MONEY AS A UNIT OF ACCOUNT

We develop a theory that rationalizes the use of a dominant unit of account in an economy. Agents enter into non-contingent contracts with a variety of business partners. Trade unfolds sequentially in credit chains and is subject to random matching. By using a dominant unit of account, agents can lo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Econometrica 2017-09, Vol.85 (5), p.1537-1574
Hauptverfasser: Doepke, Matthias, Schneider, Martin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1574
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1537
container_title Econometrica
container_volume 85
creator Doepke, Matthias
Schneider, Martin
description We develop a theory that rationalizes the use of a dominant unit of account in an economy. Agents enter into non-contingent contracts with a variety of business partners. Trade unfolds sequentially in credit chains and is subject to random matching. By using a dominant unit of account, agents can lower their exposure to relative price risk, avoid costly default, and create more total surplus. We discuss conditions under which it is optimal to adopt circulating government paper as the dominant unit of account, and the optimal choice of "currency areas" when there is variation in the intensity of trade within and across regions.
doi_str_mv 10.3982/ECTA11963
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_1944994237</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>44955172</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44955172</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4595-9d5038c6895f425618fce66421ef2cb3ee59662528da8666ec99ccaad153d76a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j81Lw0AQxRdRMFYPXgUh4MlD7H5Odo8hpFqoycHk4GmJmw00VFN3W0r_e1civQkDM4ffm_ceQrcEPzEl6bzI64wQBewMRYSDTDAFeo4ijAlNFEh6ia68HzDGIkyE7l6rsniPs7c4i5tyWcfVIs7yvGrK-hpd9O3G25u_PUPNoqjzl2RVPS_zbJUYLpRIVCcwkwakEj2nAojsjQXglNiemg9mrVAAVFDZtRIArFHKmLbtiGBdCi2boYfp79aN33vrd3oY9-4rWGqiOFeKU5YG6nGijBu9d7bXW7f-bN1RE6x_q-tT9cDOJ_aw3tjj_-B0pSHIDN1PisHvRndSBHchSErZD5y6XWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1944994237</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MONEY AS A UNIT OF ACCOUNT</title><source>JSTOR Mathematics &amp; Statistics</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Doepke, Matthias ; Schneider, Martin</creator><creatorcontrib>Doepke, Matthias ; Schneider, Martin</creatorcontrib><description>We develop a theory that rationalizes the use of a dominant unit of account in an economy. Agents enter into non-contingent contracts with a variety of business partners. Trade unfolds sequentially in credit chains and is subject to random matching. By using a dominant unit of account, agents can lower their exposure to relative price risk, avoid costly default, and create more total surplus. We discuss conditions under which it is optimal to adopt circulating government paper as the dominant unit of account, and the optimal choice of "currency areas" when there is variation in the intensity of trade within and across regions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-9682</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-0262</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3982/ECTA11963</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Econometric Society</publisher><subject>American dollar ; balance sheet risk ; credit chains ; Currency ; currency areas ; Economic theory ; Money ; Unit of account</subject><ispartof>Econometrica, 2017-09, Vol.85 (5), p.1537-1574</ispartof><rights>Copyright ©2017 The Econometric Society</rights><rights>2017 The Econometric Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4595-9d5038c6895f425618fce66421ef2cb3ee59662528da8666ec99ccaad153d76a3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44955172$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44955172$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,832,1417,27923,27924,45573,45574,58016,58020,58249,58253</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doepke, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Martin</creatorcontrib><title>MONEY AS A UNIT OF ACCOUNT</title><title>Econometrica</title><description>We develop a theory that rationalizes the use of a dominant unit of account in an economy. Agents enter into non-contingent contracts with a variety of business partners. Trade unfolds sequentially in credit chains and is subject to random matching. By using a dominant unit of account, agents can lower their exposure to relative price risk, avoid costly default, and create more total surplus. We discuss conditions under which it is optimal to adopt circulating government paper as the dominant unit of account, and the optimal choice of "currency areas" when there is variation in the intensity of trade within and across regions.</description><subject>American dollar</subject><subject>balance sheet risk</subject><subject>credit chains</subject><subject>Currency</subject><subject>currency areas</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Money</subject><subject>Unit of account</subject><issn>0012-9682</issn><issn>1468-0262</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j81Lw0AQxRdRMFYPXgUh4MlD7H5Odo8hpFqoycHk4GmJmw00VFN3W0r_e1civQkDM4ffm_ceQrcEPzEl6bzI64wQBewMRYSDTDAFeo4ijAlNFEh6ia68HzDGIkyE7l6rsniPs7c4i5tyWcfVIs7yvGrK-hpd9O3G25u_PUPNoqjzl2RVPS_zbJUYLpRIVCcwkwakEj2nAojsjQXglNiemg9mrVAAVFDZtRIArFHKmLbtiGBdCi2boYfp79aN33vrd3oY9-4rWGqiOFeKU5YG6nGijBu9d7bXW7f-bN1RE6x_q-tT9cDOJ_aw3tjj_-B0pSHIDN1PisHvRndSBHchSErZD5y6XWw</recordid><startdate>201709</startdate><enddate>201709</enddate><creator>Doepke, Matthias</creator><creator>Schneider, Martin</creator><general>Econometric Society</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201709</creationdate><title>MONEY AS A UNIT OF ACCOUNT</title><author>Doepke, Matthias ; Schneider, Martin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4595-9d5038c6895f425618fce66421ef2cb3ee59662528da8666ec99ccaad153d76a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>American dollar</topic><topic>balance sheet risk</topic><topic>credit chains</topic><topic>Currency</topic><topic>currency areas</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Money</topic><topic>Unit of account</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doepke, Matthias</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Martin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Econometrica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doepke, Matthias</au><au>Schneider, Martin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MONEY AS A UNIT OF ACCOUNT</atitle><jtitle>Econometrica</jtitle><date>2017-09</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1537</spage><epage>1574</epage><pages>1537-1574</pages><issn>0012-9682</issn><eissn>1468-0262</eissn><abstract>We develop a theory that rationalizes the use of a dominant unit of account in an economy. Agents enter into non-contingent contracts with a variety of business partners. Trade unfolds sequentially in credit chains and is subject to random matching. By using a dominant unit of account, agents can lower their exposure to relative price risk, avoid costly default, and create more total surplus. We discuss conditions under which it is optimal to adopt circulating government paper as the dominant unit of account, and the optimal choice of "currency areas" when there is variation in the intensity of trade within and across regions.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Econometric Society</pub><doi>10.3982/ECTA11963</doi><tpages>38</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-9682
ispartof Econometrica, 2017-09, Vol.85 (5), p.1537-1574
issn 0012-9682
1468-0262
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_1944994237
source JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects American dollar
balance sheet risk
credit chains
Currency
currency areas
Economic theory
Money
Unit of account
title MONEY AS A UNIT OF ACCOUNT
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A38%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MONEY%20AS%20A%20UNIT%20OF%20ACCOUNT&rft.jtitle=Econometrica&rft.au=Doepke,%20Matthias&rft.date=2017-09&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1537&rft.epage=1574&rft.pages=1537-1574&rft.issn=0012-9682&rft.eissn=1468-0262&rft_id=info:doi/10.3982/ECTA11963&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_proqu%3E44955172%3C/jstor_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1944994237&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=44955172&rfr_iscdi=true