Canopy Gas Exchange Measurements of Cotton in an Open System
A portable, open transparent chamber system for measuring canopy gas exchanges was developed and tested. Differentials between incoming and outgoing atmospheric H2O and CO2 concentrations were used to calculate canopy transpiration (E) and net assimilation (A) at 10‐s intervals using solenoid valve...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Agronomy journal 2009-01, Vol.101 (1), p.52-59 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 59 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 52 |
container_title | Agronomy journal |
container_volume | 101 |
creator | Baker, Jeffrey T. Van Pelt, Scott Gitz, Dennis C. Payton, Paxton Lascano, Robert Joseph McMichael, Bobbie |
description | A portable, open transparent chamber system for measuring canopy gas exchanges was developed and tested. Differentials between incoming and outgoing atmospheric H2O and CO2 concentrations were used to calculate canopy transpiration (E) and net assimilation (A) at 10‐s intervals using solenoid valve actuated sample lines connected to an infrared gas analyzer. A programmable data logger controlled fan speed and air flow rate to control daytime chamber air temperature to within 0.5°C of ambient air temperature. To validate the mass balance equations used to calculate E, the chamber was positioned over sealed soil potted cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants which were placed on a weighing scale. A second scale was used to measure E of cotton plants outside the chamber to quantify potential chamber effects. A wide range of crop canopy leaf areas and soil water contents were created with greenhouse‐grown plants for these comparisons. Data analysis indicated agreement between chamber E measurements and the internal weighing scale (R2 = 0.93), as well as comparison between the internal and external scales (R2 = 0.88) across wide ranges of soil water contents and canopy leaf area. Transpiration ranged from near zero at night to 900 g (H2O) h−1 during the day. Bias estimates of E for chamber vs. internal scale and the internal vs. external scale were −6.0 and 4.6 g (H2O) h−1. With minor chamber effect, the chamber accurately estimates E for many field applications such as comparison of canopy gas exchanges and water use efficiencies among irrigation treatments. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2134/agronj2008.0007x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194553208</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1855346161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392X-d684c621da276f9d5d0c40918da252d3c543c24c22523d62cbeb2f458004e1ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHhfBY-rs7CZNwEsoGi3Vgh_QW9huNjWl3Y27KTb_vaktevQ0zI_33jCPkEsGA2Rc3MiFs2aJAPEAAIbbI9JjgocBRCI8Jr2OYcCSCE_JmfdLAMYSwXrkdiSNrVuaSU_vtupDmoWmT1r6jdNrbRpPbUlHtmmsoZWh0tBprQ19bX2j1-fkpJQrry8Os0_e7-_eRg_BZJo9jtJJoHiCs6CIYqEiZIXEYVQmRViAEpCwuAMhFlyFgisUCruNFxGquZ5jKcIYQGimC94nV_vc2tnPjfZNvrQbZ7qTefdFGHKEuBPBXqSc9d7pMq9dtZauzRnku4ryv4ryn4o6y_UhV3olV6WTRlX-14eM4RAROl26131VK93-m5un2RjT7GX6PN7BHZvxbyw_eh0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194553208</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Canopy Gas Exchange Measurements of Cotton in an Open System</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Baker, Jeffrey T. ; Van Pelt, Scott ; Gitz, Dennis C. ; Payton, Paxton ; Lascano, Robert Joseph ; McMichael, Bobbie</creator><creatorcontrib>Baker, Jeffrey T. ; Van Pelt, Scott ; Gitz, Dennis C. ; Payton, Paxton ; Lascano, Robert Joseph ; McMichael, Bobbie</creatorcontrib><description>A portable, open transparent chamber system for measuring canopy gas exchanges was developed and tested. Differentials between incoming and outgoing atmospheric H2O and CO2 concentrations were used to calculate canopy transpiration (E) and net assimilation (A) at 10‐s intervals using solenoid valve actuated sample lines connected to an infrared gas analyzer. A programmable data logger controlled fan speed and air flow rate to control daytime chamber air temperature to within 0.5°C of ambient air temperature. To validate the mass balance equations used to calculate E, the chamber was positioned over sealed soil potted cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants which were placed on a weighing scale. A second scale was used to measure E of cotton plants outside the chamber to quantify potential chamber effects. A wide range of crop canopy leaf areas and soil water contents were created with greenhouse‐grown plants for these comparisons. Data analysis indicated agreement between chamber E measurements and the internal weighing scale (R2 = 0.93), as well as comparison between the internal and external scales (R2 = 0.88) across wide ranges of soil water contents and canopy leaf area. Transpiration ranged from near zero at night to 900 g (H2O) h−1 during the day. Bias estimates of E for chamber vs. internal scale and the internal vs. external scale were −6.0 and 4.6 g (H2O) h−1. With minor chamber effect, the chamber accurately estimates E for many field applications such as comparison of canopy gas exchanges and water use efficiencies among irrigation treatments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj2008.0007x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGJOAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: American Society of Agronomy</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gas exchange</subject><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2009-01, Vol.101 (1), p.52-59</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Agronomy</rights><rights>2009 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jan/Feb 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392X-d684c621da276f9d5d0c40918da252d3c543c24c22523d62cbeb2f458004e1ed3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c392X-d684c621da276f9d5d0c40918da252d3c543c24c22523d62cbeb2f458004e1ed3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fagronj2008.0007x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fagronj2008.0007x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=21127220$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baker, Jeffrey T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Pelt, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gitz, Dennis C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payton, Paxton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lascano, Robert Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMichael, Bobbie</creatorcontrib><title>Canopy Gas Exchange Measurements of