Long-term tillage, cover crop, and nitrogen rate effects on cotton: yield and fiber properties
Loess soils of the Midsouth USA are easily eroded, contain little organic matter, and are drought susceptible. Conservation tillage and cover crops may increase cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yields on these soils. A field study was conducted from 1995 through 2001 on Gigger silt loam (fine-silty, m...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Agronomy journal 2004-09, Vol.96 (5), p.1436-1442 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1442 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1436 |
container_title | Agronomy journal |
container_volume | 96 |
creator | Boquet, D.J Hutchinson, R.L Breitenbeck, G.A |
description | Loess soils of the Midsouth USA are easily eroded, contain little organic matter, and are drought susceptible. Conservation tillage and cover crops may increase cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yields on these soils. A field study was conducted from 1995 through 2001 on Gigger silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, thermic Typic Fragiudalfs) to study effects of tillage, cover crops, and N rates on yield and fiber properties. Cotton was grown without tillage (no-till) and with surface tillage (surface till) following annual winter cover crops of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth), or volunteer winter vegetation (native) and with fertilizer N rates of 0, 39, 78, 118, or 159 kg ha(-1). Tillage, cover crop, and N rate affected cotton yield. The till x N rate, till x cover crop, and cover crop x N rate interactions were significant. Yields of cotton receiving zero fertilizer N were 28 to 49% higher under surface till than under no-till. In contrast, cotton receiving optimum N produced 5 to 11% higher yields with no-till than with surface till. Following native cover, 118 kg N ha(-1) optimized cotton lint yields under no-till (1249 kg ha(-1)) whereas only 78 kg N ha(-1) was necessary to optimize yields under surface till (1117 kg ha(-1)). Following wheat, 118 kg N ha(-1) optimized lint yields under both no-till (1246 kg ha(-1)) and surface till (1185 kg ha(-1)). Following hairy vetch, no fertilizer N was needed to optimize yields under no-till (1238 kg ha(-1)) and surface till (1160 kg ha(-1)). Tillage, cover crop, and N rate did not appreciably compromise or improve fiber quality. After 7 yr, lint yields did not decrease in systems employing no-till and cover crops, and combined with optimal fertilizer N, these conservation practices increased cotton yields. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2134/agronj2004.1436 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_194514702</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>710765351</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3766-a0d806c12d030a57faef25176c1d7b94e74ca8f903f1bb95a723f97750154c1c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWB9rlwbBnaM3r0nHjZSiVSkKPrYOaSYpU8akJlHpvzdjCy5dXTh85xzuQeiIwDkljF-oefBuQQH4OeGs3EKDfEQBJRfbaAAAtCBVSXfRXowLAEIqTgboberdvEgmvOPUdp2amzOs_ZcJWAe_PMPKNdi1Kfi5cTioZLCx1ugUsXcZTMm7S7xqTdf8oradZesyW01IrYkHaMeqLprDzd1HrzfXL-PbYvo4uRuPpoVmsiwLBc0QSk1oAwyUkFYZSwWRWWrkrOJGcq2GtgJmyWxWCSUps5WUAojgmmi2j07Wubn649PEVC_8Z3C5ss5_CsIl0AxdrKH8WozB2HoZ2ncVVjWBut-w_tuw7jfMjtNNrIpadTYop9v4ZysJG1LZc1dr7rvtzOq_2Ho0uaejydPjw32vbZqO1wlW-Z7PLa_PFAgDqMSQM8p-AK7JjlU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>194514702</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long-term tillage, cover crop, and nitrogen rate effects on cotton: yield and fiber properties</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Boquet, D.J ; Hutchinson, R.L ; Breitenbeck, G.A</creator><creatorcontrib>Boquet, D.J ; Hutchinson, R.L ; Breitenbeck, G.A</creatorcontrib><description>Loess soils of the Midsouth USA are easily eroded, contain little organic matter, and are drought susceptible. Conservation tillage and cover crops may increase cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yields on these soils. A field study was conducted from 1995 through 2001 on Gigger silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, thermic Typic Fragiudalfs) to study effects of tillage, cover crops, and N rates on yield and fiber properties. Cotton was grown without tillage (no-till) and with surface tillage (surface till) following annual winter cover crops of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth), or volunteer winter vegetation (native) and with fertilizer N rates of 0, 39, 78, 118, or 159 kg ha(-1). Tillage, cover crop, and N rate affected cotton yield. The till x N rate, till x cover crop, and cover crop x N rate interactions were significant. Yields of cotton receiving zero fertilizer N were 28 to 49% higher under surface till than under no-till. In contrast, cotton receiving optimum N produced 5 to 11% higher yields with no-till than with surface till. Following native cover, 118 kg N ha(-1) optimized cotton lint yields under no-till (1249 kg ha(-1)) whereas only 78 kg N ha(-1) was necessary to optimize yields under surface till (1117 kg ha(-1)). Following wheat, 118 kg N ha(-1) optimized lint yields under both no-till (1246 kg ha(-1)) and surface till (1185 kg ha(-1)). Following hairy vetch, no fertilizer N was needed to optimize yields under no-till (1238 kg ha(-1)) and surface till (1160 kg ha(-1)). Tillage, cover crop, and N rate did not appreciably compromise or improve fiber quality. After 7 yr, lint yields did not decrease in systems employing no-till and cover crops, and combined with optimal fertilizer N, these conservation practices increased cotton yields.