MONEY AS A UNIT OF ACCOUNT
We develop a theory that rationalizes the use of a dominant unit of account in an economy. Agents enter into non-contingent contracts with a variety of business partners. Trade unfolds sequentially in credit chains and is subject to random matching. By using a dominant unit of account, agents can lo...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Econometrica 2017-09, Vol.85 (5), p.1537-1574 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1574 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1537 |
container_title | Econometrica |
container_volume | 85 |
creator | Doepke, Matthias Schneider, Martin |
description | We develop a theory that rationalizes the use of a dominant unit of account in an economy. Agents enter into non-contingent contracts with a variety of business partners. Trade unfolds sequentially in credit chains and is subject to random matching. By using a dominant unit of account, agents can lower their exposure to relative price risk, avoid costly default, and create more total surplus. We discuss conditions under which it is optimal to adopt circulating government paper as the dominant unit of account, and the optimal choice of "currency areas" when there is variation in the intensity of trade within and across regions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3982/ECTA11963 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1944994237</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44955172</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44955172</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4595-9d5038c6895f425618fce66421ef2cb3ee59662528da8666ec99ccaad153d76a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j81Lw0AQxRdRMFYPXgUh4MlD7H5Odo8hpFqoycHk4GmJmw00VFN3W0r_e1civQkDM4ffm_ceQrcEPzEl6bzI64wQBewMRYSDTDAFeo4ijAlNFEh6ia68HzDGIkyE7l6rsniPs7c4i5tyWcfVIs7yvGrK-hpd9O3G25u_PUPNoqjzl2RVPS_zbJUYLpRIVCcwkwakEj2nAojsjQXglNiemg9mrVAAVFDZtRIArFHKmLbtiGBdCi2boYfp79aN33vrd3oY9-4rWGqiOFeKU5YG6nGijBu9d7bXW7f-bN1RE6x_q-tT9cDOJ_aw3tjj_-B0pSHIDN1PisHvRndSBHchSErZD5y6XWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1944994237</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MONEY AS A UNIT OF ACCOUNT</title><source>JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Doepke, Matthias ; Schneider, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Doepke, Matthias ; Schneider, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>We develop a theory that rationalizes the use of a dominant unit of account in an economy. Agents enter into non-contingent contracts with a variety of business partners. Trade unfolds sequentially in credit chains and is subject to random matching. By using a dominant unit of account, agents can lower their exposure to relative price risk, avoid costly default, and create more total surplus. We discuss conditions under which it is optimal to adopt circulating government paper as the dominant unit of account, and the optimal choice of "currency areas" when there is variation in the intensity of trade within and across regions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9682</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0262</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3982/ECTA11963</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Econometric Society</publisher><subject>American dollar ; balance sheet risk ; credit chains ; Currency ; currency areas ; Economic theory ; Money ; Unit of account</subject><ispartof>Econometrica, 2017-09, Vol.85 (5), p.1537-1574</ispartof><rights>Copyright ©2017 The Econometric Society</rights><rights>2017 The Econometric Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4595-9d5038c6895f425618fce66421ef2cb3ee59662528da8666ec99ccaad153d76a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44955172$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44955172$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,832,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574,58016,58020,58249,58253</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doepke, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>MONEY AS A UNIT OF ACCOUNT</title><title>Econometrica</title><description>We develop a theory that rationalizes the use of a dominant unit of account in an economy. Agents enter into non-contingent contracts with a variety of business partners. Trade unfolds sequentially in credit chains and is subject to random matching. By using a dominant unit of account, agents can lower their exposure to relative price risk, avoid costly default, and create more total surplus. We discuss conditions under which it is optimal to adopt circulating government paper as the dominant unit of account, and the optimal choice of "currency areas" when there is variation in the intensity of trade within and across regions.</description><subject>American dollar</subject><subject>balance sheet risk</subject><subject>credit chains</subject><subject>Currency</subject><subject>currency areas</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Money</subject><subject>Unit of account</subject><issn>0012-9682</issn><issn>1468-0262</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j81Lw0AQxRdRMFYPXgUh4MlD7H5Odo8hpFqoycHk4GmJmw00VFN3W0r_e1civQkDM4ffm_ceQrcEPzEl6bzI64wQBewMRYSDTDAFeo4ijAlNFEh6ia68HzDGIkyE7l6rsniPs7c4i5tyWcfVIs7yvGrK-hpd9O3G25u_PUPNoqjzl2RVPS_zbJUYLpRIVCcwkwakEj2nAojsjQXglNiemg9mrVAAVFDZtRIArFHKmLbtiGBdCi2boYfp79aN33vrd3oY9-4rWGqiOFeKU5YG6nGijBu9d7bXW7f-bN1RE6x_q-tT9cDOJ_aw3tjj_-B0pSHIDN1PisHvRndSBHchSErZD5y6XWw</recordid><startdate>201709</startdate><enddate>201709</enddate><creator>Doepke, Matthias</creator><creator>Schneider, Martin</creator><general>Econometric Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201709</creationdate><title>MONEY AS A UNIT OF ACCOUNT</title><author>Doepke, Matthias ; Schneider, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4595-9d5038c6895f425618fce66421ef2cb3ee59662528da8666ec99ccaad153d76a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>American dollar</topic><topic>balance sheet risk</topic><topic>credit chains</topic><topic>Currency</topic><topic>currency areas</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Money</topic><topic>Unit of account</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doepke, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Econometrica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doepke, Matthias</au><au>Schneider, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MONEY AS A UNIT OF ACCOUNT</atitle><jtitle>Econometrica</jtitle><date>2017-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1537</spage><epage>1574</epage><pages>1537-1574</pages><issn>0012-9682</issn><eissn>1468-0262</eissn><abstract>We develop a theory that rationalizes the use of a dominant unit of account in an economy. Agents enter into non-contingent contracts with a variety of business partners. Trade unfolds sequentially in credit chains and is subject to random matching. By using a dominant unit of account, agents can lower their exposure to relative price risk, avoid costly default, and create more total surplus. We discuss conditions under which it is optimal to adopt circulating government paper as the dominant unit of account, and the optimal choice of "currency areas" when there is variation in the intensity of trade within and across regions.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Econometric Society</pub><doi>10.3982/ECTA11963</doi><tpages>38</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0012-9682 |
ispartof | Econometrica, 2017-09, Vol.85 (5), p.1537-1574 |
issn | 0012-9682 1468-0262 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_1944994237 |
source | JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | American dollar balance sheet risk credit chains Currency currency areas Economic theory Money Unit of account |
title | MONEY AS A UNIT OF ACCOUNT |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A38%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MONEY%20AS%20A%20UNIT%20OF%20ACCOUNT&rft.jtitle=Econometrica&rft.au=Doepke,%20Matthias&rft.date=2017-09&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1537&rft.epage=1574&rft.pages=1537-1574&rft.issn=0012-9682&rft.eissn=1468-0262&rft_id=info:doi/10.3982/ECTA11963&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44955172%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1944994237&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44955172&rfr_iscdi=true |