Nutritive Quality of Four Perennial Grasses as Affected by Species, Cultivar, Maturity, and Plant Tissue

Improved perennial grasses provide ranchers with high-quality forage for grazing and hay. However, in the Northern Great Plains of the USA, nutritive quality information is limited on both established and new cultivars. This study compares the nutritive quality of established and more recently relea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agronomy journal 2006-11, Vol.98 (6), p.1400-1409
Hauptverfasser: Karn, J.F, Berdahl, J.D, Frank, A.B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1409
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1400
container_title Agronomy journal
container_volume 98
creator Karn, J.F
Berdahl, J.D
Frank, A.B
description Improved perennial grasses provide ranchers with high-quality forage for grazing and hay. However, in the Northern Great Plains of the USA, nutritive quality information is limited on both established and new cultivars. This study compares the nutritive quality of established and more recently released cultivars of crested wheatgrass [Agropyron desertorum (Fisch. ex Link) Schultes] (CWG), intermediate wheatgrass [Thinopyrum intermedium (Host) Barkworth and Dewey] (IWG), western wheatgrass [Pascopyrum smithii (Rydb.) Love] (WWG), and smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss.) (SBG); evaluates the effect of plant maturity on tissue quality; compares nutritive quality differences among species; and evaluates nutritive quality relationships. Smooth bromegrass leaf tissue had the highest (P < 0.05) in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and lowest neutral detergent fiber (NDF), but IWG and WWG had higher stem IVDMD. Few quality differences were detected between cultivars within a species, but 'Rosana' WWG had higher (P < 0.10) stem and whole plant IVDMD than the more recently released 'Rodan'. Leaf percentage differed significantly (P < 0.05) among species, with WWG (49.8%) having the highest, and CWG (21.2%) the lowest. Correlation coefficients between quality measurements suggest that if grass leaf tissue were selected for higher IVDMD, leaves should also have higher crude protein (CP) and lower NDF. This relationship was best illustrated with WWG for all three tissue types. The apparent lower quality of Rodan WWG compared with the older cultivar, Rosana, should caution plant breeders to monitor forage quality to ensure that selection for improved agronomic traits does not compromise nutritive quality.
doi_str_mv 10.2134/agronj2005.0293
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194531968</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1243764581</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-f75023d73a99610596a9077e127404f6e84d113a3b86fc8106608b0bd1abf2413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEuWxZomFxK6hYzvPFYoqWqig5bmOJokNrkJS7ASUv8dVKrFkZWl05lzPJeSMwRVnwp_gu2nqNQcIroAnYo-MmC8CD0I_2CcjAOAeS0J-SI6sXQMwlvhsRD6WXWt0q78lfeqw0m1PG0VnTWfoozSyrjVWdG7QWmkpWpoqJYtWljTv6ctGFlraMZ12lTOgGdMHbDun68cU65I-Vli39FVb28kTcqCwsvJ09x6Tt9nN6_TWu1_N76bpvVf4TAhPRQFwUUYCkyRkECQhJhBFkvHIB1-FMvZLxgSKPA5VETMIQ4hzyEuGueJOcUwuBu_GNF-dtG22dsfULjJzFwfCdRA7aDJAhWmsNVJlG6M_0fQZg2zbZvbXZrZt021c7rRoC6yUwbrQ9m8t5on7S-S464H70ZXs_9Nm6XzB0_nzarnYznZJ54NBYbPlXcrbCwcmAKJABC7jF83dkKg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194531968</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nutritive Quality of Four Perennial Grasses as Affected by Species, Cultivar, Maturity, and Plant Tissue</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Karn, J.F ; Berdahl, J.D ; Frank, A.B</creator><creatorcontrib>Karn, J.F ; Berdahl, J.D ; Frank, A.B</creatorcontrib><description>Improved perennial grasses provide ranchers with high-quality forage for grazing and hay. However, in the Northern Great Plains of the USA, nutritive quality information is limited on both established and new cultivars. This study compares the nutritive quality of established and more recently released cultivars of crested wheatgrass [Agropyron desertorum (Fisch. ex Link) Schultes] (CWG), intermediate wheatgrass [Thinopyrum intermedium (Host) Barkworth and Dewey] (IWG), western wheatgrass [Pascopyrum smithii (Rydb.) Love] (WWG), and smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss.) (SBG); evaluates the effect of plant maturity on tissue quality; compares nutritive quality differences among species; and evaluates nutritive quality relationships. Smooth bromegrass leaf tissue had the highest (P &lt; 0.05) in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and lowest neutral detergent fiber (NDF), but IWG and WWG had higher stem IVDMD. Few quality differences were detected between cultivars within a species, but 'Rosana' WWG had higher (P &lt; 0.10) stem and whole plant IVDMD than the more recently released 'Rodan'. Leaf percentage differed significantly (P &lt; 0.05) among species, with WWG (49.8%) having the highest, and CWG (21.2%) the lowest. Correlation coefficients between quality measurements suggest that if grass leaf tissue were selected for higher IVDMD, leaves should also have higher crude protein (CP) and lower NDF. This relationship was best illustrated with WWG for all three tissue types. The apparent lower quality of Rodan WWG compared with the older cultivar, Rosana, should caution plant breeders to monitor forage quality to ensure that selection for improved agronomic traits does not compromise nutritive quality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj2005.0293</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGJOAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison: American Society of Agronomy</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Agropyron desertorum ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bromus inermis ; chemical constituents of plants ; Cultivars ; digestibility ; forage evaluation ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; genetic variation ; Genetics and breeding of economic plants ; leaves ; nutritive value ; Pascopyrum smithii ; plant fibers ; Plant tissues ; quantitative analysis ; Thinopyrum intermedium subsp. intermedium ; Varietal selection. Specialized plant breeding, plant breeding aims ; Yield, quality, earliness, varia</subject><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2006-11, Vol.98 (6), p.1400-1409</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2006 by the American Society of Agronomy</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Nov/Dec 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-f75023d73a99610596a9077e127404f6e84d113a3b86fc8106608b0bd1abf2413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-f75023d73a99610596a9077e127404f6e84d113a3b86fc8106608b0bd1abf2413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fagronj2005.0293$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fagronj2005.0293$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18291067$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Karn, J.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berdahl, J.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank, A.B</creatorcontrib><title>Nutritive Quality of Four Perennial Grasses as Affected by Species, Cultivar, Maturity, and Plant Tissue</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Improved perennial grasses provide ranchers with high-quality forage for grazing and hay. However, in the Northern Great Plains of the USA, nutritive quality information is limited on both established and new cultivars. This study compares the nutritive quality of established and more recently released cultivars of crested wheatgrass [Agropyron desertorum (Fisch. ex Link) Schultes] (CWG), intermediate wheatgrass [Thinopyrum intermedium (Host) Barkworth and Dewey] (IWG), western wheatgrass [Pascopyrum smithii (Rydb.) Love] (WWG), and smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss.) (SBG); evaluates the effect of plant maturity on tissue quality; compares nutritive quality differences among species; and evaluates nutritive quality relationships. Smooth bromegrass leaf tissue had the highest (P &lt; 0.05) in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and lowest neutral detergent fiber (NDF), but IWG and WWG had higher stem IVDMD. Few quality differences were detected between cultivars within a species, but 'Rosana' WWG had higher (P &lt; 0.10) stem and whole plant IVDMD than the more recently released 'Rodan'. Leaf percentage differed significantly (P &lt; 0.05) among species, with WWG (49.8%) having the highest, and CWG (21.2%) the lowest. Correlation coefficients between quality measurements suggest that if grass leaf tissue were selected for higher IVDMD, leaves should also have higher crude protein (CP) and lower NDF. This relationship was best illustrated with WWG for all three tissue types. The apparent lower quality of Rodan WWG compared with the older cultivar, Rosana, should caution plant breeders to monitor forage quality to ensure that selection for improved agronomic traits does not compromise nutritive quality.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Agropyron desertorum</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bromus inermis</subject><subject>chemical constituents of plants</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>digestibility</subject><subject>forage evaluation</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>genetic variation</subject><subject>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</subject><subject>leaves</subject><subject>nutritive value</subject><subject>Pascopyrum smithii</subject><subject>plant fibers</subject><subject>Plant tissues</subject><subject>quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Thinopyrum intermedium subsp. intermedium</subject><subject>Varietal selection. Specialized plant breeding, plant breeding aims</subject><subject>Yield, quality, earliness, varia</subject><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EEuWxZomFxK6hYzvPFYoqWqig5bmOJokNrkJS7ASUv8dVKrFkZWl05lzPJeSMwRVnwp_gu2nqNQcIroAnYo-MmC8CD0I_2CcjAOAeS0J-SI6sXQMwlvhsRD6WXWt0q78lfeqw0m1PG0VnTWfoozSyrjVWdG7QWmkpWpoqJYtWljTv6ctGFlraMZ12lTOgGdMHbDun68cU65I-Vli39FVb28kTcqCwsvJ09x6Tt9nN6_TWu1_N76bpvVf4TAhPRQFwUUYCkyRkECQhJhBFkvHIB1-FMvZLxgSKPA5VETMIQ4hzyEuGueJOcUwuBu_GNF-dtG22dsfULjJzFwfCdRA7aDJAhWmsNVJlG6M_0fQZg2zbZvbXZrZt021c7rRoC6yUwbrQ9m8t5on7S-S464H70ZXs_9Nm6XzB0_nzarnYznZJ54NBYbPlXcrbCwcmAKJABC7jF83dkKg</recordid><startdate>200611</startdate><enddate>200611</enddate><creator>Karn, J.F</creator><creator>Berdahl, J.D</creator><creator>Frank, A.B</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200611</creationdate><title>Nutritive