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-1962</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-0645</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2134/agronj2004.1436</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AGJOAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy</publisher><subject>Agricultural practices ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; application rate ; Biological and medical sciences ; cotton ; Cover crops ; crop yield ; Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage ; fertilizer application ; fiber quality ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Gossypium hirsutum ; nitrogen fertilizers ; no-tillage ; Soil tillage ; tillage ; Tillage. Tending. Growth control ; Triticum aestivum ; Vicia villosa ; wheat ; winter</subject><ispartof>Agronomy journal, 2004-09, Vol.96 (5), p.1436-1442</ispartof><rights>American Society of Agronomy</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright American Society of Agronomy Sep/Oct 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3766-a0d806c12d030a57faef25176c1d7b94e74ca8f903f1bb95a723f97750154c1c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3766-a0d806c12d030a57faef25176c1d7b94e74ca8f903f1bb95a723f97750154c1c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134%2Fagronj2004.1436$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.2134%2Fagronj2004.1436$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1412,27905,27906,45555,45556</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16138276$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boquet, D.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchinson, R.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breitenbeck, G.A</creatorcontrib><title>Long-term tillage, cover crop, and nitrogen rate effects on cotton: yield and fiber properties</title><title>Agronomy journal</title><description>Loess soils of the Midsouth USA are easily eroded, contain little organic matter, and are drought susceptible. Conservation tillage and cover crops may increase cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yields on these soils. A field study was conducted from 1995 through 2001 on Gigger silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, thermic Typic Fragiudalfs) to study effects of tillage, cover crops, and N rates on yield and fiber properties. Cotton was grown without tillage (no-till) and with surface tillage (surface till) following annual winter cover crops of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth), or volunteer winter vegetation (native) and with fertilizer N rates of 0, 39, 78, 118, or 159 kg ha(-1). Tillage, cover crop, and N rate affected cotton yield. The till x N rate, till x cover crop, and cover crop x N rate interactions were significant. Yields of cotton receiving zero fertilizer N were 28 to 49% higher under surface till than under no-till. In contrast, cotton receiving optimum N produced 5 to 11% higher yields with no-till than with surface till. Following native cover, 118 kg N ha(-1) optimized cotton lint yields under no-till (1249 kg ha(-1)) whereas only 78 kg N ha(-1) was necessary to optimize yields under surface till (1117 kg ha(-1)). Following wheat, 118 kg N ha(-1) optimized lint yields under both no-till (1246 kg ha(-1)) and surface till (1185 kg ha(-1)). Following hairy vetch, no fertilizer N was needed to optimize yields under no-till (1238 kg ha(-1)) and surface till (1160 kg ha(-1)). Tillage, cover crop, and N rate did not appreciably compromise or improve fiber quality. After 7 yr, lint yields did not decrease in systems employing no-till and cover crops, and combined with optimal fertilizer N, these conservation practices increased cotton yields.</description><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>application rate</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>cotton</subject><subject>Cover crops</subject><subject>crop yield</subject><subject>Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage</subject><subject>fertilizer application</subject><subject>fiber quality</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Gossypium hirsutum</subject><subject>nitrogen fertilizers</subject><subject>no-tillage</subject><subject>Soil tillage</subject><subject>tillage</subject><subject>Tillage. Tending. Growth control</subject><subject>Triticum aestivum</subject><subject>Vicia villosa</subject><subject>wheat</subject><subject>winter</subject><issn>0002-1962</issn><issn>1435-0645</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWB9rlwbBnaM3r0nHjZSiVSkKPrYOaSYpU8akJlHpvzdjCy5dXTh85xzuQeiIwDkljF-oefBuQQH4OeGs3EKDfEQBJRfbaAAAtCBVSXfRXowLAEIqTgboberdvEgmvOPUdp2amzOs_ZcJWAe_PMPKNdi1Kfi5cTioZLCx1ugUsXcZTMm7S7xqTdf8oradZesyW01IrYkHaMeqLprDzd1HrzfXL-PbYvo4uRuPpoVmsiwLBc0QSk1oAwyUkFYZSwWRWWrkrOJGcq2GtgJmyWxWCSUps5WUAojgmmi2j07Wubn649PEVC_8Z3C5ss5_CsIl0AxdrKH8WozB2HoZ2ncVVjWBut-w_tuw7jfMjtNNrIpadTYop9v4ZysJG1LZc1dr7rvtzOq_2Ho0uaejydPjw32vbZqO1wlW-Z7PLa_PFAgDqMSQM8p-AK7JjlU</recordid><startdate>200409</startdate><enddate>200409</enddate><creator>Boquet, D.J</creator><creator>Hutchinson, R.L</creator><creator>Breitenbeck, G.A</creator><general>American