Cotton in an Open System</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>A portable, open transparent chamber system for measuring canopy gas exchanges was developed and tested. Differentials between incoming and outgoing atmospheric H2O and CO2 concentrations were used to calculate canopy transpiration (E) and net assimilation (A) at 10‐s intervals using solenoid valve actuated sample lines connected to an infrared gas analyzer. A programmable data logger controlled fan speed and air flow rate to control daytime chamber air temperature to within 0.5°C of ambient air temperature. To validate the mass balance equations used to calculate E, the chamber was positioned over sealed soil potted cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants which were placed on a weighing scale. A second scale was used to measure E of cotton plants outside the chamber to quantify potential chamber effects. A wide range of crop canopy leaf areas and soil water contents were created with greenhouse‐grown plants for these comparisons. Data analysis indicated agreement between chamber E measurements and the internal weighing scale (R2 = 0.93), as well as comparison between the internal and external scales (R2 = 0.88) across wide ranges of soil water contents and canopy leaf area. Transpiration ranged from near zero at night to 900 g (H2O) h−1 during the day. Bias estimates of E for chamber vs. internal scale and the internal vs. external scale were −6.0 and 4.6 g (H2O) h−1. With minor chamber effect, the chamber accurately estimates E for many field applications such as comparison of canopy gas exchanges and water use efficiencies among irrigation treatments.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gas exchange</subject><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbvHhfBY-rs7CZNwEsoGi3Vgh_QW9huNjWl3Y27KTb_vaktevQ0zI_33jCPkEsGA2Rc3MiFs2aJAPEAAIbbI9JjgocBRCI8Jr2OYcCSCE_JmfdLAMYSwXrkdiSNrVuaSU_vtupDmoWmT1r6jdNrbRpPbUlHtmmsoZWh0tBprQ19bX2j1-fkpJQrry8Os0_e7-_eRg_BZJo9jtJJoHiCs6CIYqEiZIXEYVQmRViAEpCwuAMhFlyFgisUCruNFxGquZ5jKcIYQGimC94nV_vc2tnPjfZNvrQbZ7qTefdFGHKEuBPBXqSc9d7pMq9dtZauzRnku4ryv4ryn4o6y_UhV3olV6WTRlX-14eM4RAROl26131VK93-m5un2RjT7GX6PN7BHZvxbyw_eh0</recordid><startdate>200901</startdate><enddate>200901</enddate><creator>Baker, Jeffrey T.</creator><creator>Van Pelt, Scott</creator><creator>Gitz, Dennis C.</creator><creator>Payton, Paxton</creator><creator>Lascano, Robert Joseph</creator><creator>McMichael, Bobbie</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200901</creationdate><title>Canopy Gas Exchange Measurements of Cotton in an Open System</title><author>Baker, Jeffrey T. ; Van Pelt, Scott ; Gitz, Dennis C. ; Payton, Paxton ; Lascano, Robert Joseph ; McMichael, Bobbie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c392X-d684c621da276f9d5d0c40918da252d3c543c24c22523d62cbeb2f458004e1ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gas exchange</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baker, Jeffrey T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Pelt, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gitz, Dennis C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payton, Paxton</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lascano, Robert Joseph</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMichael, Bobbie</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baker, Jeffrey T.</au><au>Van Pelt, Scott</au><au>Gitz, Dennis C.</au><au>Payton, Paxton</au><au>Lascano, Robert Joseph</au><au>McMichael, Bobbie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Canopy Gas Exchange Measurements of Cotton in an Open System</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2009-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>52</spage><epage>59</epage><pages>52-59</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><coden>AGJOAT</coden><abstract>A portable, open transparent chamber system for measuring canopy gas exchanges was developed and tested. Differentials between incoming and outgoing atmospheric H2O and CO2 concentrations were used to calculate canopy transpiration (E) and net assimilation (A) at 10‐s intervals using solenoid valve actuated sample lines connected to an infrared gas analyzer. A programmable data logger controlled fan speed and air flow rate to control daytime chamber air temperature to within 0.5°C of ambient air temperature. To validate the mass balance equations used to calculate E, the chamber was positioned over sealed soil potted cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants which were placed on a weighing scale. A second scale was used to measure E of cotton plants outside the chamber to quantify potential chamber effects. A wide range of crop canopy leaf areas and soil water contents were created with greenhouse‐grown plants for these comparisons. Data analysis indicated agreement between chamber E measurements and the internal weighing scale (R2 = 0.93), as well as comparison between the internal and external scales (R2 = 0.88) across wide ranges of soil water contents and canopy leaf area. Transpiration ranged from near zero at night to 900 g (H2O) h−1 during the day. Bias estimates of E for chamber vs. internal scale and the internal vs. external scale were −6.0 and 4.6 g (H2O) h−1. With minor chamber effect, the chamber accurately estimates E for many field applications such as comparison of canopy gas exchanges and water use efficiencies among irrigation treatments.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj2008.0007x</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-1962 |
ispartof | Agronomy journal, 2009-01, Vol.101 (1), p.52-59 |
issn | 0002-1962 1435-0645 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_194553208 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Biological and medical sciences Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gas exchange |
title | Canopy Gas Exchange Measurements of Cotton in an Open System |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T02%3A55%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Canopy%20Gas%20Exchange%20Measurements%20of%20Cotton%20in%20an%20Open%20System&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Baker,%20Jeffrey%20T.&rft.date=2009-01&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=52&rft.epage=59&rft.pages=52-59&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft.coden=AGJOAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj2008.0007x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1855346161%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194553208&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |