Yield Estimation and Clustering of Chickpea Genotypes Using Soft Computing Techniques

Crop growth is a multifactorial nonlinear process and different kinds of models have been developed to predict crop yield. In recent years, crop growth models have become increasingly important as major components of agriculture-related decision-support systems. Moreover, clustering is a multivariat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agronomy journal 2008-07, Vol.100 (4), p.1077-1087
Hauptverfasser: Khazaei, J, Naghavi, M.R, Jahansouz, M.R, Salimi-Khorshidi, G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1087
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1077
container_title Agronomy journal
container_volume 100
creator Khazaei, J
Naghavi, M.R
Jahansouz, M.R
Salimi-Khorshidi, G
description Crop growth is a multifactorial nonlinear process and different kinds of models have been developed to predict crop yield. In recent years, crop growth models have become increasingly important as major components of agriculture-related decision-support systems. Moreover, clustering is a multivariate analysis technique widely adopted in agricultural studies. Using this method, different genotypes (accessions) of crops can be classified and characterized. This paper discusses the use of soft computing techniques such as artificial neural networks (ANN) and fuzzy logic based approaches in regression and clustering problems. The ANN technology was used for modeling the correlation between crop yield and 10 yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Also, the fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering technique was used for the classification of 362 chickpea genotypes based on their agronomic and morphological traits. The ANN performed very well. Among the various ANN structures, a model of good performance was produced by 10-14-3-1 structure with a training algorithm of back-propagation and hyperbolic tangent transfer function in the hidden and output layers. The model was able to predict the chickpea yield data of 0.32 to 14.38 g plant-1 with a RMSE and T value of 0.0195 g plant-1 and 0.988, respectively. T statistics measures the scattering around line (1:1). When T is close to 1.0, the fitting is desirable. The mean absolute error, relative error, and coefficient of determination between actual and predicted data were 0.0109 g plant-1, -1.07%, and 0.991, respectively. The ANN model predicted 90.3% of the yield data with relative errors ranging between ±5%. The consequent reduction in the number of training data from 250 to 50, decreased the training RMSE, but increased the prediction error. It was found that even with a few number of patterns in the training dataset (50 patterns), the prediction error of the ANN model was in the range of acceptance for yield modeling. Obviously, with 25 x 103 iterations, the ANN models with 5 and 10 input variables gave almost the same estimation of the chickpea yield. The results of clustering showed that the FCM clustering technique can be successfully applied to classify chickpea genotypes in terms of agronomic and morphological traits.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/agronj2006.0244
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194541358</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1955705851</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4144-67341feff902bf20b9dfa1c27754549ea87d76576f846e07fcdda43ab87a938e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbPHg2Cx7Qzu5uvk5RQq0Us2ObgKWyT3TY1zcbdFOl_b0KKHj0NM_Ob95hHyC3CiCLjY7ExutpRAH8ElPMzMkDOPBd87p2TAQBQFyOfXpIra3cAiBHHAUk-ClnmztQ2xV40ha4cUeVOXB5sI01RbRytnHhbZJ-1FM5MVro51tI6ie12S60aJ9b7-tB07Upm26r4Okh7TS6UKK28OdUhSZ6mq_jZfV3MXuLJq5tx5Nz1A8ZRSaUioGtFYR3lSmBGg8DjHo-kCIM88L3AVyH3JQQqy3PBmViHgYhYKNmQ3Pe6tdGdb5Pu9MFUrWXavudxZF7YQuMeyoy21kiV1qZ91hxThLSLLv2LLu2iay8eTrLCZqJURlRZYX_PKHjI_Ahb7rHnvotSHv-TTSezOZ3M3hdv8252crrrFZTQHd-6JEsKyAAiRIrIfgDw8Ivo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194541358</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Yield Estimation and Clustering of Chickpea Genotypes Using Soft Computing Techniques</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Khazaei, J ; Naghavi, M.R ; Jahansouz, M.R ; Salimi-Khorshidi, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Khazaei, J ; Naghavi, M.R ; Jahansouz, M.R ; Salimi-Khorshidi, G</creatorcontrib><description>Crop growth is a multifactorial nonlinear process and different kinds of models have been developed to predict crop yield. In recent years, crop growth models have become increasingly important as major components of agriculture-related decision-support systems. Moreover, clustering is a multivariate analysis technique widely adopted in agricultural studies. Using this method, different genotypes (accessions) of crops can be classified and characterized. This paper discusses the use of soft computing techniques such as artificial neural networks (ANN) and fuzzy logic based approaches in regression and clustering problems. The ANN technology was used for modeling the correlation between crop yield and 10 yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Also, the fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering technique was used for the classification of 362 chickpea genotypes based on their agronomic and morphological traits. The ANN performed very well. Among the various ANN structures, a model of good performance was produced by 10-14-3-1 structure with a training algorithm of back-propagation and hyperbolic tangent transfer function in the hidden and output layers. The model was able to predict the chickpea yield data of 0.32 to 14.38 g plant-1 with a RMSE and T value of 0.0195 g plant-1 and 0.988, respectively. T statistics measures the scattering around line (1:1). When T is close to 1.0, the fitting is desirable. The mean absolute error, relative error, and coefficient of determination between actual and predicted data were 0.0109 g plant-1, -1.07%, and 0.991, respectively. The ANN model predicted 90.3% of the yield data with relative errors ranging between ±5%. The consequent reduction in the number of training data from 250 to 50, decreased the training RMSE, but increased the prediction error. It was found that even with a few number of patterns in the training dataset (50 patterns), the prediction error of the ANN model was in the range of acceptance for yield modeling. Obviously, with 25 x 103 iterations, the ANN models with 5 and 10 input variables gave almost the same estimation of the chickpea yield. The results of clustering showed that the FCM clustering technique can be successfully applied to classify chickpea genotypes in terms of agronomic and morphological traits.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj2006.0244</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGJOAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: American Society of Agronomy</publisher><subject>agronomic traits ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Biological and medical sciences ; calibration ; chickpeas ; Cicer arietinum ; correlation ; crop models ; crop yield ; cultivars ; decision support systems ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; fuzzy c-means clustering technique ; fuzzy logic ; Generalities. Genetics. Plant material ; Genetic resources, diversity ; Genetics and breeding of economic plants ; genotype ; Genotypes ; growth models ; neural networks ; plant growth ; Plant material ; plant morphology ; simulation models ; yield components</subject><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2008-07, Vol.100 (4), p.1077-1087</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 by the American Society of Agronomy</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Jul/Aug 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4144-67341feff902bf20b9dfa1c27754549ea87d76576f846e07fcdda43ab87a938e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4144-67341feff902bf20b9dfa1c27754549ea87d76576f846e07fcdda43ab87a938e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fagronj2006.0244$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fagronj2006.0244$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20513691$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khazaei, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naghavi, M.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahansouz, M.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salimi-Khorshidi, G</creatorcontrib><title>Yield Estimation and Clustering of Chickpea Genotypes Using Soft Computing Techniques</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Crop growth is a multifactorial nonlinear process and different kinds of models have been developed to predict crop yield. In recent years, crop growth models have become increasingly important as major components of agriculture-related decision-support systems. Moreover, clustering is a multivariate analysis technique widely adopted in agricultural studies. Using this method, different genotypes (accessions) of crops can be classified and characterized. This paper discusses the use of soft computing techniques such as artificial neural networks (ANN) and fuzzy logic based approaches in regression and clustering problems. The ANN technology was used for modeling the correlation between crop yield and 10 yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Also, the fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering technique was used for the classification of 362 chickpea genotypes based on their agronomic and morphological traits. The ANN performed very well. Among the various ANN structures, a model of good performance was produced by 10-14-3-1 structure with a training algorithm of back-propagation and hyperbolic tangent transfer function in the hidden and output layers. The model was able to predict the chickpea yield data of 0.32 to 14.38 g plant-1 with a RMSE and T value of 0.0195 g plant-1 and 0.988, respectively. T statistics measures the scattering around line (1:1). When T is close to 1.0, the fitting is desirable. The mean absolute error, relative error, and coefficient of determination between actual and predicted data were 0.0109 g plant-1, -1.07%, and 0.991, respectively. The ANN model predicted 90.3% of the yield data with relative errors ranging between ±5%. The consequent reduction in the number of training data from 250 to 50, decreased the training RMSE, but increased the prediction error. It was found that even with a few number of patterns in the training dataset (50 patterns), the prediction error of the ANN model was in the range of acceptance for yield modeling. Obviously, with 25 x 103 iterations, the ANN models with 5 and 10 input variables gave almost the same estimation of the chickpea yield. The results of clustering showed that the FCM clustering technique can be successfully applied to classify chickpea genotypes in terms of agronomic and morphological traits.</description><subject>agronomic traits</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>calibration</subject><subject>chickpeas</subject><subject>Cicer arietinum</subject><subject>correlation</subject><subject>crop models</subject><subject>crop yield</subject><subject>cultivars</subject><subject>decision support systems</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>fuzzy c-means clustering technique</subject><subject>fuzzy logic</subject><subject>Generalities. Genetics. Plant material</subject><subject>Genetic resources, diversity</subject><subject>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</subject><subject>genotype</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>growth models</subject><subject>neural networks</subject><subject>plant growth</subject><subject>Plant material</subject><subject>plant morphology</subject><subject>simulation models</subject><subject>yield components</subject><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1Lw0AQxRdRsFbPHg2Cx7Qzu5uvk5RQq0Us2ObgKWyT3TY1zcbdFOl_b0KKHj0NM_Ob95hHyC3CiCLjY7ExutpRAH8ElPMzMkDOPBd87p2TAQBQFyOfXpIra3cAiBHHAUk-ClnmztQ2xV40ha4cUeVOXB5sI01RbRytnHhbZJ-1FM5MVro51tI6ie12S60aJ9b7-tB07Upm26r4Okh7TS6UKK28OdUhSZ6mq_jZfV3MXuLJq5tx5Nz1A8ZRSaUioGtFYR3lSmBGg8DjHo-kCIM88L3AVyH3JQQqy3PBmViHgYhYKNmQ3Pe6tdGdb5Pu9MFUrWXavudxZF7YQuMeyoy21kiV1qZ91hxThLSLLv2LLu2iay8eTrLCZqJURlRZYX_PKHjI_Ahb7rHnvotSHv-TTSezOZ3M3hdv8252crrrFZTQHd-6JEsKyAAiRIrIfgDw8Ivo</recordid><startdate>200807</startdate><enddate>200807</enddate><creator>Khazaei, J</creator><creator>Naghavi, M.R</creator><creator>Jahansouz, M.R</creator><creator>Salimi-Khorshidi, G</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200807</creationdate><title>Yield Estimation and Clustering of Chickpea Genotypes Using Soft Computing Techniques</title><author>Khazaei, J ; Naghavi, M.R ; Jahansouz, M.R ; Salimi-Khorshidi, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4144-67341feff902bf20b9dfa1c27754549ea87d76576f846e07fcdda43ab87a938e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>agronomic traits</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>calibration</topic><topic>chickpeas</topic><topic>Cicer arietinum</topic><topic>correlation</topic><topic>crop models</topic><topic>crop yield</topic><topic>cultivars</topic><topic>decision support systems</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>fuzzy c-means clustering technique</topic><topic>fuzzy logic</topic><topic>Generalities. Genetics. Plant material</topic><topic>Genetic resources, diversity</topic><topic>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</topic><topic>genotype</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>growth models</topic><topic>neural networks</topic><topic>plant growth</topic><topic>Plant material</topic><topic>plant morphology</topic><topic>simulation models</topic><topic>yield components</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khazaei, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Naghavi, M.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jahansouz, M.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salimi-Khorshidi, G</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khazaei, J</au><au>Naghavi, M.R</au><au>Jahansouz, M.R</au><au>Salimi-Khorshidi, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Yield Estimation and Clustering of Chickpea Genotypes Using Soft Computing Techniques</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2008-07</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>100</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1077</spage><epage>1087</epage><pages>1077-1087</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><coden>AGJOAT</coden><abstract>Crop growth is a multifactorial nonlinear process and different kinds of models have been developed to predict crop yield. In recent years, crop growth models have become increasingly important as major components of agriculture-related decision-support systems. Moreover, clustering is a multivariate analysis technique widely adopted in agricultural studies. Using this method, different genotypes (accessions) of crops can be classified and characterized. This paper discusses the use of soft computing techniques such as artificial neural networks (ANN) and fuzzy logic based approaches in regression and clustering problems. The ANN technology was used for modeling the correlation between crop yield and 10 yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Also, the fuzzy c-means (FCM) clustering technique was used for the classification of 362 chickpea genotypes based on their agronomic and morphological traits. The ANN performed very well. Among the various ANN structures, a model of good performance was produced by 10-14-3-1 structure with a training algorithm of back-propagation and hyperbolic tangent transfer function in the hidden and output layers. The model was able to predict the chickpea yield data of 0.32 to 14.38 g plant-1 with a RMSE and T value of 0.0195 g plant-1 and 0.988, respectively. T statistics measures the scattering around line (1:1). When T is close to 1.0, the fitting is desirable. The mean absolute error, relative error, and coefficient of determination between actual and predicted data were 0.0109 g plant-1, -1.07%, and 0.991, respectively. The ANN model predicted 90.3% of the yield data with relative errors ranging between ±5%. The consequent reduction in the number of training data from 250 to 50, decreased the training RMSE, but increased the prediction error. It was found that even with a few number of patterns in the training dataset (50 patterns), the prediction error of the ANN model was in the range of acceptance for yield modeling. Obviously, with 25 x 103 iterations, the ANN models with 5 and 10 input variables gave almost the same estimation of the chickpea yield. The results of clustering showed that the FCM clustering technique can be successfully applied to classify chickpea genotypes in terms of agronomic and morphological traits.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj2006.0244</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-1962
ispartof Agronomy journal, 2008-07, Vol.100 (4), p.1077-1087
issn 0002-1962
1435-0645
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_194541358
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects agronomic traits
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Biological and medical sciences
calibration
chickpeas
Cicer arietinum
correlation
crop models
crop yield
cultivars
decision support systems
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
fuzzy c-means clustering technique
fuzzy logic
Generalities. Genetics. Plant material
Genetic resources, diversity
Genetics and breeding of economic plants
genotype
Genotypes
growth models
neural networks
plant growth
Plant material
plant morphology
simulation models
yield components
title Yield Estimation and Clustering of Chickpea Genotypes Using Soft Computing Techniques
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T14%3A06%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Yield%20Estimation%20and%20Clustering%20of%20Chickpea%20Genotypes%20Using%20Soft%20Computing%20Techniques&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Khazaei,%20J&rft.date=2008-07&rft.volume=100&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1077&rft.epage=1087&rft.pages=1077-1087&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft.coden=AGJOAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj2006.0244&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1955705851%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194541358&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true