Society of Agronomy</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200409</creationdate><title>Long-term tillage, cover crop, and nitrogen rate effects on cotton: yield and fiber properties</title><author>Boquet, D.J ; Hutchinson, R.L ; Breitenbeck, G.A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3766-a0d806c12d030a57faef25176c1d7b94e74ca8f903f1bb95a723f97750154c1c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>application rate</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>cotton</topic><topic>Cover crops</topic><topic>crop yield</topic><topic>Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage</topic><topic>fertilizer application</topic><topic>fiber quality</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Gossypium hirsutum</topic><topic>nitrogen fertilizers</topic><topic>no-tillage</topic><topic>Soil tillage</topic><topic>tillage</topic><topic>Tillage. Tending. Growth control</topic><topic>Triticum aestivum</topic><topic>Vicia villosa</topic><topic>wheat</topic><topic>winter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boquet, D.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchinson, R.L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Breitenbeck, G.A</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boquet, D.J</au><au>Hutchinson, R.L</au><au>Breitenbeck, G.A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long-term tillage, cover crop, and nitrogen rate effects on cotton: yield and fiber properties</atitle><jtitle>Agronomy journal</jtitle><date>2004-09</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1436</spage><epage>1442</epage><pages>1436-1442</pages><issn>0002-1962</issn><eissn>1435-0645</eissn><coden>AGJOAT</coden><abstract>Loess soils of the Midsouth USA are easily eroded, contain little organic matter, and are drought susceptible. Conservation tillage and cover crops may increase cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) yields on these soils. A field study was conducted from 1995 through 2001 on Gigger silt loam (fine-silty, mixed, thermic Typic Fragiudalfs) to study effects of tillage, cover crops, and N rates on yield and fiber properties. Cotton was grown without tillage (no-till) and with surface tillage (surface till) following annual winter cover crops of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth), or volunteer winter vegetation (native) and with fertilizer N rates of 0, 39, 78, 118, or 159 kg ha(-1). Tillage, cover crop, and N rate affected cotton yield. The till x N rate, till x cover crop, and cover crop x N rate interactions were significant. Yields of cotton receiving zero fertilizer N were 28 to 49% higher under surface till than under no-till. In contrast, cotton receiving optimum N produced 5 to 11% higher yields with no-till than with surface till. Following native cover, 118 kg N ha(-1) optimized cotton lint yields under no-till (1249 kg ha(-1)) whereas only 78 kg N ha(-1) was necessary to optimize yields under surface till (1117 kg ha(-1)). Following wheat, 118 kg N ha(-1) optimized lint yields under both no-till (1246 kg ha(-1)) and surface till (1185 kg ha(-1)). Following hairy vetch, no fertilizer N was needed to optimize yields under no-till (1238 kg ha(-1)) and surface till (1160 kg ha(-1)). Tillage, cover crop, and N rate did not appreciably compromise or improve fiber quality. After 7 yr, lint yields did not decrease in systems employing no-till and cover crops, and combined with optimal fertilizer N, these conservation practices increased cotton yields.</abstract><cop>Madison, WI</cop><pub>American Society of Agronomy</pub><doi>10.2134/agronj2004.1436</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-1962 |
ispartof | Agronomy journal, 2004-09, Vol.96 (5), p.1436-1442 |
issn | 0002-1962 1435-0645 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_194514702 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Agricultural practices Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions application rate Biological and medical sciences cotton Cover crops crop yield Cropping systems. Cultivation. Soil tillage fertilizer application fiber quality Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General agronomy. Plant production Gossypium hirsutum nitrogen fertilizers no-tillage Soil tillage tillage Tillage. Tending. Growth control Triticum aestivum Vicia villosa wheat winter |
title | Long-term tillage, cover crop, and nitrogen rate effects on cotton: yield and fiber properties |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T23%3A21%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long-term%20tillage,%20cover%20crop,%20and%20nitrogen%20rate%20effects%20on%20cotton:%20yield%20and%20fiber%20properties&rft.jtitle=Agronomy%20journal&rft.au=Boquet,%20D.J&rft.date=2004-09&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1436&rft.epage=1442&rft.pages=1436-1442&rft.issn=0002-1962&rft.eissn=1435-0645&rft.coden=AGJOAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.2134/agronj2004.1436&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E710765351%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=194514702&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |