_6G8W7-PE9-OqG-I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1945722596</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Late Pleistocene proboscidean population dynamics in the North American Midcontinent</title><source>Wiley Online Library Open Access</source><creator>Widga, Chris ; Lengyel, Stacey N. ; Saunders, Jeffrey ; Hodgins, Gregory ; Walker, J. Douglas ;  Wanamaker, Alan D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Widga, Chris ; Lengyel, Stacey N. ; Saunders, Jeffrey ; Hodgins, Gregory ; Walker, J. Douglas ;  Wanamaker, Alan D.</creatorcontrib><description>Understanding megafaunal population dynamics is critical to testing and refining scenarios of how extinctions occurred during the terminal Pleistocene. Large‐scale, collections‐based, chronological and taphonomic analyses of midwestern Proboscidea suggest divergent population histories in mammoths and mastodons after the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). Although extinction of both taxa occurred in the very late Bølling‐Allerød (B‐A) or early Younger Dryas (YD), Mammuthus is dominant during the LGM with a decreasing presence in the region until extirpation. Mammut americanum however, is absent during the LGM but becomes the dominant taxon during the subsequent B‐A. Trace and physical evidence of large carnivores in post‐LGM proboscidean assemblages is extremely rare, suggesting apex predators had minimal impact on mammoth and mastodon populations at this time. The ultimate mechanism(s) of extinction remain unclear; however, the wide geographical distribution of late Mammut and an increase in the frequency of multi‐animal death assemblages is consistent with a large, destabilized population experiencing periodic boom‐bust cycling at the end of the B‐A. We suggest this pattern is due to the collapse of trophic controls on proboscidean populations prior to the LGM and a subsequent system‐wide shift from top‐down to bottom‐up regulatory mechanisms in Proboscidea.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-9483</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1502-3885</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/bor.12235</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Aarhus: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Carnivores ; Economic conditions ; Extinct species ; Extinction ; Geographical distribution ; Glacial periods ; Last Glacial Maximum ; Mammoths ; Pleistocene ; Population ; Population dynamics ; Populations ; Predators ; Proboscidea ; Regulatory mechanisms (biology) ; Species extinction ; Taphonomy ; Taxa ; Younger Dryas</subject><ispartof>Boreas, 2017-10, Vol.46 (4), p.772-782</ispartof><rights>2017 Collegium Boreas. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Boreas © 2017 Collegium Boreas</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3555-db71d551ed5d0b7fa31ae9ba6be72e8032f025479ad0e3ee5ea6ad858dcfe76f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3555-db71d551ed5d0b7fa31ae9ba6be72e8032f025479ad0e3ee5ea6ad858dcfe76f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fbor.12235$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fbor.12235$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,11541,27901,27902,45550,45551,46027,46451</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111%2Fbor.12235$$EView_record_in_Wiley-Blackwell$$FView_record_in_$$GWiley-Blackwell</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Widga, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lengyel, Stacey N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgins, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, J. Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib> Wanamaker, Alan D.</creatorcontrib><title>Late Pleistocene proboscidean population dynamics in the North American Midcontinent</title><title>Boreas</title><description>Understanding megafaunal population dynamics is critical to testing and refining scenarios of how extinctions occurred during the terminal Pleistocene. Large‐scale, collections‐based, chronological and taphonomic analyses of midwestern Proboscidea suggest divergent population histories in mammoths and mastodons after the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). Although extinction of both taxa occurred in the very late Bølling‐Allerød (B‐A) or early Younger Dryas (YD), Mammuthus is dominant during the LGM with a decreasing presence in the region until extirpation. Mammut americanum however, is absent during the LGM but becomes the dominant taxon during the subsequent B‐A. Trace and physical evidence of large carnivores in post‐LGM proboscidean assemblages is extremely rare, suggesting apex predators had minimal impact on mammoth and mastodon populations at this time. The ultimate mechanism(s) of extinction remain unclear; however, the wide geographical distribution of late Mammut and an increase in the frequency of multi‐animal death assemblages is consistent with a large, destabilized population experiencing periodic boom‐bust cycling at the end of the B‐A. We suggest this pattern is due to the collapse of trophic controls on proboscidean populations prior to the LGM and a subsequent system‐wide shift from top‐down to bottom‐up regulatory mechanisms in Proboscidea.</description><subject>Carnivores</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Extinct species</subject><subject>Extinction</subject><subject>Geographical distribution</subject><subject>Glacial periods</subject><subject>Last Glacial Maximum</subject><subject>Mammoths</subject><subject>Pleistocene</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Population dynamics</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>Proboscidea</subject><subject>Regulatory mechanisms (biology)</subject><subject>Species extinction</subject><subject>Taphonomy</subject><subject>Taxa</subject><subject>Younger Dryas</subject><issn>0300-9483</issn><issn>1502-3885</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10MlOwzAQBmALgUQpHHgDS5w4pPUSZzmWik0qFKFytpx4orpK7WC7Qn17DOHKXObyzaIfoWtKZjTVvHF-Rhnj4gRNqCAs41UlTtGEcEKyOq_4OboIYUcIyTnJJ2izUhHwWw8mRNeCBTx417jQGg3K4sENh15F4yzWR6v2pg3YWBy3gF-dj1u82IM3bZIvRrfORmPBxkt01qk-wNVfn6KPh_vN8ilbrR-fl4tVprgQItNNSbUQFLTQpCk7xamCulFFAyWDinDWESbyslaaAAcQoAqlK1HptoOy6PgU3Yx708-fBwhR7tzB23RS0joXJWOiLpK6HVXrXQgeOjl4s1f-KCmRP6HJFJr8DS3Z-Wi_TA_H_6G8W7-PE9-OqG-I</recordid><startdate>201710</startdate><enddate>201710</enddate><creator>Widga, Chris</creator><creator>Lengyel, Stacey N.</creator><creator>Saunders, Jeffrey</creator><creator>Hodgins, Gregory</creator><creator>Walker, J. Douglas</creator><creator> Wanamaker, Alan D.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201710</creationdate><title>Late Pleistocene proboscidean population dynamics in the North American Midcontinent</title><author>Widga, Chris ; Lengyel, Stacey N. ; Saunders, Jeffrey ; Hodgins, Gregory ; Walker, J. Douglas ;  Wanamaker, Alan D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3555-db71d551ed5d0b7fa31ae9ba6be72e8032f025479ad0e3ee5ea6ad858dcfe76f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Carnivores</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Extinct species</topic><topic>Extinction</topic><topic>Geographical distribution</topic><topic>Glacial periods</topic><topic>Last Glacial Maximum</topic><topic>Mammoths</topic><topic>Pleistocene</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Population dynamics</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>Proboscidea</topic><topic>Regulatory mechanisms (biology)</topic><topic>Species extinction</topic><topic>Taphonomy</topic><topic>Taxa</topic><topic>Younger Dryas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Widga, Chris</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lengyel, Stacey N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Saunders, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodgins, Gregory</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, J. Douglas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib> Wanamaker, Alan D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Boreas</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Widga, Chris</au><au>Lengyel, Stacey N.</au><au>Saunders, Jeffrey</au><au>Hodgins, Gregory</au><au>Walker, J. Douglas</au><au> Wanamaker, Alan D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Late Pleistocene proboscidean population dynamics in the North American Midcontinent</atitle><jtitle>Boreas</jtitle><date>2017-10</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>46</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>772</spage><epage>782</epage><pages>772-782</pages><issn>0300-9483</issn><eissn>1502-3885</eissn><abstract>Understanding megafaunal population dynamics is critical to testing and refining scenarios of how extinctions occurred during the terminal Pleistocene. Large‐scale, collections‐based, chronological and taphonomic analyses of midwestern Proboscidea suggest divergent population histories in mammoths and mastodons after the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM). Although extinction of both taxa occurred in the very late Bølling‐Allerød (B‐A) or early Younger Dryas (YD), Mammuthus is dominant during the LGM with a decreasing presence in the region until extirpation. Mammut americanum however, is absent during the LGM but becomes the dominant taxon during the subsequent B‐A. Trace and physical evidence of large carnivores in post‐LGM proboscidean assemblages is extremely rare, suggesting apex predators had minimal impact on mammoth and mastodon populations at this time. The ultimate mechanism(s) of extinction remain unclear; however, the wide geographical distribution of late Mammut and an increase in the frequency of multi‐animal death assemblages is consistent with a large, destabilized population experiencing periodic boom‐bust cycling at the end of the B‐A. We suggest this pattern is due to the collapse of trophic controls on proboscidean populations prior to the LGM and a subsequent system‐wide shift from top‐down to bottom‐up regulatory mechanisms in Proboscidea.</abstract><cop>Aarhus</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/bor.12235</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0300-9483
ispartof Boreas, 2017-10, Vol.46 (4), p.772-782
issn 0300-9483
1502-3885
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1945722596
source Wiley Online Library Open Access
subjects Carnivores
Economic conditions
Extinct species
Extinction
Geographical distribution
Glacial periods
Last Glacial Maximum
Mammoths
Pleistocene
Population
Population dynamics
Populations
Predators
Proboscidea
Regulatory mechanisms (biology)
Species extinction
Taphonomy
Taxa
Younger Dryas
title Late Pleistocene proboscidean population dynamics in the North American Midcontinent
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T16%3A33%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_24P&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Late%20Pleistocene%20proboscidean%20population%20dynamics%20in%20the%20North%20American%20Midcontinent&rft.jtitle=Boreas&rft.au=Widga,%20Chris&rft.date=2017-10&rft.volume=46&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=772&rft.epage=782&rft.pages=772-782&rft.issn=0300-9483&rft.eissn=1502-3885&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/bor.12235&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_24P%3E1945722596%3C/proquest_24P%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1945722596&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true