Quality of Four Perennial Grasses as Affected by Species, Cultivar, Maturity, and Plant Tissue</title><author>Karn, J.F ; Berdahl, J.D ; Frank, A.B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4133-f75023d73a99610596a9077e127404f6e84d113a3b86fc8106608b0bd1abf2413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Agropyron desertorum</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bromus inermis</topic><topic>chemical constituents of plants</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>digestibility</topic><topic>forage evaluation</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>genetic variation</topic><topic>Genetics and breeding of economic plants</topic><topic>leaves</topic><topic>nutritive value</topic><topic>Pascopyrum smithii</topic><topic>plant fibers</topic><topic>Plant tissues</topic><topic>quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Thinopyrum intermedium subsp. intermedium</topic><topic>Varietal selection. Specialized plant breeding, plant breeding aims</topic><topic>Yield, quality, earliness, varia</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Karn, J.F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berdahl, J.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Frank, A.B</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Research Library</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Karn, J.F</au><au>Berdahl, J.D</au><au>Frank, A.B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nutritive Quality of Four Perennial Grasses as Affected by Species, Cultivar, Maturity, and Plant Tissue</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2006-11</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1400</spage><epage>1409</epage><pages>1400-1409</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><coden>AGJOAT</coden><abstract>Improved perennial grasses provide ranchers with high-quality forage for grazing and hay. However, in the Northern Great Plains of the USA, nutritive quality information is limited on both established and new cultivars. This study compares the nutritive quality of established and more recently released cultivars of crested wheatgrass [Agropyron desertorum (Fisch. ex Link) Schultes] (CWG), intermediate wheatgrass [Thinopyrum intermedium (Host) Barkworth and Dewey] (IWG), western wheatgrass [Pascopyrum smithii (Rydb.) Love] (WWG), and smooth bromegrass (Bromus inermis Leyss.) (SBG); evaluates the effect of plant maturity on tissue quality; compares nutritive quality differences among species; and evaluates nutritive quality relationships. Smooth bromegrass leaf tissue had the highest (P &lt; 0.05) in vitro dry matter digestibility (IVDMD) and lowest neutral detergent fiber (NDF), but IWG and WWG had higher stem IVDMD. Few quality differences were detected between cultivars within a species, but 'Rosana' WWG had higher (P &lt; 0.10) stem and whole plant IVDMD than the more recently released 'Rodan'. Leaf percentage differed significantly (P &lt; 0.05) among species, with WWG (49.8%) having the highest, and CWG (21.2%) the lowest. Correlation coefficients between quality measurements suggest that if grass leaf tissue were selected for higher IVDMD, leaves should also have higher crude protein (CP) and lower NDF. This relationship was best illustrated with WWG for all three tissue types. The apparent lower quality of Rodan WWG compared with the older cultivar, Rosana, should caution plant breeders to monitor forage quality to ensure that selection for improved agronomic traits does not compromise nutritive quality.</abstract><cop>Madison</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj2005.0293</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-1962
ispartof Agronomy journal, 2006-11, Vol.98 (6), p.1400-1409
issn 0002-1962
1435-0645
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_194531968
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Agropyron desertorum
Biological and medical sciences
Bromus inermis
chemical constituents of plants
Cultivars
digestibility
forage evaluation
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
genetic variation
Genetics and breeding of economic plants
leaves
nutritive value
Pascopyrum smithii
plant fibers
Plant tissues
quantitative analysis
Thinopyrum intermedium subsp. intermedium
Varietal selection. Specialized plant breeding, plant breeding aims
Yield, quality, earliness, varia
title Nutritive Quality of Four Perennial Grasses as Affected by Species, Cultivar, Maturity, and Plant Tissue
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T15%3A47%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nutritive%20Quality%20of%20Four%20Perennial%20Grasses%20as%20Affected%20by%20Species,%20Cultivar,%20Maturity,%20and%20Plant%20Tissue&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Karn,%20J.F&rft.date=2006-11&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1400&rft.epage=1409&rft.pages=1400-1409&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft.coden=AGJOAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj2005.0293&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1243764581%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194531968&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true